Jason Whitlock, Ruffling Feathers All Over CNN and the Today Show * [Update: CNN Transcript Added]
Uncategorized April 13th. 2007, 12:57pmAbout the most shocking email we’ve ever received here at TBL arrived late last night, while we were catching up on ‘Scrubs’:
“After appearing on the CNN programs Lou Dobbs and Anderson Cooper 360, Jason Whitlock may be on his way to national stardom not as a sportswriter but as a pundit and political commentator.€
The hell? We went to Youtube for evidence and by jolly there it was. Among Whitlock’s greatest hits on Tucker Carlson (and we’re paraphrasing here): ‘Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are domestic terrorists lighting fires and picking everyone’s pocket on the way out of town. Jackson should be down at Duke apologizing to those lacrosse players - he owes them an apology for stirring up that mess. Black America is tired of Jackson.’
Wow. Tucker Carlson, clad in that annoying bowtie, closes with: ‘I nominate you, Jason Whitlock.’
Hold up. Let’s check the trajectory here: KC Star to ESPN, ESPN to Sports Reporters and PTI, and then losing the ESPN TV gigs for talking to a blog. Six months later, he’s becoming a social and political commentator who is having a say in dictating the agenda of black America.
Minutes ago, the wife just called out, ‘there’s a sportswriter on CNN totally destroying Al Sharpton.’ Curious, we checked it out. It was Whitlock! We’ll say this - dude knows how to put Al Sharpton in place. We half expected Sharpton to respond the way Scoop Jackson did when Whitlock blasted him in the interview with us - ‘what’s with the black on black crime?’ Instead, Sharpton remained mostly silent.
Don’t think we’re quite ready to summarize Whitlock’s actions - it’s not even freakin’ 9 a.m. - but this story has consumed us all morning. A sportswriter on the Today show is kind of a big deal; the real good news here is nobody ordered our blog to be blown up.
[Update: After the jump, we've got the transcript of Whitlock vs. Sharpton]
S. O’BRIEN: Well, Don Imus, as we’ve been telling you all morning, is now out of a job. Leading the charge to take him off the air was the Reverend Al Sharpton. But “Kansas City Star” columnist Jason Whitlock says Sharpton’s outrage is focused in the wrong direction.
Both gentlemen are joining us this morning.
Nice to see you. Thank you for talking with us.
First and foremost, Reverend, let’s begin with you. How do you feel today? I mean, what happened was exactly what you had asked for from the get-go. So is vindicated the right word? Do you feel progress was made?
AL SHARPTON, CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST: No. I think that it’s a lot more to do.
You know, we’ve been fighting this battle the last couple of years, and it intensified about what’s happening on the airwaves, what’s happening in many of our communities. National Action Network, my group, two years ago at our convention said we were going after some of these music companies, some of these people that have polluted airwaves. Have had meetings with the FCC.
Imus fell within the whole spear of that, and certainly within the spear of what we fight, civil rights. So when the National Association of Black Journalists came out and looked and called for his firing, we came out right behind them, and the rest became history. But I think it’s really sad that we have to address these issues.
This is 2007 and have to still talk about these kind of things. How could we feel good about it?
S. O’BRIEN: At the same time, Jason, you said that you actually thought in all of this Imus was “irrelevant and insignificant”. I’m quoting you on that. What do you mean? Why?
JASON WHITLOCK, “KANSAS CITY STAR”: To us. To us as black people, he carries no weight in our community. He has no influence over us. He doesn’t define us.
He’s not the one defining our women as bitches and hos. We know who that is.
Don Imus is insignificant, and we’ve turned him into this all- powerful figure, and actually have put these young women at risk. They’re now being harassed, death threats because people don’t…
S. O’BRIEN: So let me stop you there. Are you saying then it was wrongheaded to go after Don Imus in the way that…
WHITLOCK: I think that an apology should have been demanded from Don Imus, and we should have asked MSNBC and CBS, you guys deal with him. He’s an idiot. And then moved on from there.
The press conferences, the over-the-top picketing, reaction, all, it just all went way too far. Don Imus doesn’t — doesn’t move us, doesn’t carry any weight in our community. He doesn’t define us.
S. O’BRIEN: Then let me get to the Reverend Sharpton, because, of course, you talk about the picketing and the calls for protests. I mean, he’s talking about you.
SHARPTON: Again, my argument is not with him. I think when the young ladies had their press conference they made it very clear when Essence spokes that they were aware of what we were doing and was happy with what we were doing.
So, I mean, again, these girls are very intelligent and speak for themselves. I think the issue now is where we go from here.
Imus was just a portion of preserving the airwaves. And I think you can’t, at one hand, as we have, challenge the hip-hoppers and challenged those that are doing this daily in our community, but I’m also challenging others, saying, because you are big and because you have these presidential candidates and senators on your show, we will take you on.
And he says that MSNBC and CBS should have been told to deal with them. That’s what we did. We told them to deal with him.
S. O’BRIEN: Well, at the same time, though, there are certainly many rappers who use those words all the time, all the time, and have for a long time. And those rappers who, in many cases, are, you know, represented by Universal. Universal is owned by NBC.
I mean, there’s a big connection. That’s a big corporation.
SHARPTON: Exactly.
S. O’BRIEN: So, what’s…
SHARPTON: And that’s part of two things in both the NBC CEO meeting and the meeting with CBS. We said, we’ve got to talk about your other side here, your entertainment side. We’ve got to talk about the fact that many of you are in the business of this whole climate that is devastating our community. And we’ve got to talk about the lack of inclusion of people of color on the airwaves. I mean, if you look at America and look at most of our primetime shows, you don’t even see us. And you don’t see us behind the camera, where maybe if someone was in the studios, then Imus would not have gotten away with this for years.
S. O’BRIEN: Let me give a final question to Jason this morning.
And it’s going to be about a case that we followed, as well, which are these three young men from Duke University who really had their lives ruined for the last year, to put it pretty simply. Do you think that there should have been people marching and calling for justice for them?
WHITLOCK: Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely.
S. O’BRIEN: In all communities?
WHITLOCK: You must maintain the moral high ground. You must have some consistency about you.
Injustice for one is injustice for all. Those young men were exploited the same way these young basketball players have been exploited by Jesse and Al. They run around the country exploiting these young people, making problems where — making the problems much bigger than what they should be.
These three kids down at Duke, these basketball players have been used and exploited, and it’s unfortunate.
S. O’BRIEN: Well, we’re out of time, but I’m going to let you respond for a second.
SHARPTON: Well, I mean, first of all, the young ladies spoke for themselves in their gratitude to us. You never heard people that we fought for. It’s always guys that are not in the ring that want to call the fights.
And that — you know they’re going in the ring. You’re going to have critics. We try to win on behalf of the people we’re fighting for. You can’t satisfy people not involved in the fight.
S. O’BRIEN: Reverend Al Sharpton joining us this morning. Also Jason Whitlock from the “Kansas City Star”.
Gentlemen, I appreciate both of you. Thanks for being with us — Miles.
Imus isn’t the real bad guy (KC Star)
127 Responses to “Jason Whitlock, Ruffling Feathers All Over CNN and the Today Show * [Update: CNN Transcript Added]”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

April 13th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Preach, Whitlock!
April 13th, 2007 at 1:21 pm
I wrote Whitmlock an email telling im how impressed I was with his appearance on Tucker. Will there be a You tube copy of him on the today show?? I hope so.
April 13th, 2007 at 1:36 pm
So Whitlock goes to play Tucker Carlson’s game, and THAT is the solution? Bleh. Carlson is one of the biggest hacks on television, and I’m sure he just loves having a black man come on to help him villify other black men–particularly prominent black men like Jackson.
April 13th, 2007 at 1:39 pm
Um yeah, interesting trajectory there. It’s almost like he’s placing himself in the middle of a controversy, espousing a contrarian viewpoint to gain national recognition. Totally not an attention grabbing media whore move. WTMF!?! If you don’t see that Whitlock is Al Sharpton on the other side of the coin I don’t know what kind of coffee you drink, but you should switch up. Tucker Carlson singing your praises? Think he might be called upon the next time there is a controversial subject with racial overtones? Mind you, I don’t begrudge dude for trying to get his paper on, but DON’T sell me on certain “leaders” being ambulance chasers when you’re doing 90 in the other lane.
April 13th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
I agree 100% with Whitlock. I hope someone posts video of him owning Sharpton . Soon
April 13th, 2007 at 1:42 pm
Here are the links to his two columns about this. He is dead on. I wish more people could react as thoughtfully as Whitlock instead of the emotionally charged garbage on liberal news networks.
http://www.kansascity.com/182/story/66339.html
http://sports.aol.com/whitlock/_a/time-for-jackson-sharpton-to-step-down/20070411111509990001
April 13th, 2007 at 1:45 pm
Well, it wouldn’t take much for Whitlock to be a better political commentator than sports writer. Maybe he’ll trajectorize himself out of the KC Star so I don’t have to look at his mug 3-4 times a week and read is lazy columns.
Yes, I know I don’t have to read them, but what else am I going to do with my morning shit?
