Bigger Fraud, Duke or Memphis?
College Basketball March 27th. 2009, 9:45am
Let’s begin with Duke’s pitiful showing in a 23-point drubbing at the hands of gritty, defensive-minded Villanova. Henderson: 1-for-14. Enough to give him second thoughts about the NBA? Jon Scheyer: 3-for-18. Shades of Redick against LSU three years ago. Bounced.
Duke could never get anything started offensively against a vastly superior athletic team and ended up with their worst shooting performance in 41 years. Henderson could create his own shot by knifing into the lane - but when the defense would collapse, the jump shots didn’t fall. Duke also got destroyed on the glass - good thing two bigs are on their way next season … just hope they’re more Singler/Laettner than Newtown/Zoubek.
Villanova vs. Pitt part deux, Saturday. Tough not to like long and athletic Villanova winning again. Especially if DeJuan Blair gets in foul trouble again.
We actually think Memphis shat the bed worse last night. How can the No. 1 defense (stats!) in the country give up 102 points? At some point, the pundits will realize that all schedules are not created equal and those defensive stats this season were a joke. Last year, Memphis had three NBA draftees (in the first 33 picks) in the starting lineup. This year it’s Tyreke Evans (who was tremendous with 33 points) and that’s it. Too many people were blinded by the stats, the gaudy record, and the win streak.
After Missouri determined it couldn’t stop Tyreke Evans, Mike Anderson went zone midway through the first half and Evans was bottled up in the lane. Memphis proceeded to shot 3-for-15 from three. The Tigers were a joke defensively - curls and cuts resulted in at least a dozen layups and 53 percent from the field. Calkins is a great writer, but this “luck” business is garbage.
Pittsburgh 60, Xavier: 55: This was too easy to call - this season, Pitt is the Mariano Rivera of closers. Levance Fields, who really needs to incorporate the big balls dance into his routine since he seems to make every clutch late shot that he takes, had five of his 14 points in the final 90 seconds. Of course, he may not have had the chance to perform his weekly heroics if Derrick Brown didn’t step out-of-bounds while chasing down a loose ball. Xavier could have been up two with the ball and pulled the upset. That’s unlucky.
Connecticut 72, Purdue 60: Not really sure what Matt Painter’s plan was. Purdue came out shooting jumpers and never took it at Thabeet. The result: 8-0 deficit. UConn never lost the lead. Jeff Adrien hit all of his foul-line jumpers last weekend; he made 3-of-13 in Glendale. AJ Price (5-for-15) forced the action, too. If either of those guys play at their normal level, this is close to a 20-point blowout. While Purdue returns its entire nucleus, we still think they’re a take-over player away from the Final Four. Purdue had numerous chances to tie the game and the offense always seemed to bog down. JuJuan Johnson could have been that guy … but it seemed like he was more of a decoy than anything (drawing Thabeet away from the basket), and he had to settle for 15-foot jumpers (he shot 5-of-13).
58 Responses to “Bigger Fraud, Duke or Memphis?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


March 27th, 2009 at 9:52 am
If Memphis are frauds, then Gonzaga must really suck.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:52 am
who picked Gonzaga in the Final 4?
March 27th, 2009 at 9:54 am
Didn’t win a National Championship? Why that’s quite fraudtastic of you.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:56 am
I don’t know about Memphis being a “fraud”, but they definitely didn’t look like a team who went 16-0 in their conference. Wait, what conference are they in? Nevermind.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:56 am
I have Gonzaga in the final 4. It’s my only hope in my money pool.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:56 am
I gamble and went with Gonzaga in the final four…I also had Purdue in the final four so I’m not looking so good.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:57 am
I gambled and went with Gonzaga in the final four…I also had Purdue in the final four so I’m not looking so good.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am
I don’t know why they are frauds. In my opinion, they are who I thought they were. I knew Duke would meet a physically superior team in the tourney and wouldn’t be able to create offense. I saw it happen numerous times to them throughout the season, and they had no consistent inside scoring to prove to me they would go deep in the tourney.
Memphis was a team that was bolstered by a hilariously weak conference. They weren’t that impressive out of conference this year, and I actually thought they’d lose in the second round. I saw them play earlier in the year, and they just were nowhere near the team they were last year. Evans is a great player, but he’s almost all they have on a consistent basis.
Both of these teams performed just how I thought they would. They got beat by better teams.
