On Dan Patrick’s Move to SI
Uncategorized October 19th. 2007, 12:02pm
Having had sufficient time to devour the depth of Dan Patrick’s new endeavor, here’s the quote that we loved most: “I’m in a partnership with SI. I was an employee of ESPN.” Increasingly, we all want to be our own boss. Working for the man is nice, and it gets you sweet benefits and a great 401k match, but as anyone who has ever owned a business will tell you, nothing compares to being your own boss. (It is akin to doing laundry in NYC. If you’ve got machines in your own apartment, you’re one of the few fortunate ones; the rest of us have to schlep to the dungenous basement and fend off the flies and cockroaches … only to find out all the machines are full or you are a quarter short, and you need to trudge back upstairs. This is our private hell. It’s not glamorous like it is in 40 Days in 40 Nights.)
But was Dan Patrick the right move for Sports Illustrated? First, the cons: it’s another white guy going to an increasingly white magazine. SI seems excited to have Patrick and Rick Reilly bookend the mag (speaking of which … we don’t see much of a print background in his profile), but in an era where you need minority voices to offer different perspectives, SI lacks one. Which is exactly what we think when we read the big names destined for Dan’s radio show - Reilly, Peter King and Tom Verducci. These are all white guys in the 45 and up category, right?
And now, the pros: Dan Patrick was the face of ESPN. You can’t put a value on that. His radio show, simply based on his connections, will eventually have some clout. Will this ultimately lead to some scoops for SI? Probably. In our opinion, here’s perhaps the biggest benefit: as viewers become more annoyed with many aspects of ESPN’s coverage of the sports world, where might they turn? To the soothing voice they knew best when ESPN was in its prime: Dan Patrick.
This will come off as blog-centric, and since we don’t know how long Patrick had been in talks with SI, it could be off-base … but Patrick’s dilemna is one bloggers face everyday. Can I make it on my own without the help of the company that helped me get where I am today? Bloggers want to branch out on their own … but it’s a challenge. Perhaps Patrick had no idea how difficult it would be on his own, and quickly realized that he needed a wingman. Yeah, he had the radio thing slowly expanding, but he needed to partner (in blogger lingo, this would entail ‘joining a network’) up with a large entity if he wanted to become profitable and relevant. Was Patrick ready to sink his hard-earned money into his own website to make it a must-visit destination? It ain’t cheap. He’ll enjoy the free makeover on the SI dime.
Now for the question we really want to know: What’s the reaction inside ESPN?
Dan Patrick: Brand-new again (USA Today)
New job for Patrick, the former ESPN Star (NY Times)
13 Responses to “On Dan Patrick’s Move to SI”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

October 19th, 2007 at 12:06 pm
I’m guessing they have him slated to fill Steve Rushin’s space?
Anyway, while I’ve always sort of liked SI, this move is entirely PR and void of substance. He’ll bring essentially nothing to the table at SI.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
SI could solve its minority perspective issue with 3 subtle words…Screamin’ A. Smith.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:24 pm
“He’ll bring essentially nothing to the table at SI.”
Agreed.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:39 pm
He will bring Olberman and Reggie Miller. Those guys were on there with him more than Phil “the show killer”
October 19th, 2007 at 12:46 pm
Dan Patrick is going to make out huge with this deal. Essentially he is syndicating his own Radio Show, and is having SI makeover his website and sell the advertising for him. He also gets paid to write a column and gets access to all of SI’s writers for his Radio Show. He will be rolling in it if this works out even half way decent. I don’t know if he will ever get on the air in NY but if he gets about 10 major cities and lots of secondary markets he will be fine. Plus if, lets say, NBC puts him on as an anchor of some sort of sports coverage, SI will surely get “SI’s Dan Patrick” stamped on that and it may lead to more views of the website at least as well as the roll ups of danpatrick .com. As a business move this is Big for DP and OK for SI. It provides them with a few different platforms to cross brand each other. As for content…I agree that this is nothing major.
October 19th, 2007 at 12:53 pm
first, the compliment:
i think what patrick is doing is smart. it’s not unlike what a savvy investor does: he diversifies his portfolio. he doesn’t put all his eggs in one basket.
if patrick’s radio show fails, he still has is SI gig, his blog, his deal with nbc (you just know that is coming). it’s a smart, safe move. i don’t look upon this as bold, just common sense.
now my kvetching. i think mike tirico is light years better on the radio than patrick, who always bored me with his subjects, his buddy-buddy regular guests (will reilly bring patrick to the next lsu game) and his smarmy frat-boy attitude,.
patrick never, ever tried to push the envelope (tirico already has), never tried to be daring… he was just a bore. it’s pretty bad when your subordinates were more interesting than you are on the radio.
patrick was a less obnoxious version of a jocksniffer (chris berman being the obnoxious version).
maybe it’s just me, but i don’t know of anyone that said, as some have about stern, rome, etc, that if they missed dan patrick’s show it seemed their day was incomplete.
patrick got lucky and rode the coatails of olberman. he noticed that olberman because a success outside of the clutches of the disney mice. but olberman, hate him or love him, has a personality. in some ways he’s a lightning rod and often that’s what works.
patrick was, for all intents and purposes, was olberman’s straight man.
i think in three or four years patrick will be working for nbc fulltime doing golf and the olympics.
October 19th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
interesting take, jimmy. good observations.
October 19th, 2007 at 1:33 pm
Very nice post TBL. Very well written.
October 19th, 2007 at 1:48 pm
Why does SI need black voices? No one reads SI or any magazine about sports for the writer. They read for the stories. White, black, asian, blue
It doesn’t matter.
October 19th, 2007 at 2:04 pm
Why does SI need black voices? No one reads SI or any magazine about sports for the writer. They read for the stories. White, black, asian, blue It doesn’t matter.
i hope i don’t start a race flamewar. i mean, i’m about as whitebread/midwest/fiscal conservative/floridian transplant as they get.
people read si (more importantly si.com) for opinion pieces, not so much the stories. i mean, you can get stories anywhere. but the more writers you get from different backgrounds, the more perspectives from different prisms of life you get.
as much as we all would like life to be, it isn’t just black and white. and yeah, si could use a latino voice or two too.
and, re: the whitlock column about race and the nfl that TBL linked in another post today, i promise you a white writer would never touch that for fear of it being his last story written for money.
and different stories from different backgrounds also brings about debate. unlike the lame, tired scripted arguments you can find on bspn all day long, good, rational well-thought debates using premises from different views are healthy if not enlightening and interesting.
October 19th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
Sometimes, when people strike out on their own, for whatever reason, there comes that “Oh shit; what have I done?” moment(Don Geronimo will have that moment after he opts out of his contract with CBS radio in May). I think DP had that moment not too long after leaving ESPN and called in some chips to get that job with SI. Will this work? Only time will tell, but this much I know; he’ll never reach the level of success he had at the WWL, and it’s going to eat away at him.
October 19th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
but this much I know; he’ll never reach the level of success he had at the WWL, and it’s going to eat away at him.
“success” meaning fame or “success” meaning money?
he’ll likely make more money now that he is out of the clutches of the disney mice.
October 19th, 2007 at 4:55 pm
Dan P. is a star only in his own mind. Hard to believe you can’t figure that out.