Ever Wonder How ESPN ‘Learns’ Everything? Here’s How …
Uncategorized May 21st. 2007, 2:52pm
This young lad is Patrick Patterson, one of the most prized high school senior basketball players in the country. He’s a beastly power forward expected to have an immediate impact on the college scene. Last week, he called a press conference to announce that he would attend the University of Kentucky. Hearts in Florida - his second choice - were broken. It appears some hearts at ESPN were aching as well.
ESPN tried to get a hoop scoop on Patrick Patterson’s college choice. The cable network offered to televise the player’s announcement if he would reveal the choice a half hour before the 3:45 p.m. news conference.
That way, ESPN gets a scoop to put on a crawl at the bottom of the screen, while Patterson gets national exposure.
“Thank you, but no thank you,” the player’s mother, Tywanna Patterson, said she told ESPN. “This is what he wanted to do. More personal and at the high school … .
“This is not about show. It’s about family.”
So that’s how they do it. Bery, berry interesting. So would this ’scoop’ have gone to Andy Katz? Or would they have thrown someone else a bone? Doug Gottleib, perhaps? Joe Lunardi? Kind of makes you wonder if ESPN is going to cut the same deal with, say, Brett Favre when he is set to retire?
Let’s Make a Deal (2nd item) (Lexington Herald-Leader)
Patrick Patterson Press Conference Live Blog (A Sea of Blue)
20 Responses to “Ever Wonder How ESPN ‘Learns’ Everything? Here’s How …”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

May 21st, 2007 at 3:34 pm
I’d love to see the face of the Fox Sports guy you interviewed on Friday when he hears/reads this. He talked a little bit about the advantages ESPN has in that interview. No doubt he said “I KNEW IT!” followed by a trail of expletives.
May 21st, 2007 at 3:47 pm
ESPN sucks.
May 21st, 2007 at 4:32 pm
I found it interesting, that Patterson, said he didn’t want to move the family to “Jacksonville” as one the reasons, he didn’t opt for Florida. The fact that Florida is in Gainesville is really moot. What I found most interesting, is that I thought that when you accepted a scholarship to play for a school, only you went, not the family.
I guess Mom will be getting a job in Lexington!
May 21st, 2007 at 5:33 pm
I don’t trust ESPN for any news anymore. ESPN is about money and ratings, not news. I always confirm something like that somewhere (or anywhere) else.
May 21st, 2007 at 5:52 pm
Good for ESPN … It appears as though you are looking to slag ESPN where there is absolutely no reason to … It didn’t buy the story, just took a shot at making a deal to get a scoop … It’s a competitive world out there and getting the story first is what it is all about … Deals are struck between sources and media outlets all the time … This is clearly a case of no harm, no foul … And, yes, let’s hope Brett Favre announces his retirement soon … even if it is on ESPN …
May 21st, 2007 at 6:09 pm
Matt - You have to think bigger picture … can anyone else say, ‘hey, we’ll make your announcement national news by putting it on TV … if you give it to us first!’
Journalism is all about cultivating and maintaining sources … not using TV exposure to win a scoop. Hell, why not just offer the kid money? Let’s say ESPN got the scoop using this TV hook - would ESPN actually have ‘learned’ that Patterson was Kentucky-bound? Not through the usual journalistic channels of befriending the coach, building up a repoire, and then ‘beating’ the other journalists who have been working the coach as well.
May 21st, 2007 at 7:49 pm
Big Lead — I accept your points and it’s nice to see you have principles and still want to live in a world where hard work is rewarded … those are noble thoughts … yes, ESPN does have an advantage because of its size and reach, but obviously no outlet had broken the story if ESPN was still dangling its national exposure carrot … so why wouldn’t ESPN use this advantage to its advantage? … And where were the hard-working local journalists while ESPN was trying to eat their lunch? … Should ESPN take pity on these people? Should the Boston Red Sox play their second stringers against the Kansas City Royals?
Let’s not be naive. Media outlets make deals all the time to get stories. Even your hard-working local newspaper person is going to make a deal of some kind in order to break a story … Should it be a requirement to include a footnote on how every story was broken so you and I can be sure jouralistic integrity was maintained? …
May 21st, 2007 at 9:17 pm
I agree with Matt here, TBL just looks for ways to shit on ESPN, even when there isnt a good reason. TBL would do the same thing if they could, but they cant, so they’re jealous and have to bitch about it. Same with any other site that bitches about it. Know your role.
May 21st, 2007 at 9:38 pm
Let’s let one of the most successful and respected journalists ever, David Halberstam, speak to this from beyond the grave. This was from a column written by the Seattle Times’ Steve Kelley, who was a beat writer covering the Trailblazers when Halberstam was writing Breaks of the Game:
“During that season with the Trail Blazers, occasionally he would be invited into private meetings, by coaches or front-office people. He always refused. If no other reporters were invited into the Blazers’ inner sanctum, David wouldn’t go.”
May 21st, 2007 at 10:03 pm
Hey guys:
Thanks for tossing us the link.
I started to write a diatribe about the whole “ESPN offering to cover if they get an exclusive”, but other topics found there way on instead. But I like your take, and it is a darn good question.
So now they show us how they roll, and it isn’t all that pretty …
May 21st, 2007 at 11:07 pm
No, guys. TBL is right. There is a big difference between getting news and making it. This isn’t a mortal sin, but it’s pretty darn tacky.
May 22nd, 2007 at 1:26 am
I’m suprised that people are suprised that this happens. Do you honestly think that The New York Times, or any other major newspaper, has never told a source, “if you give us an exclusive we will put your story above the fold?” Or that a magazine has never given someone a cover in exchange for an exclusive? Or that a radio show has never told a guest it will have him on in exchange for an exclusive interview?
The simple fact is that the Patterson news conference by itself held no value to ESPN. But, the Patterson news conference plus a scoop did have value. In exchange for that value, ESPN was willing to provide Patterson with value, i.e., exposure.
May 22nd, 2007 at 5:39 am
ESPN is a piece of shit, period.
May 22nd, 2007 at 1:32 pm
I would have loved for him to tell ESPN that he chose a school other than Kentucky, and then when they went to him live he announces that he’s going to Kentucky. Talk about an instant classic.
May 22nd, 2007 at 2:37 pm
Ok, I see how this works. This site can post a thread about Tony Parker’s wedding being called off without any investigation for accuracy. This site can post the wedding pictures of a couple just for ridicule. But when it comes to ESPN, journalistic integrity has all of a sudden been discovered?
May 22nd, 2007 at 5:31 pm
Dom, save the Gator whining for another post, please.
May 23rd, 2007 at 12:27 am
Dom–The Jacksonville refernce is something the family said, which was they would move or try to be about an hour or two away from PP so they could give him his space, yet watch him play. Billy Donovan, according to PP himself, offered to help the family get a house in Jacksonville…..which smells way improper. But that shows us how BD rolls, as well. And PP says this, not conjecture or heresay. Gaytor fans just can’t take the fact he chose UK. You can have the pixie Lucas. We’ll take the stud.
May 23rd, 2007 at 1:19 am
the pattersons wanted to be close but not too close. that’s why they planned on moving to jax instead of gaynesville had he chosen the lesser school. but thanks for playing, moron.
May 23rd, 2007 at 1:52 am
ESPN is a large collection of ego maniacs these days. Its almost to a point where I dont watch anymore.
http://WWW.razztalk.com all Uk all the time
May 23rd, 2007 at 3:35 pm
ppat should have told espn he was going to florida and then announced UK. shove it right back in espn’s face.