March 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am
sorry- i accidentally double clicked there
March 27th, 2009 at 10:01 am
Eva Mendes is hot as fuck.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:01 am
Memphis is a fraud. I read it on a reputable sports
blogwebsite.March 27th, 2009 at 10:04 am
memphis, clearly.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:05 am
Also, I’m an idiot, and basically what I was saying is, yes, Memphis was a big fraud.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:06 am
I only watched one Memphis game all year. Watching Coach Cal almost die last night was pretty funny
March 27th, 2009 at 10:07 am
fraud: deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.
All of these apply to Memphis this season. Not a fraud last season because of the talent; fraud this season. The “best” defense in the country?
March 27th, 2009 at 10:08 am
Pittsburgh is the biggest fraud.
Duke just wasn’t that good. They have 3 offensive threats, one of which can be shut down if a team chooses to (Scheyer). They had no post game. They were athletically challenged, yet tried to play pressure defense, which led to easy layups. That made my weekend, and the weekend hasn’t even started yet.
Memphis was better this year than probably even Calipari thought they would be. However, they were just a very good mid-major team this year. They had 1 threat (Hello NBA, I’m Tyreke. Nice to meet you!) and a bunch of athletes. This was not a big surprise, but a very pleasant one. Does this signal Cal to leave for UK?
March 27th, 2009 at 10:08 am
lol. Yeah TBL like I said, I’m stupid. I was basically saying they are a fraud, but forgot to clarify that for Memphis and not Duke.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Duke lost to a better team, not sure you can say that about Memphis. They may have been overrated, but that Mizzou team (having watched them for the first time last night) didn’t seem like anything special.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:11 am
Pitt is a fraud?
How is this?
March 27th, 2009 at 10:12 am
Thank you.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:12 am
coop: Still better than Memphis.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:15 am
I dont know why I dont like Levance Fields the guy is a fucking gamer. I remember when they beat Duke at MSG last year that fucker nailed a 3 at the buzzer. Then he was clutch last night. I just have this feeling that hes gonna fuck it up.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:15 am
Cal has a huge bonus coming to him and I believes makes 5 mil a year and can almost guaruntee a top 3 seed with the recruiting class he has coming in. I have heard from multiple people, one a head coach at a D1 school, that a deal has been in place for the past week or two in principle for a coach to take over. Cal wouldn’t have agreed to that if he thought he was goign to make a tourney run. I would expect to see Donavan as the new coach in matter of time.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Duke has been clearly overrated the last 6 tourneys.
Lost last 6 tourney games to teams seeded below them. of course, you could flip that an argue another way.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:18 am
Fields just looks and somewhat acts punkish. He’s a big time gamer (what is with Pitt having gamer PG’s? Krauser was the same), but his hair makes him look like a women’s player.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:18 am
Equally fraudtastic.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:18 am
/Walks away whistling
//Also picked Memphis for Final Four
March 27th, 2009 at 10:22 am
I was going to call you out on “Fields will fuck up late and cost Pitt the game” Tampa, but you already did so. That 3 was HUGE. The steal was all Blair.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:25 am
PIT frauded their way all the way to the Elite 8.
Oh and the 4th best team from the Big East just beat the ACC’s 2nd best team by 20.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:27 am
/Vitaleswifesbush
//he’d never play for that racist Coach K
March 27th, 2009 at 10:28 am
both are NYC guys Sean Jean, FWIW
March 27th, 2009 at 10:30 am
This whole business of “fraud” in the blogosphere is comical. Duke and Memphis lost in the Sweet 16. So what. They both lost to equally good teams as only slight favorites; 2 seeds losing to 3 seeds are very, very rarely considered shocking losses. Was either result surprising? If the answer is “I was shocked”, then yes, they were fradulent. But I doubt anybody was shocked by last night’s games.
Go ahead and roll out the definition again, TBL, but by declaring Duke and Memphis to be frauds, you are just engaging in the same hyperbole that you often accuse the mainstream media of.
Memphis’s defensive stats…ok, they were fradulent.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:36 am
Thing is with those defensive stats they are adjusted for the teams that you play, plus taking one bad game isn’t enough evidence to call someone fradulent. If Memphis and Mizzou played 10 times I am pretty sure Memphis would come out on top. Although if you asked me the Duke and Memphis losses showed the need for a true point guard that can set things up. Next up on the upset bandwagon I belive is UL for this same reason.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:36 am
Great points Jay V…I think I’m more impressed with Missouri than I think Memphis is a fraud. It’s the Sweet 16 and if you’re playing other good teams, things like this are going to happen.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:37 am
Memphis complained about not getting a 1 seed. Never heard Duke say a word. Memphis was no better than a middle of the road major all year, using the Tyreke Evens to PG excuse but ignoring that they played horrible teams the last 2 months of the year.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:37 am
perhaps fraud is thrown around too much in the blog world. i can’t really speak to that. all my opinion is is that memphis was a fraud this season.
