A History of Futility Gives Birth to Hope: The U.S. Improbably Vanquishes Spain
Soccer, World Cup June 24th. 2009, 6:15pmCurmudgeons will tell you that what happened today in South Africa is a mere footnote to history, a blip, and another in a series of false footsteps forward for the U.S. men’s national soccer team.
But I don’t think that’s the case. Let me tell you a story. I apologize in advance for its length.
In 1950, England was the lion of international soccer. From Wikipedia:
At the time, the English considered themselves the “Kings of Football”, with a post-war record of 23 wins, 4 losses, and 3 draws. Conversely, the Americans had lost their last seven international matches (including the 1934 World Cup and 1948 Summer Olympics) by the combined score of 45-2. The odds were 3-1 the English would win the Cup, and 500-1 for the U.S.
For the U.S. team that went to Brazil for the 1950 World Cup, the first Cup since 1938, those were the towering circumstances that presaged failure.
And those were the circumstances that reality scoffed at during what transpired in the group stage of that tournament.
England and the United States met at Belo Horizonte that day, and the U.S. national team played probably the finest game in its history. Joe Gaetjens punched in a goal in the 37th minute, and the team held on for a 1-0 victory so unfathomable that some newspapers in Britain, upon receiving the news, deemed it a misprint and reported a 10-0 triumph for their home side.
But that British team was off-form enough to lose again, to Spain, and exit the tournament disgracefully.
And our team dipped from that singular moment of brilliance to dark ages of soccer irrelevance. We lost to most teams that weren’t from Caribbean islands or China. We saw a domestic soccer league fail. We failed to qualify for the 1986 World Cup. We conceded eight goals while scoring only two in the 1990 World Cup, and just squeaked out of our group as the host nation in the ‘94 Cup.
We also came in dead last in the 1998 World Cup in France.
Golden days were few and far between (the U.S. upset an off-brand Brazil team in the 1998 Gold Cup, but did not win the tournament), and seemed like cruel glimmers of hope before another crushing defeat.
Yet along the way, the team and its fans started to justify my use of “we”: Soccer became a grassroots phenomenon in the U.S., youth leagues sprouting almost as fast as the suburban fields bloomed. Fathers, like mine, who played soccer in their youth, taught the game to their daughters and sons; “soccer mom” entered the lexicon as the sobriquet of choice for the involved mother shuttling her children from practices to pitches.
Soccer gained a measure of gender equality in the country when the U.S. women’s team, led by talents like Mia Hamm and Michelle Akers, stormed to victory in the 1999 Women’s World Cup, the most-attended exclusively women’s sporting event in human history, electrifying the nation for a summer. Brandi Chastain ripping off her shirt in exuberance, just as most male players had always done before, became, absurdly, a touchstone in the culture wars.
And then the men’s team decided it should share some spotlight. In 2002’s World Cup, the Americans beat Portugal and tied host South Korea, then downed bitter rival Mexico, as spectators flocked to bars in the mid-morning to catch games live. There are soccer fans in this country still embittered by the U.S.’s quarterfinal loss to Germany for a questionable non-call on the goal line; that says something about how soccer fandom has caught on here.
What followed, though, seemed to confirm the American reputation for maddening underachievement. They rose to the top ten of the (largely useless) FIFA rankings just prior to the 2006 World Cup. They followed that by losing to the Czech Republic and Ghana, notching the only point of their tournament by tying eventual champion Italy in the only game of the World Cup that saw the Azzurri concede a regulation goal.
They won two Gold Cups, in 2005 and 2007, and established themselves as the lords of CONCACAF, which covers North and Central America, and the Caribbean. They reinforced a perception as a poor traveling team with losses to lightly-regarded CONCACAF foes on the road.
The Under 20 portion of the squad made magic happen at the 2007 U20 World Cup. Those same players failed to make substantive impacts on the full national team.
So when the U.S. dropped the first two matches of the 2009 Confederations Cup, looking valiantly outclassed against Italy and inept against Brazil, the roller-coaster was assumed to have a downward trajectory. Few expected the U.S. to put up even a win against an Egypt side that played Brazil to its limits and edged the world champion Azzurri.
Then last Sunday happened, with the Americans shocking the Pharaohs 3-0 as the Brazilians dispatched Italy by the same tally, and the U.S. improbably advanced to the semi-finals of the Confed Cup.
With Spain, the world’s top team according to FIFA rankings, 2008 Euro champions, and possessors of an unbeaten streak in international play dating to November 2006, looming, it was only natural to assume that the U.S. had spent its good fortune for the year. The Spaniards, a highly technical and potent group, would cut a shaky American midfield and defense to ribbons, and the U.S.’s attack had neither the creativity nor the talent to keep pace.