April 13th, 2007 at 1:46 pm
“Six months later, he’s becoming a social and political commentator who is having a say in dictating the agenda of black America. ” I SOOOOO have a problem with that statement. Who is Jason Whitlock to dictate the agenda of black America. I didn’t nominate him or Jesse or Al or Luis or Barack (yet) for that matter. That is the problem. The media nominates these dudes as our voices, with no input from us. You know, the actual black people in this country. Then when they act up, everyone gets indignant about these “black leaders” and how can black people support them and blah blah blah. It’s annoying on levels you can’t imagine.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
I nominate you, Diallo Tyson.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
Diallo,
who did you nominate? not being a dick here, just curious, you’ve made it clear who you didn’t nominate.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
I don’t agree with everything JW has to say, that’s for sure. No one appointed him as the Voice of Black America either. But I will say that he is one of the few people that “preaches” self-responsibility. I hate to quote terrible presidents, but maybe there is some creedence here to “it’s time to stop crying and start sweating”. I’ve heard far worse other programs and to me this whole circus has been about people getting their faces on TV and not about the deeper issues. In other words, business as usual.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
Why do I have to nominate a “black leader?” That’s the whole point. It’s a sham. The media needs a flash point they can go to whenever something pops off. Who’s the Italian-American leader? Jewish leader? et. al? You want to lead, run for Congress or the Presidancy. Because contrary to popular belief, black people don’t think with a collective consciousness. We’re diverse individuals. We’re democrats, republicans, homosexuals, rich, poor, educated, uneducated, different….you know like everybody else. How the Hell is one person going to “lead” us? It’s ridiculous…
April 13th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
Sorry Matt, hope you don’t think I snapped at you. Some things get me amped:)
April 13th, 2007 at 2:14 pm
Go Jason.
As for folks suggesting he is a media whore, I suggest you go back and read some of his stuff excoriating black hypocrisy in the past, such as his scrap with Scoop Jackson.
Whitlock is simply being consistent with his beliefs, and people are picking up on that.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:16 pm
Lasy journalist or not, Whitlock’s perspective on this particular issue is spot on.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Tucker stopped wearing his bowties a while ago… maybe he wants to be taken more seriously? ha!
Still, whether or not you like Carlson, Whitlock made some valid points, specifically re: Jackson and Sharpton. They stir the shit up and aren’t subject to having to apologize when they do it without the facts (see the Duke lacrosse players case, for just one recent example). God forbid we ask these men to apologize… wouldn’t want to appear racist!
I’m not a fan of Whitlock and think he often made ridiculous statements when he was on ESPN programming… however, he made some valid points re: forgiveness and apologies, etc. If anyone thinks Imus was fired for moral reasons by CBS and NBC, you’re in dreamland. He was fired because Sharpton and Jackson demanded it and promised to boycott anyone who sponsors Imus — when the sponsors began fleeing, NBC/CBS saw fit to remove Imus. It was a money decision, plain and simple. And when Imus reappears on satellite radio on six months, he’ll probably have a bigger listenership that before. Well done, Sharpton.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
It’s cool, you’re probably right in actuality. Although can I nominate Oprah to lead the “people who I find annoying but my wife loves category”, although she’ll have to beat out Katie Couric.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
I don’t see how being consistent in your beliefs doesn’t make you a media whore:) He’s just a media whore to some because you agree with his points. If he was on Tucker carlson backing up Al, you’d call him a media whore. Cause for the life of me, leaving aside their respective messages, I can’t see a difference between the two. He’s about to appear on Colin-I mean Schutebag’s show and he’s gonna be on Detroit radio at 4:00 today. That’s a lot of media appearances for one day. Definitely not media whore behavior.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
I meant “just not a media whore to some…”
April 13th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Whitlock is being ASKED to appear on these shows b/c he has an opinion that producers think should be heard and that audiences obviously want to hear (b/c if people were turning the channel he wouldn’t keep popping back up).
Whoring is selling your dignity for money. Whitlock is keeping his integrity for money by sharing his opinion. Very big difference.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
I know a lot of you hate Colin Cowherd, but he broke ESPN “rules” today by having Whitlock on. Check it out. Whitlock was awesome!
April 13th, 2007 at 2:37 pm
If you don’t think he sees a financial gain at the end of this rainbow, you are so fooling yourself. He’s not suing anybody for money. but an increase in exposure increases his readership which increases his bargaining leverage. Sort of like a radio host/activist that champions certain causes to gain exposure. But like I said, i don’t begrudge his right to say what he wants. I don’t begrudge him appearing on tv and gaining national exposure. Just don’t be self righteous as if you’re above the fray, when you’re in the muck like everyone else.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
I couldn’t agree more with Whitlock, but is there any other black journalists that hate blacks more than Whitlock? Remember, he was the only black sports writer they could find who would say Vince Young couldn’t be a QB in the NFL. I sent him an email about this to him, and he didn’t respond. By the way Paul, fuck schrutebag.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
He was on Stephen A. Smith’s show two days ago too.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
As a former reporter I once blasted Jackson during a Q&A …I took the easy look at me route and asked the man who appointed him the voice of Black America and if his presence actually impeded black professionals. ( it was during a Wall Street Project event) I will go to grave regretting that. While I cant apoligize ( and he doesn’t need me to speak for him) for Hyme Town or his ties with the Democratic party . The man has a body of work ( good and bad ) and has earned the title “Leader”
April 13th, 2007 at 2:48 pm
so does that mean anyone with an opinion that chooses to express it in the media is a media whore? having read whitlock’s stuff in the past, i’m pretty sure that these are things he feels pretty passionately about, and maybe that’s why he’s so eager to talk about them. i dont know that he’s trying to be “the voice of black america” or anything. he’s just talking. he’s not the same as Al Sharpton. Al Sharpton has used racial epithets in the past, plenty of times, yet his whole platform is to rail against anybody who uses an epithet themselves. that’s the height of contradiction. Sharpton certainly seems to be trying to position himself as the ‘voice of black america’ in a much more calculated, contrived way, while Whitlock is just a man with an opinion that he feels very strongly about and wants to get it out there.
and Tony Soprano is the voice of italian americans. everybody knows that.
April 13th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
It’s pretty sad when Whitlock is one of the only mainstream media member (in the sports media that is), black or white, who discusses this. Bernie Miklasz in STL did something similar, but the hacks at USA Today, NYT, and Los Angeles Times need to pull their heads from their asses.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
TBL, I’m not sure you guys are being consistent with your positions on Imus, here. I can’t hear the video (work restrictions) but Whitlock is saying in his article that Imus is an irrelevant shock-jock, he shouldn’t be taken seriously, and his apology should be the end of it. Yet two posts down, you guys celebrated Imus’ firing. Now you’re pumping up Whitlock’s article and appearance? Is there a disconnect here, or is there something I’m missing?
April 13th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
I like Whitlock and I agree with him here…I have also taken issue with some of the things he wrote, which I feel shows he has a good column I am not always for agreeing with everything I read or hear as long as it makes me think. As with the “media whore” thing, I don’t necessarily agree with that. He wrote a column that has resonated with people and the talk shows are putting him on. Does he have to take them? I guess not but in this business aren’t we all looking to advance our careers? He is a whore if he is just saying anything to get on these shows. I geniunely believe that Jason believes what he says and now he is given a forum to express it? I don’t see Jason looking to be a “black leader” (which I totally agree with Diallo no community needs a leader anointed by the Media) but he is providing a voice that wasn’t really represented over the last few days. If it anything it shows that all black people don’t agree on this issue and how it was handled which over the past few days it has been portrayed that way by the media and Jackson and Sharpton.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:25 pm
There are probaably Irish-American or Italian-American or whatever “community leaders” but no one knows them because no one gives a crap if you rip these ethnicities. Whitlock seems to be on the same page as Bill Cosby.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:27 pm
Jason appeared on “Prime Time Sports”, a national sports talk show in Canada and the northern united states and espoused his ideas to the hos, Bib McCowan. He had the ear of Mr McCowan as what he said makes a lot of sense. Whatever his goal is in making these statements, and I believe they are altruistic (as much as anyone can be), it is refreshing to hear such a different viewpoint. Read his 4 articles and fixing sports….simply great writing. not only does he criticize, but he does what crtics rarely do: he offers a solution.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
A LOT of blacks thought OJ was frickin innocent.
Whitlockis in the mold of Thomas Sowell, John McWhorter, Shelby Steele and Walter Williams. Black men who hold people to a higher standard than that of a fucking moron like Snoop Dog or JayZ.
Guy’s got balls the size of church bells.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Agree with Benrand.
Somebody needs to step up and challenge ‘domestic terrorists’ such as Sharpton and Jackson, whose primary agenda is clearly to line their own pockets.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Jason Whitlock wants NO parts of Al Sharpton one on one.
none.
Im glad you all are so entertained. that IS what its all about, after all.
April 13th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
no one wants a piece of Al Sharpton; they might get shot
April 13th, 2007 at 3:54 pm
Domestic terrorists? Timothy McVeigh. Al Sharpton. Yep, pretty much the same person.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
LOL, AL Sharpton…
Oooh, is he gonna challenge him to a FIGHT??!?!?!
