Oh Damn, Did Whitlock Really Say That? A Q&A With Jason Whitlock
Media Interviews September 22nd. 2006, 4:29pm![]()
What does it take to secure an interview with esteemed columnist Jason Whitlock? After repeatedly dodging our emails, he finally consented to a Q&A - but only after we threatened him with illicit photos of JW fluffing Jeff George before the quarterback tried out with the Raiders. You�ve read his pot-stirring columns on ESPN.com and in the Kansas City Star, and you�ve seen the overweight lova co-hosting PTI (where he has actually used lines like, �can�t trust a big butt and a smile�). Surely you know Jason Whitlock played football at Ball State, Jeff George may be the most famous name in his cell phone, and he�s tight with Drew Bledsoe. Oh, and he�s not a fan of Scoop Jackson. What follows is a frighteningly candid Q&A with Whitlock (yup, that’s him) about Scoop, race, Mike Lupica, a Civil Rights movement and the iconic photo above.
Q: Why’d you leave Page 2? Did your feud with Scoop Jackson have anything to do with you leaving?
I’ve always disagreed with Page 2 about the value of my column. But when I started, it was an opportunity to write alongside Ralph Wiley, Hunter S. Thompson and Bill Simmons. That’s a great lineup, and I just wanted to be in the middle of that order somewhere. Page 2 had a lot of energy. Ralph and Hunter passed, Simmons got his own page, the editor who kicked me ideas (Jay Lovinger) got promoted and suddenly I was batting in a very different lineup, and the new manager had me hitting a lot lower in the order. I wasn’t real comfortable, but I figured I’d let things play out. I quit doing radio and had more time to focus on my weekly ideas. The column was already game tight, but the frequency, consistency and content all improved. The compensation didn’t, the place in the batting order didn’t and the team started shopping for talent in remote locations.
Q: What about Scoop? Based on the way you bitch-slapped him in the KC Star, you couldn’t have liked working with him.
We didn�t work together. But, yeah, there’s a big dropoff from being associated with Ralph, Hunter and Bill than being linked to someone doing a bad Nat X impersonation. It pissed me off that the dude tried to call himself the next Ralph Wiley and stated some [bleep] about carrying Ralph’s legacy. Ralph was one of my best friends. I hate to go all Lloyd Bentsen, but Scoop Jackson is no Ralph Wiley. Ralph was a grown-ass man who didn’t bojangle for anybody. Scoop is a clown. And the publishing of his fake ghetto posturing is an insult to black intelligence, and it interferes with intelligent discussion of important racial issues. Scoop showed up on the scene and all of a sudden I’m getting e-mails from readers connecting what I write to Scoop. And his stuff is being presented like grown folks should take it seriously. Please. I guess I’ll go Bill Cosby on you, but it’s about time we as black people quit letting Flavor Flav and the rest of these clowns bojangle for dollars. There’s going to be a new civil-rights movement among black people and the people bojangling for dollars are going to be put in check.
Q: A Civil Rights movement? In 2006?
Dude, it’s in the air. Black people are tired of letting idiots define who we are. It’s dangerous. I grew up loving hip hop music. But the [bleep] is way out of hand now. Flavor Flav went from fighting the power with Chuck D to a minstrel show on VH1. You have all of these young rap idiots putting out negative images about black men and black women, and it’s on us to stop it and say enough is a enough. It’s not on white people. And it’s not on old black people like Cosby and Oprah. We have to police our own. W.E.B. Dubois talked about the talented 10 percent leading the black masses. We’re letting the Ignorant 5 lead us straight to hell. The Ignorant 5 are telling white folks, “Yeah, this is how we really is. Let me bojangle for ya, boss. You say step and I’ll show ya I can fetch.” And what�s even more dangerous, the Ignorant 5 are telling black kids, �It�s cool to be locked up. It makes a man out of you. And don�t embrace education. Dealing dope and playing basketball are better career choices.� The Ignorant 5 is the new KKK and twice as deadly. That�s why you don�t hear �bout the KKK anymore. The Klan is just sitting back letting 50 Cent and all the other bojanglers do all the heavy lifting.
Q: Will you remain a sports columnist? And isn’t it time you moved out of the sticks in Kansas City?
Yeah, I�m always going to keep a hand in the sports world. Writing about sports is a great platform to write about the rest of life. Plus, the sports world and the entertainment world are where much of the bojangling is taking place. I haven�t left the Kansas City Star because I�m treated well there, enjoy the freedom, love the city, the Internet makes the world much smaller and, most important, I have a good boss. Most sports editors want to be at home by 4 p.m. or three Martinis down by 6 p.m. My boss (Mike Fannin) likes to work. He understands what diversity is. It�s not a bunch of different color faces. It�s long debates and occasional heated arguments and forgetting about it the next day. I come at things from a totally different perspective from most columnists. I throw heat, and I throw a knuckleball. The sports editor is going to have to flop around in the dirt once or twice a month. Most people don�t want to work that hard. They�d prefer to get handed an 88-mph feature story right down the middle of the plate, and they want it by 3 p.m.
Q: Why AOL Sports? Sportsline and Yahoo are emerging as players. SI.com?
Neal Scarbrough, the head of AOL, doesn�t mind catching knuckleballs. He brought me in over at Page 2. He�s good people. And I�m a risk-taker by nature. AOL Sports has nowhere to go but up. I talked with CBS about a year ago, but the guy running the place didn�t have a concrete plan. Yahoo and SI have never shown an interest.
Q: Who are your boys in the sports writing industry? Who do you read?
Jeff Chadiha of Sports Illustrated is my boy. We go back to my days in Ann Arbor. Jeff and his wife just moved to Kansas City, and we�ve been working on a TV pilot for the past two years. The dude is just a rock-solid human being and real freaking smart. Jason King of the KC Star is my dog. He covers the University of Kansas. He�s the best beat writer in the country. He breaks news and writes great features. You can�t beat that combination. Terrence Harris of the Houston Chronicle is my brother from another mother. We disagree on damn near everything, but that�s definitely my boy. Bob Wojnowski of the Detroit News might be the coolest cat in the business. If Wojo had my ego, he�d be considered the best columnist in the country. Well, he�d also need to work for a newspaper that actually cared about its product. But that�s outside his control. Damn, can�t forget JA and Lonnie White out in LA. Greg Couch in Chicago. Who do I read? Simmons, TJ Simers, Wilbon, Deadspin, John Feinstein�s books, message boards and Scoop Jackson whenever I�ve overeaten and want to purge.
Q: In one of your most memorable appearances on The Sports Reporters, you got into a tiff with Mike Lupica and Mitch Albom when you said sports was just ‘entertainment.’ Lupica told you to go work on ‘Entertainment Tonight.’ You haven’t appeared with either of them since. Have the three of you kissed and made up?
I don�t have a problem with Mitch Albom. Lupica is an insecure, mean-spirited busybody. He�s upset because I put a clown suit on him on that show and in a follow-up column I wrote for ESPN. His little disingenuous overreaction to an opinion I�d stated previously on the show was staged to try to put me in a bad light. I guess no one had ever informed Mike that the E in ESPN stood for Entertainment. The Little Fella probably won�t let the producer (Joe Valerio) have me back on the show again. That�s cool. They�re mostly upset that I wouldn�t participate in their Barry Bonds witch hunt and help them single Bonds out as the creator of steroids. Lupica doesn�t like to be disagreed with, and he�s spoken so abusively to that producer for years that the producer probably doesn�t realize people are allowed to disagree with Lupica. I enjoyed my time on the show. But if the price of admission is stepping to Lupica�s drum, I�m more than happy to go without.
Q: Will your departure from ESPN.com impact your status on other shows at the network, like Rome is Burning, PTI, or The Sports Reporters?
I don�t think so. Kornheiser, Wilbon and Rome actually have legitimate self-confidence and don�t mind seeing other people stating opinions. And I don�t have a problem with ESPN. It�s a great network. The producers I work with on PTI and Rome are great and don�t have a problem with me stating my opinions. I don�t see Lupica having the power to interfere with what I do on other shows. But I could be wrong. And I don�t see the people at ESPN.com caring that I left for a better opportunity. I did five years at Page 2 for next to no money. I�m not Kunta Kinte. I got�s to feed my family. I left .com on good terms. No hard feelings.
Q: People say you play the race card far too frequently. Your response?
Black people think I�m too hard on black people. They write me and tell me I�m a sellout. White people say I play the race card too much when I question the timing of Charlie Weis� contract extension. But those same white people write me love letters when I blast off into the way the media and a prosecutor tried to crucify the Duke lacrosse players on the word of a couple of black criminal escorts. I�m going to write about race because race is an issue in America and my life experience has put me in a position to have something insightful and intelligent to say about race. I don�t have an agenda when it comes to racial issues. There�s enough stupidity on both sides of America�s black-white dilemma to keep me typing for years. I don�t have a guilty conscience about race. The people in my life know that I choose my friends solely on the content of their character. And I don�t choose sides in my column based on the color of anyone�s skin.
Q: The photo of you suffocating the sofa is truly hilarious. What�s the story behind it?
Love that picture. Makes me laugh every time I see it. It�s a picture of me after I finished my morning radio show. It�s from back in the days when I hosted �Jason Whitlock�s Neighborhood� from 6 to 9 weekday mornings. You ever wake up at 4 a.m. Monday thru Friday? That�ll have your ass falling out on the first couch you see at 9:05 a.m. I think that picture was taken the day after our charity flag football game. It was a big party the night before (after the game). I�m not a big drinker, but it was a tradition for my team to lose and for me to drown my sorrows in Crown Royal and then stumble in and talk about it on the radio. That picture puts a smile on my face.
213 Responses to “Oh Damn, Did Whitlock Really Say That? A Q&A With Jason Whitlock”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

September 22nd, 2006 at 5:09 pm
Great interview guys, and though I’ve enjoyed Whitlock’s work for some time now, this was a great view behind the columns, so to speak. Well done on all sides.
Also, fuck Scoop Jackson.
September 22nd, 2006 at 6:10 pm
Awesome interview. I always thought JW played the race card too much, but by the end of his articles, he had always made a valid point and it didn’t bother me anymore. Scoop on the other hand…glad to hear JW had the guts to call him out on his bojangling ways. Am I allowed to use that word?
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:19 pm
Good stuff. I think he’s pretty tolerable for the most part. “F” Scoop Jackson….go write about tennis.
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:28 pm
Can’t say that I read much more than Hunter on Page 2 before his death, but after reading this, I’m more inclined to check out what Jason has to say. Real nice interview!
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:30 pm
I’ll forever be in debt to Whitlock because, during a PTI, he referred to the Lion’s asst. coach driving naked as Porky Pigging. I thought he was making it up but I looked it up on the internet (see it’s good for things other than porn and sports) and sure enough he’s right. It almost makes up for his many stupid opinions (David Gerrard is the backup QB in J-ville because he’s black and all the racist J-ville fans would want Leftwich benched if they had a white backup, notice how they cheered when Matt Jones played QB during a trick play.) That was almost Scoop-like.
September 22nd, 2006 at 7:55 pm
I’ve found myself liking the 10 truths coloumn more and more over the past couple years and always thought Whitlock was underrated. He’s been a great guest host on PTI and this interview is great. Whitlock deserves credit for taking a stand on difficult racial issues he’s passionate about. Best of luck with AOL, I’ll be reading.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Believe me, many people in KC wish he would leave , too. He is amazing in his ability to write a column that contributes absolutely nothing to the sports conversation in KC, at the same time somehow managing to fill his columns with back-patting and endless lines of “I was in LA last weekend, and talked to XXXX’. Jason has burnt absolutely ever single bridge in KC with ANYONE who has a legitimate reputation. Also, the whole ‘Entertainment’ argument is a smoke screen for the fact that he has no idea how to write something meaningful. If you want to read a clown, Whitlock is fine…. If you want to read something that actually will make you think, try Joe Posnanski.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:15 pm
CBS Sportsline? They still have a site? I haven’t even looked at that site in years. Their original content isn’t that good and they bring nothing to the table. Yahoo might be worse off. They don’t have much but a great fantasy game section. Columnists there are bland. AOL is up and coming and Whitlock should shine there. They aren’t afraid to get on the hot topics and ride them.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:50 pm
Good job here. It was informative and didn’t sound like so many blog interviews where the host is sucking up to the subject. I like Whitlock. I don’t always agree with his opinions, like when he tried to say people in Jacksonville hate their black QB. But I think he’s dead on about Notre Dame, and he’s also dead on about Scoop Jackson. That guy writes like a high school kid.
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:58 pm
Whitlock is an idiot and a sloppy writer. His ESPN.com column is way more polished than his KC Star one. I attribute that to better editing. Read his KC Star column from yesterday. It makes no sense.
This interview, however, is Highlarious. But I’m not an enemy of my enemy is my friend type of guy.
September 22nd, 2006 at 10:10 pm
The love you. They hate you. You are doing it right, Jason. Don’t change.
September 22nd, 2006 at 10:42 pm
Indeed, Jason, take your name-dropping show on the freakin’ road. You add nothing locally, and I don’t care if you kissed Jesus square on the lips.
September 23rd, 2006 at 12:28 am
Man, I’ll miss your articles. I was arguing with my friend who bashed a thing you said, “Name me 3 better sports columnists than Jason Whitlock.” And he couldn’t come up with it. You really rank there in my top 3 and be sure to let us know where you’ll be.
I was already done with ESPN but I checked in to read Jason’s columns and Bill Simmons. Well 1 less reason. All we need is to get Bill off ESPN and then I’ll never have to go there again.
Yahoo Sports is about 1000 times better anyway.
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:12 am
Could someone please define for me the verb, “bojangle?”
Is it another way of saying, “to prostitute oneself?”
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:15 am
Some of this stuff is downright hilarious. The editing process at The Star is more stringent for me than the one at ESPN…. It’s absolutely two different styles of columns writing for the Internet as opposed to writing for a newspaper. You have far more freedom on the Net. But carry on with your theories.
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:19 am
Great interview. It’s enough to seriously consider changing my opinion on Whitlock, which has been in the negative ever since I read his “Let’s face it, everyone’s racist” column after Team USA’s smackdown in Greece in ‘04. However, the entire section where he goes off on “The Idiot 5″ was undeniably brilliant, because he essentially says that the only people that deserve ridicule in this country are the losers who are proud of their ignorance. Amen.
September 23rd, 2006 at 2:58 am
Keep up the good work. But ya gotta mention Ball State more often. Our peeps need the pub.
September 23rd, 2006 at 3:47 am
Jason Whitlock is the best damn column on the ‘net or print.
The best there is.
Period
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:01 pm
I liked what Jason had to say about Flav; it’s hard to watch what has become of him. PE help make hip hop a legit social watchdog. Now Flav and hip hop (for the most part) has lost the credibility. But talking about credibility, Jason lost 99.9% of his when he tried to compare Andre Agassi’s use of cortisone shots (administered by a doctor to treat a legitimate injury) to athletes using steroids (administered by themselves to cheat). I wonder if Jason would have made that comparison if it were Michael Jordan or Jerry Rice?
September 23rd, 2006 at 3:41 pm
Like him or not, Whitlock keeps things interesting. Dumping the daily quickie (I hated it, but it was must read….i’m a masochist, i guess) and now Whitlock leaving, leaves nothing but Simmons at ESPN.com worth reading….although, I admit…I LOVE reading Spoop’s columns…basking in his ignorance makes me feel so bright…..
September 23rd, 2006 at 5:45 pm
Tom, yeah I would have. My point is we pick and choose which “steroids” are bad based on what the FDA tells us. Just because the FDA or the media doesn’t tell you that cortisone has terrible side affects, too, doesn’t mean it’s good for you. It’s not. And Jerry Rice’s fast recovery from a terrible knee injury late in his career smells like HGH to anyone with a brain or anyone involved in athletics. But we don’t talk about that because J.Rice because we love J.Rice. Athletes do all sorts of silly stuf to take the field. Carry on. You’ll catch up one day.
September 23rd, 2006 at 11:43 pm
Jason, are you out of your mind? Here is a simply test for athletes to decide if they are doing the right or wrong thing: If you are under the care of and being treated by a doctor, in full view of your sport, the fans and the media, you are doing the right thing. If you are self-medicating, buying your drugs on the street like you were a basehead, and hiding from your sport, the fans and the media, you are probably doing the wrong thing. And where do you get off suggesting Jerry Rice used anything but his famous work ethic to come back from injuries? Any facts to back that up, or would that just get in the way of your point of view?
September 24th, 2006 at 2:20 am
We would like to apologize for Jason’s repeated misspelling of its. Unless the use of “its” is referring to possession, there should be no apostrophe.
However, we do wholeheartedly agree with his opinion of Wojo. He is an excellent writer.
September 24th, 2006 at 1:35 pm
I would laugh if it wasn’t so sad. Never heard “it is = it’s.” Wow! Carry on. My critics, you gotta love ‘em.
