So Mike Greenberg, What Does, ‘Womaned Down’ Exactly Mean?
Uncategorized November 2nd. 2006, 5:23pm
One thing ESPN may recognize soon, if it hasn’t already: There’s an army of bloggers out there who have become increasingly infuriated with the ESPN product. They see through the phony ombudsman, the played-out catchphrases, uncessary screaming. The bloggers lay in wait, hoping for mistakes. Then they pounce. And mock.
It’s not only on the .com and on-air, but on the radio, too.
This morning, Mike Greenberg, who shares radio time with Mike Golic each morning on Mike & Mike, apparently said something he may end up regretting, according to Sports Media Review:
Greenberg was discussing the suspension yesterday of Guillermo Mota, the hard-throwing former Mets’ reliever, for violating MLB’s steroid policy. Mota is automatically subject to a fifty game suspension and issued a statement taking full responsibility for what he had done. Greenberg expressed shock that a modern athlete would simply accept responsibility for what he had done, and not try to make excuses for having failed a drug test. By contrast, Shawne Merriman and Rafael Palmeiro, for example, insisted that if they ingested banned substances, they did so unwittingly.
I heard this while driving my daughter to school, so I don’t have the full quote, but Greenberg did positively say that Mota “manned up” by coming clean, as opposed to all of these other athletes who “womaned down.”
Since we didn’t hear the show – it’s always on ESPN2 on mute in the background every morning, but since LOST was such a mindfuck last night, we had to watch it again this morning – we’re not even sure what the hell ‘womaned down’ means. Is this his way of referring to a blowjob? Are men who lie about cheating … women?
Between one of those Page 2 clowns possibly embellishing a story about Shaq dick-whipping a female reporter, to an ESPNU announcer using the word ‘gay’ and getting suspended, and the Harold Reynolds mess, it’s been quite a week at the Worldwide Leader, huh?
Should Mike Greenberg Be Fired? (Sports Media Review)
12 Responses to “So Mike Greenberg, What Does, ‘Womaned Down’ Exactly Mean?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


November 2nd, 2006 at 5:48 pm
Damn I missed it this morning. But I did get to hear how Mark Schlereth talk about how he peed himself during games. So I’ve got that going for me.
November 2nd, 2006 at 5:56 pm
Geez, enough with the obsession with ESPN already. They sure don’t give a rip what you think. And neither do we.
Let’s talk about sports, not your obvious bitterness over the fact you don’t have a chance in hell of ever getting a job at the worldwide leader.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:12 pm
Wow, I just wasted my time reading this article. This is not news. I wish that bloggers would stop trying to find the mistakes in EVERYTHING ESPN does. They dont royally fuck up everyday, but every sports blog I read makes it seem that way. You know there were about 15 basketball games on last night, right? Maybe you could find some stories there.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:16 pm
Was listening on my way to work as well and he actually said Women Up first then changed it to Woman Down. Basically, he most likely was kicking himself after the dumb statement. It really was one of those statements that no good can come out of.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:51 pm
I think way more is being read into this than it needs. He was simply just saying the opposite of each word. man up woman down. Doesn’t mean anything. ESPN is generally very bad and has enough targets on it that things don’t need to get invented.
November 2nd, 2006 at 6:53 pm
I’ve got to say that I personally enjoy most of the ESPN stuff on this site, although this might be stretching things a little. There are a lot of sites I can check out for commentary on last night’s NBA games, but some of the inside ESPN stuff you guys get makes this site stand out.
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:04 pm
Comedian Bill Burr has a great bit about “the podium.” How whenever sportscasters start to say something dumb – racist, sexist, gayist (is that a word?) – everyone else just backs away and out comes the podium where the offender apologizes and loses their job. I almost feel bad for Greenberg. He tries so hard to act like a guy who is trying to fit in and happily (appears so anyway) fills the role of butt of jokes for Golic and every guest. I can just imagine him saying it and being able to hear the air getting sucked out of the room. I’m sure he knew he was making a mistake as soon as it came out of his mouth and was desperately trying to figure out how to fix it.
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:09 pm
And to the ESPN-defending commenters . . . just because ESPN has the best sports content on TV and radio does not mean that they aren’t filthy, cross-promoting whores. And if you actually read the other posts on this blog today, you would see that the night in the NBA was covered, and quite well.
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:15 pm
Actually, seeing the opposite form should make us realize that the initial expression, “man up,” is itself chauvinist and implies there is a particular way of behaving that is appropriate for men, and that men shouldn’t act like “girls.”
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:19 pm
Umm, can I use your opening paragraph as the main blurb for my site?
Mike & Mike is a terrible show. I cannot listen to it anymore. WFAN is all you need here in NYC anyway.
November 2nd, 2006 at 7:27 pm
that statement was “kinda gay.”
November 2nd, 2006 at 8:26 pm
YES Mike Greenberg should be fired. Not for this probably but just in general.