On Nowness, Barkley and Race in Sports: an Interview with Mike Wilbon of the Washington Post
Media Interviews July 19th. 2007, 4:36pm
You know him from the Washington Post, PTI and most recently, his squabble with Peter King. Perhaps you remember him from The Sports Reporters, back when it was the Supreme Court of sports journalism. Now the show has devolved into Judge Joe Brown, but that’s neither here or nor there. Mike Wilbon is among the respected sports journalists in America, and he’s ridiculously wealthy, too. After much cajoling, we finally got him to do an interview with us.
Q: Let’s just get ‘Who’s Now’ out of the way early – Bill Simmons took a swipe at it, Newsweek did too, and now Peter King has done so. In the Chat House, you mentioned it was loose and fun. So is everyone justified in poking fun at it, or is this slamming of ESPN a bit overboard? [For what it's worth, we did something like this 'round NCAA tournament time - an all-encompassing Culture tournament.]
It’s fair to take shots at big institutions, and ESPN qualifies as that easily … I don’t tailor my thoughts to what people think I should do or not. I liked doing “Who’s Now” and would like it even more if I was sitting next to Jessica Biel for the second round! Look, I’m hardly a joke-writer as a columnist. But I like it, usually, when Tony and I veer off into pop-culture land. I didn’t like it nearly as much when PTI started, but our producers, Erik Rydholm and Matt Kelliher, made me see the value in taking a lighter approach at times. Now, I thoroughly enjoy most of it (though never Good Cop/Bad Cop). But I don’t want to hear from sportswriters on this, given the trivial junk we often prize … the fights and debates over players who never mattered and should never be argued about. I think the bracket formula was smart, and the pairings as well. And I’d do it again, regardless of criticism. Everything doesn’t have to and shouldn’t be serious all the time.
Q: You’re buddies with Sir Charles. Should ESPN throw whatever it takes at Barkley to grab him for the ESPN NBA show next year, filling the void left by Dan Patrick?
Wow…great question. I don’t know. It’s not my money. I love Charles and would love the chance to work with him beyond his two book projects, which I’m grateful he asked me to be involved in. My loyalties are to ABC/ESPN on this topic, of course … but I think Charles, Kenny Smith and Ernie (not to mention Magic or Reggie Miller) have the best sports show on television. Even if I can’t catch the game on TNT, if I get in before 1:30 or so, I’m turning the TV on to hear what Charles/Kenny/Ernie/Magic/Reggie have to say. It’s must-see TV for a pro basketball junkie like me. Charles, six or seven years into retirement, is still the biggest star in the NBA. If you don’t think so, just see the reaction to him when he enters a room … I can’t get fined for tampering, so yeah, I’d love to see Chuck with us. But if I was Turner, would I let Charles leave? Hell, no. No. No. That would be insane.
Q: You’re one of the most beloved sportswriters around (the Teflon Sportswriter, up until this ‘Who’s Now’ business), but have you had any memorable athlete/coach run-ins? As a point of reference, TJ Simers told us that he once had an athlete blow their nose on his shirt.
I don’t try to incite athletes; that’s not my job as I see it. I’ve been friends with T.J. for years but we don’t do the same thing. I don’t write jokes (I’m no good at that) and to me there’s a huge difference between criticism and ridicule. I’m not into ridicule, except when someone is truly an ass and has earned it. I don’t call a guy named Jim “Chris” to incite. I haven’t had any infamous run-ins … I’ve had players and coaches/managers get angry and have had confrontational phone calls or behind closed-doors disagreements, but certainly nothing physical. “Get away from my locker” from Donnie Moore once … After criticizing a local athlete or coach, I try to show up the next day at practice or a game. I learned from columnists and old-time ballplayers years ago that the situation is diffused if the angry party doesn’t have to look for you very long, and that it becomes very exaggerated if you don’t show up. It was my father’s philosophy when I was a kid: “Don’t throw the rock and hide your hand.” If a guy can speak his mind the next day or two, it usually ain’t going much further than that.