April 13th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
Walter Williams …humm
The same fool who wrote that if you took blacks out of America it would be a much safer place. A bojangles is a bojangles is a bojangles!
April 13th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
Tyson-
Where do you stand on Whitlock’s argument? Your analysis to this point appears to be to call him out for alleged cashgrabbing. Be that as it may, what do you think of the substance of his arguments? You haven’t taken those on yet.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:07 pm
I don’t get what you are talking about DP..one on one…are they going to sumo wrestle or something…and TBL..”domestic terrorists” umm I have many many many many many issues with Jackson and Sharpton but I find the problem is people give them to much credence and attention and they get there way…they aren’t doing anything to physically harm anyone…I would go as far to call them agiatators nothing more
April 13th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Diallo, I respect your opinon and I agree terrorists is a little harsh. But the problem I have with Sharpton and Jackson, much the same as Whitlock does, is this - what Imus did was inexcusable, he attacked people for no reason but rating. Sharpton and Jackson slammed him. But where is the outrage against the hip-hop community for gansta mentally? Where is the outrage by Sharpton and Jackson about the filth being sold to the children in these songs? Sharpton and Jackson like to play the victim card - like what was done at Duke (And yes, Imus does have a good point - where are the Duke’s player’s apologies?). Bill Cosby has spoken out about being responible. So have a few others. Where are Jackson and Sharpton speaking out against it? Yes, it’s all the ‘man’s’ fault instead of taking some responbility for their own actions.
Imus is an idiot and I never cared for him. He degraded woman and has paid the price. But did he do anything worst that what is being done to the black culture by the black culture?
(Hey, what are they Reverends of anyway?)
April 13th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
I used to board opp Imus’s show and trust me the public has heard almost nothing ..the man is an ass! Do you realize this man was fired from his first radio job for running a racist contest aimed at the Black Panthers ..this was 1969 …1969 how bad his act must have been for a white guy to get fired for offended blacks in 1969
April 13th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
dude, Al Sharpton has spoken out against the negative images present in rap on numerous occasions. i can’t help it if CNN, MSNBC, and Fox don’t sent 100 cameras to cover that. check out the links:
http://radio.about.com/b/a/152053.htm
http://media.www.thehilltoponline.com/media/storage/paper590/news/2005/03/28/Campus/Sharpton.Calls.For.Ban.On.Violent.Rap.Music-904105.shtml
http://www.bet.com/Music/MUSICNEWS_HENCHMEN+PRESS+CONFERENCE.htm?wbc_purpose=Basic&WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished&Referrer=%7B7E1EC1DC-BFEB-4FE5-AAE1-DAEB68532DDD%7D
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0503/09/ltm.03.html
April 13th, 2007 at 4:32 pm
Jason Whitlock is doing a real good job of going solo on his political commentating.
He does NOT want to match wits with Al Sharpton in front of a Live microphone.
You all can take all the pot shots at Al you want, Lord knows ive taken my share.
But I wouldnt give any of you the loose change in the seats of my Jetta in a one on one debate with him about civil rights.
Dont let the Perm fool ya.
Al is many things…some good..some bad…
but in a debate situation, he is as good as they come.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:35 pm
The crazy thing is I agree with some of the things Whitlock is saying. He often makes valid points. He also makes a fair share of stupid points. I DO NOT begrudge him the right to be a voice of dissention or to move up in the game. My problem, in this particular instance, is that he criticizes someone for exhibiting a particular behavior yet he exhibits the same behavior. If he wasn’t on 20 shows today, I wouldn’t have batted an eyelash. But I feel that he wants to be a national voice for self aggrandizement and financial gain. Nothing wrong with that, but don’t sell me on the altruism angle cause I don’t buy it. By the way, I agree that Jesse and Al are media whores. I just include Jay Love in that category as well.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:43 pm
Both Jackson and Sharpton have been on hip-hop and its performers for lyrics and content. Let’s get that out of the way.
And “domestic terrorists?” Whitlock is ready to be a political commentator and pundit: he’s already well versed in hyperbole and ad hominems.
Still, good for him — more black faces commentating with different opinions is fine by me. Too bad the format of the debate shows lends itself to the “shouting match” and less to actual debate and attempt to find solutions.
April 13th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
Benrand, a lot of blacks thought O.J. was innocent because he was in fact found not guilty! I happen to agree with Whitlock’s points but there’s no need to “pull the O.J. card”. We’re all subject to the same justice system and its definitely not perfect. Sometimes innocent black men go to jail too but I don’t read a lot of posts along the lines of “A lot of whites think Joe Blackguy is frickin’ guilty!” I wonder why that is…
April 13th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
I completely agree with Whitlock.
April 13th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
When I want top notch observations on race relations in the US, my first thought is to contact Stephen A Smith, Stu (cyclops) Scott and Jason Whitlock.
What next, a seminar on intelligent radio sport talk hosted by Schrutebag?
April 13th, 2007 at 6:34 pm
Intresting discussion, why is that the only time i see people so passionate about the problems of black people is when another black person slams them.Is there something in us that likes/love it when we are against each other. Yes there is problems in the black community, just like in other communities and as the country as a whole. “Jason W.” should and has an opinion but when you start talking nonsense like he does then it becomes a problem. There were other people yesterday (people of color and other races that all made valid and very important points why are then not all over the tv. The media and the people i must add loves anyone who who stirs up stuff –right or wrong they dont care. Thats why people like rush, sean hannity are the 2 most powerful talk show host it the country, not because of their content but because they are controvasal ways. Jason Whitlock has learnt that if he say the most outrageous things he will get some attention and he his doing it. He made some valid points but what his he doing about it, oh sorry i guess by attacking everybody on tv he will change the world he needs to get “real” and stop stiring up stuff just to get attention. everyone wants to talk about sharpton, jackson and the rappers (yes they have their own faults) but thats not the point right now THE I-MAN said something racist and sexist and he is paying for it. The bar has to be set to let everyone know they are not above the law. Ask yourself whose making the real money off rap music is definately not the rappers. Rappers like deadpres,krs- one, talib, just to name a few never gets sign to major labels, the ignorant ones are the ones they sign, so why are you/we blaming the rappers, some of them talk all these nonsense because they know this is what the companies want and his the fastest way to get paid .Jason whitlock is doing the same thing and his play this stupid game of Mr. look in the mirror— he needs to look in the mirror. His type usually gets exposed sooner or later (ask Al Sharpton). This what happens in a capitalist society “CASH RULES EVERYTHING” so please lets all face the facts and stop the madness about jason withlock or whatever is name his .
April 13th, 2007 at 6:41 pm
Excellent job by Jason Whitlock. Some may say this is just self promotion, but he’s a lot more on top of these points than most people.
April 13th, 2007 at 6:55 pm
The real hypocrisy isn’t jackson or sharpton. it isn’t rappers saying ho and then blacks getting mad at an old white guy….the real hypocrisy:
“Snoop Dogg insisted “this punk” Imus deserved much more than a two-week suspension. He deserved to be fired. He should at least be punished like the NFL suspended Tennessee Titans football player Adam Jones for an entire season for scrapes with the police:
“Kick him off the air forever,” he said. “Ban him like they did [Adam] ‘Pacman’ Jones. They kicked him out the [National Football] League for the whole season [for numerous violations of the NFL's personal-conduct policy, including multiple arrests], but this punk gets to get on the air and call black women ‘nappy-headed ho’s.’ ”
http://nationofislamsportsblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/whitlock-why-doesnt-he-like-blacks.html
April 13th, 2007 at 7:15 pm
Whitlock has been A-one for years. But if any one expects to use him to further their own political take - they will be sadly mistaken.
I have noticed the usual voices of authority on sports (Lupica, Rick Reilly, Tony Kornheiser) have been less visible during this controversy than they usually are. Any theories?
April 13th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
Wale…His name is Jason Whitlock…He made valid points…maybe there is a problem with the entertainment we let our children listen too black and white…not everyone needs to agree with Al Sharpton…there are many opinons so if Jason’s doesn’t meet yours does not make him wrong…the fact that Imus said something stupid is not grounds for this…the passion and the power of the real problems are being folded in to a old shock jocks firing…they got the pound of flesh but it doesn’t make it right…
April 13th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
how did Whitlock ‘own’ Sharpton? Based on the transcript, Jason barely got a word in edge-wise.
April 13th, 2007 at 7:57 pm
This is where our culture of personality in America gets to sophisticated (complicated?) for its own good. That strange overlap where popularity, opinions, leadership and responsibility get all smashed together. We want our heroes, who lineup so well with most of our major beliefs, to be consistent with EVERYTHING we believe so that we can feel comfortable investing in them and having them represent us. Al Sharpton is great social activist just as Whitlock is a fantastic sports columnist but neither should be made out to be more than what they are.
The media machine cuts both ways: the fact that Whitlock is black AND strands in opposition to Al Sharpton is why overworked, snap-judging, ambitious TV and radio producers are so quick to line him up for interviews. If Whitlock has any kind of ambition he’d be stupid not to take advantage of those pub opportunities.
