Former player looks at positives of a lockout: Nate Jackson, a wide receiver with the Denver Broncos from 2003-2008, wrote about some of the positives that could come from the lockout. While I don’t think the length of a lockout will be enough to have an impact on player independence or health, he does raise some interesting points. Why do so many players struggle after football? Jackson thinks less is more, and thinks the “player development” employee that takes care of all off-field issues has the opposite role, keeping players “in a perpetual state of adolescence and guarantee[ing] that he will be unprepared for life outside of it. [WSJ]
Raica Oliveira, a model … “Sasquatch chased deer onto highway, woman tells deputy” … very cool GIF of a (…)
Zion Williamson, a 16-year old man-child who is social media gold because he dunks with the ferocity of Dominique Wilkins while being (…)
Bad evening for the Cavs.
Tis the season.
One word to describe this?
Jim Buss bet big on himself and lost badly.
Bob Kraft told the Giants owner the Patriots would have lost to them in the Super Bowl