Q: Right now, which pro sports league has more of a bum rap among the public at-large: the NFL or the NBA? Do you think the public views Pacman, Chris Henry, Jared Allen et al worse than Ron Artest, Stephen Jackson et al?
The NBA is seen by people in the main, black and white, as a “black league” and its players are called all too often (and mostly by white non-fans of the league) “those thugs.” The NFL will never, by anybody, be seen as a black league even though 65 or 70 percent of the players are black. When Pacman made it “rain” in the strip club and acted like an ass during the NBA All-Star weekend in Las Vegas, who did it immediately reflect upon? The NBA, of course. People said, “Oh, look at what the thug league has done now” even though it was an NFL player who was involved in the trouble. I didn’t see columnists and commentators calling the NFL a “thug league” last year when Bengals kept getting arrested right and left. They ripped the individual players, but didn’t attach the behavior to the league as is almost always the case with the NBA. So, what’s that about? The NFL is the preeminent form of civic entertainment in America. The product is superior, and it gets almost no criticism, even when deserved. Most of my brethren will criticize the local team, or whether the coach made the proper decision on third-and-three with two minutes left, but not the game, not the sport. You don’t hear anybody say, “The games this week sucked. They were poorly played.” There’s little honest assessment of it, just worship. The NFL has a brilliant construct, and has gathered quite a following of sycophants in the newspaper and television/radio business who believe anything the NFL does is historic and needs to be reported breathlessly … That, I find rather sad. By contrast, it’s open season on the NBA all the time, when it’s deserved and when it, in my opinion, isn’t.
Q: More fun to cover Gilbert Arenas or Clinton Portis? Why? Who is the bigger star in DC?
Gilbert Arenas, and Gilbert Arenas. I was at a restaurant in Georgetown the other night and Clinton Portis came in … people didn’t know who he was. Seriously, people looked at each other and said, “Isn’t that somebody I’m supposed to know?” A few knew Portis. Everybody in town knows Gilbert Arenas. He’s genuine, stylish, handsome, affable and approachable. And he’s an All-Star. He gets it. He has time for everybody (not that Portis doesn’t) and he’s out and about in town. He’s the biggest star in D.C. (not counting the Jordan years) since Joe Theisman and John Riggins in the mid-1980s … D.C. simply doesn’t have many stars.
Q: Did you play any sports growing up in the neighborhood or at the high school level?
Yes, I played everything, from tackle football without pads and helmets in West Chatham Park on the South Side of Chicago, to horseshoes, to table tennis, but especially baseball, hockey (no joked about black people playing hockey, ’cause that’s what brothas do in Detroit and Chicago and St. Louis), tennis, basketball. Everything except golf and soccer. Those were out of bounds. I played baseball as a sophomore and junior at St. Ignatius College Prep (the Jesuits would hurt me if I didn’t use the official name), and tennis as a senior … I was pretty good at almost everything, and great at nothing.
Q: Circulations are shrinking, the Cincinnati Post just folded, and newspapers in general seem to be in trouble. If you were to go back to Northwestern to talk with j-school students, would you advise them to get into newspapers? The online game? Magazines? Start a blog?
You don’t have to pose a question in theory. I just went back two weeks ago to talk to journalism students (well, high school students at The Cherub program … kids who will likely major in journalism) and told them it’s still about being literate, about being able to master the language, about knowing how to tell a story masterfully. If you can do that, it can be applied in any medium. You can’t plan a whole career in the newspaper industry the way I did, the way Kornheiser did … but good writing, detailed reporting and in general great storytelling are never going to go out of style. The skills are transferable in my mind.
Q: Which was a worse NBA pick: Adam Morrison by the Bobcats last year, or Yi Jianlian by the Bucks this year?
Yi … because he’s not going to Milwaukee. Adam Morrison has plenty of time to become a good enough player. Why would Milwaukee, given all the Bucks need, have to take Yi? It’s not like he was John Elway and Baltimore had the first pick in the 1983 draft. Yi isn’t Oden. Why do it? I think it’s crazy.
