The U.S. Didn’t Choke: Brazil Just Throttled Them
Soccer, Video June 29th. 2009, 2:15pm
I’ve ragged on the U.S. men’s national team for all sorts of reasons: Really stupid uniforms, the continued employ of Bob Bradley (until about, oh, a week ago), an inability to do anything except shrivel on foreign soil in their CONCACAF region, and an allergy to controlled and sensible first touches.
But I can’t knock them for choking against Brazil on Sunday. Because they didn’t. And, if you’ve watched the NCAA Tournament, you’ve probably seen the same scenario before.
Yes, the first half of the game, from a scoring standpoint, was as near-perfect as possible. Another Jonathan Spector cross whipped into the box and netted by Clint Dempsey and an ambitious, breathtaking, and technically flawless two-man counterattack from Charlie Davies and Landon Donovan provided a two-goal advantage at halftime.
By my eyes, though, the Americans were not in total control of the game. Their goals came on quick stabs, rather than as a result of steady, probing development, and Brazil walloped the Stars and Stripes in possession, at one point in the first half holding a massive 59-41 advantage that portended ill.
This game was the equivalent of a Cinderella team bombing a few threes and taking an eight-point halftime lead. The U.S. team, like many Cinderellas, is one with a few standout players on a squad better known for its streaky play; Brazil was North Carolina, or Connecticut, stacked with studs and only kept down by fortune.
The U.S. went to halftime up by two goals, in a better position than they held against Spain, but with a far less dominant half behind them. The Brazilians seemed destined to score, despite a Herculean effort by Tim Howard and good work from much of the active American back line.
Then, as if the prospect of defending a two-goal lead for longer than an entire March Madness game were not enough, Brazil’s Luis Fabiano received a pass, turned, and fired at the top of the box, scoring his first goal almost before the echoes of the second half whistle died.
ESPN’s GameCast contains two entries, back-to-back, from the 46th minute:
46′ USA kick off.
46′ GOAL! USA 2-1 Brazil.
It happened in a flash, and put the U.S. permanently on its heels; while it was able to press against Spain into the second half, sparing Howard and his defense at least briefly, the siege started early in the final and lasted until the whistle.
Howard’s magic was only so potent, and the American team’s steam ran out well before their dream could be realized. Without midfielder Michael Bradley, out thanks to a silly red card against Spain, his father/coach Bob had no go-to substitutes; Brazil’s Dunga could pluck Elano and Dani Alves from the bench. And Brazil should have won 4-2; that ball that pinballed off the crossbar was unquestionably over the line.
This wasn’t a choke, because the U.S. didn’t lose this game so much as the Brazilian’s stellar seleção won it, chopping Cinderella’s lead in half until the furious run in the final twenty minutes to put the game out of reach. And there are no one-and-one free throws in soccer.
It is also partly because of our location that we viewed this game as only a referendum on our nation’s progress: This was our chance to prove ourselves, the Confederations Cup, against good teams in the same venues that will host the 2010 World Cup. But the proudest soccer nation on the planet had questions to answer, too, especially after a rollicking 4-3 opening win against Egypt that sent shocks to the system and invited questions about a side lacking two heroes of 2002, Ronaldinho and Ronaldo, due to form issues.
The Brazilians allowed just two goals the rest of the tournament, and trailed for only 74 minutes, sambaing past everything on the pitch when on form, restoring confidence in themselves when behind, and getting lucky enough when off their game (as they were, in a huge way, against South Africa) to advance. They played, as is their wont, beautiful soccer, and it verges on impossible to top an all-parts-in-order Brazilian side when their venerable talent fuses with their potentially transcendent form to create football Voltron.
For a half on Sunday, the Americans were better than what the mighty Brazilians could muster. That, and the sting that will stay with this team after faltering in the last throes of this tournament, will power this team entering World Cup qualifying against an inferior slate of CONCACAF foes.
But if they fail to qualify for the Cup? Chokers and frauds.
39 Responses to “The U.S. Didn’t Choke: Brazil Just Throttled Them”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

June 29th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
All I want is to get out of the group stages at the World Cup
June 29th, 2009 at 2:23 pm
At least the expectations wont be too high next year. They got dominated the entire game. Wasnt it something like 9 SOG for Brazil to 4 for the US in the first half? I’ll take losing 3-2 to Brazil all day. If they get out of group play in the WC there should be a parade.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
False. Choke job. 2-0 at half time and than giving up 3 unanswered goals to CHOKE away a win. How is it anything other than a gag? This isn’t like the NBA where no lead is safe ever, even if its 25 points going into the fourth quarter. This is soccer where you’re lucky to see 3 goals in a game let alone in a half. you give up 3 unanswered goals in one half in a final to lose by 1……..c’mon Phil Mickelson and Greg Norman thinks this is bad.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
did ronaldinho have some kind of fall from grace? i didnt hear any mention of him.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Another reason soccer doesn’t thrive in the U.S like every where else in the world…..people are satisfied with a 3-2 loss
June 29th, 2009 at 2:29 pm
don’t lump mickelson in with that hack…norman’s explosions were WAYYYYYYY worse.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
choke job.
/true story.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
did ronaldinho have some kind of fall from grace? i didnt hear any mention of him.
It is more fun to say, “Kaka.”
June 29th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Um, you do realize that Brazil scored 3 goals in a half against Egypt and Italy right? And 3 in 62 minutes against the US. Thats not lucky. They’re really good.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
fuck you sparty
/made up story
June 29th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
If having your lifestyle catch up to you, gaining about 30lbs and becoming a complete non-entity is a fall from grace then yes.