The lesson here is dont start any calamity that can be carried on 24 hour news AND 24 hour sports networks….or travel or food or fashion networks.
April 13th, 2007 at 7:58 pm
Sharpton is a coward. He refused to do battle with Whitlock because he was afraid to.
And nobody suggest that he was taking the “high” road in ignoring Whitlock. Sharpton has no morals, therefore is incapable of taking the high road; he doesn’t know where it is. Anyone who thinks Sharpton HAS morals needs to revisit the Tawana Brawley scam.
April 13th, 2007 at 8:24 pm
Slick - Good. On Imus, we do think what he said was wrong, and due to a history of such acts, he should have been canned.
Whitlock’s off on a different tangent, looking at the big picture. He’s talking about young black America, and how Jackson and Sharpton are going after the wrong prople.
April 13th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Whitlock has some good points, but so does Armstrong Williams and many other African-Americans who embrace the Scorched Earth policy regarding how to solve the African-American crisis.
Plus, he really needs a new suit.
April 13th, 2007 at 8:43 pm
Whitlock is on Oprah Monday. We will see if bojangles for the Queen or if he stays the course and speaks truth to power. As we all know once he is on Oprah he is cannonized.
April 13th, 2007 at 10:11 pm
I believe this is what “speaking truth to power” is really all about.
April 13th, 2007 at 10:20 pm
Um, on what planet does a reading of that transcript translate to Whitlock “knows how to put Sharpton in his place”? That’s a very ridiculous asskissing interpretation. Actually, after he tried to lob another bomb at Sharpton and O’Brien had the grace to let Sharpton respond, he basically called Whitlock out, accurately, as a do-nothing loudmouth with his “not in the fight” comment.
Anyway, though I strongly disagree with them, it’s an insult to Thomas Sowell and Shelby Steele et. al to compare them to Whitlock. He belongs lesser lights like Ken Hamblin, Armstrong Williams and company, whose primary “talent” is constantly hectoring other blacks about their supposed failings from safe, comfortable and, more importantly, profitable, mainstream media platforms. If Whitlock is intertested in a political commentary career, he might be able to join those characters. He seems to have the uninformed shouting part down pat already, and as Armstrong and crew can attest, there’s good money to be made from being a black scold of black people.
The funny thing is that Whitlock is becoming as much of a minstrel as he claims some rappers are now. He’s just working the other side of the street.
April 13th, 2007 at 10:48 pm
F*ck Jason Whitlock.
http://bgdboom.blogspot.com/2007/04/fck-jason-whitlock.html
April 13th, 2007 at 11:43 pm
“Imus fell within the whole spear of that, and certainly within the spear of what we fight, civil rights.”
Not having heard it, I’m pretty sure he must have said “sphere,” not “spear.” Go ahead and joke about that one, you racists!
April 14th, 2007 at 1:09 am
Both Sharpton and Jackson are doing more harm than good for the blacks in this country. They ar the perfect model of racial predjuce.
April 14th, 2007 at 3:23 am
enigmatik, you make an excellent point when you say “Jason don’t got no homeys in the feds either”. Couldn’t have said it better myself. I think we should all ignore him, because, as your friend Rizoh says “Jason ain’t got never bust a gun.” Clearly, with his lack of ‘homeys in the feds” and lack of “got bust a gun” experience, he’s clearly not really black. That photo of the morbidly obese black man is clearly an actor hired to play him.
April 14th, 2007 at 4:40 am
you all a bunch of mental cases. One Love, SKEET SKEET SKEET..
April 14th, 2007 at 5:08 am
1. Who the fuck is Jason Whitlock?
2. This malcontent is what we call a “Go-To Guyâ€. You know, he’s one of those Blacks that Whites go to for quotes, when they need some credibility in a race argument or discussion.
3. for the most earth shaking moment in Lou Dobb’s history, jolly ol’ Whitlock looks into the camera and assures Black people, that there isn’t a “magical†White man controlling everything. Thank God for Jason Whitlock, he’s opened my eyes and now I’m saved. What this Ass-Hat fails to see is that just as there is no “magic White manâ€, there isn’t a “magic Black man†either. There is no one Black leader in the Black community, Thank God.
4. What I saw on Lou Dobbs were a bunch of handpicked Uncle-Tom’s trying to rain on my parade, by saying things like we need new leadership. In light of the fact that a revenue-generating cash cow/ radio legend like Don Imus was just forced out his job, I think our leadership is doing just fine, lol.
April 14th, 2007 at 8:24 am
“A lot of whites think Joe Blackguy is frickin’ guilty!†I wonder why that is…
Answer: Approximately 33 percent of black males nationally will do prison time.
It ain’t cause they got racially profiled folks. It is cause they are much more likely to commit crimes.
Honest Jon
April 14th, 2007 at 8:41 am
Some nice points and all, but before we go and nominate Jason Whitlock for a Nobel and/or Pulitzer Prize, remember that this is the same guy who every football season writes a column stating that Jeff George should be a starting NFL qb, and he still has what it takes to a lead a team to a Superbowl. Seriously.
April 14th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
According to Whitlock, C. Vivian Stringer, her team, Al Sharpton and JJ are all opportunists.
So, what does that make him now that he’s America’s Favorite Black Guest?
And before you say, “He was asked!” … well Stringer and her team were too. Looks like Whitlock is going on his own recruiting pitch as well.
And the problem with “annointing” yourself or having someone annoint you is this: Can you morally stand up to the test?
Question: What’s in Whitlock’s iPod?
April 14th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
1. Tucker Carlson should be shot for giving Al Sharpton any platform to speak on. Al Sharpton is a race riot starting, police bashing, false lawsuit starting, money extoring drug dealer. Al Sharpton belongs in jail, and when news media personalities give him air time as a “commentator” or “leader” or whatever, they implicitly tell the public that Sharpton has intellectual and moral integrity.
2. Whitlock was sandbagged by Scoop Jackson and ESPN. Whitlock doesn’t play the race card every single second, so when he talks about race, I take his views seriously. He also doesn’t act like Stepin Fetchit. But Scoop Jackson does, and ESPN wanted a black writer to act like a stereotype. When Whitlock attacked Scoop for being a bad writer (which is definitely true, Stepin Fetchit-act aside), ESPN circled the wagons. Face it–stereotypes like Stuart Scott, Scoop Jackson, Michael Irvin, and Steven Smith are favored over men who just happen to black (e.g. David Aldrige, Whitlock) because ESPN wants a minstrel show.
3. Whitlock is trying restart his career as a media member, that much is true. When ESPN destroys your national sportscasting career by blackballing you, you have little recourse. So Whitlock tried politics, where his moderate voice (he’s not right) can be heard. So yes, its opportunism. But Whitlock has (thus far) integrity, and hasn’t set himself up as a leader, and hasn’t committed a crime in doing so. So, as of now, Whitlock can be a commentator without me laughing my head off. But Sharpton? That asshole has no authority to do any of those things.
April 14th, 2007 at 4:37 pm
Hooray for Jason Whitlock. He has the guts to speak the truth and will not back down to opportunists like the so-called “Rev.” Jesse Jackson and the so-called “Rev.” Al Sharpton. These two do not want to see the advancement of black people. If that happened they would be out of a job. They are an embaressment and a sad excuse of leadership.
April 14th, 2007 at 4:47 pm
JayTee,
Both Rizoh and I were being facetious. The comments that we both made were quotes that Young Jeezy made concerning Nas when he (YJ) said Nas wasn’t “real” because he (Nas) supposedly lacked those qualities.
Jason Whitlock makes sweeping generalizations of hip hop and black culture constantly. He is constantly critical of everything, yet he offers no solutions and doesn’t highlight anyone who is doing something positive. Trust, he is not the spokesperson for blacks in America.
Thinking Black Person - Excellent question. If hip hop is so bad, then why doesn’t he tell us what he’s listening to and what’s so good about it. And have him try to name more rappers than just 50 Cent, Snoop Dogg, and Young Jeezy.
April 14th, 2007 at 5:02 pm
It seems like Whitlock is auditiong for a spot on the conservative chitlin’ circuit. That makes sense when you consider that the usual suspects are getting old. He’s perfect for the modern version of the job in that he’s comfortable on television and can handle the shoutfest “debates”. They can dust him off when a racially tinged issue comes up and they need to put a blackface on their opinions/spin - also known as the “See, a black guy said it.” strategy. I suggest he look up Glenn Loury’s time with those folks as a cautionary tale.
Whitlock also fits the rightwing minstrel pattern in that he either doesn’t know much about, or is largely uninvolved with the community he’s hectoring from his comfortable and soon to be profitable perch.
How do you not know that Sharton and Jackson who, despite their flaws have done more for more black people than the likes of Whitlock ever will, have long been involved in protesting against some of the unsavory images in rap music?
How do you not know that some of the main things that you’re laying at the feet of your all purpose hip hop culture bogeyman have actually gotten better? Black teenage pregnancy has dropped every year since 1991 and has led the overall drop in teenage preganacy which in general, is now at it’s lowest level since they started measuring it. Crime, despite a few recent upticks here and there, is still at generational lows in most places.