Q: We’re in agreement that Kim Kardashian is the new … whoever she wants to be. The next time you see Reggie Bush, will you ask about her? We’ve been assured they are dating, but you never know with these athletes …
No, I won’t ask…Okay, please don’t be so nerdy. Don’t ever use the word “dating” with people who have money and/or celebrity … what is this, the Donna Reed show?
Q: The last good book you read – sports and non-sports.
“The Big Bam” by Leigh Montville, the life and times of Babe Ruth … fabulous … and now, I’m just about to start “Pistol,” about the life and times of Pistol Pete Maravich, a biography by Mark Kriegel … I love sports biographies … biographies in general. Katharine Graham’s “Personal History” is fascinating, more so to me than others perhaps because I was fortunate enough to work for her for many years before she passed away. I’m about to start, on vacation, a James Baldwin bio by David Leeming … I don’t have great range when it comes to books … no fiction … only non-fiction and almost exclusively bios.
Q: Best movie you’ve seen this summer?
It’s been a bad summer for movies, so far. “Knocked Up” is the only thing I’ve seen and it had a bunch of laugh-out-loud moments. I liked that a lot … Katherine Heigl is damn nice to look at for two hours. I don’t do horror flicks or car chase stupidity, so I’m waiting for the rest of the summer fare.
Q: Stat boy has rebuffed our advances for an interview. Once he sees this, you think it’ll turn him around? Word around DC is that he’s livin’ large with the Georgetown co-eds. Or maybe it’s ladies of GW.
One of many things I love about Tony Reali is he’s pretty immune to peer pressure, especially stupid peer pressure. I don’t monitor his personal life, but if I was 29 years old, looked like that, and hosted a TV show, I’d run through quite a few colleges … but I don’t know if that matters to him in the least. He’s just one of those people who was raised right, as my parents say … he’s a prince of a person.
Q: You’re hosting a dinner with one sportswriter, one athlete, and one celebrity. Either or all can be living or dead. There may or may not be a visit to the hot tub afterward. Who you got?
I don’t do well on these types of questions because I always have an agenda. I’ve had dinner, fortunately for me, with all the great sportswriters I ever wanted to dine with, most notably Shirley Povich, (for 75 years or so THE COLUMNIST at The Washington Post) and Sam Lacy, Shirley’s contemporary, who lived nearly 100 years and covered the other side of the world, even though he and Shirley lived, allegedly, in the same world. Mr. Lacy worked for the Afro-American, in Baltimore and Washington. So, if I get to pick, I want to have dinner with both of them in an integrated restaurant (so I guess, California) in 1947, the day before Jackie Robinson is to integrate baseball. Athlete: Ali, no question. Celebrity? Never been into it … don’t really care that much. Well, not male celebrities, anyway. Can I get rid of everybody else and just have dinner with Roselyn Sanchez? If you don’t know her, hit google. Okay, if I have to answer seriously, then Ali, Lacy, Povich and Sinatra … that’s a pretty damn good group, right?
62 Responses to “On Nowness, Barkley and Race in Sports: an Interview with Mike Wilbon of the Washington Post”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


July 19th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Wilbon forgot to mention his love of BOWLING.
July 19th, 2007 at 5:17 pm
Great interview TBL. Wilbon seems cool.
July 19th, 2007 at 5:18 pm
There’s a lot I don’t like about ESPN, including Who’s Now. But I like Wilbon. He’s intelligent, he’s not a buck-passer, he’s not a smarmy tool. He gives good insight as to why he did the Now crap without it becoming a Van Pelt vs. Leicht “losers in bathrobes” non-answer. In other words, Wilbon doesn’t come off like a guy drinking the Bristol Blue Blast flavored Kool-Aid.
July 19th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
Good interview. Nice work TBL.
PTI is one of few shows on ESPN I still watch.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
WOW!!!!!!!
You snag THE BIG DOG!!!!!
