New York Post Keeps its Erin Andrews Coverage Classy
ESPN, Erin Andrews July 22nd. 2009, 8:59am
Thanks to a reader for the screengrab and helpful yellow arrow. [NY Post]
More Andrews:
USA Today’s Christine Brennan on the Erin Andrews Situation: “Women sports journalists need to be smart and not play to the frat house.€
TMZ: Could the Creepy Erin Andrews Hotel Videos Have Been an ESPN Inside Job? Edit
Erin Andrews’ Lawyers Have Spoken About the Creepy Peephole Video, Which is Unfortunately Real
14 Responses to “New York Post Keeps its Erin Andrews Coverage Classy”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:01 am
and here I always thought the Post was as classy as escargot, caviar, and the dos equis dude.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:08 am
Kudos to the New York Post for outdoing any blog’s coverage of this story.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:10 am
Dude, I don’t think ’snatch’ is the preferred nomenclature. Vagina-American, please.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:13 am
If this “incident” definitively proves one thing, it’s that I’m one creepy motherfucker with too much time on his hands.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:13 am
“This is not Nam…there are rules.”
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:15 am
I watched the video last week, and upon doing so felt very dirty.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:15 am
God, only on days like this do I miss living in the city.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:20 am
Pardon my naivete, but what the fuck does the New York Post bring to the table? Why are they still even in business? Do people understand that they are part of what’s wrong with journalism?
/Idealist working for TV media (shoot me, please)
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:24 am
I watched the video last week, and upon doing so felt very dirty.
I probably spent a cumulative 3 hours looking for it, all sneakily, as we had company, mostly with a baby next to me. When I finally got it, at like 6am monday morning, I didn’t make it through half. It was genuinely creepy. I felt really bad for that lady.
I’m glad I don’t love her as much as Ty Duffy, though. I’ll bet he’s truly betrayed.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:25 am
Do you really have to ask that question?
Repeat after me: lowest common denominator.
You should already know this, because you work with TV media.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 am
What’s wrong with journalism is appealing to people’s interest and selling well?
Not defending the Erin Andrews coverage. Think it’s abhorrent. But, despite the sensationalist format, they do break a fair amount of sports and entertainment news.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:30 am
Does anyone really find this shocking? It’s just another day in the life of the Rupert Murdoch media empire.
July 22nd, 2009 at 9:49 am
He is the classic capitalist. I find it so funny that conservatives hold him up to be this bastion of conservatism. When the reality is he would go to a 100% HuffPost liberal slant if it meant making one more dollar a year than he does now.
July 22nd, 2009 at 10:04 am
god i love the new york post!