He still has the ability but would need to show tremendous dedication to come back. I don’t see it happening.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
+1. if i do it after today, i may get banned.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Yes, it’s not as though the United States fetishizes getting to the Final Four and losing or celebrates every Cinderella in every sport ever.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
I knew they should have come out in the 2nd half in a 2-3 matchup zone.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Oh and Andy congrats on officially entering the system.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:40 pm
I’ll read Simmons if I want to read something this long. This is a blog, dude.
Why does Al Sharpton insert himself into everything? That annoying, goofy-haired hypocrite is holding a press conference with Joe Jackson. What does Sharpton have to do with the Weirdo of Pop’s death? I’d bet nothing but we know he loves himself more than TO loves himself.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
NDub, he is what we refer to as an attention whore. I don’t know whose worse, him or Jesse Jackson
June 29th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Sharpton > Jackson
June 29th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Jesse Jackson is worse because sometimes people cave into his demands. People just laugh at Al.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
reaching the Final Four is the pinnacle of college basketball. the confed cup is like the preseason NIT.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Thanks. I feel very Borg-like.
June 29th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
You’re right. We’re not rioting right now, killing foreigners, and sending death threats to our own players.
/soccer fan stereotype’d
//didn’t piss of half the people here with a Detroit cheap shot
June 29th, 2009 at 2:55 pm
Rockabye > Duffy
June 29th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
I’ll read Simmons if I want to read something this long. This is a blog, dude.
@ NDub, that’s three times with the same line since last wednesday. Get some new material.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
You’re right. We’re not rioting right now, killing foreigners, and sending death threats to our own players.
+1 Jay, i set myself up for that one.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Dear Andy,
Here is an excellent, and interesting, post by the Washington Post’s well known soccer blogger, Steven Goff:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/soccerinsider/2009/06/usa-brazil_rewind.html
It’s interesting because I think you could at least given him a hat tip or acknowledment since you stole your NCAA tournament analogy from him.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
Dear Andy,
signed,
Steven Goff’s mom
June 29th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
You’re tracking me now? I hope you’re not a follower on Twitter.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
I’m also wondering if you didn’t get this comment
“Without midfielder Michael Bradley, out thanks to a silly red card against Spain, his father/coach Bob had no go-to substitutes; Brazil’s Dunga could pluck Elano and Dani Alves from the bench.”
from the excellent That’s On Point soccer blog, since it stated the same point twice yesterday in very similar language:
” 2. Immediately after Brazil leveled it at 2-2, who were the subs Bob Bradley put in? Sascha Kljestan and Jon Bornstein. Not to single these two guys out. But on the other side Dunga is throwing on Elano and Dani Alves.”
http://thatsonpoint.blogspot.com/2009/06/tough-kaka.html
“As I mentioned before, Dunga had the likes of Dani Alves and Elano off the bench. Bradley had Sacha Kljestan and and Jonathon Bornstein.”
http://thatsonpoint.blogspot.com/2009/06/breaking-bad-or-good.html
June 29th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
No. And if I had, I probably would’ve spelled Sacha and Jonathan right. I do a lot of things wrong, I’m sure, but plagiarism isn’t one of them.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
Also not stolen. I did read a few things on my own, though from none of the sources you’ve listed, but I came up with my own thoughts. If you want to go check my Twitter from last night, you can see I was yapping about that metaphor then, too.
Simply put: There’s a lot of soccer talk on the Intertubes right now. Much of it is going to overlap. Some of it may be lifted from other places. But mine isn’t. Thanks for asking, though.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
Hutchins > Cardillo
June 29th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
did ronaldinho have some kind of fall from grace? i didnt hear any mention of him.
He peaked 2 years ago and stopped working. He’s gotten lazy, self-centered and overweight and still thinks he’s better than the rest of the pack.
Think of the Shaq post-three titles in LA but pre-trade to Miami.
And no, it’s not a choke job. 2-0 leads are not insurmountable in soccer at all — see: Liverpool v AC Milan 2005 for the easiest example.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
Also, I hadn’t read them before this, but all of those links are excellent. The last line of the second one from That’s On Point is especially good.
June 29th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
OK. Comments rescinded.
Although I do not see where pace entered into Luis Fabiano’s first goal. He excellently turned and struck the ball with the defender on his back, in the manner of Torres and Zlatan.
June 29th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
I was trying to say the goal happened quickly. Bad phrasing, I see now.
June 29th, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Good work Andy. Way to stick to your guns… Agree. No choke.
Unfortunate that Brazil was up to the task. They are playing at an extremely high level right now and to get a 2 goal lead against them is something to work from.
June 29th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
[...] The U.S. Didn’t Choke: Brazil Just Throttled Them- [TheBigLead] [...]
June 30th, 2009 at 3:56 am
Now that is spoken like someone informed about the game as is this fine writing by Andy again!
“Choke job” is just rhetoric from either those who never played the game or who just did not watch the replays. Brazil EARNED every single goal. There were no red cards or other “controversies” to blame this time. The turn-around goal from Fabiano was a goal of classic beauty, as our defender was not off him by much and yet still that was too much.
Brazil is so good that they can play an imperfect game and still win, whilst your team must play a perfect game to beat them.
This has been the case also historically with Brazil for the most part in the World Cup and at high levels of international play. The lone US win over a second-select Brazilian team in 1998 certainly is impressive nonetheless, but that was not the highest level of world play anyway.
The good news is that at last our US team is a serious threat to any team on the globe now such that we will not be taken for granted again by such teams.