I gotta give you props IMMEDIATELY for that. Can’t read it just yet – got a deadline due
July 19th, 2007 at 6:04 pm
I ran into Reali at Buffalo Billiards in G-town in February and the dude was hanging out with some really hot women. I have to say that from the 2 minute wait I had while getting a beer, he seemed like a pretty down to earth guy. Drunk college kids were coming up to him and sucking up to him while he was trying to get laid and he never seemed to get too pissed off.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:07 pm
Q: Why did you choose to attend St. Ignatius College Prep?
’cause that’s what brothas do in Detroit and Chicago and St. Louis
Fan-fucking-tastic interview, TBL.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
nice interview, but it’s kind of sad to find out that deep down, he doesn’t like the good-cop/bad-cop shtick. also, i would have never, ever been able to picture Wilbon in skates and a hockey stick.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:14 pm
Great interview. The questions were insightful and the answers enlightening. This is as good as it gets and I have greater respect for Wilbon now than before. I can now forget about the last interview on this site, as TBL is back on its game as well.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:16 pm
good stuff guys
July 19th, 2007 at 6:16 pm
Best Interview in a while TBL. Great Job getting Michael Ray Wilbon!
Best line in the interview…..No, I won’t ask…Okay, please don’t be so nerdy.
July 19th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
That’s why “Who’s Now” is so hard to take; Wilbon is on it. He’s the best writer-turned-broadcaster.
July 19th, 2007 at 10:28 pm
Great stuff.
July 19th, 2007 at 10:30 pm
“No, I won’t ask…Okay, please don’t be so nerdy.”
Ha! I wonder how many times he’s told LeBatard that same thing…
July 19th, 2007 at 10:35 pm
great interview, I’ve always been a big Wilbon fan and loved his columns at the Post, nice grab TBL
July 19th, 2007 at 10:37 pm
Most Catholic School guys in chicago turn out Great.
July 19th, 2007 at 10:37 pm
Fantastic stuff, TBL. I met Wilbon in person once at a Illinois Collegiate Newspapers event of some kind and he seemed really cool. It’s good to know that still seems like the case now that he’s a superstar.
July 19th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
You guys forgot he was the “Lupica” of the Budweiser Sports Report. The show Valerio and Espn ripped off. Twenty some odd years later I can still remember him hammering Brian “pre-Bison Dele” Williams for ditching coach Wade and Maryland. He was wrong though… by the way whatever happened to coach Wade?
July 19th, 2007 at 10:51 pm
Wade is running parks and recs in Baltimore, last I heard.
Great interview, folk. Hope SVPStyle goes Optimus Prime like TBL one day.
Maybe Reali.
July 19th, 2007 at 10:54 pm
and now…for Tony Kornheiser’s retort
July 19th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
“No, I won’t ask…Okay, please don’t be so nerdy. Don’t ever use the word “dating†with people who have money and/or celebrity … what is this, the Donna Reed show?”
it’s about time someone said this. whatever happened to ‘ESPN Hollywood’ anyway?
July 19th, 2007 at 11:09 pm
It is sad that an interview like this feeds your ego and gives you more credibility … I wonder if Mr. Wilbon knows what you did to Allison Stokke or to Urban Meyer’s daughter today … I think not! … You know, I try to like you but you make it so fucking difficult some days …
July 19th, 2007 at 11:14 pm
Stokke? You mean the girl who was profiled on the front page (A1) of Wilbon’s paper?
Urban Meyer’s daughter? Talk to the Rivals fans who started it.
July 19th, 2007 at 11:24 pm
No, I am talking to you … the guy who is promoting Urban Meyer’s daughter … and it was because of you asshole bloggers that the Washington Post did the feature … that wasn’t a feature on a young athlete, it was about a young athlete who gained notoriety for the wrong reasons … her father was worried about his daughter’s safety because of a group of basement boys who hide behind their silly little names …
July 19th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
C’mon, TBL … take down the photo, link and discussion about Urban Meyer’s daughter … dare to be different than the other sausage festers out there … be a leader among the unaccountable … don’t follow losers like With Leather and Brooks … trust me, you will gain some self respect … Now, let me ask you a serious question: do you think when Brooksy is screwing an SBB girl, she calls him Daddy? …
July 19th, 2007 at 11:49 pm
Nice work. I loved Wilbon’s allusion to Jim Rome’s interview with “Chris” errrrr… Jim Everett. An absolute classic.
