POWERED BY

NFL

Upon Further Review, the Mark Sanchez Contract Extension Isn't That Bad

What everyone heard late Friday night:

The Jets struck out with Peyton Manning and to keep 3rd year QB Mark Sanchez happy, they gave him a “3-year, $40.5 million extension.”

As one of the few Mark Sanchez defenders on planet earth, even I was outraged. It seemed like an irrational move. What was the rush? When Sanchez struggled down the stretch last season, I thought he’d have one more year with a new offensive coordinator to get his act together.

Disgusted, I prepared a scathing diatribe about the suddenly-clueless Jets’ front office that had lost its way. (Remember when I was singing their praises in 2010?)

Then Mike Florio wrote this for Pro Football Talk:

For an extra $2.75 million, Sanchez gave the Jets three straight option years, allowing the team to keep him if he finally realizes his full potential — and to cut him without further investment after the 2013 season, the 2014 season, or the 2015 season.

The move creates $6.4 million in 2012 cap space.

He could have been dumped after 2012, with the $6 million due next year forever gone.

To recap: Crisis averted. The extension isn’t really a $40 million extension. They’ve got cap room to pursue another running back, a linebacker, a safety, or perhaps most important, a capable right tackle.

Previously: No, the Jets Don’t Need Peyton Manning
Previously: Santonio Holmes is an Imbecile, and the New York Jets’ 2011 Postmortem

Because you want to see it first!

Like and follow The Big Lead today!

blog comments powered by Disqus

Because you want to see it first.

Like and follow The Big Lead today!