Bob Stoops + Notre Dame = Tons o’ Fun!
College Football December 1st. 2009, 3:10pm
Bob Stoops, what a sly dog. Let’s rewind the Oklahoma coach’s quotes yesterday during a conference call with reporters:
Question: “There is officially an opening now at Notre Dame, so you’re not going there?”
Stoops: “What, what I’m, what I’m saying is that I intend to be at Oklahoma, that’s, uh, the only place that right now, yes, that I’m looking to do. I will never confirm or deny whether I talk or not talk to anybody. Um…that’s…and I won’t be interviewing for any jobs.”
Of course he wouldn’t “interview” – he’s won a National title and been to four title games in the last decade!
Question: “I’m asking you, can you tell me right now that you will not go at Notre Dame?”
Stoops: “What I’m saying is that I’m going to be at Oklahoma next year, so I can’t be at two places at once.”
Not quite a denial!
Question: “Why can’t you just say no?”
Stoops: “Because I don’t like the way you worded it, so in the end I told you what I intend to do.”
There was laughter after this. Intend is soooo ambiguous!
A few hours after this, Sportscenter led with Stoops and the Irish, and in an odd moment, ESPN NFL reporter Adam Schefter – who, to our knowledge, has never attempted to break college football news – chimed in, saying that “Stoops to Notre Dame was all but a formality.” He tweeted as much.
So last night, Stoops was forced to again address the situation to mollify the masses, and said the following: “I stand by the comments that I made earlier today. I will be at Oklahoma. Any reporting to the contrary is completely unfounded.”
This morning, Stoops ripped Schefter to the Tulsa World.
“I don’t know where (Schefter) is getting his information, but it’s wrong,” Stoops said in a telephone interview. “It’s all been wrong.”
Quickly, Schefter has backed off his story. (But he couldn’t leave well enough alone and now claims the Irish aren’t interested in Cincinnati’s Brian Kelly, which would probably sadden his colleague Pat Forde, who thinks Kelly would be a perfect fit in South Bend.)
Question that remain unanswered: Has Notre Dame formally offered Stoops? (Nobody knows.) Will anything Stoops/Kelly/Meyer/Dungy et al have said this week/month prevent Notre Dame from approaching them? (Definitely shouldn’t. Aim high!)
Nobody knows anything, which is what’s making this so damn fun. Anywhere you turn, it is all speculation and rumor and for that, Swarbrick deserves props. He’s doing an outstanding job keeping a lid on things.
113 Responses to “Bob Stoops + Notre Dame = Tons o’ Fun!”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


December 1st, 2009 at 3:12 pm
behave?
/out
December 1st, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Frankly, I don’t really see why Bob Stoops would be their 1st pick. But that’s me.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I had cold sweats last night knowing this would be a post sometime today.
/kid
December 1st, 2009 at 3:15 pm
there is a tiger post. Why would anyone want to comment on this one?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Huh…
December 1st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
I got your back today TBL. Tiger story, covered. ND, like it or not important. Why, money fool, they’ve got an endowment of like 6 Billion, with a B, to my knowledge far and away the most of any big time football school.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
If this happens it will be groundbreaking. What’s next, Pete Carroll leaving USC for the UNLV job? How often do coaches take this kind of step down?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Big name coaches that have won NTs don’t leave the schools they won them at to go to another big name school. Last one I am pretty sure about was Johnny Majors way back when (Pitt to UT).
December 1st, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Adding all of a person’s “Uh”’s and “Um”’s make them sound less believable.
/journalist trick.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pm
if UNLV offers pete carroll 7 mill he would probably go
December 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pm
i knew a guy that said “um” all the time when he spoke as a replacement for “shit” and “fuck.”
December 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pm
That’s a weak denial?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:19 pm
What’s next, Pete Carroll leaving USC for the UNLV job? How often do coaches take this kind of step down?
Let’s not absurdly overstate things. Bob Stoops going from Oklahoma to Notre Dame is not even close to the same thing as Stoops going from USC to UNLV. I’ll agree that this is at best a lateral move, but then again when you’re at a place like Oklahoma, there’s not many other moves available to you.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:20 pm
exactly…i need audio
December 1st, 2009 at 3:20 pm
substitute second “Stoops” with “Carroll”.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Who gives a shit?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:21 pm
STOOPS. ISN’T. GOING.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:21 pm
ms, I was being a tad hyperbolic.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:22 pm
just like meyer never will. but it was fun to get you all hot and bothered.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:22 pm
ms, I was being a tad hyperbolic.