The thing that’s really sad is Whitlock’s lazy use of the term “bojangling” to describe either the black people he disagrees with or dislikes. If he knew anything beyond the surface about Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, who was a 1000000 times the man Whitlock will ever be, he would be ashamed to use his “name” as a slur against other blacks. You’d think a black sportswriter would know that “Bojangles” was a co-founder of the NY Black Yankess and instrumental in the Negro League. Oh well, it seems ignorance about one’s history is not just limited to rapping, baggy pant wearing, gat busting, gin-and-juice drinking and babydaddy making hip hop bogeymen.
April 14th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are race-pimps, not “reverends.” Every time you see them they are pushing the buttons for their mindless, knee-jerk-reacting robots to hit the streets with threats of death and destruction. The so-called “black community,” as defined by those who blindly follow these hustlers is one that is held together by hate and anger, and nothing else.
What is the future for this so-called “black community” that is led by these so-called “black leaders?” Can there be a bright tomorrow for any community that has no other glue holding it together than hate and expressions of violence? Is there any future for any group of people whose attention is focused solely upon their hate for other people, but cannot see their OWN elemental problems? Is there any future for any people who only care about how they can make a buck, but neglect to know anthing about reading, writing, ciphering, science, and lessons from the past?
People need to stop simply hearing and reacting to what is preached to them by self-proclaimed leaders, and start listening and thinking about what these people are saying. People have to start being individtuals with individual responsibilities, rather than just part of a group-think, group-act machine. There are hateful, monstrous people who would like to simply weld this “black community” like a club to beat the rest of the world over the head with it.
There is no future for a community where its members are merely sheep to be controlled by the whim of despots. There is no future for a community that discourages individualism and liberty. There is no future for a community that is held together by hate, ignorance, and anger. The outcome of the message that Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson preach is death. There is no bright tomorrow in Al’s and Jesse’s world.
April 14th, 2007 at 6:24 pm
Oh btw, can somebody tell me EXACTLY what Jackson needs to apologize for in regards to the Duke Lacrosse case? Not what you FEEL or THINK he should apologize for, but a specific deragatory statement he made against the Dukies such that he should apologize for it now.
From what I can recall, he mostly supported the accuser and demanded a full investigation. Shouldn’t the apology come from the accuser and the DA to ALL parties involved in the case? According to Whitlock, Jackson should apologize for stirring stuff up!? Nonsense. Stuff was already stirred up before he was involved with the case.
While we’re at it could somebody tell ESPN’s Jemele Hill to get up off her knees. An “apology” is one thing but abject groveling is another and is a tad embarrassing.
Anyway, back to Whitlock, I wonder how many folks noticed an interesting piece of hypocrisy in Whitlock’s comments? He downplayed Imus’ cheapshots in order to take cheapshots at Jackson and Sharpton but ,the telling thing was his pitiful cheapshots against Coach Stringer. Calling her press conferences with her team which, for most obervers were models of dignity and grace, an opportunistic recruiting tactic was dirty. It’s very ironic that he downplayed Imus’ verbal cheapshot on some black women but took one of his own against another black women. Like Imus, he must have been under the spell of the hip hop culture. Nice work Jason!
April 14th, 2007 at 6:25 pm
Jason Whitlock is right on, and these criticisms by name callers and bottom feeders (there I go calling names) are absurd. I don’t hear him anywhere claiming he’s the voice of black America. I hear the opinion of one man. And it makes a lot of sense. He’s absolutely right calling the racist, bigoted, media whores, Jackson & Sharpton, terrorists.
To have some cracker say he’s “auditiong for a spot on the conservative chitlin’ circuit” is another comment that could have come from any of the racist leaders. Some of these criticisms remind me of the story about the pile crabs in the open bucket When one guy says “aren’t you afraid they might escape?”. the other one says, “Nope, as soon as one gets to the top, another one reaches up and pulls him right back down.”
April 14th, 2007 at 7:10 pm
If Whitlock and those who agree with him were to found an organization that promoted the values he speaks of so eloquently, I would join that organization. Black activists and liberal Democrats have a stake in blacks’ staying where they are and blaming the white man. For Democrats that translates into a lot of votes. The deal is this- we will patronize and condescend to you and sympathize with your excuses about your crime, your illegitimacy and your perpetually whining “artistic” class. In return all we ask is that you allow multi-millionaire Democrats to do the thinking for you and your votes. 98% will do just fine.
April 14th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
Whitlock makes the same points that black social critics like Shelby Steele have been making for years. Read Steele’s book, “The Content of Our Character” for a more eloquent expression of what Whitlock is saying, here.
April 14th, 2007 at 7:55 pm
I always saw that Tucker guy in passing on TV and thought he looked like a complete tool, and now that I see him in action; his mannerisms and over professionalism, and last but not least his love for Al Sharpton, it’s clear this man should be put down with a tranq gun. Anyone in Tucker’s position who claims to have a modicum of intelligence should have at some point dug up Sharptons sad, horrible track record, and thought “Gee this guy’s a waste.”
April 14th, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Poor steve, reduced to crabs in barrel analogies already. He’s above criticism because you agree with his lame, and much better said by others, talking points? Nothing to say about the criticisms here except issuing blanket comdenations. Not a surprise.
Hey, who’s pulling Whitlock down? He’s the one going off half-assed and running his mouth all over TV and exposing himself as an intellectual lightweight. He’s gotta come better than a second rate Stanley Crouch (and that’s saying something) if he wants to be taken seriously other than as a new member of the conservative minstrel bombthrowing association. Given his penchant for catchy phrases, like absurdly refering to Jackson and Sharpton as “domestic terrorists”, he at seems to have enough talent to at lesat be on the bench for them. I wonder when he’ll start.
It’s funny that since I accurately placed him on the conservative chitlin’ circuit that means I must be a “cracker”. Too funny.
Btw, the person who mentioned Shelby Steele should probably realize that his ideas were eviserated and largely discreditied by his brother Claude Steele and, on the national stage, he hasn’t been heard from much since.
April 14th, 2007 at 8:28 pm
Gotta love how topics like this bring the bigots running out proclaiming that the “so-called black community is held together by hate and anger, not interested in reading or science”…yadda, yadda, yadda… and being led Pied piper like by Al and Jessie…insert more stock phrases…blah, blah, blah. Heh
April 14th, 2007 at 8:47 pm
I’d Suggest that corporations that wish to put Jason Whitlock on their airwaves do some RESEARCH!
He’s a perennial quitter and usually wound up getting FIRED for over-reaching. They also need to investigate his personal lifestyle. He’s known for hanging around METH-HEAD white girls and engaging in scandalous behavior.
He’s bound to trip up and FAIL. This time - it won’t be limited to the Sportsworld. This time it’s going National.
He’s in the bigboy league now - when EVERYTHING is about REPUTATION.
April 15th, 2007 at 12:50 am
k.s. ..much luv.( I used the Bojangles reset before and I am glad you set me straight )
April 15th, 2007 at 1:08 am
First, Google WICHITA MASSACRE and also a murder in Knoxville, Tenn.
Then tell me when one black person succeeds in anything other than basketball or rap music. Other than filling up our prisons, loading up our welfare systems, destroying our schools and large cities, I feel that blacks are truly useless. Please name one black that has contributed anything to the world, other than in sports? ALso, most blacks have discraced sports (Navy QB is the newest to come to mind). Reggie Bush is in the process of wiping out his alma mater (USC). Stay tuned.
2 Bengals just got suspended with more coming. Blacks are slowly being eased out of baseball.
April 15th, 2007 at 1:11 am
Hey Richard, back at ya. No problem, I got that you were mocking Whitlock’s use of the term. Just wanted to remind others that Bill “Bojangles” Robinson was an extrodinary man.
April 15th, 2007 at 2:02 am
I was impressed with whitlock’s take. glad to see he looks at things outside the box, not being lead or leading by anger or hate.
there are far more pressing issues in this country than an old ass man calling some young black women names. not at all defending imus, but if we used half the emotions and energy displayed the last week and a half on more important issues, we could maybe work to a resolution on these trivial problems that have been festering at the surface.
clearly those girls were hurt and needed an apology. imus deserved time off and should have been able to use his position on air clear the air and make things right. were was sharpton’s daughter when al was going after rap lyrics? but he paraded her out for this?
can anyone tell me one thing or one accomplishment contributed by jesse jackson or al (slim shady) sharpton that anybody black or white has benefited from? children? the elderly? poor? as long as there are victims we are stuck with these leeches. we need to realize it is time we stick together pick each other up and make ourselves accountable to one another.
April 15th, 2007 at 2:48 am
The fact of the matter is, every time Sharpton gets involved in anything things escalate. Imus was fired because of money reasons and that is blatantly obvious. Sharpton and Jackson have a checkered history that includes being indirectly responsible for property damage, arson, and murder.
Imus’ comments were wrong, but Whitlock is right on when he points out that African American males say far worse things about black women every day in songs. Why is that acceptable? Surely they have more influence in the black community than a “shock jock” who’s viewer ship does not generally fall into that demographic.
