Rick Reilly Talks to Us About His Career at SI and Move to ESPN
Media Gossip/Musings October 22nd. 2007, 3:15pm
Although Rick Reilly initially refused comment when we emailed him Friday inquiring about his move from SI to its rival, ESPN, now that the move has formally been announced, he felt more comfortable talking to us. We asked him a few questions about his industry-shaking move, and “America’s Best Loved Sports Writer” answered them. (You can find the rest of our interviews with prominent sports journalists right here.)
Q: You’ve had 20+ years as an SI columnist. Fondest memory?
Wow. That’s like asking Kirstie Alley about her favorite donut. I guess I’d say the time the magazine took us all down to Orlando for a three-day meeting and I finally got to really know Gary Smith and Steve Rushin and laugh so damn hard I thought I was gonna break a rib. My favorite column has to be “Nothing but Nets” - a column about malaria in Africa … which started the Nothing but Nets campaign through the United Nations foundation, which is now up to $13 million. How cool is that?
Q: What will you miss most about SI?
Well, since i was seven, my whole goal in life was to work for SI, so I guess I’ll miss saying, ‘hey, this is Rick Reilly from Sports Illustrated calling and …’ then again, ESPN is stronger than a garlic milkshake, too.
Q: ESPN has been after you before. Why make the jump now?
They pretty much let me create my own job. They said, ‘think of us like a Chinese menu. Take what you want from column A, column B and column C.’ So I’m getting to do what I really want, which is to bring well-written essays to TV. And to do, hopefully, a high-quality interview show. Plus, the money is ridonkulous. At first, I was sure they meant Pat Riley.
Q: Golf seems to have always been your passion … did ESPN acquiring some Masters coverage factor at all into the decision?
No. The U.S. Open, British Open and Ryder Cup ain’t exactly the Walla Walla Men’s Scramble, you know.
Q: If you could host a 30-minute TV show, who do you want as your first guest and why?
Dead - Damon Runyon. Alive - Mike Tyson.
32 Responses to “Rick Reilly Talks to Us About His Career at SI and Move to ESPN”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

October 22nd, 2007 at 3:21 pm
mmm…garlic milkshake.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Nice job TBL
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:28 pm
It’s funny how ESPN.com considers this “news” on the webpage.
It wasn’t newsworthy when Dan Patrick went to SI.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:35 pm
“Wow. That’s like asking Kirstie Alley about her favorite donut.”
Fucking golden.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:35 pm
Damn, TBL. Those answers are ridiculous, smug, and arrogant. You sure did a damn good job using the Satire on this one.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:42 pm
has anyone made a pu-pu platter joke yet?
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Redonkulous? Is Reilly a college freshman in 1999?
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Nice score with this interview, TBL.
Reilly still sucks.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:46 pm
You’ve lived a good life when a finger banging session in a pressbox at an LSU football game doesn’t even register as one of your fondest memories.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:47 pm
It’s funny how ESPN.com considers this “news†on the webpage.
It wasn’t newsworthy when Dan Patrick went to SI.
it’s “funny” if you actually expect news to come from bspn. it’s predictable when you understant bspn is not about sports news, but about hype.
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:53 pm
nice pull tbl…….dude was probably bored as hell at SI…..20 years of having to write a one page column every single week seems like it would get a little boring…seriously…no seriously
October 22nd, 2007 at 3:54 pm
I know, Jimmy. But if you go to ESPN.com, it has the Rick Reilly story under the heading of “news.”
That’s where I have the problem. If that’s what they’re going to do, then there should be a “public relations” or “press releases” column. When ESPN gets rights to a league, they call it “news.” But it’s never “news” when another network gets rights.
Just label it correctly, and I’ll be quiet.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:06 pm
You mean my Pu Pu PU Platter. The extra Pu makes all the difference.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:08 pm
[...] Big Lead interviews Reilly on his move. (I guess Big Lead has pretty much dominated all the worthwhile stuff today for some [...]
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:08 pm
I know we have a lot of young readers in the house, but in the 35-55 set, Reilly is king of the sports journalism world for a lot of folks.
I know it’s hard to believe, but there are still millions who get their news first when the magazine hits the mailbox … and they flip first to Reilly to see what he has to say.
Remember - in the 80s, ESPN was a non-factor and Reilly was The Man. Most of the folks who were in the 16-25 range in the 80s grew up reading Reilly.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:10 pm
What the hell’s a magazine?
