The Big Boys Wrap Up All-Star Weekend With Opposing Viewpoints (Except Weed. They Agreed on That.)
Uncategorized February 20th. 2007, 10:16pm
Since NBA games begin in a few hours, this is probably the last NBA All-Star post we’ll be doing – excluding Pacman Jones and his strip club incident, of course. We figured the best way to cap off the coverage was to do a little compare and contrast between Bill Simmons’ 8,000 word opus on all the fun he had in Vegas, and Jason Whitlock’s ‘Sin City was a war-zone’ column.
Simmons used the ace up his sleeve – ESPN’s cozy relationship with the NBA – to get some face-time with NBA commish David Stern. Agree: Simmons was smart to drive from LA as opposed to fly. Disagree: Lauren Graham of ‘Gilmore Girls’ is definitely not ‘sneaky hot,’ she’s just hot. (As for Meadow Soprano – like many girls, when you’ve this social butterfly out a few times, you become immune to her hotness and she stops emanating hotness. However, when your friend meets her for the first time, he’s blown away and raves about her for months.)
Simmons touches upon all the weed and violence that went down, but – and perhaps he was hamstrung, who knows – he elects to spend more time talking gambling than mayhem … which is where Whitlock scored points. We will say this – it is one of the first Simmons columns that we read from start to finish without getting up or clicking away – so he did something right. One last agreement: Hard Rock is the best hotel in Vegas. We recommend a Sunday by the pool – sitting in a cabana looking at all the strippers cavorting on their day off. Great fun.
While Simmons made you feel like you were running with him from Pure to his hotel to change shoes, Whitlock put you in the action as if it were truly dangerous. These few lines may be the funniest we’ve ever read from the guy: “Vegas police were simply overwhelmed along The Strip. They were there solely for decoration and to discourage major crimes. Beyond that, they minded their own business. I was there. Walking The Strip this weekend must be what it feels like to walk the yard at a maximum security prison. You couldn’t relax. You avoided eye contact. The heavy police presence only reminded you of the danger. Without a full-scale military occupation, New Orleans will not survive All-Star Weekend 2008.”
Agree: The French Quarter will not survive Suge Knight’s posse. Disagree: You can’t take the All-Star game to China. Though we don’t read him regularly, this may be the best thing we’ve read from Whitlock.
Welcome to Hip-Hop Woodstock (ESPN.com)
Mayhem Main Event at NBA All-Star Weekend (AOL Sports)
Can anyone answer why didn’t Yahoo, Sportsline, or Sports Illustrated didn’t produce these kinds of wrap-up pieces? Guys, you’re writing for the net. You’ve got bandwidth to burn, and the rules can be bent. If either of the other big sites did have a recap, and we missed it, feel free to send it along.
11 Responses to “The Big Boys Wrap Up All-Star Weekend With Opposing Viewpoints (Except Weed. They Agreed on That.)”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


February 20th, 2007 at 11:05 pm
Lauren Graham is always hot.
Agree about Meadow. Her Maxxim (?) shoot was cool the first time.
February 20th, 2007 at 11:39 pm
Sometimes, I wonder what planet Simmons is living on. He likes to make observations that he thinks are novel, but are actually quite banal. In the All-Star wrapup, he mentions the Blackberry and then compares it to crystal meth, which might be insightful if, I don’t know, people hadn’t been calling the device the “Crackberry” for years because of its druglike qualities. His college basketball blog is full of similar gems, such as when he came down from Mount Sinai with last week’s revelation that Texas A&M is pretty good. Really? Is there any college basketball fan who hasn’t been hip to this all year? Next, I expect him to clue us in that Indiana is a real threat to win the 1987 NCAA Tournament.
February 21st, 2007 at 12:10 am
Many things going on here…
The Hard Rock pool on a Sunday afternoon cannot be described with mere words.
Both Simmons and Whitlock nailed their columns. Whitlock, being black, said things Simmons couldn’t, while Simmons still does a solid job combining the access of a true insider with the perspective of a man on the street, or Strip, as the case may be.
Everyone I’ve talked to said Monday at McCarran looked like a Third World airport the day after the local generals staged a coup.
I didn’t go, and I can’t decide if I am glad or sad that I missed it. Probably both.
p.s. does Whitlock’s AOL page have an RSS feed?
February 21st, 2007 at 1:11 am
haha, yeah I’ve been really noticing that lately. The college basketball “blog” was full of “insights” that most everone knows. It really feels like there’s no point to reading him when he says that kind of stuff. He’s still one of the few writers that may say something you hadn’t have thought of but the overall quality control needs to improve to keep the guy from sounding like a coworker who barely follows sports.
Basically, I think he’s said everything he has to say and spends most of his time watching reality TV and other ladies fare at this point.
February 21st, 2007 at 1:46 am
For what it’s worth , Jack Mccallum did a “choosing sides” for si.com in which he picked Hell over Vegas for an all-star game location.
http://tinyurl.com/yvskwo
February 21st, 2007 at 6:36 am
I think the problem with Simmons is he just isn’t hungry enough anymore. He needs a new venue to get recharged and back to form, and I think it’s doable. I say this because one positive I’ve noticed is since all of those negative posts on those ESPN comments boards he’s stopped alot of the out-of-date references to movies from before most readers’ time and other repetitiveness, showing that he heard the critics and was affected by their comments. I say give him a few more months and his stuff will only improve more.
February 21st, 2007 at 3:17 pm
Damn, did Whitlock just say that? He may want to lay low for a little while; neither bloods nor crips appreciate the bad press.
February 21st, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Whitlock wrote this article for the Kansas City Star. The tenor is slightly different from his aolsports article. Curious as to why he saved the vitriol and outrage for one column over the other. if the weekend offended him so much, seems like that would have a bigger presence in the “softer” piece.
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/sports/columnists/jason_whitlock/16730767.htm
February 21st, 2007 at 8:38 pm
Thanks Tyson, I was just going to write that!!! Whitlock reveals that he is the REAL Bojanger…. just read both columns before defending him…..
February 21st, 2007 at 9:31 pm
SI.com was posting daily recaps of the scene in Sin City from Arash Markazi. He posted a recap after All-Star weekend last year, but much like Simmons’ piece it was way too damn long. I sort of liked the nightly recaps better than the novel sized recaps on Monday when I’ve already moved on from the game.
February 24th, 2007 at 5:25 pm
I used to think Whitlock told it like it was : calling out Snoop, Irvin – you know, the “usual Bojanglers.” Some of his social commentary shit but when I read a blogger’s (it escapes me who it was) side by side comparison of his K.C. article and his AOL article I was shocked at his 180. Whitlock dancing for the man…I never saw it coming. TheBiglead should get him in here to defend himself…What a load of garbage. Oh and by the way Simmons jumped the shark a long time ago. The majority of his fans call for one of his “mailbags” at the very least once a month but he gives us his best “firedocrivers” columns instead…