Finally, Amanda Beard’s Spread
Uncategorized June 8th. 2007, 7:27pm
So here they are. Tasteful and tame. Enjoy, people. Not sure how long they’ll be around.
The link was taken down, and we haven’t been able to identify an update on these photos.
31 Responses to “Finally, Amanda Beard’s Spread”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 8th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
Looks like she played it fairly safe. Typical.
June 8th, 2007 at 7:39 pm
Agreed.
June 8th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
Does she have Carl Edward’s intials tattooed on her ass? Very classy and tame(too bad)
June 8th, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Those might be more tame then the FHM photos.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Gosh, I wish she wasn’t covered with so much body make up and airbrushing!
She looks pretty strong, though!
Now her ex, Carl Edwards needs to do Playgirl in retaliation! You guys might remember his spread in Men’s Health (sort of the gay version of FHM), a couple of years ago.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:22 pm
Yawn. Too much airbrushing, and the best shots (the underwater/wet ones) were nothing we hadn’t seen before except nipple.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:26 pm
http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/iamlegend/hd/
This shit ain’t gonna be tame. Will Smith is f’n jacked.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:39 pm
i’ve never seen so much airbrushing before in my life. she actually looks like an oil painting.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Meh.
June 8th, 2007 at 8:56 pm
what an absolute snoozfest. the maxim photos were hotter.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:04 pm
Agree with the Maxim and FHM stuff being better. What’s the point of being nude if you’re going to art it up and airbrush to the extreme?
Sadly, Playboy is getting to the point where you can say you read it mostly for the articles with a straight face.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:20 pm
No box shots. Move along, nothing to see here.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:36 pm
Good old fashion boring. figured this was coming since she pantomimed on letterman she is still swimming for to Olympic Team
June 8th, 2007 at 9:39 pm
you know what i just noticed upon further inspection?
you don’t get an unobscured look at both of her breasts in any photo. i get hotter shots sent to me from my blog readers. and i truly mean that.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:52 pm
A lower back tattoo, how unique (rolling eyes)
June 8th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
1. How do I get regular blog readers?
2. How often do they send nude photos?
3. Yeah, this set was weak.
June 8th, 2007 at 9:58 pm
But these don’t look like her Playboy spread; there’s not a word of text. Surely, these are just the extra cyber-club pics. Maybe the magazine spread has more . . anyone one scanned those yet?
June 8th, 2007 at 10:06 pm
Yeah, this was nice and wack.
Now if this was Ivory Latta…
June 9th, 2007 at 12:20 am
OK, now that you’ve added the ‘Adult Swim’ intro pic, we can see that this is the Cyber-Club pictorial, not the magazine spread — often the magazine in more explicit. Let’s hope someone scans that in too and shares with the rest . .
June 9th, 2007 at 12:27 am
the more i look at them the less and less impressed i am
June 9th, 2007 at 1:11 am
I want to put $10 on a trifecta of her, John Elway, and Mr. Ed.
June 9th, 2007 at 2:54 am
I’ll still take the Katarina Witt layout as the best female athlete in Playboy
June 9th, 2007 at 3:13 am
I’d hit that!
June 9th, 2007 at 6:21 am
Speaking of Trifectas isn’t there a horse race in a few hours?
June 9th, 2007 at 6:44 am
and who uses the name “stephen?” What a fag…
June 9th, 2007 at 8:09 pm
Don’t you mean faggot-american? JK for all the tightasses out there
June 10th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
This is only the FHM shoot…
Check out the Playboyshoot here http://playahclub.com/640/amanda-beard-playboy-shoot/
June 10th, 2007 at 4:37 pm
BM30 - The photo we have up top is Beard from FHM … the link is to her playboy pics. We won’t be posting nude photos on the front page.
June 10th, 2007 at 11:38 pm
Just to clarify . . neither of your links take you to Amanda Beard’s Playboy magazine pictures. Someone needs to scan those and post them. What is linked are some, but not all, of her Playboy cyber-club pics. The magazine pics are usually more revealing . . let’s hope so this time.
June 11th, 2007 at 3:28 am
Carlo - You sure about that? How do you know this?
June 11th, 2007 at 12:29 pm
They aren’t more revealing. What you see there is what you get. They suck.