Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Wherefore art thou Thomas Mueller?
Madison Bumgarner will be on the hill later today for the San Francisco Giants against the Oakland A’s. He’ll also be in (…)
WWE has high upside potential the next few months.
How did they corner him in one location long enough for a drug test?
College World Series Final Being Played Before Tiny Crowd, and ESPN Couldn't Get It Moved to Primetime
It’s being televised on ESPNU instead of in primetime after last night’s rainout.
It’s always something.