September 24th, 2006 at 2:05 pm
Thanks for the smack on Lupica. That was truly the greatest Sports Reporters ever and I’m glad to hear somebody show him up. What a whiny runt. Between Lupica’s insecurity and Mitch Albiom lying in columns, The Sports Reporters lost their best reporter with Whitlock gone.
September 25th, 2006 at 1:02 am
What is even more sad is that you are on a blog reading comments to see what people thought of your profile Q&A. Someone a little insecure?
September 25th, 2006 at 3:40 pm
J-Dub is one of the best columist in the country and I’m glad we have him in KC. I’ll be reading AOL Sports now.
September 25th, 2006 at 4:54 pm
Yeah, I’m a real fool. I consent to an interview and have the nerve to actually read it and see what people think. I’m a terrible, terrible person. I read message boards like regular folk…. Why not come back with this: “Man, I look like a real idiot. I failed 5th-grade English and don’t even know how to use an apostrophe. Thank God this thing is anonymous and I’m the only one who knows how foolish I look.” Or why not just come up with another screen name? Seriously, dude, this is weak, weak stuff. Who’s (who is) writing this stuff for ya, Lupica?
September 25th, 2006 at 6:50 pm
I would say that Jason is a sad little man. But, you know…
September 25th, 2006 at 7:37 pm
Jason: Thank you for putting into words why I hate Scoop Jackson’s writing so much. And to think I’d probably hate him even more if I was black. That’d be a lot of hate. Damn.
September 26th, 2006 at 4:22 am
Whitlock,
Thanks for having the guts to speak your mind. If you ever need to do some more purgin, check out our pet project devoted to Scoop at http://www.scoopwatch.blogspot.com.
September 26th, 2006 at 4:33 am
Jason’s editor: you’re a moron. A possessive ‘its’ has no apostrophe. This is specifically to allow one’s reader to distinguish this word from ‘it’s’ (the contraction of ‘it is’). Go back to 2nd grade.
Whitlock: Have to hand it to you man. Cojones. Cojones for being so honest in the article and, what’s more, showing up in the comments. I’ve never been your biggest fan, but you’re nothing if not genuine authentic. Much respect, and good luck re. future endeavours.
September 26th, 2006 at 11:52 am
Jason tells it like it is. If you can’t take the heat get the “f” off the stove. When he talks of race it usually has something to do with the issue at hand. Read his articles twice and try and undertand what they say. He is a perfect guest host on PTI and he can “burn” as good as Rome. This is American and freedom of speech is what makes it great.
Give them hell Jason.
September 26th, 2006 at 12:13 pm
Amen to speaking your mind about that round mouth Lupica. Ever since Dick S. passed, Sports Reporters has devolved into the Mitch and Mike fluff show. Jason gave the show an edge. Often I disagree with Whitlock, but that is why I keep reading and watching.
September 26th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
Exellent q&a Jason fuck all these haters here in k.c. keep doing your thing. In my opinion you shake this city up like no black man ever has. You call out all idiots regardless of race. Even if your are an idiot sometimes yourself. Keep bringin tha real!!
September 26th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
See, Whitlock’s column in the Star this morning (Freedom to Speak Has Price) and his run-in with Lupica illustrate exactly the split personality that he possesses. The only time he takes ANYTHING seriously is when somone offends HIM. The only time he bothers to do ANY research is when the story is about HIM.
I thought this was all Entertainment? Wait.. someone has upset Jason, all of a sudden it is a ‘Freedom of Speech’ issue, and NOTHING is more important than Jason Whitlock and his fight for Truth and Justice. All of a sudden, sports and sports reporting are HUGELY important issues.
September 26th, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Whitlock has enough life experience to write about black/white issues. He also has enough life experience to write about meglomania. Some of his writing is good. A lot of it is really bad. He’s an insecure person who likes to tell everyone who he’s rubbing elbows with. I’m not impressed and would love to see him move on from the KC Star. In fact I encourage it.
September 26th, 2006 at 1:00 pm
Hey jason fuck these k.c.haters a lot of them resent the fact that your a black man on top who won’t kiss the k.c.sportworld’s ass. Keep calling them idiots out even if your one sometimes yourself!!!!
September 26th, 2006 at 1:26 pm
I’ve been reading Jason’s column since he started for the KC Star. I like him. The reason people probably don’t like him is because with his articles, he hits you right between the eyes.
He doesn’t kiss anybody’s ass to get the scoop. If I remember right, Carl Peterson banned Jason from the Chiefs lockerroom. Why? Jason wouldn’t kiss his ass!! Jason wrote what many people though and what other journalsists were afraid to write.
Keep going Jason!!
September 26th, 2006 at 1:33 pm
People from kc need to quit the complaining. They have two great columnist in Joe and Jason. Any city would be luck to have them. Why is KC the sticks? There are more towns than chicago in the midwest you know.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:09 pm
The only thing I didn’t like was the interviewers referring to KC as “the sticks.” You guys need to get out more.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:12 pm
I don’t always agree with Jason’s views, but I never miss one of his columns. If everyone had the same opinions, what a boring world this would be. I like the fact that he is not an ass-kisser to the Chiefs and Royals. Keep up the good work, Jason!
September 26th, 2006 at 2:18 pm
Jaon, I have read your column since the day you started working for the Star. I frequently have a different opinion but just as frequently find that your opinion makes me consider an issue in ways that had never occurred to me before. Whether I agree with you or not, that’s often a good thing.
My only real gripe is the ego. I understand that without that ego, you wouldn’t have the career you do today. But seriously, if you were forced to use a keyboard with a missing “I” key, I don’t think you could write a column at all. Your many insightful ideas would carry more weight if you simply told the story rather than try to become a part of the story. Ever wonder where your career would be today if the Star had pulled the trigger after suspending you for the “Drew Bledsoe is gay” incident?
All in all, though, I’m glad to have you in town. I suspect you’re not a big fan of Posnanski’s style but I think the two of you provide the perfect polar-opposite team.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:29 pm
Thank God for Jason sticking around in the “sticks” of K.C. Whether you agree with him or not, he gets people talking. Things would be rather stale around these parts without Jason and if he decided to leave here, you would miss him more than you know. There’s been a big void left since he left radio. Now all we get is Kevin Kietzman’s whiny ass in drivetime and the other station is completely unlistenable. It sure would be nice to hear Jason counter Kevin’s K-State humping and BBQing on the radio…talk about a snoozefest. Keep on keeping things real Jason. You’ve got more than your fair share of fans who appreciate what you do.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:43 pm
I don’t often read message boards because the exchanges so often become mean-spirited and petty. I see this has happened here as well. This is all you need to know about Whitlock, and it is neither mean-spirited nor petty: He manipulates his audience. Anyone who has read his columns in Kansas City knows this. HIs agenda is not the pursuit of truth, but the provocation of his readership in pursuit of personal gain. All this comes at the expense of honesty. This is crystal-clear, but probably won’t reveal itself without a lot of reading. Lots of folks in Kansas City have read a lot of Jason. They know this, and are insulted by it. Another Jason column about Jason. What a surprise. He is also an inconsistent (and sometimes poor) writer. That’s a far lesser sin, but it goes to explain the previous mention of Posnanski in The Star: a very talented and much more consistent writer. Finally, if you want to read about race in a thoughtful atmosphere of honesty and mutual respect, check out Leonard Pitts, Jr.
September 26th, 2006 at 2:53 pm
jason, keep it up. my only real contact with home since i moved to new york is the star online. i’m constantly forwarding your column and joe’s to my sox-and-yankees-fan-friends, and they wish their guys were as good. keep it up. if people who don’t want you at the star take the time to read the columns at the boston globe or the detroit free press, they’d change their minds…
September 26th, 2006 at 3:11 pm
Jason, You are the Sports writer that Leonard Pitts would be if he were so inclined. I enjoy your evenhanded approach to your column. Don’t always agree with your opinons but I would be disappointed if I did. How would that make us think about a different viewpoint if we agreed with everyting you said. I saw that episode of the Sports Reporters with you cut lose. They looked as though you were cursing Jesus Christ himself. I knew that that would not be the end of it.
September 26th, 2006 at 3:56 pm
Jason whitlock’s race card playing is far worse for black americans than the hip hop world is…. He’s telling them in every article ‘We’re getting screwed as black people… you should feel sorry for yourself’… that message is far worse than … ‘go kill that N!GGER!”…. sorry, but its true
September 26th, 2006 at 3:57 pm
Jason whitlock’s race card playing is far worse for black americans than the hip hop world is…. He’s telling them in every article ‘We’re getting screwed as black people… you should feel sorry for yourself’… that message is far worse than … ‘go kill that N!GGER!”…. sorry, but its true
September 26th, 2006 at 4:29 pm
Enough of that , already…
Hey, it looks like Whitlock’s column from this morning just got pulled off of the KC Star site. It was dated this morning and titled ‘Freedom to Speak has Price’
September 26th, 2006 at 4:32 pm
Nevermind
September 26th, 2006 at 4:37 pm
Whitlock does have an amazing ability to write a perspective that gets right to the heart of the story, and with an honesty that gets it there quickly. My only beef with him after reading him in KC for 10 years is that I wish the guy knew more about Sports. Sounds odd, but he’s certainly more interested in the entertainment / social / culture aspects than he is about sports. A good example is when the Royals barred two complete idiots who live to do nothing but start stupid arguments because they know literally nothing about sports. It was the first time the word, “Royals” entered Whitlock’s mind in years, and so he had no credibility to write about them at all when he made a mountain out of that mole hill in the name of… (naturally) “free speech.” Talk about Scoop Jackson… those two radio reporters are far more ignorant and useless.
September 26th, 2006 at 4:47 pm
Th’is (The is) is hilarious. The’re (The are) so many angry individuals out there needing to be heard (and educated)…actually feeling better about themselves because they think they’ve trashed the mighty Whitlock.
Whitlock, you’ve done nothing but put forth great work here in “the sticks” and abroad, and I hope you know you are much appreciated.
September 26th, 2006 at 5:04 pm
I’ve never been a real big fan of Whitlock… however, anyone in the media that will ‘bash’ Scoop for what he is, which is a horrible writer, well, I like them a little more.
Great interview.
September 26th, 2006 at 5:05 pm
I always think it is weird when someone posts laughing at all of the other idiot posters and how they feel the need to be heard.
Doesn’t that make you just as ‘angry’, and feeling ‘better’ because you stood up for your boy?
PS… IF we all live by Jason’s creed, I should call you ‘Bojangles’ and tell you to stop trying to suppress my right to speak. Go ahead and keep sucking up to the MAN (WHITLOCK, in this case). ‘Mighty’ Whitlock? Are you trying to get NBA tickets, or something?
September 26th, 2006 at 5:31 pm
Whitlock-
Thanks for ALWAYS keeping it real. Glad you lost your Bristol privileges and not your principles. You Rock Man!
September 26th, 2006 at 5:44 pm
Did someone actually suggest that Polyanna Posnanski would provide a more entertaining or informative analysis of sports than Jason Whitlock? I guess if you like reading that “This Just Might Be The Royals’ Year!” column every spring, he might just be your cup of tea. If you really want to hear someone with an opinion and some real thought to back it up, stick with Whitlock.
September 26th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
I am glad that Jason stood up to those little jock sniffers like that whiney Lupika. I do not agree with JDub’s take on Bonds either, but he makes a good point. Lupica summarily dismissed and belittled JDub’s prediction a couple of months ago that the Twins will come back and make the play offs. I guess that little twerp isn’t right about everything. But as for JDub’s comment to this interview that he has to feed his family….last I knew he was single with no kids…….but I guess he eats as much as any family!
I do miss his radio show. But he didn’t quit, if you know what I mean.
September 26th, 2006 at 6:11 pm
Uh, the Whitlock article is still on kansascity.com (the kcstar website). They didn’t take it off because it was controversial or anything–also, it was most likely in the print edition anyway. Anyway, most sports columnists often include themselves in what they’re writing about–Simmons, Peter King, even Joe Posnanski (how many boyhood-in-Cleveland stories have you heard?)…that’s part of what differentiates column writing from story writing. I suppose Whitlock could write himself out of his column in this manner (even when he is the story): “Item! Guess who was seen grumbling to producers outside of the Sports Reporters studio? A certain small, bespectacled New York columnist who, according to sources, has had enough of his large, barbecue-loving, Midwestern co-reporter! Perhaps those Rosie O’Donnell rumors have some truth to them.”
September 26th, 2006 at 7:21 pm
Great interview! I need to reacquaint myself with JW to see if he writes a good game, because he sure does talk it! AOL Sports, eh? Okay, we’ll see. ESPN is all about the reader showing them the money, CBS Sportsline must use dartboards to rate their players but FOX and Yahoo have it down. I’ll give AOL a look, too. Loved this column!
September 26th, 2006 at 8:02 pm
All these KC homers who are bashing Jason and saying that KC hates him are full of it. Yes, some like his writing, some really dislike his writing. Some like him personally, some dislike him personally. Mostly that stems from his radio show days–which I admit was horrible. He made me change the channel more times than I wanted to. But since he left radio his writing has gotten much much better. Can’t complain on the quality or style–don’t always agree with what he says, but I read every column. Besides when I turn on Sports Reporters and see Lupica I change the channel. Mitch I don’t mind so much. Lupica, can’t stand.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:09 pm
I’ve never really been too high on Whitlock, but he hit the nail on the head in this column. Lupica is a pretengious jerk who thinks all things revolve around mighty New York. Scoop is just ignorant and thinks that every single injustice in this world, one way or another, boils down to race. Whitlock does have a tendency to play the race card a little too much, but hearing his opinions on racial issues in this article was very interesting and well said.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:53 pm
Great interview fellas. This was better than any column every written by Jason….and that’s no knock on his work at the Star. I find it pretty amusing that some of these people that are paid to have an opinion in this industry are bothered by the opinions of others, or get upset when other parties don’t want to go along in their attempts to villianize someone.
I found it hard to believe that Scoop Jackson was actually getting paid for the work that he does with the ESPN and the NBA. Who’s dick did he have to suck to get that gig? I don’t mean to hate on the brotha, but when I first heard him do an interview, I was like “what the fugg!” He gave me more confidence than ever that I could get paid to talk sports as well. I guess I owe him a ‘thank you’ in some weird way.
Also, I was wondering if we’d ever hear Jason on KC Sports Radio ever again? It seems like he’s burned his bridges here with the 2 local stations, but I could be wrong. Although Jason had many who hated him, they all still loved to hear what he had to say. 610 Sports needs some serious help, and they’d be doing themselves a favor by giving Jason back his show……if he wants it.
September 26th, 2006 at 8:59 pm
Thank God someone finally called out Lupica & Scoop Jackson…Lupica is a whiny little bitch, does anyone really care what he has to say? How does he wield any power at ESPN? Not one person in the country is tuning in to watch him, not one. Scoop is indecipherable, I have no idea what the fuck he is saying, other than “the black man has it tough”. OK, thanks for the insight there, Scoop. He is almost bad enough to screw up Ralph Wiley’s legacy. Keep up the good work, JW, even when i disagree with your opinion, I enjoy hearing your perspective.
September 26th, 2006 at 9:12 pm
Anyone know the world record for using the word ‘bojangle’ and any iteration of, cause I think it was just broken.
September 26th, 2006 at 9:14 pm
I am so thrilled that I won’t have to see Whitlock spout his barely-intelligible opinions on ESPN any more. Lupica is a blow-hard, but at least he usually has something to say that’s worth listening to, whether I agree with him or (usually) not.
September 26th, 2006 at 9:31 pm
Great interview! Whitlock made some good points about the black culture and its (possesive) glorification of thugs with poor grammar. I hope that he wasn’t suggesting that only recently has hip hop been degrading towards women because I’m pretty sure that NWA, DJ Quik, and Too Short said some pretty degrading things. To Tom’s point that Public Enemy helped turn rap into a legit social watchdog, that is ridiculous. I am certain that there are no policy makers at any level of government who operate with the fear that a crackhead wearing an oversized clock and a trendy silouhette of Africa is going to write a song about them.
Whitlock does a fine job for the Star. I don’t miss too many articles and his morning show was the best (thanks to his interaction with Esteban San Juan).
If it’s (it is) worth anything, I wish that he wouldn’t try to discuss the Royals because he doesn’t follow baseball and that he wouldn’t use his access to media outlets to blast people personally (e.g. James Hasty for deciding not to write for the Star, Marcus Spears and that car dealership fiasco).
September 26th, 2006 at 9:31 pm
I am on Jason’s side all the way here. Whoever the moron is that wrote -
He’s telling them in every article ‘We’re getting screwed as black people… you should feel sorry for yourself’-
You either entirely lack any reading comprehension ability, or have never read Mr. Whitlock’s fine work. I was surprised to find out Jason is black after some of the things he wrote. I have found him to be quite evenhanded and fair when covering subjects that most writers’ opinions on could be guessed simply by knowing the color of their skin. I’m headed to AOL Sports right now……peace
September 26th, 2006 at 10:15 pm
However small this may appear in history, it will be the Jason Whitlocks of the World that take us step by step to a time when we will truly not have any prejudice on race or colour. Even though it is 2006 Jason Whitlock, is ahead of his time, fortunately not alone.