Gotcha. My brain is tired.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:22 pm
You know what better demonstrates this? Not leaving a comment.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Again? Seriously? TBL – What will you offer your readers and loyal commenters when you find out that you are wrong?
/If ND isn’t interested in Kelly, what the hell are they looking for?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:23 pm
i’m not saying that he is going for sure but if he is 100% staying at Oklahoma then why doesn’t he just say it? why won’t he come out and be clear. he’s beating around the bush here..
December 1st, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Cowher!
December 1st, 2009 at 3:24 pm
Bob Stoops to Kentucky. ND folds.
/fin
December 1st, 2009 at 3:24 pm
what do you want from him wally, he has less power these days. After all he has no one calling him the godfather
December 1st, 2009 at 3:24 pm
nd would have an instant in with the catholic schools in ohio if they hire stoops. would make sense on their part.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:25 pm
anything to get more money out of oklahoma if he can. but he isn’t leaving, regardless.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Everyone say it together…
CONTRACT EXTENSION.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:25 pm
see David Sanchez, Dallas Attorney sees eye to eye with me.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Because his agent is telling him not to. You never burn a bridge until you know you’ll never need it. I agree that it is a dick move and it must be infuriating for OU fans, but you pay an agent for a reason so you might as well take his advice.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
What he said…I saw it doen to Florida not ONCE but TWICE. In fact the first time he was reported as signed IN PRINT in the fucking newspapers…Then he backed out and signed an extension with the Sooners.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
WON’T.EVER.HAPPEN.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Lou Holtz
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
STOOPS. ISN’T. GOING.
This is the same TBL who, this morning, took the words of a Bradenton Newspaper opinion writer asserting that Charlie Crist would be better served running for Senate as a Democrat and repackaged them as “Charlie Crist is rumored to be switching parties”.
I agree that it’s weird that Stoops didn’t just out and out say he’s staying, but take away the “Uh”’s and “Um”’s from the article and he sounds fairly forthright. That being said, he’s been an Oklahoma long enough now that I’m sure he’s considering what the next stage in his career is.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:27 pm
What should he have to offer? Does it matter? He isn’t speculating, he is reporting what is out there. Do you want to stone him to death if Stoops is not the next ND coach? This is the fun of it all.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:28 pm
No need to be an asshole, s1rweeze. No need at all to be a giant fucking asshole.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:28 pm
In other college football coaching news, Gary Patterson just got a long term contract. TCU is going to be a powerhouse as long as he is coaching them.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:29 pm
should have given him a lifetime contract.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:30 pm
That’s what buyouts are for.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:30 pm
There’s a guy that might listen. Not Stoops
December 1st, 2009 at 3:30 pm
they should get lou holtz back
“dey put deir pantsh on deh shame way wee do”
December 1st, 2009 at 3:31 pm
CelticLaw -
It’s called sarcasm. Half the fun around here is making fun of the boss for beating a dead horse over and over and over and over…
December 1st, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Ms- listen to the audio. I didn’t insert anything into those quotes.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:32 pm
I’m glad that the laugh out loud moments from the Tiger post have carried over to this one.
Solid work REAAAZY. +1
December 1st, 2009 at 3:33 pm
Ms- listen to the audio. I didn’t insert anything into those quotes.
Sorry TBL, I didn’t mean to imply that you were. I was referring to the journalist who originally transcribed them.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:34 pm
I will be very curious to hear who gets an interview with ND. Will they continue to chase “big names” that they can’t get or will they go out and get a hot shot young head coach like Kelly, Patterson or Pedersen?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:35 pm
i get this part of it. but its absurd to think that there is no way in hell Stoops ends up at Notre Dame. stranger things have happened..
December 1st, 2009 at 3:35 pm
My meter is all f’d up.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:35 pm
TBL we need a Toby Gerhart should be heisman post. i know you have it in you.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Chip Kelly > Brian Kelly
December 1st, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Stewart Mandel took a dump all over ND yesterday. Shockingly it wasn’t mentioned on this blog.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Let me grab a bat and take it to the horse:
I think Stoops wants to go. Why? He’s seeing the Big XII getting tougher to win and his last few BCS bowl outings have not been good. Better to leave on a high and be remembered fondly than continue to lose ground.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Brian Kelly doesn’t get his ass kicked by Boise State with Oregon’s talent.
