What’s All This “Iverson is Done” Business?
Jason Whitlock, NBA April 13th. 2009, 4:45pm
Allen Iverson turns 34 this summer, he’s a free agent, and he’ll likely sign with his fourth team in four years. That is, if anyone will have him – the way he talked his way out of Detroit this season will be yet another pock mark on a career resume highlighted by the 5th best career scoring average in NBA history.
Here’s what Jason Whitlock wrote about Iverson last week:
Iverson’s career as an NBA legend died of self-inflicted wounds this season in Detroit. Much like the death of his role model, rapper Tupac Shakur, Iverson’s supporters will reject the news of his demise and predict a Machiavellian return, a Dr. J-like finish to Iverson’s career … Winning has never really mattered to Allen Iverson. He is the embodiment of everything that has gone wrong in America, an unexposed, all-style-little-substance Hall of Famer.
While it’s a redeeming column – mentions of Tupac, Lost, and Ron Jeremy always lighten the mood – for Whitlock after this complete and utter debacle regarding shady college basketball programs, bloggers rushed to the defense of Iverson, who has always been an NBA fan favorite (full disclosure: Us, included):
Dude’s 6-foot, 175 pounds. My size. I consider myself a decent baller, and I couldn’t even play JC ball.
AI’s playing in the freaking league, used to throw down on people in transition, was an MVP, and has averaged 27 ppg in his career when and only two players in NBA history ever averaged better than 30, Jordan and Wilt, so I think it’s safe to say he “overachieved†on the court at 6 foot, even if he is a headcase.
And then there was this:
Whitlock just writes off the amazing season Iverson and the Sixers had to “Larry Brown brow-beating him Nightlyâ€. Didn’t Larry Brown brow-beat Iverson nightly in each of their seasons together? Hmm….anyone with any respect for, or knowledge of the game of basketball may want to take a closer look at WHY the Sixers were successful that season. But wait….alas….the solution was sitting right under Whitlock’s nose. He mentions above, “Aaron McKie, Eric Snow, Tyrone Hill and 34-year-old Dikembe Mutomboâ€, any bells going off yet Whitlock? Probably not. Let me enlighten you. Instead of crucifying Iverson for being born and bred as a talented scorer, Philly tried a little experiment in which they surrounded Iverson with highly talented defenders, rebounders, and unselfish role players who could help harness Iverson’s scoring abilities, while making up for his defensive woes. What was the result? One of the best seasons in Philadelphia Sixers modern history. And proof, that if managed correctly, Iverson was and could be a winner in the NBA.
Which gave us a thought for next season: Houston. The Rockets play outstanding defense, have all the necessary role players in place, and since T-Mac undoubtedly will get injured next year, Iverson will be the clutch (shot clock winding down, 4th quarter) offensive scorer that Houston will lament … as it’s getting bounced in the first round this season.
19 Responses to “What’s All This “Iverson is Done” Business?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


April 13th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
I don’t know if it’s my brower or what, but this post is all effed up on the main page.
April 13th, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Same, I think he has the one-liner category defaulted and he didnt choose NBA
April 13th, 2009 at 4:56 pm
Great post by the Hoop Doctors.
April 13th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
what are you viewing in? no problems via firefox …
April 13th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
Great argument.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Whitlock has really been missing a lot lately.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
I’m 6′1, 165 and only made it to HS varsity. Does this mean Nate Robinson is a HOFer?
/I’m confused’d
April 13th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Why is AI done?
1. The chucker is getting older and older isn’t better like in golf.
2. He isn’t the athlete with the same quicks as he was 5 years ago.
3. He HAS to be THE MAN to be successful both from a physical aspect of the game. He isn’t going to be successful without having the ball in his hands the majority of the time and always be Option 1.
4. He HAS to be THE MAN to be successful from a mental side and there are few teams that would be willing (and the Rockets certainly aren’t one of them) to allow him the freedom to the undisputed leader of their team.
/list’d
April 13th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
It’s fine now. It was just the main page. When I clicked on the post, it looked fine. Now all is well.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Is Jason Whitlock claiming to only be 175 pounds? I would click to check, but I can’t stand Whitlock.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
“Utter debacle of a column.”…. Interesting tidbit in the middle of this post…. Please explain.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:16 pm
Dirtheavy, I was 175 in 7th grade.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
i was about that too.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Hey TBL, I’m not sayin, I’m just sayin.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Does his scoring average mean anything when he takes as many shots as he needs to reach that number.
I have to agree with Whitlock on this one and I actually read a similar story somewhere else saying Iverson is probably going to get mid level exception at best next year and there is a good chance this could become a sprewell, I have to feed my kids situation.
I think Iverson and Marburry are similar in that they are great indivdual players, terrible when put on a team. I have no respect for someone that won’t come off the bench when there is a better player (RIP Hamilton) in front of you.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
I’m hoping that the Iverson is Done business keeps picking up, just because I wouldn’t mind him coming back to Philadelphia and taking a backup role. But, that wouldn’t be anywhere close to successful if his ego was still to the point of him thinking he could be a main starting player.
April 13th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
So, let’s surround a 34 year old guard with declining skills with unselfish role players? That’s retarded. Iverson is/was great at what he did/does, score as the main guy. Does it help a team for someone with this personality to come off a bench for 18-22 mnutes a game? No, his ego won’t allow it. Do you start him and have him be the main guy like he was ten years ago? No, because he sucks on defense, isn’t the scorer he used to be, and can’t make anyone around him better. Either he checks his ego at the door and become a modern-day Vinnie Johnson, or retire. That’s it.
April 13th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
If Philly brings back Iverson, they better bring back Gminkski too.
April 13th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
good lord no, the rockets don’t need or want AI. Tracy McLady was bad enuff, there’s no way they’d voluntarily take on that headache