Maybe it is only a small thing but EVERYTHING COUNTS. Fighting and standing up for one side or another may be fine and something with which I may be proud of or agree in part but the way JW sees all sides will eventually be the path to harmony. In Canada we have the harmony but still need a lot more. EVERYTHING COUNTS
September 26th, 2006 at 11:43 pm
God, that above post is bad… I am considered a liberal Democrat in this neck of the woods (Kansas) , but the above post ‘aboot’ makes me ill. I can only hope that this is some kind of a joke, cause I can only imagine Big Sexy hisself cracking on that one….
Actually , I don’t think Big Sexy is right anymore, according to the above post, is it time to dust off ‘Big Baby Jesus’?
September 27th, 2006 at 1:35 am
Whitlock needs to quit the Star, not Page 2. People actually read the Star. Plus, he smells horrible.
September 27th, 2006 at 1:47 am
http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000227.htm
September 27th, 2006 at 2:07 am
You got what you deserve Jason, its called karma. And yes, its a bitch. God is striking you down for all the bashing you did on Vince Young (the best college football player of all time) befor the NFL Draft. Your article titled “Shut Up Vince” ,which i think was later re-titled soon after it was put on espn’s website, was an absolutely unessessary attack on a very nice guy (VY). You went on to say his “stock” in the draft was dropping, but you were later proved wrong when he was the 1st QB to be selected.Anyway, I was surprised to hear you praise the 2006 Texas O-Line earlier this season, and ill give you props on that. But God obviously is a Texas Longhorn, and did not appreciate your rudeness towards his son Vince Young. Therefore you got what you deserve, you lose your shot at becoming a big time jounalist, and a TV personality.
Hook em Horns
September 27th, 2006 at 3:38 am
Scriv in KC couldn’t be more wrong. We love Whitlock here and appreciate his loyalty to our city in spite of the fact that his star has risen high since he first took the job of the only columnist that matters 12 years ago. If you want to read a boring, ass kissing, column trying to blow sunshine up everyone’s butt, read Jo Posnanski. If you want to hear it like it is from a guy who know’s and has no fear of telling it, read whitlock. His column is so influential, he has actually swayed GM’s of our pro sports teams into decision making, though they would never admit it. Also, if you read JW with any regularity, you’d know he doesn’t play race cards, only presents race as it should be. He may be the most objective black man writing about race. He calls a spade a spade regardless of the color of skin.
September 27th, 2006 at 5:22 am
Jason follows a beat of a different drummer. It’s safe to say that if you like him, that’s fine. If you can’t stand him, that’s fine in his book as well. What is imporant is that if we read or listen to him, we talk about it. Self-promotion? If you think that’s what he’s doing, that is your opinion.
I don’t have to agree with everything he takes a position with, but I respect his views and his honesty when he is asked a question. He is one of the best sports columnists today. I appreciate him even more in the fact that no one is above criticism, even himself when he admits it. As a young black man, it’s about time that someone stepped forward and called out the black community for its ills and problems. There is no one else to blame but ourselves.
It’s damn shame when a brother gets a college degree, they get treated like crap and disdain. It’s the gangbanger who gets royal treatment every where he goes. It’s sickening.
September 27th, 2006 at 5:25 am
Great interview. Never read many of his columns because I refuse to use ESPN unless it is absolutely neccessary.
Anyone who dogs on ESPN is alright in my book. Their “Reality TV” approach to sports is downright dispicable. You talked about the 5% of ignorant blacks portraying an image, but ESPN has done this for years. They ruined the NBA in my opinion with their highlights and how they made it into a sport of Street Ball. Kids have been growing up learning how to dunk instead of learning how to shoot FTs because that doesn’t get them on Sportscenter. The overall game has gone completely downhill and I pretty much attribute it to ESPN and the media.
Same goes for your mentio of how they wanted you to portray Bonds. It is sickening how they beat a dead horse on everything. Trying to basically create controversey that isn’t even there. Don’t even get me started about that douchebag Jim Gray that is employed by them now, or their ridiculous NFL coverage for games.
ESPN is watched by me for nothing more than sporting events. Sportscenter is no longer enjoyable and their website is terrible. Charging for worthless opinions on things that can be found free from some guy at a bar.
September 27th, 2006 at 6:15 am
Jason is burning way too many bridges. He has progressed as a journalist because he does like to cause shit and often times he’s flat wrong…I’ve read his stuff for years. Is some of his social commentary true? Yes. He makes a lot of money and that said, if a big fat white guys says the same stuff, would we still be listening? I think he’s a puppet for a bad newspaper who says “keep stirring the pot.”
September 27th, 2006 at 7:19 am
I hate to see anyone lose their job for any reason, especially since I recently lost mine, but I must say Jason that all this is happening to you because you dogged The Greatest College Football Player in history, Vince Young.
With all the jaw-dropping, come-from-behind, freakishly athletic plays, you just couldn’t give him his due.
It’s o.k. to admit you were wrong…just go back and watch the ‘05, ‘06 Rose Bowls, ‘05 Ohio State Game, ‘05 Okla. State game….NO ONE has ever done what he did, time and time again, when the spotlight was the brightest, the pressure and the stakes the highest, he ALWAYS, ALWAYS came through….Vince Young is Superman!
September 27th, 2006 at 10:37 am
JW was the only reason I watched the sports reporters. Lupica is an ass Albom should stick to writing novels Ryan should never leave Beantown and the host whatever his name is should take whatever medicine MJackson took to lighten his skin because he is more white than the other three gentlemen.
Left by Big Daddy Ed September 27, 2006
September 27th, 2006 at 12:49 pm
Hey Steve (KC)…If you think that the government was not concerned about what hip hop artist like Public Enemy or KRS-One was saying in the late 80’s/early 90’s, you are out of your mind. Hip hop was no problem when it was the Fat Boys rapping about how many pizzas they could eat, but when PE dropped “It Takes a Nation of Millions…” everyone, the government included, took notice.
September 27th, 2006 at 1:06 pm
whitlock, your gratuitous overuse of the word “bojangles” does a disservice to the pioneers (and bill robinson, in particular) who came before you.
September 27th, 2006 at 2:49 pm
Yes GMooney, I am totally wrong. EVERYONE in KC loves Whitlock… Just ask anyone at 810WHB, 610 Sports, The Chiefs, The Royals, His family (according to his own columns), ESPN, James Hasty, Marcus Spears, etc, etc, et,c and at least half of the people who commented on this board.
Gosh, I am sorry… I don’t know what I was thinking.
Yeah, and EVERYONE knows J-Dub NEVER plays the race card. Just look at the comments on here about ‘bojangles’.
Also, you are right… he is very well known for his loyalty to this city… He represents KC, and NEVER leaves in the middle of baseball season to cover the NBA in Los Angeles. And whenever he mentions people that he talks to, he ALWAYS manages to name-drop such famous Kansas Citians as Charles Barkley. I forgot that he is the Grand Marshall at EVERY parade in town. He is Mister KC, after all….
September 27th, 2006 at 3:01 pm
Whitlock, I always found your comments about race relations in America spot on. You certainly burned some bridges with this interview. Gotta respect that.
September 27th, 2006 at 3:04 pm
Prayers for T.O…..
Wow!! Just got the word out of Dallas. Do not like T.O., but terrible, terrible news… The guy has serious problems, and I hope that someone finally tries to get him the help that he needs….
September 27th, 2006 at 3:13 pm
Jason W. was a breath of fresh air on the Sports Reporters. Getting up on Sundays to watch the show was a must. Can’t say I’ve read his KC articles but, his commentary on ESPN was interesting and entertaining at times. His comments at black america are so on point IT’S scary. If these are the things he writes about in KC, I might follow him more often. The views of black america are slanted with the nonsense you hear in ignorant rap music. Our black stars/ heroes are rappers who talk about selling drugs, caring guns, B!tches, shouting a N!66a, robbing and stealing and so forth. Or our kids follow sports stars who are constantly puttin their foot in their mouths about social issues. There are intelligent athletes but those are the ones we hear from. If you think this new age of rap stars aren’t poisoning our youth then your are missing the boat. Why do your think so many rappers have there own sneaker, clothing lines, commercial. Why are they advertising for different clothing, sneaker and apparel companies. Because our children listen to them and want to be them and want to follow in there footsteps. The media and advertising know this which is why they use these people. Oh, I don’t want to blame black america’s problems on the media or musicians though. There are more important issues like the poor education system, poor parenting, lack of jobs and discrimination and the like. But that doesn’t mean we can forgive our own for leading our children down this path. Back to Jason. Keep on Writing about these issues. We need a big loud voice
September 27th, 2006 at 4:01 pm
“But God obviously is a Texas Longhorn, and did not appreciate your rudeness towards his son Vince Young. Therefore you got what you deserve, you lose your shot at becoming a big time jounalist, and a TV personality.”
Agreed! God sits in heaven doling out penance and retribution based on his subjects’ sports affiliations and preferences. Root against God’s team….and He will smite thee! Write an article shedding an unflattering light on the key player on one of God’s favorite teams….and He will cast locusts upon your crops!…..My only point of contention with the above brilliance would be an objection to the proposition that the Good Lord is a Horns fan…..to that I can only ask: If God isn’t a Carolina fan, why did He make the sky Carolina Blue?
Amen! Religion and sports are inseparable…all that happens on the field is by the grace of God! Here’s to hoping Spoop Jackson addresses this subject in an upcoming column….
September 27th, 2006 at 4:48 pm
Jason Whitlock is sometimes solid commentating on how social issues and sports intertwine. But maaaan, is he (and most everyone else on this blog) wrong about Scoop Jackson. Dude’s words are some of the most poetic and poignant prose you can find anywhere on the ‘net. And the nerve of that one visitor to put his skills on a high school level! If that be the case, he was the damn valedictorian…
September 27th, 2006 at 5:18 pm
Jason Whitlock looks like a Sharpei, only fatter with more rolls in his face than a French Bakery!
September 27th, 2006 at 5:25 pm
Am I the only one that hating seeing Whitlock on TV? While this interview is very telling about the goings on at the Worldwide Leader it still doesn’t make me like Whitlock. It disappointed me everytime I turned on PTI and saw him sitting there. I knew the show would be dull and lame and would lead to me napping for a good 30 minutes. I’m glad the guy is no longer allowed to be on espn. But good work on the interview.
September 27th, 2006 at 5:41 pm
lupica is absolutely terrible and has been a washed up has been for years. i have never understood why anyone thinks lupica is worth anything. there is no need to read his articles on a daily basis at the daily news. lupica, honestly, just seems to have boilerplated articles that he drags out every year depending upon what time of the year it is. for example, if it is time for the u.s. open, every august he will drag out the whole summer of jimmy connors nonsense. the same is true of his articles for the yanks, mets, giants, jets, knicks, and rangers. i have been reading that guy for 30 years and before i even read his articles, i already can tell you word for word what the guy is going to say because it will essentially be the same exact article he wrote the year before about the team or player. he just substitutes the names and players he mentions in his articles. if someone did a study on the archives of his stories, they would see this. the worst is when he does the whole cute litte kiss ass isn’t this jeter kid great or whatever his latest man crush is stories? i am so tired of that guy. Lupica should have been the first one fired from the sport reporters after the great late Dick passed away. I just really can not stand the guy. the funny thing is the little nerd actually was my favorite writer when i was a kid. but i am tired of him writing the same old recycled crap every year. and i honestly could see his absolute contempt for whitlock every time he was on the sports reporters. whitlock and all of the other guys are the only ones who seem to have a honest opinion that comes from the heart, truth, knowledge, and experience. lupica just sits out there in his mansion in connecticut or whatever little rich town he lives in and he has lost absolute touch with the people, teams, sports, he is supposed to be commenting on. he lives his life with a napoleon complex. he is a little man who has always lived his life and conducted his professional life like an angry little nerd. and he always feels threatened by all of the other sports reporters around him because they have actual talent and little mikey the brat has none. well, he used to have talent but all of his little insecurities and his unwillingness to get back in touch withthe games, teams, sports, and players he covers has totally eroded his talent and he is no longer capable of writing stories and columns that have an ounce of truth to it because he simply regurgitates the boilerplated crap he has been spitting at us since he left the national 15 years ago. his little comment on bill simmons on sunday was as transparent a slap at whitlock as anything. telling us that you love bill simmons this sunday only further highlights how out of touch you are, lupica. years after everyone else has caught on to simmons, here is lupica trying to claim credit for finding the kid. maybe, if you had your finger on the pulse there lupica, you would have realized that everyone has been loving the great bill simmons for years already. but, lupica, trying to pretend he is still hip and with it, just further highlighted how out of touch the man has become. the reality was that his kids love simmons and he had no idea who the guy was until whitlock started to speak so reverently about him last week. nice try there, lupica. well, the playoffs start next week. who wants to take bets that lupica will have an article sometime in the next week talking about the mystique, the majesty, and the aura of the great yankees but they have all that payroll. it’s the same article, he has written for the past 12 years. and then he will write some kiss ass article about the mets, talking about how lovable the kids wright and reyes are and how great they have done and how great omar has done and here is willie taking another october turn like all of the other october turns he has been taken for the past 30 years but they are without questions blah blah blah how much greatness and thunder does pedro still have will he give us a blast from the past or will be a shadow of his former self or will he be that guy who was great against the yanks until he reached 100 pitches. blah, blah, blah, get ready it is coming. no need to read his crap. you have already read from him a thousand times.
September 27th, 2006 at 5:41 pm
Bill Simmons on the same level with Hunter S Thompson and Ralph Wiley? That’s a joke, right?
September 27th, 2006 at 5:50 pm
Jason is one of the few reasons people buy the Star anymore….he is one of the last of the real newspaper men….that is, he won’t be corrupted by title and privilege….
KC Ned
September 27th, 2006 at 7:50 pm
Joe Theisman sucks and Suzy Kolber can go die in a fire! Football on ESPN is rediculous and drinks are way too expensive at ESPNZone and the food is mediocre at best. The hamburgers only come well done! What a bunch of crap!
September 27th, 2006 at 10:10 pm
Hey barry bonds
Don’t be talking junk about streetball, because most of the And1 and streetballers can beat NBA superstars.
Bonds is just as guilty as McGwire, Palmerio, Sosa, and Canseco. But everyone is so scared about being called a racist they have to watch their step. If Bonds has nothing to hide why doesn’t his friend speak to the grandjury. He already admitted he took steroids, just unknowningly.
Excuse me, I had to sit through bonds on bonds. That show was just feel sorry for bonds and he is really a good guy. Yeah like I actually believe that.
Basketball sucks because their is no dominant team, no rivilaries, and the some players do not like to interact with the fans. Baskeball players can’t hit free throws or a jump shot because they don’t practice it. They think they can beat any one on one. Most of the NBA players in today’s league play streetball because they want the respect from those fans and ballers. In the off season most of the guys in the NBA go to And1 games or go to Rutger Park to show they can play with the big boys. Most of them learned from streetball.
But it is changing with Lebron, Wade, Dirk and Carmelo. Which is a good thing. They practice over the summer on what they need to improve on.
If you have a problem with streetball go tell the And1 guys and their fans, that they have ruined basketball if you are so bad ass. Or even better yet go to Rutger Park and see what happens there Mr. Barry Bonds.
September 27th, 2006 at 10:53 pm
“Dude’s words are some of the most poetic and poignant prose you can find anywhere on the ‘net. And the nerve of that one visitor to put his skills on a high school level! If that be the case, he was the damn valedictorian”
Spoop Jackson? Is that you? Seriously…..most poetic and poignant prose on the net? Spoop has tunnel vision…and is a marginal talent when it comes to subjecting us to that tunnel vision through the written word. By poignant, I am guessing you mean relevent? Yes, nothing could be more relevent than Spoop Jackson’s take on the US Tennis Open…I wait with bated breath for him to cover the Masters. Should be wonderful to read his column, all ‘whited’ up for golf fans, just like his tennis columns. How can you respect a guy that lives through his supposed ghetto card, and then when he writes about what is an overwhelming white event, leave the card in his wallet? At least be consistant, Spoop. I think I’d possibly have more interest or respect in what Spoop had to say….if it wasn’t the same tripe over and over. All roads lead to racism with Spoop. All problems are the result of racism. Maybe I could stomach his constant slamming the race card on the table…if once in awhile he offered some sort of critical suggestion or solution.
September 28th, 2006 at 12:15 am
The world needs more people like Jason who are not afraid to speak their minds. This country has become so politially correct it’s sickening. Everyone needs to learn to speak up and speak their minds.
September 28th, 2006 at 2:35 am
I’m not your biggest fan, Jason, but I respect what you do. You play the race card way too often, but you’re not a whitey-hatin’, black apologist, nor are you an Uncle Tom. You call it like you see it. ESPN is an absolute joke for firing you. You didn’t even call out the network, even though you very easily could have. All you did was point out the obvious about two of its (possessive, no apostrophe) contracted employees. It wasn’t really necessary, since Scoop needs no help proving that he’s an idiot and Lupica is blatantly a self-aggrandizing @$$hole.
