Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Rather than ban Russia from the Rio de Janiero Olympics altogether, the International Olympic Committee will let individual sports (…)
Oh for cryin’ out loud, Rio, get it together. The Olympics should have never been awarded to Rio de Janiero. That much has been (…)
Granted, there aren’t many players of Asian descent in the NBA, and it’s not like Jeremy Lin is 6-foot-10, but still: Come on, (…)
In an event almost too perfect to be believed, retired Spurs legend Tim Duncan apparently went to an Old Navy over the weekend, and stood (…)
all-time baseball story.
Does not look like that 2018 move to MLS is in the works.
A deep dive into airline armrest etiquette.
Not so “safe” about his sports fandom.
Working on rips into quick spins with the brodie @joelembiid! #100skills100days #unseenhours @adidashoops A video posted by Drew (…)
Ken Griffey Jr. and Mike Piazza will be inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame this weekend. This sentence should make you feel (…)