Today proved that sometimes everything we know can be wrong.
First, the U.S. weathered the early going that has been their downfall of late, seizing control of the pace. Then, Jozy Altidore, the sometimes-brilliant striker for the U.S., netted a 27th minute goal on a move that befuddled Spain’s excellent goalie, Iker Casillas, giving the Spaniards their first deficit of the tournament.
Then, the U.S. added another goal, a bit of cleaning up in the box from the beleaguered Clint Dempsey, in the second half, and keeper Tim Howard did everything but engineer a forcefield in front of the U.S. goal, turning away a barrage of shots from the Spaniards. Landon Donovan, often the scapegoat for America’s troubles, was indefatigable and smothering. Michael Bradley’s 87th minute red card inspired some to pessimism, but, when the whistle shrilled against the dull thrum of the vuvuzelas, the Americans had beaten the Spanish giant.
I tweeted: “I cannot remember being this stunned by a sporting event in my lifetime.”
And I can’t. I wasn’t alive for the Miracle on Ice, and rarely considered two teams so unevenly matched as I did today’s. I though Spain winning by two goals would be a good result for our boys; before the game began, I would have bet any sum on Spain advancing.
This moment is for rejoicing, for celebrating a great game (both teams were offensively proficient, and the Americans’ backline did a remarkable imitation of granite) and reveling in the magic of sports delivering the unexpected.
But, fairly, it also time to respect soccer’s place in America.
That curmudgeon I linked to would have you believe that America’s soccer players don’t dream of advancing to Confederations Cup finals. I would counter that, before today, he would have been right, as they could not envision U.S. success on the world’s stage.
Today changes that.
This team has beaten two good teams, and soundly, in the country where next year’s World Cup will take place, and played admirably against a third team that will be expected to advance in the tournament. There’s an air of legitimacy to today’s result, with a team performing at levels hinted at for years, and a level of support for the team in both mainstream and outsider media that will be touted in the days leading up to Sunday’s final.
This team is coming of age as an international soccer power, to the delight of the young generations of Americans, raised around fields, rather than diamonds (it’s telling that President Obama’s daughters play soccer), and savvy enough to understand that American fans aren’t “soccer snobs,” but smart, interested observers who understand the game and our team’s place in the world.
Those fans would tell you that the American team is still definitely the underdog in a final that will include the winner of the Brazil-South Africa semi-final tomorrow and should be a rematch of the 3-0 debacle in the group stage.
But those fans, and others, will now tell you that they have hope, hope that our team will not just avoid embarrassment but claim victory. Perhaps that’s the legacy of this victory: Hope.
That’s what this feels like to me, anyway.
85 Responses to “A History of Futility Gives Birth to Hope: The U.S. Improbably Vanquishes Spain”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


June 24th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Too long. Even Duffy quit reading.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Andy: Needs more cthomashowell. Also, You didn’t get my memo:
http://thebiglead.com/?p=15176#comment-436906
I tweeted: “I cannot remember being this stunned by a sporting event in my lifetime.€
TBL: This is what you get when “lifetimes” begin about 1990. I warned you.
/curmudgeon’d
//but don’t lump me in w/ Lozo, he seems like a dick
June 24th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
Wow. You know that this is a blog right?
June 24th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
I read the whole thing…and it was long. But a well written piece. So there’s your compliment. But this..
Is crap. Boston coming back from down 3-0 in the ‘04 ALCS is a colossus compared to a semi-final game in an event that is not even the premiere of it’s sport. And you were alive for that.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
When TBL promised to pay you by the word, he was lieing.
Actually an interesting read.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Umm…unless he changed it…
Think that means all boys dream of winning a confed cup, unless he’s being sarcastic.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
Did TBL hire The Sports Guy’s son?
June 24th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
We scored 2 and allowed 8 goals in Italy in 1990. We scored 3 and allowed 4 goals as hosts in 94.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
You know who Lozo is, right?
No. And “hire” isn’t the word.
You’re probably right; I’ll go make sure and tinker.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
And my comment is awaiting moderation…
June 24th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
today was a great day for the real american football but this so called coming of age for USA soccer is short sighted. lets qualify for 2010 and then let the games begin
June 24th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
nice of you guys to give him shit on his first post. real nice.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Why? Did Favre finally sign?
June 24th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
soccer fans take some beatings the fact this was a front page story on ESPN is good for us
June 24th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Yeah, I’m just joshin ya.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
Nice post. Don’t sweat the morons with the 5th-grade attention spans.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
It’s his second and not everyone gave him shit. Besides, comes with the territory does it not?
