Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Very emotional statement.
Steelers have a decision to make.
Roundup: Getting Kinky With a Forbes Magazine; Marketing BitCoin to Your Parents; Kim Kardashian's Burn
Here’s a Donald Trump spanking story you can’t unread … Season 2 of Making a Murderer coming … Hawking gold is (…)
Rihanna missed her chance with Joel.
Mayfield to Miami?