The best point made here has to do with their Christian values. As ministers they are held more accountable than others (both biblically and socially). If they can’t forgive, and instead choose to attack and berate someone, what kind of message does that say to other black Americans and to Christians alike. If they want a blurring of racial lines and an end to racism and segregation, they are in fact working in the opposite direction. Holding a grudge and going out for vengeance is exactly the type of thing that will maintain current racial tensions in the United States.
April 15th, 2007 at 3:09 am
Thank you for posting this. He hit the nail on the head. Jesse and Al need to work on the problems not create them!!!!!!!!!
April 15th, 2007 at 3:53 am
C’mon now, you got to be kidding attacking Whitlock as the media whore. Personally its the first time I have seen the guy. Guess he should just sit back and let Al and Jesse do all the whoring. Sure don’t want to interfere with them spreading their lovely philosophy of hate and victim hood nationwide and lining their pockets on the way. More power to him if he can have his reasonable voice and message heard. Better then the pablum that most of the media regurgitate when their is any type of discussion on race. My hometown Baltimore is a fine example of a government that accepts the Sharpton/Jackson philosophy that averages three or four murders a night lately. Sure ain’t the white people in the suburbs that are getting mowed down in the streets. Christ if I was in the KKK I’d support these guys wholeheartedly.
April 15th, 2007 at 4:40 am
“In light of the fact that a revenue-generating cash cow/ radio legend like Don Imus was just forced out his job, I think our leadership is doing just fine, lol”
Oh really? How’s “your leadership” doing at reducing black imprisonment rates, which are multiple times higher than all other races? How are they doing at reducing STD rates and teen pregnancies that are multiple times higher? How are they doing with the fact that white people live more than 6 years longer than black people?
Oh, they got some retarded old idiot off the air. Well then, it’s all good. Jesse Jackson is paying the college tuition of the Duke rape false accuser. Al Sharpton was found guilty in court of falsely accusing a man of rape based on no evidence. It’s all good.
News flash: Jackson/Sharpton and the entrenched powers in this country have a symbiotic relationship. They allow Sharpton to conduct some show trials during which politically incorrect people are publically humiliated to show how un-racist we all are. Then Sharpton can solicit “donations” from corporations should they want to avoid a similar public embarassment and picketing. In exchange for this generous arrangement, there is the tacit agreement that nothing meaningful will change, and nothing does change. Imus is exiled to his ranch, 1000 young black men are sent to far longer prison terms than they would be if white. If you think “your leadership” is truly doing just fine, I’m very sorry for you.
April 15th, 2007 at 2:05 pm
Is it me or did he say “Duke soccer players” instead of Lacrosse on Tucker appearance?
April 15th, 2007 at 2:36 pm
For the record, Tucker is bowtie-less in his interview with Whitlock.
And kudos to Whitlock for excoriating a lazy media that is content to allow a monopoly of Jackson and Sharpton to provide its content on “what Black America” thinks. F**k them.
ps - Good to see the RU women stand up to Imus and tell him to f**k off…oh, wait…
April 15th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I am a 60 year old, white female, who has never written to anyone about anything politically because I try not to get involved in political discussions because I think all politicians are crooks with their own agendas. I have two mixed (white/African American) neices which I love beyond belief, and they are nothing more or less to me than two wonderful girls who are not defined by their races. I must now write and say that I am totally impressed with Jason Whitlock (never heard of him before today). I am as impressed with him as I am with Justice Clarence Thomas. Both men believe that the problem with their race is not the white people — it is their own self asteem and ambitions. Justice Thomas says “don’t treat me any different or ask any less of me than you would a white person because I am just as good and I do not need special treatment.” He has pride and dignity. That is the way Jason Whitlock appears to me too. I do admire and respect Jason Whitlock because he obviously has a great sense of himself and truly knows he is as good and intelligent as any human being on the planet (regardless of color). Any person, regardless of race, that says “I do not need the help of the white person, or any race of people, to make it, and I don’t care what remarks come out of their ignorant mouths, it will not affect me because I know who I am and I know my self worth.” These are the people who earn the respect of people of all races. Good going Jason Whitlock. I think you should have your own national show. You are the person to heal the breech between the races — not the useless, ignorant, uneducated, self-indulgent Jackson and Sharpton. They have done more to cause people to “hate” and divide the races than anyone else in the last two decades. What a waste of oxygen those two.
April 15th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
Outstanding! God bless Jason.
April 15th, 2007 at 5:40 pm
This guy needs to be the one leading the black community. The other two bafoons need to be gone.
April 15th, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Here’s the CNN video that was transcribed above:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qpaM5bA7Z0
Today show appearance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PP-ucZqu1U
April 15th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
KS: You make too much sense.
Pete: Assuming you aren’t being facetious (and, if you are, where’s the funny part?), there are explanations - many of them systematic - for what you believe to be true. Read up on two terms: The first, “embedded injustice”; the second, “slavery.”
Susan: You mentioned your neices. Why? Being capable of loving non-white people - who are part of your family, no less - is neither an accomplishment nor a sign of credibility on the matter of what mindset is properly dignified for blacks to adopt to elevate themselves in society.
Clarence Thomas and Jason Whitlock do not get it, and while you may certainly have a good heart, neither do you. *Everyone* needs help, not just blacks. White people get the “help” that Thomas so bravely declines, but it comes in the form of white privilege, or conferred dominance - not welfare checks, or however Thomas conceives of the undeserved care package that the black community lazily demands.
Racial minorities, particularly blacks, are disadvantaged, and that will not change until they accept affirmative action, and, yes, pile on Imus for degrading the women BECAUSE of their skin color, and other sorts of “help” - there is no shame in taking what is rightfully theirs: equity, if not equality.
April 15th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
Someone asked, what did Jesse jackson do that he should apologize for? The following is an exerpt from “Duke accusations reopen old wounds” Chicago Sun-Times, Apr 18, 2006 by Jesse Jackson
We don’t know exactly what happened that night. Initial DNA tests came back negative, incriminating no one. But something happened on the night of March 13, something so compelling that Durham, N.C., District Attorney Michael Nifong was prompted to say, “This case is not going away.” Indeed, he asserts that the lack of DNA evidence “doesn’t mean nothing happened. It just means nothing was left behind.”
The accuser goes to school full time at North Carolina Central, and for two months has worked for an escort service to help pay her way through school and support her two children. The team was notorious for its gross behavior. Fifteen of the 47 players had been previously charged with misdemeanors ranging from underage drinking to public urination.
Black women; white men. A stripper and a team blowout. The wealthy white athletes — many from prep schools — of Duke and the working-class woman from historically black North Carolina Central. Race and class and sex. The history of white men and black women — the special fantasies and realities of exploitation — goes back to the nation’s beginning and the arrival of slaves from Africa. The patterns associated with this history arouse fears and evoke bad memories.
Duke University is clearly embarrassed by the incident. The president canceled the lacrosse team’s season, and accepted the resignation of its coach, who had taken the team to the national championship last year. The president convened five panels to look into various aspects of the incident. At Duke, North Carolina Central and schools across the country, students and administrators began discussing once more the combustible realities of racial and sexual harassment on campus.
Durham, where Duke is located, is not the old South. Its mayor is black, as are its police chief and the majority of its city council. It is relatively prosperous, with low unemployment; it’s the home of high-tech companies. The largest black-owned insurance company is located there, as are two black-owned banks. There is also poverty, disproportionately African American. And there is Duke, a private school stocked with affluent, mostly white kids, and often referred to as the plantation.
Alas, Duke is probably no worse than other schools in the way black women are too often perceived. As Rebecca Hall of the University of California at Berkeley, who studies images of African- American women in the culture, states: “Turn on a music video. A black woman is somebody who has excess sexuality. . . . It’s excess sexuality that white men are entitled to.” This image is magnified in our culture — and not simply by white producers, but on black music videos and black networks as well.
The Duke scandal should lead colleges across the country to hold searching discussions about racial and sexual stereotypes, exposing the myths that entrap so many. But it shouldn’t take the brutalizing of a mother of two to raise these issues. Justice must be pursued at Duke. But Duke should not be treated as an isolated extreme — but as a goad to probing discussion and concerted action to lift students above the hatreds, the fears and the fantasies that still plague our society.
e-mail: JJackson@rainbow push.org
The faacts are: five “different” semen specimens were present when the “supposed victim” was examined. None matched “any” Duke players dna. Repeat none matched.
Why did Jesse go off on Duke University, the players, and the community? Specifically ,the accused players. From his public article, once again:
But it shouldn’t take the brutalizing of a mother of two to raise these issues.
In other words, the three players accused had been judged and found guilty by Jackson, of “brutalizing” a mother of two.
These young men were just as innocent as the Rutgers team. Repeat, just as innocent. Yet their reputations have been dealt heavy blow, about something which NEVER happened. These young men were at least as innocent at the Rutgers team. Neither team asked to be put in the public’s eye. And, Imus didn’t accuse the Rutgers team of any violence.
Why don’t Jesse call for his own dismissal from His Rainbow Coalition? Jesse labeled the young men as brutalizers. That the three young men took deliberate action to harm and degrade another individual.