July 20th, 2007 at 12:16 am
I agree with Matt that the whole “publicizing hot high schoolers” is a little (well alot) lame, but he’s being such a tool about it that I can’t really give him too much credit.
That said — congrats on landing Wilbon. Whitlock or Schrutebag may have gotten you more pub, but getting an interview with probably the most well liked and biggest name sportswriter in the country is a real validation for what you’re doing with the site. Good job.
July 20th, 2007 at 12:35 am
Your best interview in some time, TBL. Good to see the site back up and running.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:14 am
Thanks, Mark … that is the nicest thing anybody has ever said to me … trust me, TBL have some history with this topic and I have decided to be blunt rather than pc … Besides, TBL and others sit on their high horses and anonymously criticize anything and everything in the world with absolutely no accountability … i love reading good writing and debating sports, but I hate seeing these guys getting their jollies at the expense of young women … that is way over the line … if that makes me a tool so be it …
July 20th, 2007 at 1:22 am
I chided TBL on the last big-time interview for not providing good enough questions to get serious answers.
Cause I did that before, I gotta give alot of credit for this interview. Great questions, great interview. Unbelievable get.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:23 am
Should have asked about the Cubs.
Big fan.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:37 am
How does he feel about the pods during the Chase?
Gotta get some corporo-speak in there.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:52 am
TBL — you’ve come a long way since the days when your media interviews featured phony little vermin like Andy (Panda) Marchand. Whatever happened to that twerp? When the New York ComPost fires your ass, you’ve hit rock bottom.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:03 am
Good interview and I love Wilbon but why does he have such a man crush on Tiger? Sergio said something that could be seen as slightly anti-Tiger like years ago and Wilbon is still butthurt about it. He won’t even pick the field over Tiger in toss up. . . EVER. It’s really weird.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:14 am
Fair enough, Matt. Your thoughts and comments are noted. Feel free to drop us an email to discuss it further.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:22 am
It’s Matt.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1Av7N2qaWD0
July 20th, 2007 at 3:30 am
Once again, Mike Wilbon comes across as a different breed than most of the sports broadcasters out there… a guy who is not only willing to do an interview for a blog, but put the blogger in his place without getting uptight about it (”What is this, the Donna Reed show?”).
Great interview, and congrats on snagging the big guy.
July 20th, 2007 at 3:36 am
Bravo to both TBL and Wilbon. This was five minutes well spent.
July 20th, 2007 at 5:16 am
This is so now.
July 20th, 2007 at 5:24 am
Great interview. I met Wilbon once by basically crashing the PTI Christmas party and he was such a nice guy then and it really comes across in the interview. As a lifelong reader of him in the Post it’s great to see the rest of the country get on board. Keep it up TBL.
July 20th, 2007 at 10:55 am
Wilbon’s the absolute best.
July 20th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Great stuff, TBL. And Wilpon is right– the less celeb worship, the better.
July 20th, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Matt, since you have such a hard-on for Allison Stokke’s poor aggrieved father –
http://dethroner.com/2007/06/05/allison-stokkes-father-is-notorious-misogynist-defense-lawyer/
Well, links don’t work too well on here. But suffice to say a few boys cranking one out in the basement pales in comparison to some of the shitbags that her lawyer dad has defended (ok when it’s your daughter, not when it’s my little princess).
July 20th, 2007 at 12:20 pm
Now, back to why I read this post.. I’ve been reading Wilbon’s work in the Post for many years, and he is simply one of the best. TK was good back in the day when he used to write columns (Style and Sports sections), but he’s too big for that stuff now.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:00 pm
Good Get, TBL, and a good lead. I’m happy to have Wilbon’s byline delivered to my front door a few times a week.
Was this an e-mail interview or a phone conversation?