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:16 pm
“I know we have a lot of young readers in the house, but in the 35-55 set, Reilly is king of the sports journalism world for a lot of folks. ” -
Well as an 18-35 demographicer I expect you to interview Bridgid Mullen next so we can have a competitive balance. And remember us youngins like our news through pictures. So the more the merrier of Mullens
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pm
All I can say about the 24-35 set that find blogs and online “community” sites about sports so fascinating: Go to a library. A good one. Find a late 1980s section and locate Sports Illustrated. Find Rick Reilly’s column on the late, great LA Times columnist Jim Murray. Try not to lose your breath at Reilly’s mastery. Try not to shed a tear for Murray’s life. It was a masterful piece of sports writing about the greatest sports writer ever. It was a changing of the guard. Awesome, as you all would say.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pm
All I can say about the 24-35 set that find blogs and online “community” sites about sports so fascinating: Go to a library. A good one. Find a late 1980s section and locate Sports Illustrated. Find Rick Reilly’s column on the late, great LA Times columnist Jim Murray. Try not to lose your breath at Reilly’s mastery. Try not to shed a tear for Murray’s life. It was a masterful piece of sports writing about the greatest sports writer ever. It was a changing of the guard. Awesome, as you all would say.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pm
All I can say about the 24-35 set that find blogs and online “community” sites about sports so fascinating: Go to a library. A good one. Find a late 1980s section and locate Sports Illustrated. Find Rick Reilly’s column on the late, great LA Times columnist Jim Murray. Try not to lose your breath at Reilly’s mastery. Try not to shed a tear for Murray’s life. It was a masterful piece of sports writing about the greatest sports writer ever. It was a changing of the guard. Awesome, as you all would say.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:41 pm
How in the hell is that guy worth paying two million a year…
Wow, a Kirstie Alley fat joke.
Wasn’t A. Whitney Brown available for a pair of Birkenstocks and a jug of wheatgrass juice?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:08 pm
So….does he have a blog, or what?
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:11 pm
great grab TBL, i can’t believe he said ridonkulous
October 22nd, 2007 at 6:53 pm
Honestly, aside from the Football Phone (which I made my mom get a scrip for) I cant say SI was good for anything besides that back page. I guess the front couple were cool, but I really got nothing from it. Then, the back page, when I was really comfortable on my throne, I see RR, some mention of golf, some mention of morality, some mention of pop culture. Then I am done, throw the mag on the back of the toilet, and go about my day.
October 22nd, 2007 at 7:34 pm
Is there any chance in hell that we can get SI to take Chris Berman off of ESPNs hands? He would complete the demise of SI as the sports bible as we once knew it.
Bermans “My Sharona” bit for Rob Bironas eight fild goals last night was so fucking stupid….His bit on Sage Rosenfels was equally as nauseating…
I never thought I would say this but Keyshawn Johnson and his Interview of Chad Johnson was one of the best interviews I think I have EVER seen on ESPN
I hope RR does well at ESPN…
He cant be any worse than my list of the WORST five sports journalist-ish personalities….
My Bottom Five
5. Stuart Scott
4. Chris Berman
3. Gregg Easterbrook
2. Colin Cowherd
1. (ALL TIME WORST) Skip Bayless
October 22nd, 2007 at 8:00 pm
Very nice get. Sports Illustrated is going to miss Reilly, and I’m willing to bet they’ve left the door wide open for a return, should his entry into the world of television not go as planned.
October 22nd, 2007 at 9:33 pm
Firstly, nice score TBL. Personally, I thought the Kirstie Alley-donut reference was typically classless Reilly.
And while agree with Ballgame that there was a time when Reilly was a great writer, and despite some excellent columns like the “Nothing But Nets” he mentions, his over-the-top snottiness has seemed to overshadow some of his important work and witty writing. However, now I want to find that Jim Murray column.
Mikeychx, I would argue that with the addition of Patrick, the subtraction of Reilly, and the overlooked website addition of Dave Zirin, that SI might be on the beginnings of an UPSWING… for more detail see: http://www.cosellout.com/?p=143
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:04 am
@mikeychx — you only have easterbrook #3? He’s got to be #2 to me.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:54 am
Talking heads, all yammering, vying for the attention and eyeballs of the masses.
At some point, they must realize that there is only so much horseshit they can shovel.
Or not.
FZ once said of rock critics…”Rock journalism is people who can’t write interviewing people who can’t talk for people who can’t read.”
Doesn’t it fit with sports writing? Maybe moreso…
October 23rd, 2007 at 9:57 am
Why shouldnt ESPN list this as news? Its their right.
October 23rd, 2007 at 12:38 pm
Don’t knock golf tournaments in Walla Walla. In fact, the best local golf event you’ve never attended is the annual Northstar (Winery) Golf Tournament each August at WW Country Club — nice track, relaxed atmosphere and 95-point wines served on the course from the drink cart. Come out and loop for me — it will make a great chapter for your “Caddy” sequel.
October 24th, 2007 at 8:57 pm
If Reilly is worth $2 million (which is beyond insane), then Gary Smith must be worth $200 million. Reilly to Smith is like comparing Phil Mushnick to Voltaire.
Then again, if Reilly is worth $2 million, Jay Mariotti must be worth at least a thousand bucks. And you could get Andrew (Panda) Marchand on your crew for 12, maybe 13 cents.
A world gone nuts……….