You and Poz make up the best team of columnists in the country. I’ve been saying it at every newspaper I’ve ever worked at.
Still, I have to say that it’s (contraction of it is, apostrophe) idiotic that he was APSE Columnist of the Year in 2003 and 2005. He should have been Columnist of the Year in 2004, too. I imagine it’s (contraction of it is, apostrophe) tough writing in his shadow, but you still do a good job.
I hope “Jason’s Editor,” aka Lupica, was paying attention. Maybe you learned something other than what a worthless writer you are.
September 28th, 2006 at 3:04 am
Will some sports reporter/writer please do their homework on steroids? Cortisone and anabolic steroids are two completely different substances that happen to share a similar chemical structure and thus are both classified as “steroids.” Cortisone is acutally an anti-inflammatory substance injected locally (not IV) to treat tendinitis, arthritis, and other such conditions. You could inject cortisone into your veins until the cows come home and you will not get any bigger, stronger, faster, or recover any faster from injury. In fact, you would get diabetic, fat, and weak if you injected large amounts of cortisone IV for a sustained period of time. Cortisone injected locally is very safe and has few, if any major side effects. Other than helping an athlete with tendinitis or arthritis, cortisone offers no competitive advantage. The bottom line is, ALL STEROIDS ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL. Stop comparing cortisone to nandrelone, stanozol, HGH, and all of the other anabolic steroids.
September 28th, 2006 at 3:28 am
Agreed with everything that kenny d said about Lupica, that was an awesome post. As much as I despise Whitlock (and I do despise him), I ABHOR Mike “Ooh, Watch Me Get Overly Animated” Lupica. I would PHYSICALLY assault Lupica if I ever saw him. I hate that mousy little shit.
Another thing…Whitlock is FAR more articulate than William “I Can’t Form A Coherent Sentence To Save My Damn Life” Rhoten…geez louise, who thought it was a good idea to put THAT illiterate fuck on television?
But yeah….good riddance, Whitless.
September 28th, 2006 at 6:23 am
To the person who wrote:
“Sportscenter is no longer enjoyable and their website is terrible. Charging for worthless opinions on things that can be found free from some guy at a bar.”
I couldn’t agree more. I used to actually tape sportscenter to watch it later. At some point I found myself fastforwarding through more and more of it until it only took about 20 minutes to watch the whole hour. (including fast forward time) Sportscenter used to be about highlights of every game, now it’s a bunch of bullshit opinions and crappy features and even gameshow type segments sandwiched between highlights of Boston and New York sports. Have you noticed how Sportscenter shows two minute highlights of all NY and Boston games followed by interviews from those games followed by “expert” analysis of those games and then shows 20 second highlights of the non-NY non-Boston games? This used to befuddle me until I looked at a map and to my utter surprise discovered that Bristol Connecticut was almost exactly halfway between NY and Boston. Suddenly the new sportscenter made sense — it is now just a tool to promote NY and Boston sports and f–k the rest of the country. Here in the west we don’t even call it “sportscenter” anymore, we call it the “Boston/New York Happy Hour”. I stopped watching sportscenter the day Hank Stram died. They opened with Met highlights, then Yankee highlights and by that time twenty minutes had passed and then they reported Stram had died, and I thought, “You pushed out your precious NY scores before reporting that one of the most influential men of professional football had passed away???” Listen, I’m a BRONCO fan, not a chiefs fan, and I was PISSED. How PO’d do you think the people in KC were over that? Screw the Boston/NY Happy Hour, screw Eastern Propaganda Sports Nazis and screw Disney.
Regarding ESPN The Website, yeah, what a joke. Every columnist but Simmons is now an “Insider”. Yeah, right, I’m going to shell out their monthly fee to read those people. Whoever is paying for that needs to get their heads examined. Don’t get me wrong, Rob Neyer writes some great stuff, but I’m not going to enrich Disney’s coffers to read it.
A personal note to Whitlock — nice job on Lupica. I’ve hated that bastard since the moment he shot his mouth off. What a d-wad he is. Can someone explain why I still watch the Sports Reporters??? Lupica blows chunks. Ryan eats Lupica’s chunks. Albom laps up the leftover chunks. The black guy from the NY Times (what the hell is his name) is pathetic — he stutters and then doesn’t finish 3/4ths of his sentences. Whitlock was okay, but seemed apothetic. Woody Paige was downright embarassing for us in Colorado (by the way, Paige did NOT grow up in Colorado, he worked for the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News for thirty years but was from Tennessee). The token chicks they bring in always seem too eager to impress and too nervous to take seriously. John Saunders is above average (or maybe just seems that way because of who surrounds him) Dan LeBastard is okay, but focuses too much on Miami sports. Gawd, after writing this, I don’t think I’ll ever watch that show again.
September 28th, 2006 at 7:08 am
For those coutin’ votes, add one more to the “I love Jason” camp. I disagree with him occasionally, but he is everything you should want in a columnist. He expresses opinions that spark discussion, regardless of whether or not you agree with him. He plays the race card exactly as often as it should be played in a sports column - when it is germane to sports. On a personal note, I happen to absolutely agree with his position on race, and wish to God that we were all colorblind to prove he was right.
Not all of this means that if he was my neighbor that we would be friends. I happened to share an airplane ride with Jason, and had a reason to speak with him after the flight. He came across to me (Joe Blow) as arrogant, and he did not have time for me. But that does not lessen the respect I have for him as a writer. That is where I disagree with the tone of some of the replies here (esp. Scriv in KC). Rock on J-Dub - I’m glad you are here in KC.
September 28th, 2006 at 8:03 am
On behalf of ND fans everywhere, good riddance to this horrible, racist hack job. Only he would defend Ty Willingham’s incompotence simply cause his brother from another mother was black. Whitless never let some pesky facts get in the way of another inflammatory story. Here’s the facts about ND:
THE TY WILLINGHAM FACT SHEET:
1. Tyrone Willingham has lost 8 games by at least 3 touchdowns. By comparison, Bob Davie lost 4 games by 3 touchdowns and Gerry Faust lost 3 games by 3 touchdowns. That means that in 3 years Tyrone Willingham has lost more games by 3 touchdowns than Bob Davie and Gerry Faust did in their 10 years combined.
2. Notre Dame was shut out by at least 30 points twice in 2003. The last time that happened was 1904.
3. In Tyrone Willingham’s first 3 years, Notre Dame has lost by at least 30 points 5 times. For perspective, in the previous 40 seasons (1961-2000), Notre Dame lost by at least 30 points a total of 4 times. Bob Davie only lost by 30 points 1 time, as did Gerry Faust.
4. The 38-12 loss to 6-6 Syracuse was Notre Dame’s first 3 touchdown loss to an unranked team since 1960.
5. From the 44-13 loss to Southern Cal in 2002 until the 20-17 loss to a 5-6 Brigham Young team, Notre Dame lost 10 games over a 15 game stretch. That was the worst 15 game stretch since 1960.
6. Tyrone Willingham is the first Notre Dame coach since Joe Kuharich (17-23) to have fewer wins by 3 touchdowns (5) than he had losses by 3 touchdowns (8) . Bob Davie had twice as many 3 touchdown wins as losses (8 wins, 4 losses). Gerry Faust had over 4 times as many (14 wins, 3 losses).
7. In 2003, Tyrone Willingham became the first Notre Dame coach to have consecutive 4 TD losses to Southern Cal. In 2004, he had his 3rd in a row.
8. Tyrone Willingham has been a Notre Dame coach for 3 years out of the school’s 117 years (2.6% of the seasons) and has coached in 36 of Notre Dame’s 1,106 games (3.3%), however, he has coached in 23.8% (5 out of 21) of Notre Dame’s losses by at least 30 points.
9. After starting out 8-0, Tyrone Willingham’s record since has been 13-15.
10. When Tyrone Willingham took over, Notre Dame had the #1 all time winning percentage, with a record of 781-247-42 (.749), ahead of Michigan’s 813-265-36 (.746). At the end of the regular season of 2004, Michigan now has the #1 all time winning percentage, with a record of 842-274-36 (.747) while Notre Dame is #2 with a record of 802-261-42 (.745).
Some miscellaneous stats:
Three Notre Dame opponent records have been set in the last 3 years: Most passing yards against Notre Dame (425 yards)- Carson Palmer, USC, 2002
Most receiving yards against Notre Dame (217 yards)- Craphonso Thorpe,
FSU, 2003
Most passing touchdowns against Notre Dame (5)- Tyler Palko, Pitt,
2004, Matt Leinart, USC, 2004
Combined 3-year records:
Joe Kuharich: 10-18 (.357)
Ara Parseghian: 25-3-2 (.867)
Dan Devine: 28-7 (.800)
Gerry Faust: 18-15-1 (.529)
Lou Holtz: 25-10 (.714)
Bob Davie: 21-16 (.568)
Tyrone Willingham: 21-15 (.583)
Year by Year Coaching records for their first 3 years:
Joe Kuharich:
5-5
2-8
5-5
Ara Parseghian:
9-1
7-2-1
9-0-1
Dan Devine:
8-3
9-3
11-1
Gerry Faust:
5-6
6-4-1
7-5
Lou Holtz:
5-6
8-4
12-0
Bob Davie:
7-6
9-3
5-7
Tyrone Willingham:
10-3
5-7
6-5
Coaching Home Records for Their First 3 years:
Joe Kuharich: 7-8 (.467)
Ara Parseghian: 14-1 (.933)
Dan Devine: 12-3 (.800)
Gerry Faust: 9-7 (.563)
Lou Holtz: 15-3 (.833)
Bob Davie: 15-4 (.789)
Tyrone Willingham: 11-7 (.611)
Total Scoring Margins Through Their First Three Years at Notre Dame:
Ara Parseghian +731
Dan Devine +517
Gerry Faust +241
Lou Holtz +438
Bob Davie + 114
Tyrone Willingham +18
In the 117-year history of Notre Dame football, Notre Dame has lost by
more than 30 points 20 times.
Here is a listing of those losses, detailing year, coach, opponent, and
score:
1900 - O’Dea - Wisconsin - 54-0
1904 - Salmon - Wisconsin - 58-0
1904 - Salmon - Purdue 36-0
1905 - McGlew - Purdue - 32-0
1944 - McKeever - Army - 59-0
1945 - Devore - Army - 48-0
1945 - Devore - Great Lakes - 39-7
1951 - Leahy - Michigan State - 35-0
1956 - Brennan - Michigan State - 47-14
1956 - Brennan - Oklahoma - 40-0
1956 - Brennan - Iowa - 48-8
1960 - Kuharich - Purdue - 51-19
1972 - Parseghian - Nebraska - 40-6
1974 - Parseghian - USC - 55-24
1985 - Faust - Miami - 58-7
2000 - Davie - Oregon State - 41-9
2002 - Willingham - USC - 44-13
2003 - Willingham - Michigan - 38-0
2003 - Willingham - USC - 45-14
2003 - Willingham - Florida State 37-0
2004 - Willingham - USC - 41-10
The Five Year Myth
It is a myth that every coach at Notre Dame has an inalienable right to five years to prove himself. That has never been policy. Fifteen coaches in Notre Dame’s storied history have, for various reasons, had tenures of less than five years. That list includes Kuharich, Devore, McKeever and Anderson since Rockne. More recently coaches Davie and Faust were given five years, and those decisions proved to be miserable failures. There was some justification to warrant Faust’s extra time given his high school background and Father Ted’s personal commitment to him, but giving Davie five years was gross negligence. The five-year plan is not policy and even if it were time has proven it to be a colossal failure that should be learned from and not repeated. Ara himself set the standard by boldly stating upon his arrival that if you can’t do it in three years, you can’t do it. And without exception this has proven to be true. In the entire history of Notre Dame, no coach who failed at the three year mark, succeeded in five years. There are some who claim that because of parity, restrictions and other issues, that Notre Dame can’t win anymore, but they said the exact same things before both Ara and Lou arrived in South Bend and were proved wrong. Tedford, Meyer, Carroll, Stoops, Tressel, Amato, Friedgen, Holtz and others have made immediate impacts on their schools, most with far, far less talent than Notre Dame. When the five-year myth is promulgated by media talking heads and writers, it’s important to note that most of those talking heads and scribes are not fans of Notre Dame or speaking in Our Lady’s best interest.
September 28th, 2006 at 11:21 am
whitlock is an jeff-george-pimpng idiot. his espn-columns are nothing but stupid and bring nbothing to the table. remember this whole “hey big sexy, loved last night. beyonce” - stuff? what a stupid man. how he got on page 2, i don’t know. i don’t love scoop jackson, but he is 200 times the writer that whitlock is.
September 28th, 2006 at 12:56 pm
He got fired because he ate everything in the ESPN cafeteria and broke all of the furniture.
September 28th, 2006 at 2:04 pm
Glad to hear Jason bust Lupica. Lupica is insufferable- we have to read him several times a week here in the City. He’s a barely-closeted racist, who enjoys nothing more than demagoging a player of color and ignoring or excusing similar transgressions by white icons. His hating on Barry Bonds is insufferable (sorry to re-use the word).
September 28th, 2006 at 2:38 pm
Jason is an idiot. He says idiotic things for the sake of being outrageous. His positions aren’t even arguable, they’re just completely rediculous. Never understood why ESPN had him in the first place. Hopefully, now that he’s off .com he’ll be off the network. You can have him Kansas City.
September 28th, 2006 at 3:13 pm
i dont generally agree with most of whitlock’s views (especially about him dogging VY), but he was dead on about Lupica and Scoop….and Ty vs Charlie at Notre Dame….that’s right, ND is overrated just like Weis…..bunch of poseurs….
September 28th, 2006 at 3:42 pm
Excellent interview. I agree that Scoop Jackson is a sorry excuse for a writer. I also agree with a lot of Whitlock’s views about race but putting 50 cent and the rest of the “rap idiots” in the same sentence as the KKK is ignorant as well. How rapper idiots are portrayed on videos, cd covers, and movies is not all up to them there is a thing called consumer demand and wether it be a black, white, or yellow person there is a demand for seeing girls in barely any clothes, fast cars, and money flying in the air in slow mo. While it can be argued that this “rap idiot” sold out one has to look beyond the small screen and a rapper’s image to judge his/her morals. So even though flava flav sold out in taking part in bogus reality shows its whats he doing outside of that, that really matters. Just because the black eyed peas sing “where is the love” and show a bunch of happy diverse faces does not make them any better than 50 cent(by the way im not fan). It just seems like when it comes to thuggish rapper idiots people take them for what they are on tv too much. In short, theres no need to blame 50 cent for black on black crime.
September 28th, 2006 at 5:18 pm
Carlos, is that true even with 50 cent is a participant in black-on-black crime?
September 28th, 2006 at 5:36 pm
“I guess I’ll go Bill Cosby on you, but it’s about time we as black people quit letting Flavor Flav and the rest of these clowns bojangle for dollars.” That one quote alone suddenly gave me a new found respect for that man. Yes, a lot of the things he says are nonsensical, arrogant, and outrageous…Yet George W. Bush does the same thing and seeming a fair amount of this country actually takes what that idiot says seriously. He came on WDFN in Detroit yesterday and didn’t back off what he said. That’s an example a lot of these politically correct, back-peddling pansies in this country need to start following. Rock On Whitlock
September 28th, 2006 at 6:44 pm
Ken,
Did you even read those facts concerning ND? I don’t see how any reasonable person can read that, and still come away thinking that ND was unjustified in firing Ty Willingham. Under Ty, ND was taking a step back, where recruiting was getting worse and the players we did have simply weren’t improving. Look at the difference between Brady Quinn under Ty vs. Charlie Weis. Part of the problem with Ty is that he was way over his head, and he played too much golf to escape those problems.
September 28th, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Aztec, the fact that Bonds is just as guilty as “fill in the blank” is exactly the point. There are many who’ve used performance enhancing drugs (which is obviously wrong) but Bonds has been treated as if he invented steroids and is the only one ever to have benefitted from their use. If anyone else in the entire sports world has used steroids you wouldn’t know it from ESPN’s treatment of the issue. I defy you or anyone else to find as many articles cumulatively on every other steroid user in sports as they can find on Bonds. Bonds has been singled out, when in fact he should be lumped in with the masses of those who’ve abused steroids or HGH or whatever else is out there these days…..and since this is supposed to be about Whitlock…Keep up the good work JW, agree or disagree I find all I’ve read from you very thought provoking.
Chris
September 29th, 2006 at 3:48 am
I have always felt that Whitlock was an old fashion “tom” in modern day threads…….confusing the ability to publically criticize Black People, with being real and honest. I am not saying that I always disagree with Mr. Whitlock, but he reminds me of the Black cop that is harder on Black suspects than his white counter parts…….just to show that he is impartial. That is a role that many “new-age” Negroes feel forced to play. By “new-age” I mean the educated Negro who feels repulsed by the less fortunate, less motivate, or less situated Black Person; than he feels compelled to protect and help them. The Talented 10th were supposed to uplift, not look down upon. All and all, I wish Mr. Whitlock well.