July 20th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Great job TBL……who is on your list next BS….
July 20th, 2007 at 3:54 pm
That’s great man, I’m glad to see that a guy like Wilbon will come on here and do an interview. I love how at least some of the ESPN personalities can take some criticism and still respect your work enough to come on here and give an interview (not that there’s much to criticize Wilbon about). I hope guys like Simmons can do the same.
BTW, I really like Wilbon now, especially his points about criticizing a guy and being man enough to step right to him the next day.
July 20th, 2007 at 4:08 pm
Its great how in a short interview, it was easy for Wilbon to peg you guys as nerds, he really is quite perceptive.
And @ Matt – hallelujah brother, I’m in your corner.
July 20th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
“I learned from columnists and old-time ballplayers years ago that the situation is diffused if the angry party doesn’t have to look for you very long, and that it becomes very exaggerated if you don’t show up.”
I think Wilbon was following this philosophy by giving this interview. He absolutely CRUSHES blogs any time they are mentioned on PTI, so I guess this is his way of manning up and being accountable to those he criticizes. I gained a little more respect for him after reading this. Nice get, TBL.
July 20th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
Great read.
Cyber high five to TBL and Wilbon.
July 20th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
wanted to chime in on the great interview. love Wilbon.
July 20th, 2007 at 6:43 pm
Cheers TBL. Not only a great read and interview, but a big boost of the credibility for the sphere. Very impressive.
Cheers to Wilbon too!
July 20th, 2007 at 7:03 pm
I would like Wilbon better if it weren’t for his man-purse and open love of Celine Dion’s music.
Nice get on the interview.
July 20th, 2007 at 7:19 pm
Really? Wilbon talking about race? Really?!! I’m stunned.
July 20th, 2007 at 8:10 pm
Big ups for getting Wilbon, one of only about three respectable people left at ESPN.
I’m curious too to know whether it was phone or email.
July 20th, 2007 at 8:57 pm
I agree with Matt. Wilbon said it best: “please don’t be so nerdy.” Although I might change nerdy to “creepy.” You’re married right? What does your wife think about this weird fetishizing of young girls?
July 21st, 2007 at 4:30 am
What does Wilbon think of sportswriters protecting sportswriters? Why is Woody Paige still on television and Harold Reynolds is not?
Oh — sorry. I forgot all about wagon circling. Mariotti, Deford, Dr. Zzzzzzzzzzzz, Bayless —- Fraud City.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:32 am
What does Wilbon think of sportswriters protecting sportswriters? Why is Woody Paige still on television and Harold Reynolds is not?
Oh — sorry. I forgot all about wagon circling. Mariotti, Deford, Dr. Zzzzzzzzzzzz, Bayless —- Fraud City.
July 21st, 2007 at 4:40 am
Great Interview. I grew up with the Post being the local paper (also the Baltimore Sun) and basically learned to read on Wilbon, Kornheiser, Povich (yeah Maury’s Dad) and the Sun;s John Steadman. Its a dang shame we dont see writers like that much anymore.
July 21st, 2007 at 8:44 pm
Awesome awesome awesome. Wilbon is one of the best that ESPN has left. It’s great when a blog scores such a high profile interview.
July 21st, 2007 at 10:42 pm
There’s a lot of MikeTirico Syndrome in Michael Wilbon. Wilbon’s right there with Sean Salisbury, Hal Reynolds, Gary Miller, Woody Paige, and another very high profile on-air personality in Bristol.
July 22nd, 2007 at 10:08 pm
It’s good to hear someone else is getting into Pistol. It rambles a bit in my opinion, but there is a wealth of knowledge on basketball history in general as well as the man most deserving of a basketball championship of some sort. I feel like P.M. should be one of the greatest stories of sports in all times. He was pushed from early age to be a million-dollar player (literally) by his father. He was viewed as the great white hope for basketball. He averaged 40+ points at LSU. The team never made the NCAA tournament. He was a hard drinker, and lived a life like most wouldnt believe, and then later in life he became a evangelical preacher. What a story. Have a good time reading.