June 24th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Come on, I’d expect nothing less than your worst. Comments aren’t for slurping the author. I can take it.
Thing that’s only tangentially related to the post, so it’s not in there: We’re going to qualify barring a huge collapse. The only question is whether we win or place second in our group; if we’re second, we can expect to be in another tough group because of how the seedings work.
Conventional wisdom’s held that if we don’t win and get a decent group, we were going to be toast before the end of the group stage. But conventional wisdom got royally screwed by fate today, and it would seem that this team, at full capacity and with a little luck, can beat the best in the world.
No one’s going to argue that there are more than three better teams in the world than France right now; FIFA’s stupid rankings have them #1, which, in fact, they probably are, but Brazil, Argentina, and the Netherlands are all in that realm, too.
I would continue, but you guys have already read enough of my crap. Thanks.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Why’s everyone getting so sensitive about giving the intern some guff? It’s not like we went SuperAndy on him or anything.
June 24th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Good article and well thought out. I don’t really like soccer but this was a good read.. Rather have a good article that’s too long for a blog ( how does that make sense??) then a post on qb gossip/ fashion
June 24th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
T-Ho was a pimp today.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
i liked the post.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Andy: Needs more cthomashowell. Also, You didn’t get my memo:
http://thebiglead.com/?p=15176#comment-436906
I tw++ted: “I cannot remember being this stunned by a sporting event in my lifetime.€
TBL: This is what you get when “lifetimes†begin about 1990. I warned you. Andy, I am KINDA kidding. Nothing personal.
/curmudgeon’d
//but don’t lump me in w/ Lozo, he seems like a jackass
June 24th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
ok then. no worries. sorry
June 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
next time try to include a picture of a key player in a hat though
June 24th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
I knew he was another Footie! Thank goodness that nice Stephen fellow is fan of violence. The third intern will obviously love screen grabs and Seinfeld.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Comments aren’t for slurping the author. I can take it.
Excellent post, you dickbag parvenu.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
its 102 outside with the shitty humidity. ac capital of the world
June 24th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
andy
love the fact there is another soccer fan on the main page here, but the net is for a country like the USA to get the world soccer community’s respect we have to do it in a Cup. Yeah 2002 was good but it was seen as a fluke. Games like these help our team to gain confidence, but to do it in 2010 would cement the fact we can play a little
June 24th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
That quote was supposed to be italicized. Stupid unemployment.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
I commented on that too JPQ but it’s in moderation. Here’s the portion I wanted to say:
Boston coming back from down 3-0 in the ‘04 ALCS is a colossus compared to a semi-final game in an event that is not even the premiere of it’s sport. And you were alive for that.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
I was born in ‘90. The only other things I can come up off the top of my head are Princeton-UCLA, George Mason’s run (which got less improbable with each game), App State-Michigan (plausible, but App State had won championships), and, well, that’s it. I don’t count Boise State-Oklahoma, because Boise was the better team for most of that game.
Admittedly, though, I’m young: I can’t go back to Chaminade over Virginia or Upset over Man ‘o War or something like that.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
This post was well written and informative, if a bit long. But then, I’m soccered out for the day. This:
is true, though, so thanks for the post.
Q: If USA beats Brazil, is that a bigger upset than today? Here’s why it might be: they just got drilled by Brazil, and it’s for the cup championship.
Here’s why not: They showed today they can beat the best, and Spain had those ridiculous streaks.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
Red Sox in ‘04 was bigger because it had never been done (in baseball, at least) and because it mattered.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
i think it was only done in hockey before but im not sure. not baseball or basketball though
June 24th, 2009 at 7:14 pm
I forgot that; you’re right, it’s definitely better, but that’s as a collective event, rather than one tilt. You weren’t so much shocked by each subsequent result as you were the final toll.
Also, the nouveau riche Sox fans (the pink hat-wearers) have gotten so much scorn that it obscures how great a story that really was.
And: Rulon Gardner over Karelin. That’s more improbable on a smaller scale.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
Holy shit dude..as a former intern I want to give you props…but sweet jeebus you need to cut this in half.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:21 pm
It happened in hockey a few times–I think with the Leafs in like ‘48 or something and again with the Islanders in the ’70s.
Good call on Karelin-Gardner. Can’t believe I’d forgotten about that.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:24 pm
Today had shock value; a win over Brazil would have staying power.
Don’t count out the Bafana Bafana against Brazil, either: If you hate the vuvuzelas, you’re going to hate them far, far, FAR more after a home game against the Brazilians.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
You know I know that. I’ll be more concise in the future. Also, I did apologize for the length up there.