25 wins in a row, the defensive stats, everyone and their mom bought into these jokers, and they got rolled by the 3rd best team in the Big 12 and gave up 102 points.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:38 am
UL is an exception, T-Will is a point forward and serves the same purpose as a point guard. UL turns the ball over a little bit more, yes…but I haven’t discerned any lack of flow in their offense.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:40 am
There are four fucking people in my office today because of the blizzard and I’m one of them. My work level will be highly fraud-like.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:43 am
P.S. - Fuck Memphis.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:46 am
yeah I am just not sold on the point forward with T-Will, I said it a while back and thought it would hurt them earlier, obviously I was wrong about it so far, so I might off on this. I just think they are going to run into a good gameplan to nuetralize him a bit on the offensive side and make them pay for not having good guard play on the defensive side of the ball.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:47 am
Perhaps everyone and their mom were the frauds?
Don’t mean to give you a hard time, TBL, just think the term is overused.
I hope you are still planning on coming down to see LeBron.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Ben - where do you live that there is a blizzard today? Sunny and 60s in PA today.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:57 am
Well, I disagree with that statement. Smith and Knowles are both good defenders, in my opinion. If you don’t agree, then I can see where you are coming from as to their potential perils, but I think they are fine from that standpoint.
March 27th, 2009 at 10:58 am
Ben must live in Colorado.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:04 am
who’s going to rothbury?
March 27th, 2009 at 11:04 am
duke won the ACC.
Memphis won something called conf usa.
i think its pretty clear
March 27th, 2009 at 11:04 am
I think Bill Rafferty deserves his own post for his “onions” call on Fields’ 3. Classic
March 27th, 2009 at 11:06 am
Memphis just wasn’t that good. Last year, yes. This year, no. They were a product of their schedule and their slimy, media mongering coach. I don’t know if that makes them a fraud, but they were definitely given more credit than they should have for running through a lousy conference.
I’m with the GeneralWillChokeYou on Louisville, although they get a bit of a break against Arizona tonight. They just aren’t a great team. Very good, yes. Great, No. They have obvious weaknesses in their game that can be exposed by the right team at the right time. Just not sure that Arizona is the right matchup to do so.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:08 am
When did this happen? Is it 2005 again?
March 27th, 2009 at 11:11 am
I am in Denver and the snow finally stopped. 12-14″ in my backyard. The roads are very fucked.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:13 am
What is this snow you speak of.
/80 is the high today
March 27th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Going to Bonnaroo and Forecastle, but no Rothbury.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:22 am
Corrected for Spartan-appropriate lexicon.
March 27th, 2009 at 11:25 am
Jay, why no Roth? did you go last year?
March 27th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
First of all - Big, thank you! First post after so many years.
Secondly, Duke lost because of this:
Henderson/Scheyer: 4-32 from the field
Paulus rotting on the bench
Look, I hate Paulus as much as the next rational person, but Scheyer got eaten alive that entire game. Duke needed someone with grit, and dare I say, balls, to at least try and spark up the rest of the team. Waiting until there’s 15 minutes left and you’re down double digits to put in a guy with that kind of experience in big games is just mind-boggling.
And you know what, without that lucky step-out, Pitt is gone. They played down to Xavier’s level and deserved to lose that game the way they sleepwalked through it. Pitt also got away with a LOT of fouls. Blair was shoving guys out of the way on every rebound attempt - and on two occasions, Xavier attempted threes - you could hear Pitt defenders SLAP the arm of the shooter - and no call was made.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Memphis maybe a little fraudulent, but Mizzou is not the 3rd best team in the Big 12. They won the thing and have beaten Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma in the season. They are a good team. They put up 100+ on a good D, but they hit a lot of shots. Just check the end of the first half as evidence of that. Lets not railroad Memphis just cause some buckets fell.
March 27th, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Yes.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
@die_eagles_die: You’ve lost your mind or are high on Quin Snyder’s favorite substance. They beat Texas, KU, OU, KSU, Baylor … who else do they need to beat to be the 3rd best team in the Big 12.
Duke is the bigger fraud. Memphis has talent … but my tiger is better than your tiger. Seriously, a blue tiger? Truman (Mizzou’s mascot) could take Memphis by himself (save Tyreke Evans). I kid.
A Proud Mizzou Alum who is a fan of Coach MLK Anderson (Yes, he talks like MLK)