September 29th, 2006 at 6:34 am
Curtis said it all.
September 29th, 2006 at 8:29 am
Thats it?!? Jason got canned for these opinions? Seemed rather tame to me.
September 29th, 2006 at 1:31 pm
Look, I am an educated (highly) blk woman. My husband interested me in watching the Sports Reporters about 10 years ago. I LOVED Dick Shapp. When he passed, the show lost a lot of its luster, however I watched it every sunday morning. THEN, when thin-limbed, whiny Mike Lupica began making more appearances, I started watching only occassionally. As he appeared on the show more consistently, I stopped watching altogether. The only time I would watch is if I saw Whitlock on the show. Jason has always stuck me as a little bit arrogant (so what) but very, very smart. His views on race were dead-on. It wasn’t race baiting (you can go read Scoop for that). Jason observed and reported on different events, and disparate treatment on blk athletes as opposed to some wht ones. I listed to Jason on the John Thompson show last night. He was clear, concise, and articulate - as always. He’s right. We as blk folk need to stop allowing this “i’m so ghetto” representation of our culture. Scoop does not, and never will, be able to speak to me. He is truly BOJANGLES. He shucks and jives his way through his columns (and I use the word loosely). He’s a moron. I would also add Stuart Scott to that list. He’s been Boo-YAHin’ his was through the network for years. And, for that reason, that;s what many people thinks represents our culture, esp. w/r/t sports. My husband is a RABID sports fan. But he isn’t doing the “cabbage patch” dance in the media room every time someone gets a touch down. GET REAL. Thank you Jason for having the B*lls to speak your mind. I APPLAUD and RESPECT (always have) you. I also miss Ralph Wiley. Although I am a “girly girl” as my husband says, I love basketball, and football. I USED to love ESPN. It is now unwatchable. I will now login to AOL to see what JAson is saying. I hate ESPN (except for PTI- Loves Wilbon). I wish you the best Jason. Signed TCK!
September 29th, 2006 at 1:37 pm
I’ve always thought Mike Lupica was a pretentious, yappy little poodle who seizes on every opportunity to stop talking about sports and play amateur sociologist. Exhibit A: His relentless criticism of Andre Agassi. For years he wrote an annual column for Esquire, “The Andre Awards”, given to the biggest jerks in sports (the primary litmus being their willingness to talk to sports writers like Lupica). He finally gave it up when Agassi’s charitible works could no longer be ignored, culminating in his endowment of a school for underpriviliged kids to the tune of millions of dollars. Now he likes Agassi, and his story is that “Andre has grown up.” Wrong. Agassi’s the same guy he’s always been. You’ve just been wrong about him for twenty years. On Agassi, like a lot of things, that little bitch is too busy screaming at the top of his lungs to formulate a sound opinion. There are people in this world who could gain a lot of spiritual growth from a serious ass-beating. Lupica’s one of them and, fortunately, about 98% of the world’s population could do the job with ease.
September 29th, 2006 at 3:14 pm
Jason has been the most consistently good columnist for the last year. I am sad to see him leave Espn.com. Scoop Jackson makes me so frustrated when I read his ignorant columns. Besides Bill Simmons, espn.com is terrible.
September 29th, 2006 at 3:35 pm
AS A LONG TIME SPORTS REPORTERS FAN, MY FAVORITE PANELISTS WERE JASON, ALBUM, AND LUPICA SO I GUESS I’M SCREWED ANYWAY I LOOK AT IT. TOO BAD, DIFFERENT VIEWS MADE THE SHOW INTERESTING. I HAVE LIKED JASON FOR HIS VIEWS, HE ALWAYS SEEMS TO TELL IT LIKE HE SEES IT, DOESN’T SEEM TO WORRY ABOUT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, RACE, ECT. IT MAKES HIM REFRESHING. WHEN JASON APPLAUDED OR PANNED SOMEONE (WHITE,BLACK WHATEVER!) HE HAD CREDABILITY BECAUSE HE DOESN’T SEEM TO PLAY FAVORITES. IF THAT STRIKES SOME AS PLAYING THE” RACE CARD “OR BEING A “TOM” I WOULD DIFFER, JASON SIMPLY IS TRYING TO DO WHAT ALL WRITERS SHOULD STRIVE FOR….BEING FAIR. MITCH ALBUM’S PIECE ABOUT JEROME BETTIS PARENTS WAS ONE OF THE BEST PARTING SHOTS EVER. LUPICA HAS HAD MANY GOOD PIECES, NO ONE WINS IN THIS. GOOD LUCK JASON STAY FAIR!
September 29th, 2006 at 4:40 pm
Scoop Jackson can SUCK MY DICK!
September 29th, 2006 at 4:56 pm
Arthur Allen- I’ve never read such a perfectly worded paragraph. Lupica is an ass and should have been fired years ago. I always looked forward to two things on Sunday Mornings: The Hartford Courant Sunday Edition and the Sports Reporters. That piece of garbage Lupica has ruined the second one (Why hasn’t ESPN fired him? do people out there actually like this rodent?). Keep doing your thing Whitlock, someday Lupica will get what he’s deserved; a pink slip and a kick in the ass.
September 29th, 2006 at 5:30 pm
A quick question… I came into this with a very anti-Whitlock slant, and I still maintain that, but I just have a quick question, pointed mainly at consistent readers of J-Dubs Star column…
Does anyone recall Jason doing anything on Buck O’Neil? I was just thinking about relating to the fact that Buck is in the hospital and taking a turn for the worse, and I don’t seem to recall Jason having much to say. It seems a little weird to me that, given Jason’s apparent status as such a high-profile national ‘black’ writer that he wouldn’t have more to say about Buck. Say what you will about Posnanski, but he has been tireless in his efforts to tell the world about Buck.
I am trying to ask this question from an unbiased position. I could be totally wrong, he may have done a lot (at least in the past).
September 29th, 2006 at 8:40 pm
Jason is entertaining. If he developed a show for ESPN, I would watch.
That show Around the Horn is a clown fest. Mike Lupica is self serving as all New Yorkers know. Jason is the only reason I watch the Sports Reporters. Here is to free speech.
September 29th, 2006 at 10:04 pm
I think W hitlock is great. He made watching PTI interesting and if he did have his own show I too would watch for sure!
September 30th, 2006 at 1:47 am
I still miss the Neighborhood from 6-9 AM on WHB. Jason and Steven St. John were a great team. Entertaining and imformative. I am so sick of the “New Don Fortune” (Keitzman) that I want to vomit everytime I hear him. That Willie the Wildcat humbing asshole.
Jason, Keep up the good work, and good luck with this new opportunity.
October 1st, 2006 at 4:26 am
Concur with Whitlock on Scoop Jackson, that fool is a god damn clown.
October 1st, 2006 at 8:11 am
Jason,
In your mention of the writers you like to read, how come Posnanski wasn’t mentioned? Is there a rift there or do you just not enjoy his work?
Also, I know it’s not a big deal, but why not put the interviewer in his place with the Kansas City being in the sticks comment? It’s amazing the perception people have of this city. We have two major league teams and are probably going to get a third. Kansas City is thriving and he makes it sound like we have tumbleweed rolling through our streets.
You’re not my favorite writer, but I love your honesty. Good luck at AOL.
October 1st, 2006 at 3:19 pm
I don’t always agree with JDUB but I defend his right to say it.I am writing this after hearing this a.m. that Roger clemens was named in the “steroid” hunt. My heart is going 100 miles an hour with this news . Will Mike”Stuart Little” Lupica go after him with the same vitriol and tenacity that he had for Bonds???? DDon’t answer it was a rhetorical question. Im laughing hard at the sactimony to come about being “fair to” Clemens. Whit was right about Lupica/Little .Should he be fired for his opinion? NO. There is a lot of this going around in this present day America . Hmmmm where else are people being ridiculed for dissenting views ? Right ! If you disagree with us you’re giving comfort to the”terrorists”. SOUND FAMILAR ? Good thing Whit didn’t talk about Rumsfeld. And Scoop J. can stop posturing anyday now. My goodness Scoop we now you are black already, we get it. Now write a lucid article on occasion. JDUB keep on going.
October 1st, 2006 at 3:35 pm
Sorry that Jason is leaving Sports Reporters, If he wasn’t on I didn’t watch. He was the only guy to recognize College teams west of the Mississippi. ESPN will truly be the Eastern SPorts Network.
October 2nd, 2006 at 3:45 pm
I think many people miss the boat on Scoop Jackson. He is writing in a voice that is comfortable for his audience. Should he raise he bar and aspire to elevate the vocabualry of his readers? Maybe. Be mindful of the fact that we are talking about Page 2 of ESPN.com, not Newsweek. Scoop is not writing to or for the 35 year old MS in Sociology. He is writing for the 20 undergrad Soc major. Why not try to capture their minds and hearts where they live. Maybe I have been working in higher ed too long, but I have no problem with Scoop. I wouldn’t mind if he toned it down a bit, but I don’t fall into the demographic that he is paid to reach. I don’t expect that from Scoop, just as I wouldn’t expect George Will to write a column for Slam Magazine. Wrong speaker, wrong voice…for the wrong crowd. MY 20 year old Soc major probably won’t read much George Will in the next few years, but maybe Scoop will keep him reading until he is ready. Ralph Wiley used a certain style to keep the focus of his core audience. I remember what so called “mainstream” writers used to say about him once upon a time.
October 2nd, 2006 at 5:41 pm
Well this is clearly a lot of chatter about a topic that either is VERY personal for people or many people have a LOT of time on their hands to argue about this. I do not watch a lot of TV but I have watched the “Sports Reporters” from the first season. I thought Dick Schaap was always an excellent moderator and he drove the show so that panelists could always get their views aired. It really was like a “Meet the Press” for sports reporters. Now for anyone who has seen “Meet the Press”, there are CERTAINLY views and people one does not agree with while watching that show and that’s OK. John Saunders has also done a formidable job as the replacement for Schaap and letting everyone get their views aired. What I believe has happened here is that almost EVERYONE in this generation of reporters on TV, feels compelled to make some earth shattering statement every time they are on the air. Why? Maybe it makes them look smart and they continue to see themselves as “famous” TV people. Maybe they WANT to be part of the story and feel like this will help them in life. There is no doubt now that there’s going to be some sort of link to Barry Bonds and Jason Whitlock and ESPN and the Sports Reporters (and I can go on) after this incident. I think the real point is these people on these shows (and writers in newspapers!) ALL make mistakes. If they make too many mistakes they will be off the air or not writing. Why is that? Because I believe in the free market. Lupica, Albom, Whitlock, Rhoden, etc. seem to be showing up a lot on this message board and if you don’t like what they are saying DONT WATCH or BUY their papers or read the stuff on their websites. Does Lupica come off as a cry baby who never played sports on his own? Yep sometimes. If you dont like that, turn off the show. Don’t read his stuff. Albom comitted the sin of all sins in reporting. He’s still nicely employed. Why? You guys read and watch him AND buy his books! As for Whitlock, I thought he was pretty good. I didnt read his stuff but I saw him on the show and it appeared that he had some pretty good facts behind his views on TV. It is kind of ironic that this whole ESPN thing started with his opinions about Barry Bonds not being the villain of this whole steroid issue and VOILA Jason Grimsley just took Barry off the backpage for a bit. But again, the proof is in the pudding. If you dont like Jason’s stuff dont follow him to AOL or wherever. I can promise you all the reporters that have been mentioned in these messages are reading ALL of them. And so are their TV and newspaper bosses. But if you really feel strongly about someone one way or the other you can do something about it. Right now what everyone should do though is go back to watching the games. Last I checked Lupica, Albom, Whitlock, etc. don’t play in them and I’ll go watch the reporters or read them after the games if I have time or they MAKE it so I must read or watch them. Its as simple as that.
October 2nd, 2006 at 6:44 pm
All you Jason Whitlock haters in KC -
We’ll trade you Bob Kravitz at the Indy Star and a writer to be named later.
October 2nd, 2006 at 9:13 pm
Thanks for all of the advice, Rich. Jeez, good thing you don’t have too much time on YOUR hands.
October 2nd, 2006 at 9:38 pm
Kevin Whitlock thinks he knows more than he does. I’m glad he’s off of ESPN, I couldn’t stand him.
October 2nd, 2006 at 11:36 pm
i can neither say i like or dislike fatlock. i read him almost every time he writes about the chiefs but couldn’t care less when he talks hoops or plays the psychologist patient role. his spontaneous shift from pro-nhl-team-for-the-sprint-center to that of the nba variety damaged what little respect for his opinions i had managed to salvage. most of that respect was restored upon reading the “welcome to real talk” column and the interview. talking about race in our society today could very well be the most important issue we have. jason makes a number of highly-intelligible points about what certain members of the black community are portraying to the rest of the world. and it needs to stop.
so, while i commend him for voicing these notions, i do nothing but look to the right of my screen and discover that he has posted john “horse-faced colts draft” elway as one of the greatest athletes to ever play the game. what a joke. are you kidding me? if ever a clown suit was put on, he put one on himself when posting that information. i don’t care if he carried a franchise on his shoulders for 15 years. hell, he could carry the denver capitol building on his back and it wouldn’t change the fact that he refused to play for the team that drafted him (insert whiny baby sounds) and essentially had dan reeves driven out of his job and the town.
but he’s got a much more prosperous life now drinking beer and leaving his family while selling cars and steak dinners on the side.
back to the race issue, though. it’s okay to go bill cosby. it’s okay to go lloyd bentsen. as long as your ultimate goal is to diminish the image that a large number of black icons are producing for the world, you can go whoever you want.
one thing’s for certain, though. jason will keep writing. most of us will keep reading and ban him for a couple of days when he talks about burnt ends and marathons and jeff george and his seat at staples center and the racist community in jacksonville. but we’ll be back. and we should be if he really thinks he can advocate something positive with this new civil rights agenda.
October 3rd, 2006 at 3:04 am
Who was that moron spouting off about ’streetball?’ Aztec? If those morons are sooooo good, why are they making tens of thousands when their NBA counterparts are making tens of millions?
Streetball is a joke. Anyone that height and size can make ridiculous dunks when everyone on the court is standing around and watching. Those guys could NEVER hang in a NBA game.
Streetball is just another form of bojangling that JW talks about.
October 3rd, 2006 at 3:12 am
Whit…this AOL thing is tight!!! Makes me recall all of the controversy you used to cause while we were at Ball State. That’s what I love about you man…you make me think more broadly than perhaps I normally would on my own.
Your “haters” are off the chain!!! If they hate you so much, why do they spend so much time reading, editing, and commenting on your stuff? Must be that love-hate thing. Jjust keep a large supply of clown suits in your closet so you can keep throwing them on people. It’s real funny to see when you do it!!!
Out!
October 3rd, 2006 at 4:54 am
I liked the interview…i disagree with Whit on some stuff, but I enjoyed the Ten Truths on Page 2. Honestly I liked Scoop Jackson in SLAM magazine but not so much on ESPN, don’t know why but he seemed like a token ghetto opinion columnist whether that was because that what he was or how he was potrayed…all and all it didnt work. But I have to give it to Whit just because I appreciate people that speak their mind even if they are wrong. And yeah SPORTS IS ENTERTAINMENT its NOT LIFE for the other 5+ billion folks that have regular jobs so yeah i agree with Whit on that…and lastly WHIT you should start a FREE BARRY BONDS CAMPAIGN…if he took steroids…he wasnt the first nor the last to try it…and its a shame that MLB and the media has hung him out to dry like that….and we wonder why he doesn’t like to talk to the press.
October 3rd, 2006 at 12:30 pm
I’m glad they cut its ties with his fat as*. I always knew he was trying to be controversial just to get noticed – but he took it too far. Yes he had some valid points on some issues but I think he spent too much time purposely criticizing other black people in general – I always thought it was a hint of jealously. How did he figure he could trash his own ESPN colleagues and not be fired – is he stupid? He talks about the Flav show or Streetball bojangling for dollars - let them make their money, it not taking the KFC out of your pockets. But I guess he feels he’s not shuckin’ and jivin’ for dollars his off the wall comments and white as* kissing. Then he has the nerve to talk about Freedom of speech – well Scoop, Lupica and everyone else has the same rights as well, so dont vent your frustrations since you may disagree with their opinions. Funny thing is he acts like AOL, Yahoo sports, or CBS Sportline is a good move. Brotherman you are really in denial.
October 3rd, 2006 at 1:44 pm
It’s unfortunate that ESPN can’t see the irony in firing a guy for his honesty. As usual, Jason’s observations are right on the money. His ability to show a love for sports while keeping it in the proper perspective is rare in sports media these days.
October 3rd, 2006 at 4:14 pm
I have enjoyed Mr. Whitlock’s columns on ESPN and his work on the Sports Reporters for years and was saddened to see him depart there. I don’t know what some of you are smoking, but Mr. Whitlock has been equally as critical of black athletes as he has of the white establishment for failing to level the playing field. I think he’s about as balanced as any white writer out there, and I’m a white guy. Mike Lupica is a whiny little sniveling New Yorker who reminds me of a yappy chihuahua. I can’t really comment on the feud with Scoop Jackson, because I never read anything that Ralph Wiley wannabe wrote.