(waits for “your mom” joke involving length)
June 24th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Just giving you shit. You should look at old Intern Bill posts if you want to know how nasty guys on this board can be. I still don’t know why people hated him so much.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:39 pm
I’ve been commenting here off and on since ‘07. (And with different names, apparently!) I know how these things go.
The college football post is coming soon, worry not.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:57 pm
The fact that under the story was a link that said ‘vote: do you care?’ shows that neither ESPN nor most people care about soccer here.
I love soccer, and to a much lesser degree team USA, but nothing short of winning a world cup will change this country’s view on soccer, and even then it would be because we’re a nation of front running ‘what have you done for me now’ fans.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:01 pm
The most improbable result in my lifetime…one that stretches 38 years…was Buster Douglass over Mike Tyson…nothing else comes close.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
Shakespeare In Love beating Saving Private Ryan for Best Picture.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:06 pm
People having any interest in anything Paris Hilton has ever done or said
June 24th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
Christian Slater getting his own TV show
June 24th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
Paris Hilton has a sex tape. Perez Hilton is a waste of oxygen.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
I’m surprised more people aren’t happy about this. Sure it’s only the confederations cup but we just beat the best team in the world, and Spain gave a crap about the tournament too, but people aren’t satisfied apparently. I don’t care if they lose 8-0 to Brazil, this was a successful tourney.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:11 pm
Yes it was. But the concerns that were there going into the tourney are not gone, that’s why I’m not getting too confident or anything. I can’t be satisfied with this team being the occasional giant killer, with our resources and talent pool to draw from there is no reason we should not be able to be a top twenty team.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
To be fair: The money for U.S. athletes is not in soccer, so they go elsewhere. Torres (or take your pick) is probably Spain’s best non-Gasol brother athlete, and plays the sport that gets him the biggest check.
Kobe loved soccer growing up, but the money was in basketball.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
OK, I hope the Moleman is still here, because I’m about to gay it up for him. This was his embarrassing theory once, and I am now the living embodiment of it.
Whenever I watch Spain play, I want to do it to 2 of those dudes. Torres and Ramos. Not them exactly, but the 2 girls from my past that they look exactly like in the face.
I’m watching them play, with my casual soccer interest, and I’m thinking about how hot those chicks were and wanting to do it. P into V, though, not P into Spanish Dude’s A.
What I’m saying is that those two guys not only look girly, they look like two girls I couldn’t close.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Well Gasol makes more than Torres.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
I was going to tag that /no homo…but that’s some gay gayness.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
I tend to do chicks that look more like Xabi Alonso, three day beard and all.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:28 pm
re: Red Sox … no way. That comeback happened over the span of a week, unlike one two hour period.
just going off the cuff … giants over patriots stunned me big-time, but the USA was a much bigger underdog today (esp considering the way they played v italy, costa rica and brazil).
oregon state over mighty usc last year (two years ago?) was big, but i actually called that upset.
the laettner shot vs. kentucky.
i’d say the lakers v portland in 2000 wcf … but i was such a geeky lakers fan that i thought they could do it.
and you can’t count singular plays - flutie, music city miracle, stewart to westbrook - because shit happens.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:30 pm
People having any interest in anything Perez Hilton has ever done or said
Paris Hilton has a sex tape. Perez Hilton is a waste of oxygen.
Andy, you are 1000% correct. All is forgiven from before-lol
June 24th, 2009 at 8:30 pm
Gasol’s also a seven-footer. Other than Crouch the Mantis, ain’t many of those big guys in soccer.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:32 pm
Bill Shankly had a fourteen inch penis.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Giants lost by a field goal a month before.
Last year. But the Stanford one two years ago was way bigger; in fact, that’s bigger than any other college football one because Stanford’s college football program is John Elway and that’s about it.
Two heavyweights.
This may be the most improbable upset of the last 20 years outside of Gardner-Karelin.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
I may be an alumni homer, but App State getting no love is ridiculous.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:39 pm
This may be the most improbable upset of the last 20 years outside of Gardner-Karelin.
I think you’re giving this tourney too much credence. It’s a practice tourney set up for South Africa’s benefit. As you said in your “somewhat lengthy” post, they had to lose sometime.
It needs to be for something to be the biggest upset of your lifetime or the last 20 years. It’s for the right to get hammered by Brazil.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Gardner is a good one Andy.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
This is the biggest upset since Vicente Fox became president.
/thank you, thank you
June 24th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Gardner is a good one Andy. It took me until Fetch said something to understand you meant Rulon Gardner v Alexander Karelin. I assumed it was an MMA reference. But yes, that was a crazy upset.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Overrated and inferior to today because:
1. That Michigan team was not very good for most of the year, and certainly not very good on that day; Spain was great at everything but finishing today, and we just beat them.
