Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Research before bloviating.
Megan Calipari took a shot at Colin Cowherd.
There has been plenty of talk about where Tony Romo might end up next season–here are five potential spots that make sense–but (…)
Vlade Divac claims he had a better deal for DeMarcus Cousins two days before trading him for less.
He spit out a bunch of things after the fight.
The ball goes in the hole.