With any luck, the same thing will happen with Mr. Whitlock as happened with Gregg Easterbrook, who criticized Michael Eisner and Disney for its violent movies and was exiled for a year before returing with TMQ. Mr. Whitlock is very observant and excellent writer. I’ll miss his columns at ESPN.com and his appearances at the Sports Reporters.
October 3rd, 2006 at 4:52 pm
JW, if it weren’t for you, Simmons and The Daily Quicke (goota love that name), I wouldn’t even go o ESPN.com - Great job on the PTI stints when you were there - good luck to you in the future! *F* ESPN! for dumping you too - if you tow the comapny line, you get ousted - Lupica is a punk and a disgrace to New York -yeah, I might be from Buffalo, but that bitch would get the snot slapped out of him in any bar I hang at spouting off like he does about everything - he sounds like someone stole his lunch money every time he talks! Scoop Jackson, please! call him 2-Scoops - doesn’t the name “Scoop” mean that you would have something inciteful or ground breaking to report on? oh yeah, he did, on his tennis column about the US Open - Pa-lease!
out
October 3rd, 2006 at 7:10 pm
I wrote this almost a year ago, and I beleive it still represents what Whitlock stands for:
It’s guys like Jason Whitlock that are ruining sports as we know it. Not just him in particular, but what he now stands for; whinny, unintelligent, biased journalists (and yes, I do use journalists in the loosest sense of the word). I just so happened to have a discussion with a co-worker about media types such as Whitlock, Mariotti, Bayless, among others, the day that Whitlock published his mind-numbing piece of tripe that revolved around racism and the contract extension of Charlie Weis.
The discussion revolved around the fact that these media types have become so numerous that they all feel they must one-up each other and come up with the most in-your-face, hard-hitting, extreme and usually idiotic article regarding the days most current issue. They don’t truly care about the issue, they only care if it stirs up controversy in an effort to gain ratings. Also, you may have noticed that I used the phrase media types as opposed to journalists. This is because with their frequent appearances on Cold Pizza, Around the Horn, and PTI they are have become more than just journalists, they are part writer, part talk show host, and part comedian. However, the only funny thing they usually produce is an unrealistic article that they believe is worthy of publishing.
My opinion, after hearing and reading what these people have to say, is that all these media types care about is stirring up emotions from a group of fans in order to acheive higher ratings or circulation. Do you think Jason Whitlock truly cares about ND football? Doubtful. However, you can rest assured that he knew if he wrote an article that either highly praised or sternly reprimanded Notre Dame people would respond. You could tell by his terse responses to countless replies about his article that he didn’t take the time to even formulate a response. He wrote something that he knew would incite controversy in order to get a few more clicks on his column, well done Jason, you succeeded. Maybe now you can write an article and actually back it up with facts and statistics and not just your own personal opinion.
October 3rd, 2006 at 8:27 pm
when i first started reading you on page 2 i was like ” this dude is gonna get fired!!!” u were too truthful and that shit will get your ass canned.
u were like 2pac. a field negro
scoop was like freash prince. pure-d-house coon
October 3rd, 2006 at 9:01 pm
I’m half a mile behind on this Whitlock drill, but after perusing positive and negative conversations; I felt that I had to add the proverbial “2 cents.” I apologize in advance for my lack of brevity, I’m not a writer, nor an experienced blogger….
Ironically, it is my opinion that the same people that love the new FlavaFlav - love the same Jason Whitlock; ignorant blacks and whites. (Ignorant whites that would love nothing more than to turn down their Ludacris album long enough to catch Whitlock on Rome is burning, but not enough to change the channel if Springer reruns are on - and ignorant blacks that actually think this man has any interest in furthering any cause - and it sure isn’t your cause - remember self promotion….)
Whitlock is a pompous self-promoter that is willing to play the minority (notice I didn’t say race) card at a seconds notice to get attention. Ignorance is drawn to self-promotion; and obviously so is attention. Jason has spent over a decade, patting his own back and spewing dribble that the world outside of Kansas City has taken notice. Unfortunately, they never noticed that he’s hated in KC or his preschool writing, but rather his ability to self-promote and get attention kicking against the pricks. Who doesn’t hate him in KC, that he still has a job? Seems like an easy enough answer, but for the “obvious-impared” - it’s his newspaper.
He sells (or rather used to) sell newspapers. I’ve spoken to countless amounts of employees from the Star in the last 10 years, etc. and many have worked with him side-by-side at times (including his previous stint in his 1st radio job here in KC) Of those previous co-workers I haven’t found one that would piss on him if his genitals were on fire.
He also jumped ship to another (awful station) with the only less talented sports name in town; Bill Maas. If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know…..
Well my biggest beef is what I believe should have gotten him fired and simply is akin to plagiarism (steroids of the journalist):
In 1997, the university in which i attended medical school, UMKC, hired former long-time Missouri assistant Bob Sundvold as their head basketball coach. Bob had taken the blame for a “money for plane tickets - for players - to family funeral etc.” infraction at Mizzou and eventually wound up at our relatively obscure D-1 school. His hire wasn’t an attention grabber, and of course Whitlock failed to note it, as is his MO, when everyone else in KC isn’t also talking about it.
I had played college football at BYU in the early 90s for my undergrad, and had a real desire to enjoy college sports at the D-1 level again - so myself and about 5-6 other guys met with Coach Sundvold and started a group called the Kilts (aka Kangaroos In Lots o Trouble- and yes we wore kilts to the game). Bob set up a connection he had with a local pub “Harpos on Westport” and anyone with us could drink for free before the games - ironically the same pub company, that was a regular hang-out in Columbia for the more infamous and successful “Antlers.”
For 5+ years the Kilts had little else to do than raise hell at Municipal Stadium, considering we rarely fielded a .500 team….but usually 40 or so Kilts would religiously schedule all studying, etc. around Kilt/UMKC basketball events. Not that it pertains to my point, but we were relatively infamous at a point and had a 4 page color article in the KC Star sunday section about the crew, filmed a promotional commercial for the team the next year, and were regularly discussed during televised and radio broadcasts of the team. (We weren’t behaving to put it mildly)….
During that time, Bob had some success from game to game, but he relied heavily on questionable, talented but troubled, JUCO players that failed to deliver on-court on a regular basis and never could compete vs. the Valparaiso’s etc. of our conference; and was fired after a few years. Other than his love for student involvement at the games; which we’ll never be able to thank him enough for; he also had a few solid high school recruits from KC that ended up sticking around; which never seemed to happen here prior to that. (I know, because I went with the coaches on several on those recruiting trips to watch them play and we hosted their parties when the players came to campus). During Sundvolds tenure at UMKC, neither the positives nor negatives were ever written about by Whitlock. (Why not? 1. He got more attention ripping the Chiefs, KU, MU, and of course mentioning that Jeff George was his friend anytime he got the opportunity - I’m sure if you inspect closely, JG has permanent JW lipstick on his ass).
As it goes, Sundvold got fired. His teams had moderate success at best and several players got in some pretty serious academic and rl trouble.
Must have been a long night of drinking or slumming with ugly white chicks after chilling at some trashy strip club (as JW is known to do) that he decides to write that Bob Sundvold got hosed and that UMKC has screwed up in mammoth proportions; in fact JW had the nerve to write about this more than once…..
Why were we so pissed off? In 5 years that we did the “KILT thing”, the only time that Jason Whitlock ever stuck his bloated behind in Municipal to watch basketball involving our only hometown D-1 basketball team, was because Auburn and Creighton were playing in a holiday tournament- - in fact JW wasn’t even there for the UMKC game….. Our small campus of active sports fans were outraged. Although we loved Coach Sundvold as a person, we saw the writing on the wall…Why?…Because we went to the games and hung out with the players and the coaches…..Whitlock wakes up one day and gets on the bandwagon because he apparently ran out of banter for Carl Peterson (also on the KC “fraud of a human being” list) and pisses off a legion of loyal UMKC fans (who should I remind you, sadly don’t matter anyway because there are more hockey fans in KC than UMKC supporters)
Well several of us called his radio show for the most part simply cut us off and went to the next call as if the UMKC issue wasn’t worthy of radio time (although ironically worthy of 2 days of print); he took my call…..I stated the same thing I said above, adding his bloated black behind would have been impossible to miss in 5 years and where does he get off writing about UMKC hoops if he had never (NEVER) even attended a game. I happened to mention we were with the Kilts and that I was in medical school during this conversation and this is his reply….
“Just because I never went to a game doesn’t mean I didn’t follow them on TV or the radio….Oh and you’re going to be a doctor? I hope you never have any black patients……”
One thing has nothing to do with the other….I gave him a chance a couple years later in person in front of hundreds in line for the KC Jim Rome tour….Not expecting anyone to call him out while he rolled throug the crown with his posse, he #1 said “I never said that” and when about 30 other guys in line said that they heard it, he #2 responded “then I still hope you never have any black patients” and rolled off. (no more chuckling and high fives on his way inside)
JW is a fraud of a human being and writer; he flourished in KC as the “bad cop” for a while because #1 He doesn’t care about KC or KC sports at the end of the day and #2 He regularly sells out others around him for that valuable self promotion.
It makes you wonder what the truth about Lupica and ESPN really is. And how many times has Whitlock pulled a Scoop Jackson and simply couldn’t stand to share Page 2 with another no talent, self promoting whore?
All things considered, I love all my patients equally, black, white, etc. but God forbid JW ever ends up as my patient……I’ve got a prostate exam and a pine tar bat with his name on it….
October 3rd, 2006 at 11:07 pm
I am not really sure why Scoop and Whitlock are even in the same sentence with Simmons..other than the obvious ESPN.com relation. Scoop and Whitlock are sportswriters who seem to have started writing social commentaries that include sports references rather than actual columns about sports. Simmons seems to keep it to sports with a little pop culture and humor mixed in - when he calls people out it mostly seems to be as a result of performance on the field of play or in management of a sports team….big difference..I will have to agree that Scoop is utterly ridiculous but was maybe in the right place at Slam which I find to be a pretty ridiculous magazine - on ESPN that column is quite comical … I think it’s hard to fault someone like JW who has put themselves in a position to write about and talk about what they want to….and even harder to fault someone that actually takes advantage of that position … the real question for me is while it may result in an interesting read every once in a while…why is anyone actually looking to sports writers for social commentary .. whether or not it is about steroids, drugs or race … or anything other than sports…do you read movie reviews to find out what the reviewer thinks of the stars color or drug use???..yikes….
October 4th, 2006 at 4:42 am
I think its refreshing to see a Ball State grad with the mental capacity to hold opinions like Mr. Whitlocks, and it’s reassuring to know I’m not the only person in the world who thinks Scoop Jackson is a huge tool.
October 4th, 2006 at 12:22 pm
yo, stop the bullshyt…Whitlock talks about Race when it comes into play. Hell, what is a race card anyway? It’s a way for whites to discredit anyone who brings up race in a situation. Like OJ, how was that the race card that Johnny played? He found an angle that the lead detective was a racist…I guess that didn’t play anything into it?
In fact I’ve spoken with LAPD and many of them off the record will tell you that they don’t actually feel that OJ did it. And yes, these were white guys. Just telling you like it is. Whitlock was right, a message board is funny because you can be whoever you wanna be. Many of you spewing the venon wouldn’t bust a grape if you saw Whitlock in person.
You are the same softies that get their wives banged by the gardener and pool boy while you are at work. People lack Nuts. And I’m not talking planters. Anyone who talks crap on a message board is sad.
October 4th, 2006 at 3:02 pm
Talented Tenth Member is an idiot of immense proportions. Whitlock is a fat out of shape slob and doesn’t have the stones to talk back to anyone that gives him shit in kansas city. He’s a laughing stock here and considering your stupid last post - the last thing you need to be doing is chastising people for talking smack online.
The O.J. situation has nothing to do with Whitlock - and anyone, white or black that thinks O.J. is innocent, or Whitlock is a provacative writer is a colossal moron. In fact, other than his idiotic blogs and KC star rants, what the hell has JW ever written?
He tries to believe he belonged in the realms of Ralph Wiley and Hunter Thompson (both legendary published writers) when he can’t even hold the jock of a hack of an author like Bill Simmons (a played out slacker himself).
JW belongs right along side the craphole journalists like Scoop Jackson , that he likely despises because Scoop is his non-diabetic non-fatass mirror image….
Whitlock now has a crappy article on the KC star and a AOL blog that no one will read in a month……Mark my words, in a year he’ll either #1 be without work after he bridges the rest of the few bridges he has left in KC or #2 He’ll see the writing on the wall and leave for another town that will put up with his crap - either way - no one loves the guy, not his friends, not his readers, not his editor, and not his trashy meth-head white girlfriends he tries to pass off as classy. The guy is an untalented pathetic fat man with no friends, no talent and no reason for anyone on God’s green earth to care, except for the fact that his writing is an atrocity and belongs in a small town municipal paper
October 4th, 2006 at 5:06 pm
Whitlock was dead on with Mike Lupica - I witnessed that incident and it was priceless. Whenever challenged, Lupica, like Dan Patrick and Skip Bayless, get that one-octave rise in their voices when they commence to puling. So to see the fumes spewing from Lupica’s ears and hear that rise in his voice was beautiful television.
How can Whiltock be okay with Mitch Albom is beyond me. Albom is the same character who lied about attending an NCAA Tournament game, wrote an editorial as if he was there - and got away with it???
As far as Bonds and Whitlock are concerned, Whitlock has done as much Bonds-bashing as anyone. If Whiltock was really being a stand-up reporter, he’d consistently point out the deferential treatment Roger Clemens receives, rather than slight Bonds when the show fits him (as he gas on PTI) and then selectively defend Bonds when the spirit - or competing opinion as with Lupica - moves him.
But.
Civil rights and Jason Whitlock - sure. Any athlete knows that you don’t air dirty laundry in public, particularly when the public consists largely of white people who just love seeing Black people fight with each other.
So, fuck Jason Whitlock. In the end, he’s as much a Step an’ Fetchit character as any other Black face in blackface on Disney, I mean, ESPN.
October 4th, 2006 at 6:21 pm
Jason is a Moron,
LOL, take a deep breath man. LOL, go get laid or something…or is she banging the gardener again and made you get on the computer? LOL, you sir are quite sad. Another Internet Tough guy, Pathetic…You can’t even get a Meth head white girl.
You have ZERO CLASS.
October 4th, 2006 at 6:41 pm
Hey CraigO, I’m a white guy who has a JD, and MA and an AB. I speak a foreign language, don’t own an Ludacris album and don’t watch Rome is Burning or Jerry Springer. Just because I disagree with your point of view doesn’t mean you have to resort to ad hominem argument. I disagree with you. So what?
I think Jason Whitlock is very observant and a very fine writer. Is he Red Smith, Jim Murray or Shirley Povich? Who knows? Who cares? I think that he’s pretty balanced and fair. If he sees an injustice that goes against blacks, he notes it. If he sees one against whites, he notes it. He calls them like he sees them.
Lupica is a yappy chihuahua. I can’t stand him. The days he’s not on Sports Reporters are when the shows are at their best. I applaud Mr. Whitlock for calling him out.
You’re entitled to your opinion as much as I’m entitled to mine. That’s what makes this country great.
October 5th, 2006 at 6:40 pm
Jason:
I’m a big fan of your writing. I hate that you are not going to be on the Sports Reporters any longer. I always enjoyed and RESPECTED your coments on the show. I have already bookmarked AOL-SPORTS. As you probably know, you will never be able to please everyone. Just try to stay true to yourself. Keep up the good work.
October 5th, 2006 at 7:46 pm
I loved what Jason said about Mike Lupica. He is a nasty little person who is so damn arrogant. He loves to piss all over people when they screw up (read anything he’s written or listen to anything he says about Giambi) like he is all high and mighty. You can tell he is just a little nerd who was always jealous of sports people.
Thanks Jason for calling his ass out.
October 6th, 2006 at 10:42 pm
It’s funny how the term “bojangling” is being used here. I figure a large majority of you who like the fact that jason called Scoop out are white. I mention this to say, most of us Brothers can’t stand him (jason) and never will. Yeah you can reply and refute that and say you’re black and you’re black, I doubt it. Being a black man, I know if you are or just faking. jason is the one who is bojangling, and figures if he goes after the other black, they’ll like me more, when at the end of the day he’s still treated the same. Any of you can say what you want, but as we all know if you here in Atlanta looking me in my eyes face to face, you would punk out and run your mouth after I leave, like jason.
October 6th, 2006 at 10:50 pm
O.J didn’t do it, even though most of yall clowns wanted this nigga to burn, and jason ‘uncle ruckas’ whitlock is a saleout. Most of yall clowns get on these boards and talk junk, but when faced by another man yall act like little hoes. Scoop never said anything about this clown, but he (jw) plays his part as the house nigga, who hates to see another do anything. Yall faggots stay on these boards and watch yourselves on them streets, cause real men out there.