2. App State sliced them with the spread while Big Blue tried to pound Mike Hart; there was not as much of a contrast today, with us playing control (for a little while, at least) and outplaying Spain at their own game.
3. That was a meaningless game, in the scheme of things that season; this is in an international tournament with three of the best teams in the world.
Ceding a point or two to you:
1. Michigan never ever loses OOC at the Big House (that was the first one, yes?) so that was shocking.
2. It happened quite suddenly, whereas Egypt sort of previewed this game.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Still, you couldn’t even get a money line on that game, and trust me I tried.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Well, yeah. But it’s not Brazil and the Seven Dwarves. And the Patriots “had to lose sometime,” too.
.
Point for Gardner.
What if South Africa upsets Brazil? WORLD ON FIRE! (Actually, probably just Joburg.)
June 24th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
An upset? No question. I don’t want to rank it. It was a great, great, great win for the US. One that the team, Bradley, and all US Soccer supporters needed.
It is a big enough win to potentially get the US a seed in next year’s World Cup. FIFA notices little things like knocking off Spain 2-0 in a big tourney 360 days before the World Cup.
Getting a seed would mean avoiding the monster powers in round robin play (Spain, Brazil, Argentina, Holland, The Frogs, Engerland, etc…) and having a much better opportunity to get through to the knock out stages.
What I do know right now is that I’m on cloud nine until Sunday when Brazil beats them to a pulp again.
/Still a bit salty on the bull shit straight red against Bradley. It alarms me that officials have done this to them in 3 games in this tournament when really none of them were truly worthy.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
Michigan put up over 500 yards against Florida in their bowl game pretty much dominating the entire game. They were good.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
this is in an international tournament with three of the best teams in the world.
This is an international tournament that South Africa also advanced in. And go ask any Italian if they are a top 3 team right now.
It’s a designer tournament, with stunt casting (New Zealand, for instance).
June 24th, 2009 at 8:48 pm
That would have been one hell of a payday.
Stanford was a 42-point underdog, though.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Frankly it could happen, I keep telling people South Africa are going to be the beneficiary of blatant shoddy officiating next summer and judging by how bad the officiating has been in this tournament, why not start now?
June 24th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
a seed in the world cup would be fucking awesome. I don’t know how they come up with those but I want to bake a pie with money in it like in Shawshank and send it to FIFA
June 24th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
Trust me, I remember. That Michigan team was hot and cold, though.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Yeah, but that doesn’t make Spain (or Brazil, or Italy, or Egypt) any less imposing. We’ve played a harder slate than we ever do in CONCACAF and done well. That’s promising.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
Did they change how the seeding will be done? In 2006 it was a score based on your performances in the prior two World Cups and your FIFA rankings. If that’s the same, we have absolutely no chance of getting a seed.
Don’t forget that South Africa automatically gets a seed so that only leaves 7, and Italy automatically get a seed if they qualify and could drop down as far as eight in the FIFA rankings pretty easily.
June 24th, 2009 at 8:57 pm
I was asking about that elsewhere, and got this in return.
Looks a little grim.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Speaking of WCQ, CONCACAF and South America get far too many teams. Europe deserves at least two more. Four CONCACAF teams is absurd.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
You think 4.5 is too many for South America? And it’s only 3.5 for CONCACAF. 8 total, between the two.
I think Oceania gets jobbed.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Oceania doesn’t get jobbed. Only the Aussies play reasonable soccer and they chose to move to Asia for qualifying. The Kiwis are dreadful as their work in this tourney showed.
Bufana Bufana advanced because they got to play the Kiwis and Iraq in the round robin. That’s a little different from playing the best team in Africa, Italy, and the ridiculous Brazilians.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:21 pm
Oceania doesn’t get jobbed.
You missed my invisible sarcasm tag. It’s almost always there.
June 24th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Give ‘em a year, and it’ll be one of the central African teams. Honestly, they’re all crapshoots, because so few of the players play outside Africa.
Though Egypt impressed the hell out of me against Italy (didn’t see the Brazil game). El Hadary was every bit the man in that game that Howard was today.
June 25th, 2009 at 3:00 am
The best article ever written on here. Bravo Andy! TBL Godfather, he need not pledge any more he’s in! Andy get ready to be “vouched.” Captain Duffy go get the pinky ring.
June 25th, 2009 at 8:57 am
I don’t want to debate the points in the article or compare this upset to other upsets, but I just wanted to echo other sentiments that this is probably the best written post I have ever seen on TBL. Really good job. You’re a pro.