ESPN’s Jayson Stark: Why Isn’t the NFL Steroids Story Receiving Any Play?
Baseball, Drugs, ESPN, NFL, NFL retirees February 24th. 2009, 1:00pm
That would be this steroids story, which came out last week, and has been largely ignored.
An anonymous survey of 2,552 retired NFL players released today found an association between joint and ligament injuries and use of steroids. Just over 9 percent of the former pro-athletes, who played as far back as the 1940s and as recently as the 21st century, admitted using the drugs during their careers, the American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation study showed. Doping was common among players in positions requiring size and strength, with 16 percent of offensive linemen and nearly 15 percent of defensive linemen fessing up to the practice.
ESPN’s Jayson Stark (insider required) is perturbed at the inequality between that report and the media’s reaction to the NFL report.
Funny how the most monstrous baseball story of the year so far involved a baseball player who tested positive for steroids, then admitted he used them, before baseball imposed a system of random testing and stiff punishments.
Yet the national sports audience has just about no interest in a revelation that hundreds of football players were using steroids before the NFL imposed a system of random testing and stiff punishments.
We will attempt a brief list of reasons why this story is DOA:
1) If a list were made public with the names of all the steroid users in the NFL from the 1980s, there are probably less than 10 players that fans/media would get worked up about.
2) Offensive lineman don’t generate stats so when there’s a suspension or drug revelation by an offensive lineman, at best you’ll get a shoulder shrug (perhaps there would be a reaction if Anthony Munoz were named; John Madden might cry if Larry Allen’s name popped up).
3) Some of baseball’s biggest names in the last 15 years have been associated with cheating (or accused of it): A-Roid, Sosa, McGwire, Bonds, Palmeiro, Clemens. Unless there are popular NFL names that emerge – Shawne Merriman barely counts; the guy had two good seasons – the reaction isn’t likely to register. For people to sit up and pay attention, you’d need names on par with Manning, Brady, Tomlinson, Moss or Owens.
19 Responses to “ESPN’s Jayson Stark: Why Isn’t the NFL Steroids Story Receiving Any Play?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


February 24th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Maybe Jayson Stark should have done some real reporting in the 90s and actually told everyone that steroids were everywhere in baseball instead of complaining about other sports now.
sour grapes.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
Yet the national sports audience has just about no interest in a revelation that hundreds of football players were using steroids before the NFL imposed a system of random testing and stiff punishments.
What revelation? That has been known for years.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
No. 2 hints at it, but the big reason is because no fan in the NFL cares about individual stats, beyond what their fantasy team did that week. There are no iconic individual career/season numbers like 714, 511, 61, etc. in the NFL. The only revered number in the NFL is 17-0, because the Super Bowl is all that matters.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
is there an assumption that even though NFL player’s steroid use has been well documented over many years that baseball players have only been into it in the last 15-20 years?
February 24th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
Also the NFL was made to come public with steroid abuse back in the 1980s with Alzado. The general public has had 20+ years to come to terms with the fact that NFL players juice. Where as they have only had about 3 years to come to terms with it in baseball.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
You also have to consider that football players are mostly faceless drones. It would be a big deal if it came out that Tom Brady or (gasp…) Brett Favre was using steroids or HGH. No one cares if three offensive linemen from the Panthers were juicing in 2004. Who the hell remembers those guys?
February 24th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
rs27 +1
Jayson Stark is a major league douche. The day of the A-Rod presser he was on M&M talking about how he HAD to tell everything, who he got them from, yada, yada, yada. Golic tried to say why isn’t just saying he did them enough, that he probably wasn’t going to name names so the other people won’t get into trouble, etc, and Stark would hear none of it.
Olney also recently took a shot at Tom Glavine, and how as head of Payer’s Association HE should have pushed for more testing. How about those two quit sniffing Yankee and Phillies jocks back them and did some “real” reporting?
I HATE baseball media
/and i don’t care about who took steroids
February 24th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Because all of the major sports media players have a stake in the NFL? NBC, CBS, FOX, ABC/ESPN. Cannot say the same about baseball. It’s the biggest cash cow for those networks, of course they aren’t going to talk about it.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
OTL had a segment a few weeks ago where old Charger’s talked about having bowls of pink pills in their weight room. Their main bitch was they weren’t told what they were, just that they were told that they were supposed to take them. I think the report concluded that the pills were dianabol.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
The NFL is teflon. Favre abused painkillers and it wasn’t mentioned in any of his retirement articles. The Patriots surreptitiously videotaped their way to multiple Super Bowl victories and it’s already forgotten. The sheeple who think the NFL can do no wrong just want bigger, faster and stronger and they don’t care how the players get there.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
/Daft Punk’d
February 24th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Exaggerate much?
February 24th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
Roeth, this is really the only reason. +5000
February 24th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Fixed.
February 24th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
No one is outraged because we already knew all of this. It is well known that the juice was flowing in the NFL during the 70’s and 80’s (and to a certain extent earlier). The NFL stepped in, put in testing, and has constantly evolved that testing. Is it perfect, no, do people still juice, yes, and you’ll never be able to completely stop it. Whats there to get upset about?
February 24th, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Nobody cares. Testing inthe NFL is just a facade… 4 game suspension? Baseball 50 games? How about Track and Field… 8 years!!!! Cycling 2 years!.
If they really “cared about the players” the suspensions would be heavier
February 24th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
fuck yea it is.
AND THAT’S THE WAY WE LIKE IT!
February 24th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Simple…NFL is a cash cow for ESPN and all of the other networks, while Baseball is a punching bag. It is complete bullshit, but unfortunately it is true. Doesn’t matter if it is big stars versus offensive lineman or any other reason. People do not care if NFL players cheat. They should, but they do not.
The NFL, its so called “testing” and the reporting of stuff like this is a joke. Screw them…all of them. It will come back to bite them eventually.
February 24th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Actually, more like Bigger, Stronger, Faster‘d