October 7th, 2006 at 4:43 am
We criticize Scoop Jackson for writing “social commentaries” that just happen to have something to do with sports, while we praise Whitlock for writing a social commentary bashing Scoop’s social commentary… hmmm? Scoop Jackson and Jason Whitlock are both wonderfully brilliant writers, but they are also different writers. Jason cannot do what Scoop does, and vice versa. However, it should be said that what Scoop does is important.
The reason there aren’t many people writing from their social location, be it black, female or other, is because it gets bashed (see above). Scoop Jackson has the courage to write from where he is and not apologize for it. The only “bojangling” that I see comes from people that feel they must prove to this society that they fit in (see above “I am educated (highly) blck woman”). What we need is more people willing to write from where they stand, using the language they use with friends and loved ones (white writers do this in their columns)in an informed way and not feeling the need to disclaim. I like and respect Scoop Jackson, I wish Jason Whitlock luck.
October 7th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
Rest In Peace, Buck O’Neil… Not a time to be angry, but another great illustration about what a sorry-ass clown Whitlock is. He can’t think of ANYTHING nice to say about anyone, so he uses his KC Star column to bash Ron Prince. Typical Whitlock-Bullshit. I am sure he will come out with something in the next few days, because Buck’s passing is all over the news. I wonder how he will manage the name-dropping in that one?
October 7th, 2006 at 6:59 pm
David Wilson - get your facts straight before you criticize someone. Album was stupid for submitting a piece about events that hadn’t yet taken place - but it was the MSU players (Peterson and Cleaves) who didn’t attend the game after they said they would - not Album.
October 8th, 2006 at 12:15 pm
Snoop took the HIGH ROAD in responding to Jason Whitlocks attacks in his Page 2 Column. Since Snoop is the “Bojangles” and “minstrel Show” why did he not Shoot back at JW in true “Ghetto” Fashion?
Because Snoop believes in Sharing and JW did not want another “Brotha” getting attention.
JASON wanted to be the Big Shot. (re-read some of his columns where he self-promotes himself to laughable aggrandizement) The Black community DONT LIKE Whitlock. Never have. He’s bitchy, meanspirited, jealous, loathesome and LOOKS like he hates himself and therefore, hate everything else.
I agree with his accessment of Lupica. He’s like a little schnawzer that you can’t shake. Yet, Jason is OUT OF ORDER for taking his little “in-house” fued public. That’s just unprofessional, inappropriate and plain nasty. I see some deep seeded emotional disorders surrounding Mr. Whitlock. Nonetheless, I’m glad his Fat smelly ass is off my airwaves. I can only hope I won’t see him on the SportsReporters or PTI anylonger. He can stay on Rome is Burning - i don’t watch that show anyway.
October 8th, 2006 at 6:58 pm
I don’t mind Whitty so much (the name-dropping, etc), though I prefer Pos’ writing. I wish Pos would take some of the same stands Whitlock takes, ’cause there’s no doubt he could write a better column about them. As far as race goes, I don’t think you can write about sports in this country and be relevant without bringing it up. But here’s the key: there’s no one right answer to this question, and everyone is entitled to their take. To me, the idea of “playing the race card” is a cop-out for people without the stones to talk about the issue frankly.
Anyone who thinks KC is in the sticks needs one trip to Gates’ or Bryant’s, and they’ll be looking for real estate immediately. One mixed plate, that’s all it takes. As an MU junior and an aspiring sports columnist, I think Whit is one of the best in the business on the country’s best sports section. And I’m comin’ for your job, J.
RIP Buck, the city is a lot darker this morning.
October 9th, 2006 at 10:32 am
While I find the racial banter interesting…I dont think JW knows anything about football…go back in the Page 2 archive and read his Week 1 truths…I think he was 180 out on all but two of them…your a good writer…but i dont think you understand very much about football…
October 9th, 2006 at 2:13 pm
Whitlock clearly has a major issue: he seems to think it’s no problem to attack people publicly. Man, every religion worth its salt is clear on how bad that is for you, spiritually and socially, maybe even physically.
Jason, stop attacking other people in public, or it will come back to hurt you. That’s no threat–that’s a statement of fact.
October 9th, 2006 at 6:55 pm
Buster….Good post! I’m not sure when I started to not like Whitlock, but it is in full swing now. I don’t understand his “beef” with Scoop I personally enjoy his columns. I’m fan and grew up in the Hip-Hop culture and I enjoy Scoop putting references into his columns that only “Hip-Hop heads” would understand. As far as Ralph Wiley is concerned Snoop never compared himself to or said he was going to be the next “Ralph Wiley” he’s always given this man the respect he was owed. I think Whitlock felt Snoop was just getting more attention than him in the short period of time he was there so he attacked him personally (a kid’s move). I have now started my Jason Whitlock boycott and I won’t read or watch anything he is associated with!!! KEEP DOING YOUR THING SCOOP JACKSON
October 10th, 2006 at 1:10 am
Jason Whitlock is suffering from some kind of juvenile inebriation by going on a race rant that no one cares about. He is 10 years ahead of his daily calorie intake but 10 yaers behind maturity. Wake up Jason, we’re tired of your childish behavior.
Big up to Scoop, keep doing the right thing.
October 10th, 2006 at 4:33 am
Hey Dirty and Real,
First off, I love how you call out people for being nothing in the real world and talking trash on a board and then you go on to do what? talk trash on a board.
I live in Atlanta and I PROMISE you I would be glad to meet either of you face to face and show you what having a nut sack means. Chances are you are just a little punk ass wanna be gangsta’ who can’t do shit if you don’t have five of your boys around. If that not the case, your probably one of those that brings a gun because you know you can’t beat anybody’s ass. Either way, you got to have an advantage in order to do anything…so keep “keepin’ it real” which is loosly interpreted as “I’d get my ass kick if I was alone”
October 11th, 2006 at 2:28 pm
I will say this, I would rather go back to work then read Whitlock’s columns. Want ten truths? Write about something other then race. I should just restate that 10 times and maybe I could fill Whitlock’s next ESPN column, oh wait, he doesn’t have one anymore. It is sad that when even he ran out of things to write about race, that he just started bashing other writers about not getting “his”. Maybe he would have gotten his, if he spent less time bitching, moaning and complaining and spent time writing. Writing something that people actually cared about and could tolerate reading.
October 11th, 2006 at 4:06 pm
Name three sports writers that are better than this moron, OK How about Mr. Gregg Easterbrook who has the best writing skills that translate worldwide …..um WILBON is great and how about Dj “sportspickle”
That took me 32 seconds
ps Jason whitlock does not rep BlackPeople
October 12th, 2006 at 8:00 pm
I used to disagree and have a bit of disdain for Whitlock till I read this story. I’m a white guy and couldn’t agree with him more about the 5% thing. I know so many great african american leaders in the Christian community and circles I frequent. Just amazing human beings who are lumped together with the hip hop - ignorant reputation that defines most inner city individuals because of the color of their skin. It’s tragic and it’s time for it to end.
I heard a great pastor say recently that “We’re all different too…are you like all the white people you work with? Are you like all the white people you go to the football game with? We’re all different too.”
Alas - white people get stereotyped as rich, arrogant and racist.
Anyway…Good for Whitlock. He’s a little rough arounds the edges but the world needs the proper perspective.
October 12th, 2006 at 9:01 pm
ASIDE FROM MIKE LUPICA BEING A PHYSICAL DWARF,HE’S ALSO A MENTAL MIDGET.
A LOT OF THE BLOGGERS ON THIS PAGE COMPLAIN ABOUT MR. WHITLOCK’S VIEWS REGARDING THE SPORTS SCENE,BUT I DISAGREE.THE SO CALLED BACKSTORY IS SOMETIMES A LOT MORE INTERESTING THAN THE MUNDANE STORY I.E. MONEY,POLITICS OR ANYTHING ELSE CAN DRIVE A STORY IN A FAR MORE COMPELLING WAY THAN BY THE NUMBERS REPORTING.
October 13th, 2006 at 5:24 am
Since there hasn’t been one positive thing hasn’t been said about Mike Lupica on this entire board, I would like to say I don’t read much of his newspaper stuff but his books are great and I belive that is where his talent lies. I’ve read his last six books. There you go.
As for Jason, I appreciate the way you speak your mind and this interview was great. Good luck with your new venture.
October 13th, 2006 at 5:24 am
Since there hasn’t been one positive thing that’s been said about Mike Lupica on this entire board, I would like to say I don’t read much of his newspaper stuff but his books are great and I belive that is where his talent lies. I’ve read his last six books. There you go.
As for Jason, I appreciate the way you speak your mind and this interview was great. Good luck with your new venture.
October 14th, 2006 at 9:32 am
How about who gives a damm and whatever just happen to the old routine of writing. I think one of his key statements in the interview was the refrence to “I got’s to feed my family” lol, now thats funny. See the whole kit and kaboodle with the sportsreporters and Lupica is also funny when againi I think of that statement “I got’s to feed my family”, sorry but the picture is becoming clearer now. Sports reporting is a business now “oh damm” (smacks my forehead). Its not a fucking profession anymore “oh yeah that’s it”. See they have to eat so therefore each one of them, be it white or black or hispanic or whatever ethnicity, have to write, say and/or do something to stand out nowadays. I mean c’mon now its so obvious think about it, you either have the angry sports talk radio guy or the smartass know it all (who really don’t know shit) or in the local markets so wanna be funny guys who are beyond corny. How about this novel concept tell your owners to or whomever beit the writers included, (and i must say it this way lol) STOP TRYING TO GET MY FRIGGIN ATTENTION PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY PLEASE STOP PLEASE JUST STOP 1111 whoops I meant to end that with a series of exclamation points but my caps button lost power from my rant. No seriously I am so sick of hearing steroids, terrel owens, barry bonds and I swear as the lord is my witness during baseball season please do know sell me on the idea that the boston new york series or rivalry or whatever is MUST see TV . Please, it is becasue you sell it so damm hard I hate to watch those two team sometimes or even hear about them. And I say sometimes becasue yeah its a great rivalry and all, I mean they kick the crap out of each other and when both teams are good it makes for great baseball playing thus watching but please enough already. Thats my whole deal with sports entertainment in general both print and media. Another point I wanted to touch was the issue of the “RACE CARD”. Let me guess I wonder is it a hmmmm “spade” perhaps. Yeah I’m gonna wager $500 bucks Alex that it is lol. It kills me when and im soory but i have to say it (wrestling with lips dammit dammit ), it kills me when white people hear anything that causes racial conflict and say some shit like “there is no answer for race or just liberal nicey b.s period.” Did you see the picture right there on aol of the philly fan hanging the noose around the neck of the cardboard or whever the it was of terrel owens. And please I know philly fans are brutal and still possibly have a hitg out on Mitch Williams and all but come the fuck on now, how ignorant can that lady be.(I could called her a whole bunch of other shit but Im taking the high road today thumps up!!!!) Now get this straight im niether jackass or elephant (political affilation) but that is so weak and clearly shows a lack and non ability to attempt to understand the effects on racism on the current day american society. Here’s the deal white people and middle class brothers and siters who have either strayed and/or wondered into the territory “only looking for white or other than their own race” {Coughs “rice” lol} , all you have to do is just sit the HELL down and observe and listen for a fucking change and that way one could then slightly get some glimpse into understanding the issue of race in america. Trust me it doesnt come from a rap cd, videos, dave chappele show (brilliant show seriously) or anybody else you see on TV so please stop. That same white cat who listen to hip hop know every sketch to the dave chappelle show (brilliant show once again seriously) secretly yearns to be in the hood and get some of dat hoodrat loving, would feel so uncormfortable and out of place when there it’s ridiculous. Not all but some 75% in my opinon, sorry the Emiem being a good MC chopped off 5% cause it used to be eighty lol. But for another item in the article that bothers me is the reference to the so-called new black civil rights movement. Me personally Ithink it is not what is needed now. Now by saying that it does not mean that i do not respect the gains and hell just the actions in general of all invovled in such a world changing era (and if one says that the Movement was not world changing then they really have no idea what they talking about) but lets deal with todays issues that hurt us today collectivlely. One thing I liked about Ralph Wiley was that he would give an insight to race by just talking about the person or issue for that matter. Along with his thought or opinon about the topic.He didn’t tell me who to like and what to listen toif he didn’t like or if he enjoyed it he stated his opinon seemingly based on his RESEARCH of the subject (now theres the missing link in sports media) and from reading his materials I would then begin to think. Now with that being said, thats not what this article does for me, or the entire sports media genre for that matter. Basically just write abouts sports and all things related to sports becasue as an avid sports fan i love to hear, sleep, breathe and eat sports period. Just for me have a rule to where you can only talk abouts the same damm sportstory or sportsfigure for 3 days and just like god (which some your blowholes think you are anyway) you take a rest from that story or figure for a day pleasee pleaseee . Sports entertainment is going the wrong route in my opinon: its not about your favorite home team win or lose and being critical at the right time i.e when their is an actual story and just not some damm source. Today its not about hearinig about the great young up and comers regardless if they have shot somebody or have 20 kids. And for the love of MAry please don’t give that role model crap, the kid and the parent should be smart enough to know who pays the damm bills and it better be daddy and/or mama and if they are not there then we should be the responisible adults to them because they see us everday 365/year and of cousre t.o on sunday and monday or whenever. Whitlock, scoop, hunter, lupicka, patrick, whomever just report the damm sports please and if you have an issue doing that just use common sense goooooooosh .
October 17th, 2006 at 12:47 pm
Why not have a sit down with Scoop and address him like a man. I enjoy both of your columns and understand that both are trying to put forth. Have a sit down and be a man and address the issues. Justa a thought.
October 18th, 2006 at 4:03 pm
Jason if you considered yourself part of our black top 10%. Should I expect then a black bias opinion that would consistantly be in our favor and show the point of view of a race that has never been well presented in sports media. Why can they fight till they fall in hockey Nolan Ryan can put you in a head lock Clemens can throw a bat at you? Black men fight we are called thugs and criminals.Why did hockey go out of business for a year? but let a black man in the NFL want to speak to the boss about his BS contact GREEDY? Why do we protect so the mainly white quarterback position NFL? Why do they hate black men dunking and want to see improved free throw/jump shooting? Sports thru this black mans eyes and ears are still white bias and Jason you are not the equalizer seeing your opinion on Vince which if you saw him play he deserved YOU not to Rush Limbaugh him.
Do you talk of being part the black top 10% so white media views like valley boy ROME will accept you. You talk as if you see a problem the unlevel coverage by white media yet you contribute to the slaghter of black men. Whos side are you on chose one as they do get off that fence.
October 25th, 2006 at 6:18 pm
Just catching up to all of the posts on this issue. What happened to freedom of speech? And ethics within the workplace? Is there such competition that one must undercut his peers? Get on with life!!!! Stop being so thin skinned. Let it roll off your back and move on. That goes for both of them. They appear to be competent in their own right and I’m sure their employers wouldn’t hesitate to reprimand them at any time.
December 11th, 2006 at 1:12 am
A shame to see two brothers fighting, but we can get along if we try. Agree with those who see the demographics differently: Jason is older and appeals to older people, Scoop (who I read religiously) deals with the young and young at heart. Doesn’t mean I’ll not enjoy JW as much as I do Scoop. And what the heck does ND football, Vince Young, O.J., and Joe Posnanski have to do with the issue at hand here, which is a failure to communicate between brothers from the same mother who bring different but equally important things to the table. Legacy is important, but entertainment is too; Simmons, Lupica, Whitlock and Jackson all have one thing in common: they can flat out write. I plan to become a journalist when I graduate from college (I live in Belize, Central America), and I look to those guys and writers like them for my inspiration every day. So, Jason’s got a point, but he’s as much in the wrong here as ESPN is for firing him. I’m not even going to bother getting into the KC debate. I’ll end with one thing: Ralph Wiley (God bless the dead) never sounded the way Whitlock did in the interview-and he was around before Whitlock was in diapers. We need to work together.
December 12th, 2006 at 6:10 pm
Nice interview with JW but he’s no great loss from the ESPN.com. Sccop Jackson is the new breed. To say that he bojangles belies ones own insecurity and stupidity. Scoop calls it like he sees it. JW couldn’t carry Scoop’s jock to the laundry room.
January 9th, 2007 at 4:29 am
whitlock is simply the finest sportswriter there is today. read everything he ever wrote on espn. also starred in one of my favorites tv moments ever. when he put little lupica in his place. yes lupica sports is entertainment . you are mary hart . they are just games no more. real battles being fought by brave young men & women in afganistan & iraq not in football hockey ,baseball. also lupica is two faced as most of media is . ignored mcgwire till he went in front congress then they turned on him. where was his outrage during home run derby or later no just always bonds bonds more bonds . now of course these same guys will not vote for mcgwire because of principle two faced . mcgwire should get in hall fame just as rose should. all ripken did was show up everyday people celebrate this. guy is well knew to a huge jerk but media covers for him. bonds though they just love to report when is a jerk. ripken ,t/o bonds favre all same guys all about me. but some media likes favre& ripken some they don’t bonds.
