Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Big trade for Magic on Day 1.
Now that we’re deep into the Meme Era, being called a plagiarist doesn’t have the gravity it once did. And it’s not like (…)
The Bears are trying desperately to unload Jay Culter.
Sammy Sosa compared himself to Jesus when asked about performance-enhancing drug allegations.
Rob Pelinka could be the Lakers new general manager.
She will get knocked out after one season.
The Schmo travels to Nashville and crashes the Fantasy Sports Trade Association Conference to chat from with Matthew Berry. S/O to FNTSY (…)
Reggie Miller blamed the lack of defense in the All-Star Game on Millennials, because of course he did. When we hear things like this, (…)
The 98% claim seems highly improbable.