No he doesn’t have it in him. He has probably not seen 20 minutes of Gerhart this year and that is included in highlights.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:39 pm
/fixed
December 1st, 2009 at 3:39 pm
that’s why you try your hand at the NFL, make some coin, if it doesn’t workout, you comeback to college football. see; Spurrier, Steve.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:40 pm
can’t be right, they just played ND
December 1st, 2009 at 3:41 pm
That was his first game as a head coach, right?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:41 pm
But, but… Joker Phillips?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:41 pm
The B12 is not getting better. It is the same as it ever was. Texas and OU rule that league and always will. If he beats Texas he plays for the BCS. Simple as that.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm
I like Joker, but would you rather have Stoops or Joker?
/although we’d probably lose the LaGrange pipeline
December 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm
So after 11 games as a head coach he is better than Brian Kelly? Both are good offensive minds, but B. Kelly is a proven winner.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm
/fixed
December 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm
I heard that Bob Stoops was going to Manginiblog, and then was gonna buy TBL for $10 million. Is that right, or am I mixing stuff up?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:44 pm
i think you took me too literally. i am really interested in what Chip Kelly ends up doing. I think he is an offensive genius.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:45 pm
Well put, Sparty. OU had more big time injuries than any team I can remember. Had Gresham and Bradford stayed healthy OU wins 11 games this year.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Seriously? The Big 12 North hasn’t fielded a really good team this decade (with few exceptions) and his only competition in the South is Texas (which wasn’t even a rivaly until late) with TT and Ok St. being competitive every 4 or 5 years.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:48 pm
that’s why you try your hand at the NFL, make some coin, if it doesn’t workout, you comeback to college football. see; Spurrier, Steve.
See also: Saban, Nick and Carroll, Pete.
The B12 is not getting better. It is the same as it ever was. Texas and OU rule that league and always will. If he beats Texas he plays for the BCS. Simple as that
And here I thought that Okie State, Kansas, Mizzou and Texas Tech were getting better and that Nebraska was trying like hell to claw back to the top?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
i think Saban could have made it in the NFL.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:51 pm
OK St., TT, KU, and Mizzou will all have cyclical success, either by striking gold with an overlooked QB recruit, or ending up with a team that is loaded with seniors and juniors. I don’t think any of them will have much sustained success.
Huskers are the wildcard.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Sure, they’re trying to get better, but Ok St is going to suck next year as will Kansas. Texas Tech will never win the league and Leach is about to move jobs. Nebraska could get back to winning 9+ a year, but they are still a year or so away from that. OU and Texas will run that league for as long as Stoops and Brown are there.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:52 pm
It’s interesting to think what would have happened had they signed Brees instead of Culpepper.
December 1st, 2009 at 3:55 pm
exactly. he did pretty well considering his qbs were joey harrington and john beck
December 1st, 2009 at 3:57 pm
pfff
December 1st, 2009 at 3:58 pm
couldn’t this be said about the Big 10 and SEC for the most part?
December 1st, 2009 at 3:59 pm
So, you’re saying that Girardi is a candidate at Notre Dame?
December 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Agreed with this.
/Texas owns the series 59-40-5
December 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pm
You can say that about every conference, for the most part. 1 or 2 dominant teams, and everybody else is on the merry-go-round, and their number comes up once every 4 or 5 years.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:02 pm
UGA, FLA, LSU, Tenn and Bama will always be good with good coaches. The wildcards in the SEC are Auburn, Arkanas and Ole Miss. Sure, Kentucky or SCAR can have a season here or there, but generally (not this year) there are 5 pretty good SEC teams. The big 12 is all about Texas and OU.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:03 pm
i’d say the Big East is a crapshoot for the most part.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:03 pm
This is correct.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:04 pm
/kicks up feet
what’s it like to not compete for the conference title?
December 1st, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Texas’ endowment is $7.2B
December 1st, 2009 at 4:06 pm
and yet, UGA, LSU and Tennessee don’t have good coaches.
hmm…
December 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm
High fives Spencer, takes another puff of the Cuban and sips a bit more bourbon.
Things are good when your team wins.
/Then the Browns go and ruin Sundays for us.
//Back to reality
December 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Really? Richt isn’t a good coach? Miles isn’t a good coach? Kiffin isn’t a… 2 out of three’s not bad.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm
You’re 2/3 wrong. (Richt’s gameplan Saturday was fucking awesome. Georgia fans must be wondering where that’s been all year.)