It seems Jackson was the one “TAKING THE DELIBERATE ACTION TO DEMEAN SOMEONE ELSE.” Jackson is supposed to be a “reverend”, who should have a higher standard of decency and concern than a “shock jock” who never has claimed to be God’s representation.
Seems Jackson took advantage of young lady, under his supervision, by stating his marriage wasn’t a conventional marriage. Five children, but yet unconventional. Then, knowing she was impressed by his position, authority, he took advantage of her trust, to impregnate her. And when she disclosed his indisgression, she was fired from her job.
Again, I ask. Who was the person guilty of action which proved harmful to another individual?
The lacross players are hard working, student-athletes, who have worked hard to achieve their results. They didn’t ask to be found guilty by Jackson. They didn’t even ask for his involvment. So, Jackson is a “reverend”, has asked for, and received forgiveness, yet immediately finds the Duke players guilty, and proceeds to furnish a column in a large “established” newspaper. Where’s the justice about what Jackson did? Has he rushed to apologize? Has he rushed to take responsibility for his words, as Imus has done?
Maybe he has, and I missed it. But it seems pretty clear who is holding the “smoking gun”.
What’s your thoughts?
April 15th, 2007 at 10:19 pm
Some of you folks are like Pavlov’s dogs. In this case, you’ve been trained to irrationally screech everytime you hear Jackson and Sharpton’s names. The reality is that they along with the “rappers made me do it” Imus defense are just redmeat chum for the dimwitted.
I always laugh when people ask what do Al and Jessie do who won’t even bother to do a 2 second google to find out. Some of you all are not interested in, even after the proof has been posted here!, of Sharpton’s actvities regarding some rap lyrics or of Jackson’s long running “I Am Somebody” stay in school/self esteem program that he’s been doing for years in black inner and rural areas or the anti-violence stuff both of them have been doing for years in the black community. They are just handy strawmen for some people to project their bigotry/ignorance on.
All of this side chatter is just a diversionary tactic. Yeah, Imus was such a beacon of innocence and light until he was ruined by the influence of those eevvviiill hip hoppers. Yeah, if Al and Jesse wasn’t stirring stuff up all would be well. That bs is nonsense.
What really disturbing aside from Whilock’s astoundingly shallow perspective and knowledge, is his cowardly attack on Coach Stringer and his pooh poohing of what the Rutgers team went through by telling them “not to be victims”. Please, the nerve.
Earlier I suggested that Whitlock was trying to become a second rate Stanley Crouch. Well, that’s not fair to Crouch. At best, Whitlock will be the Charles Barkley of black political commentators - always ready with a loud but dubious and ill informed “contrarian” opinion. Btw, anybody know what has Whitlock done in or for the black community other than flap his gums and lecture it about it’s issues? Classic do- nothing loudmouth you find in neighborhood babershops. Perhaps we should call Whitlock’s style “babershopping”. The only place he’s fit to lead the black community is to the buffet table.
April 15th, 2007 at 10:56 pm
WOW…all I can say is WOW. Now here is a person that gets it. Him and Bill Cosby ought to run for president. Sad thing though…most of the black community will not listen.
April 15th, 2007 at 11:37 pm
Since I asked about the Duke case, i’ll answer. Sorry, i’ve read that op-ed before and there is nothing in that article that would lead a rational person to think that Jackson has anything to apologize for in regards to the Duke case. Unless you think that writing an opinion piece that runs counter your opinion is grounds for an apology.
You might not like his “tone” but it’s really a reach to try and use that article as evidence of something to apologize for by using ONE line taken way out of context as “proof”. If anything, it belongs in the “stirring something up” pile of nonsense.
What’s hilarious though in regards to some of the issues in the Imus incident is the following quote from the article (note the last line from Jackson):
“As Rebecca Hall of the University of California at Berkeley, who studies images of African- American women in the culture, states: “Turn on a music video. A black woman is somebody who has excess sexuality. . . . It’s excess sexuality that white men are entitled to.€ This image is magnified in our culture — and not simply by white producers, but on black music videos and black networks as well.”
April 15th, 2007 at 11:58 pm
I USED TO HAVE THE UTMOST RESPECT FOR JASON WHITLOCKKK, BUT AFTER READING MOST OF HIS POST-ESPN COLUMNS,ITS VERY EVIDENT THAT HES BEING PAID VERY WELL TO LEAD THE CHARGE AGAINST BLACKS.HES THE WORST KIND OF COON.I DON’T AGREE WITH EVERYTHING AL AND JESSIE DO, BUT THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND FOUGHT BIGOTS LIKE IMUS. IF NOT FOR AL AND JESSE, IMUS WOULD STILL BE ON THE RADIO INFLUENCEING POLITICIANS,POLICE, AND OTHER DIFFERENCE-MAKERS WHO DECIDE WHAT LAWS GET PASSED,WHO GETS HIRED FOR CERTAIN JOBS,WHO QUALIFIES FOR LOANS,ETC. THANKS JASON “O’REILLY” WHITLOCKKK
April 16th, 2007 at 1:38 am
It isn’t hard to understand what Jesse jackon said. It’s there in plain, simple to understand, English. I would guess that most people fluent in English understand what Jesse said, and what he meant. There’s not much wiggle room to misunderstand.
Also, he took a swip at the whole LaCrosse Team, whole university.
From his words, “The team was notorious for its gross behavior. Fifteen of the 47 players had been previously charged with misdemeanors ranging from underage drinking to public urination.”
The facts are: on the Men’s Lacross Team, there were 27 honor students, with a team cumulative GPA of 3.45. And the students had logged 500 volunteer community service hours. And the team had won the National Championship in 2005.
Rev. Sharpton wanted the point made that Imus could have been talking about Sharpton daughter. Well, Jackson could have been talking about my son. And just like Sharpton didn’t appreciate Imus’ two words, Jackson’ s words were just inappropriate.
No Duke players were ever arrested for physical harm to anyone. How dare Jackson to imply such. Did he take the time to get to know each lacrosse player? Did he go apologize to any of them ( the three )?
Websters’ says brutalize means to make or become brutal. Brutal means brute, savage, cruel, coarse, rude. Brute means lacking the ability reason: as a brute beast. Of or like an animal.
The Lacrosse players carry full academic loads, practice and play lacrosse, and spend lots of time in community service. And have a cumulative GPA of 3.45. And Duke has the highest academic standards in the Atlanta Coast Conference. There’s nothing remotely brutal in any of their history. And they have families and careers and reputations. Jackson has not right to label the lacrosse players in any fashion, except as great examples of student-athletes.
The lacrosse players handling of the entire situation makes me proud to call them “m-e-n”, and myself “m-a-n”.
And Jackson and Sharpton can title themselves “men of God.” Jesus gave two commandments. The second commandment he gave was,
Matthew 22:39 Â And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Can you show me exactly where Jackson and Sharpton bestowed any love on the lacrosse team members? Maybe i missed it.
April 16th, 2007 at 2:34 am
Sigh, they must not teach reading comprehension in schools anymore.
“From his words, “The team was notorious for its gross behavior. Fifteen of the 47 players had been previously charged with misdemeanors ranging from underage drinking to public urination.€
The facts are: on the Men’s Lacross Team, there were 27 honor students, with a team cumulative GPA of 3.45. And the students had logged 500 volunteer community service hours. And the team had won the National Championship in 2005.”
Both of the above are facts and NOT mutually exclusive. Simply because you don’t like the former fact as opposed to the latter fact doesn’t change that they are both facts. Now, i would go into the fact that the brutalize quote is speculative rhetoric designed to tie the larger themes in the article together but that seems to be beyond your skill set.
Anyway, your Duke whine is besides the point and has nothing to do with the Imus incident. The idea that Jackson should apologize for holding a different opinion than you is absurd. The only people who should be apologizing are the accuser and the DA. It’s even crazier to try and tie it to SHARPTON’S actions/comments during the Imus saga. They are very different events and one has nothing to do with the other.
Again, the accuser and DA should apologize for the Duke event and Imus should apologize (which he did) for Rutgers event. You know, the people who actually committed the wrongs. Duh!
April 16th, 2007 at 3:35 am
“The bar has to be set to let everyone know they are not above the law.”
Ummm….actually, Imus didn’t break any law.
Now, there ARE laws that involve hate speech. And the litmus test is state of mind and intent. Anyone that has listened to Imus’ comments is aware that the intent was to be funny. Did he fall short and was it in poor taste? Obviously. Was it hate speech? Obviously not.
I don’t know what “laws” you are talking about anyone being above.
April 16th, 2007 at 3:38 am
“but a specific deragatory statement he made against the Dukies such that he should apologize for it now”
He said they are guilty and that they didn’t deserve the due process of innocence until proven guilty.
Seems appropriate he MIGHT admit he was wrong…after all the times he has forced others to grovel at his throne when they say something about blacks, no?
April 16th, 2007 at 5:12 am
Diallo Tyson
thank you
I’ve felt alone in this “voice of the black people thing”
In America we celebrate the individual, but when it comes to the racial divide it quickly breaks down into all black people think the same and all white people think the same. How is it that in America we can’t see there is as much diversity in opinion as there is diversity in people?