January 14th, 2007 at 1:57 am
With Jason and Ralph gone, the only remaining draw on the ESPN site is Bill Simmons.
January 21st, 2007 at 7:56 am
Who has more GUTS to tell it like he sees it (and damn the consequences to his career) than Jason Whitlock??? This guy absolutely knows the probable consequences of his comments (ESPN’s gutless firing, certain factions in his own black community distorting his comments to turn on him) yet he fearlessly says em anyways. This guy is one of the very few non-hack original sportswriters out there wotj real independent thoughts, its too bad more don’t get to hear them.
January 21st, 2007 at 8:23 am
I’m glad to see I’m not alone on the Scoop thing. I’ve read some of scoop’s pieces and thought he wrote very poorly, like a high schooler just doing some embarrassingly transparent and unoriginal “look I’m a hip hop gangsta” act as his schtick. I was starting to wonder if I missed something because his columns appear so often on the ESPN site. Good to see others see it the same way.
January 25th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
I respect ‘Macabellys’ position on things and I must admit that he will return e-mails to state his mindset. I wish nothing but continued success to J-Dubb
February 22nd, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Without question, on The Sports Reporters, JW made me think about the black in my coffee. He infuses race INTO EVERYTHING. Not good. When I e-mailed him about it, he responded in a rage. Not good.
February 24th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
Jason Whilock-
Bro, your comments about Mike Lupica were absolutely hilarious. I’ve always prided myself on being a good judge of character, and your description of him just solidified my impressions. I enjoy reading Mitch A’s books, but hands down you are the best of the best in regards to sports reporters. I will not be watching “sport reporters,” on ESPN until either you return or Lupica is gone.
Keep up the good work
April 9th, 2007 at 2:15 am
I am sorry but you are not well versed enough on scoop jackson to ever make a negative comment. Especially, seeing as you are one of the top five black men completely out of touch with black youth, and culture. Scoop Jackson on the other hand, is one of the very few black men from another generation in the public eye, who understands how to tackle the increasing void between the beaugiose black, and someone who is just black. I know so, because as a teen he was the only person of older stature who related to my generation first hand as a writer, and most importantly socially. This was close to fourteen years ago, well before he published two books. when he was a freelance worker/writer on the source. He was one, of a short few i could go listen to lord finesse records with. Or, in my later twenties actually have a studied and profound conversation from anything from politics, to who is better right now, rakim or kool g rap. You on the other hand, come across completely out of touch with an semblance of black culture. while also, being completely dated, and unable to understand the social and economic stratification of someone, who is incapable for whatever reason, for you view them as on your level as an equal.
I have repeatedly seen you make negative, slavehouse worker, i am better than you comments. In addition to even seeing you make even more negative comments on anyone that happens to fit into the special label you have for black people who do not fit into your higher than thou, assessment of what black people should or shouldn’t be. also, to lump scoop jackson into a sea of jiggaboodom, is completely inaccurrate and devoid of any source material, whatsoever. first scoop is a legendary writer, from the original cast of the source. a person who named his child, rakim………you on the other hand come across as the black kid who got all the toys and was teased, and still fail after all this time to understand why no one would play with you.
seriously, you need to look in the mirror and understand why only one so-called stratum of blacks, and your most important but shortsighted white readers tend to gravitate towards you………while on the other hand, a much better writer, gets further having a style you would call juvenile, or having less than accredited accollade, or schooling.
blacks don’t believe education is dumb, dumba55 out of touch N!ggaz do. You are completely out of touch, and honestly till you attempt to break down you social stratification you throw on any black, you will still continue to have the same negativity thrown your way. they are playing you, against us, and I personnally believe you revel in it. plus, enjoy making every out of touch, “off-brand” comment about any sports star who doesn’t fit into the old school, hoeteetoytee ideal of what we should be to white america. you sir, are the largest sellout in all of journalism, especially sports…….and still to this very day i cringe, and throw popcorn at the same individual who is black, yet……..continues to outdo jay mariotti, every time he gets a chance.
You are the black jay mariotti, and anyone watching a special comment from you with skip, cornheiser, and wilbon….will always immediately continue to single you out, as such. Till you start to understand every facet of black life, and culture, which you are desperately bitter, and out of touch with.
Art Barr
April 9th, 2007 at 7:57 pm
That “brutha” needs to mix in a salad once in awhile.
April 10th, 2007 at 2:31 am
Art Barr just managed to show why Jason is dead on in his opinions.
April 13th, 2007 at 5:36 am
Jason was very interesting to watch on Larry King and came across as extremely intelligent and wonderfully articulate with his opinion regarding the IDIOT IMUS. Hats off to you Jason!!!! We need more self confident men such as yourself in our deteriorating society these days. Hope to see more of you and your opinions.
Lisa, New Orleans, LA
April 13th, 2007 at 1:44 pm
Jason Whitlock
Although I admit that in the past I’ve known nothing about the men and women who are the panelists on panel sports shows, my interior monologue derision of sports geeks (e.g., “If he focused as much attention on his/her family, news, culture, as he does on baseball, basketball, football, the world would be a better place and I’d be watching a better, more authoritative person.”) , would kick in immediately and my world would be put in the order I have come to expect (or require?). All that is different now that I have read your column about Imus and this Q&A. Having taken the approach you have, you are aware that a prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house, so be ready for some more damn slings and arrows. Thank-you for being a voice of reason, although I sometimes think we in the U.S. have been ushered past reason.
Tom in Tulsa
April 13th, 2007 at 6:00 pm
Jason Whitlock is a must read every morning with my coffee. I may not always agree with him, but, who wants to agree with a sports writer or any writer all the time? Concerning his coments about black society and where they are heading, Cosby started it, and now I believe the next generation of black leaders need to pick up where he left off. Jason may be right, I do agree that all you ever see is J Jackson showing up in a city with a problem, stiring it up and not offering any positive solution. Once the pot is stirred, he is gone! If Rev Jackson and Rev Sharpton are truly ministers of the word, where is their compassion after someone offers sincere apologies over and over?
JWS Shawnee
April 14th, 2007 at 3:31 am
Jason,
I had never heard of you before seeing you on CNN. I am just a middle aged woman who never listens to sports writers unless one of my kids are playing. I have a 6′2 daughter who plays center on a college team, and if Imus said that about her I would consider the source. I agree with you 100% regarding the whole Imus thing. Why would any intelligent person give a damn about what Imus thinks. Maybe they should put you in his spot on TV and radio. You are a wise man. Thanks for standing up for what you believe even if means upsetting other people who don’t agree with you. Keep on doing the right thing. Thanks
April 14th, 2007 at 4:11 am
Jason Whitlock is “a man’s man”. Jason Whitlock has the kind of values that people of all colors embrace. He is right on point about the weak-minded, simple, hating minds that abuse others while posturing as “strong”. Thanks, Mr. Whitlock; I appreciate you.
El Besino
April 14th, 2007 at 4:18 am
I’m writing in Jason Whitlock for President. Since his take on the whole Imus thing, I’ve searched and read several of his columns. We need more people in today’s society who are willing to speak the truth instead of bowing at the altar of political correctness and Mr. Whitlock appears to be ready to lead the way.
April 16th, 2007 at 3:47 am
Personally, I really enjoy Jason Whitlock and read all of his columns here in Kansas City. I don’t always agree with him, but the man is funny, intelligent and I would rather hear his opinions than half of the blowhards on ESPN. My only issue in with the interview focuses on Kansas City being referred to as “the sticks.” But then, we’ve come to expect that condescending attitude from writers from both coasts, who never, NEVER appreciate the vast center of this country.
Y’know, that mystical place where people are actually civil to one another. That place that works hard to provide food, clothing, and a vast array of services and products for many people on both coasts who merely take our efforts for granted. Sorry, but although you may think of us as hicks out here in ‘flyover country,’ it is a massive generalization that has made writers on both coasts look myopic and illiterate and YOU just proved that point. Thanks, jackass! But yeah, Jason Whitlock rocks!!
April 16th, 2007 at 3:49 am
Personally, I really enjoy Jason Whitlock and read all of his columns here in Kansas City. I don’t always agree with him, but the man is funny, intelligent and I would rather hear his opinions than half of the blowhards on ESPN. My only issue with the interview focuses on Kansas City being referred to as “the sticks.€ But then, we’ve come to expect that condescending attitude from writers from both coasts, who never, NEVER appreciate the vast center of this country.
Y’know, that mystical place where people are actually civil to one another. That place that works hard to provide food, clothing, and a vast array of services and products for many people on both coasts who merely take our efforts for granted. Sorry, but although you may think of us as hicks out here in ‘flyover country,’ it is a massive generalization that has made writers on both coasts look myopic and illiterate and YOU just proved that point. Thanks, jackass! But yeah, Jason Whitlock rocks!!
April 18th, 2007 at 9:32 am
I may disagree with Jason Whitlock , but he’s certainly provacative. I just really don’t go with his Don Imus take at all. It did seem to reveal an issue.
April 20th, 2007 at 11:23 pm
Jason, i cant beleive you would read the comment part and defend yourself against that average american idiot. That is very sad jason. I have to say that. Cause honestly, when i read your comumns on .com i like a lot of things you said. but now i think that comes more from the editors. because your comments make you sound like an idiot. i feel that because people have no idea what they are talking about, and you are lowering yourself to thier level by arguing back and forth.
Pretty sad man, sadder than the royals
April 22nd, 2007 at 12:35 am
Enough about lupica….what’s up with alboms ears?
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:01 pm
Chris
I’m sorry I’m too real for you. I like to debate with real people, even on message boards. I’m no better than anyone who posts here.
May 5th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
[...] Baskeball players can t hit free throws or a jump shot because Most of the NBA players in today s league play streetball on every opportunity to stop talking about sports and play amateur Continue [...]
May 10th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
Hello I’m new, I have noticed Whitlock making his rounds. He seems to be on a lot of talkshows. He also seems to be a hypocrite.
http://www.chapmanrecording.com/Rap%20Production.html
Rap Royalty Record For KC Chiefs
Game Day Song
Some of the biggest names in KC Rap gathered recently to record a new game day song for the Kansas City Chiefs. The track, “IT’S ON NOW 07″, was created by Seven and
produced by KC Star sports writer Jason Whitlock with the assistance of Strange Music headman Travis O’Guin. Just a few of those who participated . . . . Rich The Factor,
Bacari, Big Scoob, T-Will, Tech N9ne and Zig. The sessions were engineered by Justin Mantooth. Watch for the track at games during the 2007 season.
Tech N9ne and Rich the Factor are local rap acts. They make the same music Whitlock is “trying to fight”.
http://www.therealtechn9ne.com/home/
http://www.myspace.com/richthefact
Here’s more info on Whitlesslock
http://youbeenblinded.com/2007/04/15/doctor-j/#comments
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/995
May 16th, 2007 at 5:54 pm
I just recently became familiar with Jason Whitlock. But i plan to start to read his sports colunms. He sounds like a very intelligent, and insightful brother; that has something to say when it comes to the issues of racism. Listen, i applaud any black man that is’nt afraid to take a stand for the Black-American community. We need more positive voices in our race to combat these negative images that seems to try to keep Black people in a inferior position as it relates to every other race in this world. Enough Respect to JW. P.S. iF WHITE PEOPLE COMPLAIN THAT YOU ARE PLAYING THE RACE CARD; YOU TELL THEM THAT THIS IS THE ONLY HAND IN AMERICA’S DIRTY DECK THAT WE AS BLACK FOLKS ARE DEALT
May 26th, 2007 at 4:12 am
Who’s scoop jackson, seriously?
May 31st, 2007 at 4:44 am
Jason’s one of the most thoughtful and provocative voices out there. He honestly says what he actually believes and doesn’t seem to care what groups or special interests get angered. I respect that. I also see that he appears to have the cojones to respond to folks under his own name (I assume that’s actually him) on message boards. I respect that too.
June 3rd, 2007 at 6:14 am
I have never liked this guy. Dude is an uncle tom straight plain and simple. The type to do a dance and sing a song before he brings master some water. Fuck that fat ass slob.
June 12th, 2007 at 11:12 pm
Bojangles is perfect! I’ve felt for a long time, that somewhere along the way, our people lost the way to respect. I called it the “dance N***” syndrome, but bojangles is more apt. Leave it to a journalist to help me find the words to describe the people that need help.
He’s right, this street stuff about buying 120 shoes, even more expensive clothes, that make you look ridiculous, just isn’t right. If your job is comedian, then okay, look like a clown. But, if your job is as hard as mine, and requires professionalism, then grow up, cut your hair, shave your face, smile only when you are getting the respect you earned, and leave the materialism behind.
July 2nd, 2007 at 3:58 am
if u had such an issue with scoop, why not go straight to him? there’s been numerous interviews with him stating that when he saw you, there was ZERO problems. then when you go over the internet and put another guy on blast (content is another issue for another day), it gives a message that you weren’t much of a professional, or a black man to step to scoop.
Now, if you never addressed him personally, and then claim him to be coonin, then you’re just being disrespectful because he’s tellin a different point of view.
If he’s not tellin the truth about what happened between you two, then i can’t really respect him either.
As a black college student, i really enjoyed reading both of your collums. urs came from an intelligent black man point of view, and scoops broke down life and sports, then put it in lamens terms.
in my opinion, you all are preaching to two different people, but that’s just me
July 8th, 2007 at 4:31 am
He was the weakest link on Page 2 before and after the deaths of HST and RW. A lot of his articles looked like they were written on the 11th hour and looked purposely subversive. He admits to acting subversive on TV and seems to have no problem admitting that but he doesn’t sound disgusted at all, which is a bit surprising for a guy who’s just left The World Wide Leader. I only agree about his feelings about Lupica and “Scoop”. But totally disagree about his fellating of The Sports Guy and Chadiha but they’re pretty much like Whitlock in many way, but atleast Bill can be funny. I ignore his feelings of black America but I can’t ignore the fact the guy wants to come out as this reincarnation of WEB DuBois but he literally had no idea of Jesse Jackson’s role in civil rights movement. He’s just the poser and opportunist as his target of ire Al Sharpton. See on Oprah, Jason!
July 10th, 2007 at 11:12 pm
To whom it may concern,
Jason Whitlock is a talented writer who deserves kudos for his “in your face” honesty. By the way, Jason is correct, its is the posesessive form, it’s = it is.
Anyway, Mike Lupica is a self absorbed “little man” who thinks his word is gospel, nothing could be further from the truth. The guy is five foot nothing and espouses so many negative views and opinions about people who “actually” played sports.
Mike Lupica is a clown who wishes he could have played sports at any level. Mike Lupica telling Tiger Woods and LeBron James anything about their respective sports of endeavor is like me telling Bill Gates and Steve Bahlmer how to run Microsoft. Again, Lupica is an “idiot.”
As far as The “idiot five” is concerned, once again, Jason hit the ball out of the ball park. The “idiot five” are degenerate idiots who believe a pre- requisite of “blackness” is ignorance, crime and acting like “damn fools.”
These are the same fools who are always so quick to cry racism, but will kill someone over a pair of sneakers at the drop of a hat. These are the same fools who always blame “the man”, but don’t support any of their six kids by six different women.
These are the same fools who ostracize and criticize blacks who embrace education, excellence and achievement. As I’ve said many times to friends, family and co-workers, these are the true sell outs.
Mr. Whitlock, continue the good fight, we can’t allow “the idiot” five and the other buffoons and “so called” black leaders ” to represent good, hard working, tax paying, law abiding, African Americans like myself who are sick of the minstrel show.
Check out John McWhorters work if you haven’t already, he’s the author of “Losing the Race” and “Wining the Race.” He’s quite the scholar.
Charles B.
October 1st, 2007 at 10:43 pm
Whitlock is an awesome writer and a great man. Seriously, this guy actually thinks before he writes, something that is all to rare these days. Keep up the great work Jason. Thanks to thebiglead for the great interview.
October 10th, 2007 at 9:07 am
yes, the fact that Lupica is an idit does not mean that Whitlock is not. “In your face honesty” is only good if those words are truthful. Whitlock’s recent awful articles on The Jena Six is journalism at its very worst. For more on this point see “Whitlock-Gone-Wild”: http://www.cosellout.com/?p=107
November 29th, 2007 at 10:35 pm
Jason,
I’ve enjoyed majority of your articles and truly enjoyed this one. You maybe called an Uncle Tom or a Sell-out by some, but to me, you are a stud, a hero. Continue to do what you do and dont take any prisoners. Screw lupica, Jesse and Scoop Jackson. Freakin amazing that the ignorant 5, i.e. jesse jackson and his sons, snoop, Al Sharpton, 50 cent, Ice Cube and Tea, get more love and respect than Condi Rice, Colin Powell, Bob Johnson ” founder of BET”, and local law enforcement officers. By the way, the majority has nothing to brag about. They are just as dysfunctional.