December 1st, 2009 at 4:08 pm
sunday’s are for golfing, wally.
/looks at calendar
fuck.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:08 pm
fucking awesome. when you know your season is over by oct 3rd every single season, you can sit back and not have your heart ripped out.
i think kiffin will be good. he is still learning.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:09 pm
no, he’s not.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:09 pm
thoughts on the game tonight sparty?
December 1st, 2009 at 4:10 pm
oh settle down you slack jawed yokels…it was a joke.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:13 pm
close. my fear with this team is over playing early, and turning it over, a lot. if we can keep the turnovers down, we should win.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:14 pm
I forgot the /s on my post.
I like Joker a lot, but Stoops would be a no-brainer… So much so, they might fuck it up if they had the chance to hire him.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Richt is good. Kiffin probably will be. I don’t really think Miles is but his recruiting will keep him in the conversation. He won the Championship with Saban’s players and two great coordinators.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Wally – wrong about what, exactly? All i’ve said, all along, is that i think ND should pursue Bob Stoops. aim high. don’t settle for a safety like Brian Kelly or TCU guy or any of those other characters.
I believe they will. i hope and Want ND to pursue stoops, back up the brinks, and get him.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:46 pm
he’s not a safety guy. stoops is unrealistic. waste of time. never would happen. never does happen. move on.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:50 pm
“stoops is unrealistic” is an opinion. I disagree.
give the guy a blank check. proven winner over the course of a decade.
maybe it doesn’t happen. definitely doesn’t hurt to try.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:55 pm
So is evolution.
/big bang theoried
December 1st, 2009 at 4:55 pm
there isn’t any reason that ND shouldn’t persue stoops. I agree that they should throw a ton of cash at him and make him turn them down, but atleast try.
December 1st, 2009 at 4:56 pm
other than Johnny Majors to Tennessee, show me an example of a NT winning coach bouncing to another university. I’ll wait.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:00 pm
In the last 3 days, you’ve posted about 5 times on Stoops to ND. You’ve tweeted about it more.
What’s wrong with going after someone you can’t get? How about pissing off the guys that you MIGHT be able to get? Getting squashed several times by “names” that will never come isn’t exactly a great PR ploy for a school suffering from a football identity crisis.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Tressel
/subdivision’d
December 1st, 2009 at 5:07 pm
as long as there’s news, or even a kernal of news on this story, i’ll be posting something. i am fascinated by this coaching search.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:13 pm
But, there is more to it than Bob Stoops. And that REALLY seems to be the focus.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Wouldnt surprise me, but endowment figures are always a little fuzzy. And if the Texas coach was fired it would be a gigantic story also. Money talks, suck it Boise.
December 1st, 2009 at 5:56 pm
where can all endowment figures be found?
/drag mind from gutter, people
December 1st, 2009 at 6:21 pm
Michigan’s endowment is higher than Notre Dame.
http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/NES2008PublicTable-AllInstitutionsByFY08MarketValue.pdf
Morale of the story: don’t F with Harvard. They will bury you.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:26 pm
tartan, did you see the link about what Summers did to that Harvard endowment? doubt they’re still #1
December 1st, 2009 at 6:31 pm
I did. Most college endowments are down this past fiscal year. In the first six months, total endowments were down 23%. I doubt that many of these endowment managers (which would be a fantastic job by the way) staved off the dogs enough to pass Harvard.
December 1st, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Yale certainly didn’t catch them…
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125261190641700555.html
Neither did Stanford…
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/09/02/BAQ519HJA6.DTL
December 1st, 2009 at 6:41 pm
em>Texas’ endowment is $7.2B
Texas also has a number of campuses around the state amongst which its endowment is often shared. Anytime you look at an endowment figure for a school with multiple campuses, you have to make sure you are looking at a specific campus endowment or if it is the system endowment.
State schools often, though not always, have smaller endowments than private schools do because state schools can count upon a certain level of funding from the legislature each year. There was a study a few years ago which basically equated a state school with a $700 million endowment with a private school that has a $1 billion endowment.
Well anyway that’s the theory, until state revenues go to shit and the school has to drastically rase tuition and fees to make up the difference. Right California?
December 1st, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Or when the local governments hit up students to cover their own stupidity.
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/pa/20091201_Pittsburgh_tuition_tax_plan_stirs_student_fears.html