April 16th, 2007 at 7:40 am
Pete on April 15th asked: “Please name one black that has contributed anything to the world, other than in sports?”
George Washington Carver. He was a black agricultural chemist who declined a salary of more than $100,000 a year (almost a million today) to research (for free) on behalf of his countrymen, and that includes both black and white people.
Among his numerous accomplishments — he invented peanut butter. You ought to look him up - the man was incredible.
I learned about him in grade school - please refrain from embarrassing the white race by making such stupid comments.
April 16th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
“He said they are guilty and that they didn’t deserve the due process of innocence until proven guilty.”
Say what? Now some of you folks are just making stuff up. Though it is fuuny how you conflate due process with the presumption of innocence. Speaking of the latter, it is amazing how many people simply don’t understand that the presumption of innocence does not preclude the general public from having opinions about cases. People can think what they like about a case pro or con and, unless they are involved with the case (e.g. lawyers, judges, etc.), it has no bearing whatsoever on a defendant’s presumed innocence under THE LAW.
Anyway, since we’re demanding apologies, when is Donald Trump going to give one for the series of ads he took out during the Central Park Jogger case in which he stated, among other things, that the DEFENDANTS should be forced to suffer and perhaps executed? Nothing Jackson wrote comes anywhere close to that and, unlike the Dukies, those guys actually served time for a rape and assualt they did not commit. Oh well, I guess that’s “different” because the CPJ defendants were not photogenic university athletes.
April 16th, 2007 at 9:47 pm
Wait a minute. The comment as follows were your words!!!!!
“Oh well, I guess that’s “different†because the CPJ defendants were not photogenic university athletes”.
Are you calling the Dukies photogenic, as in “handsome”? Just merely past puberty. They haven’t fixed their acme problems yet. And you thi nk they are handsome.
I, for one, won’t stand for it. You can be nice to me, but when you start tinkering with the player’s mindset, and lure them into a trance after you have baited them with questionable compliments, whereby you can convince them of your preferance, I won’t sit by.
Don’t go using their masculinity against them. Just don’t.
Now, clean your act, and give us your real opinion. Don’t hold back. We can handle it. We always have. He He
April 17th, 2007 at 2:55 am
KS is all right in my book.
April 17th, 2007 at 4:28 am
Why is it that when a black person is critical of black culture, he gets attacked by his community as an Uncle Tom, Bojangles, etc., etc.? Is Jason Whitlock cutting too close to the bone? Do all black people have to be Democrats, be apologists for the most egregious aspects of hip-hop culture and protect jerks like Jackson and Sharpton? I must say that this knee-jerk reaction seems rehearsed; and the insulting invective hurled at a person like Jason Whitlock is even worse than what stupid Don Imus said about Rutgers (except, of course, that a white person wasn’t involved).
How is a white person who cares about the plight of black america supposed to react to this? Even if I care, my opinion doesn’t matter because I’m white (Don Imus is a convenient exception). When a person like Whitlock tries to add a different angle to the debate on the state of black america, I feel releived that someone is willing to be critical of what is going on in black culture. I live and work in the inner city and what I see is not continuous improvement, but degradation. There is nothing I can say or do that will improve the situation. The solutions have to come from within the black community. I sincerely hope that things will change for the better. But this can only occur when there is an honest debate and the Uncle Tom bullshit is put to rest. If there is no one leader of the black community, then there also shouldn’t be one black opinion.
By the way - political correctness is intellectual fascism.
April 17th, 2007 at 11:57 am
Another point to ponder. From Rev. Jackson’s April 18, 2006 column about the Duke players.
“The team was notorious for its gross behavior. Fifteen of the 47 players had been previously “”"charged”"” with misdemeanors ranging from underage drinking to public urination.”
Charged is not the same thing as being guilty. Just like the players charged with rape, were in fact innocent, although they had been charged.
Sounds like Rev. Jackson is “doing” that which he has fought against for years. Taking the characteristics of a few and applying those characteristics “upon” the whole. And that is proper?
April 17th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Hey Jackson and Sharpton, you could benefit from the truth. Get over yourselves. Keep fighting the good fight Whitlock!
April 20th, 2007 at 7:57 am
I used to not like Jason Whitlock because of his columns in the KC Star………but after hearing him NAIL Sharpton and Jackson for what they realyl are, he is now back on my reading list!!!! STUNNING!!!! Thank you, J. Whitlock, from one Jason to another!!!!!
April 23rd, 2007 at 3:34 pm
I was e-mailed a copy of the article on Jackson and Sharpton. As a white American I want to thank you for the honesty in your statements. Equality is to walk shoulder to shoulder with all Americans and take responsibility not only for what goes right but change together what is and has gone wrong without pointing fingers and blame. We may not like everyone we meet but we can work together for the betterment of all.
April 23rd, 2007 at 6:57 pm
We suggest cheapest prices for sildenafil citrate. Be sure
Follow the links:
buy viagra
cheap levitra
cheap viagra
April 23rd, 2007 at 7:45 pm
White lock is only on there b/c hes saying what they what cnn wanted to here
April 25th, 2007 at 10:14 am
[...] players - he owes them an apology for stirring up that mess. Black America is tired of Jackson.’read more | digg story Digg [...]
May 10th, 2007 at 4:58 pm
Hello I’m new, I have noticed Whitlock making his rounds. He seems to be on a lot of talkshows. He also seems to be a hypocrite.
Check out this picture with Whitlock and the Evil Rappers
(scroll down)
http://www.chapmanrecording.com/Rap%20Production.html
Rap Royalty Record For KC Chiefs
Game Day Song
Some of the biggest names in KC Rap gathered recently to record a new game day song for the Kansas City Chiefs. The track, “IT’S ON NOW 07″, was created by Seven and
produced by KC Star sports writer Jason Whitlock with the assistance of Strange Music headman Travis O’Guin. Just a few of those who participated . . . . Rich The Factor,
Bacari, Big Scoob, T-Will, Tech N9ne and Zig. The sessions were engineered by Justin Mantooth. Watch for the track at games during the 2007 season.
Tech N9ne and Rich the Factor are local rap acts. They make the same music Whitlock is “trying to fight”.
http://www.therealtechn9ne.com/home/
http://www.myspace.com/richthefact
Here’s more info on Whitlesslock
http://youbeenblinded.com/2007/04/15/doctor-j/#comments
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/995
May 18th, 2007 at 3:13 pm
“Attention All Black People”
Grow up or get some thicker skin. We are our own worst enemies. We have no one too blame but our selves for how we are perceived by other races. I’m so tired of every time someone “cares enough†to inform my race that we need too make any kind of change to improve ourselves it’s meant with such denial. Listen to the message not the messenger. My race has become so soft and sensitive. We did the same to Bill Cosby and Joe Carter for being firm in telling and giving us what we needed. There not perfect people but they have great messages to give but “NO†Russ and Super sensitive Ken spend more time avoiding what’s really wrong and complaining about the way it was said to us that they will never ever deal with the real issues that my race has. It’s really sad because in the long run we loose. We fall farther and farther behind in the race to have our share of the pie or American dream of happiness. When you want to destroy a potentially powerful group or race the one thing that is done……divide and conquer. We do such a good job of that, you know we are only a threat to our self’s.
You know the greatest gift my Dad ever gave me was not money or any material items it was the fact that he held me “Accountable†for all that I’ve done. Until my race decides to do that then and only then will we as a people start to progress. Sure there are many of us that are successful but we have got too be able to correct and offer advice to our fellow person or we are doomed to always be low man in the peaking order.
July 5th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
I’m curious as to why Whitlock is being vilified here? What is interesting to me is that I’ve never encountered such vehement opposition to the message of Mr Sharpton, or Mr Jackson. What gives? Is it perhaps because Whitlock speaks about topics in public that usually are reserved for our cookouts, get togethers, and gatherings comprised mainly of black people? Only through introspection can a community mature.
July 8th, 2007 at 5:21 am
He’s just as much of a media whore and lazy person spouting subversion just to have his mug on TV. He’s no different from Jackson or Sharpton. Whitlock is getting support now from Conservative Elites like Mr. Bowtie Tucker Carlson and racists like Pete (Does the name Oprah Winfrey ring a bell? I could go on, but I won’t bother). Oprah and Bill Cosby don’t spout, they act. Whitlock seemed to be using this new role to look for employment. Just destroying each other is counter-productive. Tune Sharpton and Jackson out if you don’t believe they represent your race. I do it with Bill Donahue all the time as an Irish-Catholic.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
I never heard of this guy till i read he had this to say about the michael vick situation:
“I believe Vick got involved with breeding vicious pit bulls because rap-music culture made it the cool thing to do.”
Wtf iz wrong with this guy???? Is he trying to stir some controversy just to be in the headlines? He also sed, “Now we can all see the stupidity. Gangsta-wannabe rappers masquerading as professional athletes is a public-relations nightmare waiting to tear apart sports franchises and leagues.”
Now rappers and athletes r 1 and the same? When did Vick become a rapper? God help this guy.
July 3rd, 2008 at 3:23 pm
poker sportivo online…
Trovare strp poker juegos casino online play poker online play poker online descargas juegos pc…