Mike Lupica’s Body Count Continues
Media Gossip/Musings January 30th. 2008, 4:23pm
Mike Lupica, the New York Daily News columnist who has a habit of running talented writers away from his paper – the lilliputian loudmouth has amassed a Taliban-like body count, including Ian O’Connor and Mark Kriegel – has done it again. Sources in Glendale tell us that the best Super Bowl buzz right now is about how Lisa Olson, the talented and respected NYDN columnist, recently stunned the sports media world by quitting. We hear that Lupica is behind it all.
The story we’re hearing: The Daily News sent several writers to cover the Packers/Giants playoff game. After the Giants stunning overtime victory, the crew decided what they were going to write, and then conducted interviews in the locker room and returned to their computers. Standard newspaper stuff. Apparently, after everyone had begun writing, Lupica decided to switch topics, effectively screwing Olson. This caused her to turn her column in late, irritating the New York office – even though it was Lupica’s fault for switching on the fly late on a Sunday night, with deadline looming. Because the entire staff lives in fear of the little man, nobody spoke up on Olson’s behalf.
Days go by. The paper finally comes to a decision on whom to send to the Super Bowl. Over 35 names are on the list. Amazingly, that list does not include Olson, who many believe to be the paper’s best writer. We are told she quit on the spot. Allegedly the paper is trying to get her to return, but she has stood firm.
That’s Mike Lupica for you, folks. It’s been about 15 years since his last good column. Now, he’s reduced to pushing out the paper’s real talent, and taking his kids on the field at Shea Stadium to get autographs from the players.
46 Responses to “Mike Lupica’s Body Count Continues”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


January 30th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
First he brings down Sports Reporters, and now the Daily News. Lupica’s ego knows no boundaries.
He looks like he’s checking out John Saunders’ ass in that picture.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Is this guy really so powerful that he can control EPSN and the Daily News? If so, what is his appeal? I mean, have you ever met a sports fan who couldnt wait to get the paper to read Lupica? Is it that he appeals to the casual sports fan? Seriously, I have no earthly idea.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Why can’t he get Bill Simmons fired ?
January 30th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
He was mentioned on Seinfeld!!
January 30th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Good for her.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Lupica respresents all that is wrong with elitist media people.
Mike, you’re a complete and utter douchebag.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
I am confused. Does he run the sports columnist department at the Daily News? Why would different columnists at the same paper be writing about the same topic?
Why would he decide the topic for every columnist?
January 30th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
“I like to read the Daily News.”
January 30th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
I don’t read the Daily News because of Mike Lupica, I read it in spite of him.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
@ CBH, I don’t know a whole lot about the newspaper world, but given the Daily News’ tabloid style, they will lump all of the columns on the same few pages, and the columns play off of eachother. So if most are writing about Eli’s maturation, an comeback story about Tynes won’t fit too well.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
Speaking of Bill Simmons, where has the Sports Guy been all week? I don’t really like reading his columns, but his Super Bowl trips are usually pretty good. Although, I’m skeptical with the Patriots in it again.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
@ Benji, I also have been surprised at his lack of presence, especially with the Patriots being there.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Die Eagles, that makes sense, I just haven’t ready any paper where columnists were encouraged to write about the same subjects for the same day of a paper. Seems like a waste and counterproductive to me.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
He may be in hiding with the slight slip up of the Bostic Celtics as of late.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Or maybe his editors listened to the fact that even his biggest supporters are getting tired of all of his Patriots/Boston crap.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
I’m sure Simmons is conjuring up a 7 page running diary of the media week.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:45 pm
I figured that was the case, but I thought he usually releases them 1 day at a time.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Bob Herbert – also mentioned on Seinfeld, and a better writer.
I also wondered about Simmons. Not only no new content, but his smiling face was removed from the front page. I thought maybe something was up…
January 30th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Lupica is a mean, mean, little man.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:52 pm
Have you noticed that Simmons is only doing 1-2 articles a week lately? I know his wife had a baby like 3 months ago, but come on. I also remember him mentioning a new book in August but nothing since then.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
i have the NYDN home delivered and almost always skip lupica’s articles. he used to be a must read and for a long time now he’s been must miss. if i ever find myself agreeing with him, i rethink my position on the topic.
TBL another great job. now just get kriegel and o’connor in an interview to discuss what happened at the NYDN
January 30th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
Phil Leotardo didn’t get it this bad.
January 30th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
wasn’t simmons the one in the wedding dress?
January 30th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
I think I fell in love with Whitlock during the Sports Reporters where he just came out and argued that fans don’t really care about steroid use in sports since it’s strictly entertainment and Lupica just stared at him like he called for the assassination of the Pope or something
January 30th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
TBL – why haven’t your scored an interview with Lupica yet? What gives?
January 30th, 2008 at 5:08 pm
@ TBL:
I’ve been scouring my mind for that Seinfeld conversation regarding Lupica. But I cant put my finger on it.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
George is at that party w/ Elaine, trying to get a job w/ Pendant Publishing. Mr. Lipman asks him who his favorite writers are, and Costanza answers that he enjoys Mike Lupica.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
Odd about Simmons’ absence.
As for Lupica, the man’s a buffoon and a pompous ass. He and Mitch Albom think themselves the protectors of sports. I loved it when Big Sexy went and burst their bubbles on Sports Reporters. No surprise that he got canned.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
@BFFredo or butters: Do you have video of that encounter? I watched it in real-time, but would love to relive it.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
It’s not just the arrogance. It’s the myopia. He’s the kind of guy who would probably tell you that the three greatest events in sports history are the 69 Mets, Joe Namath’s guaranteed Super Bowl, and something Joe DiMaggio or Mickey Mantle did. There is no world outside of New York City.
I liked The Sports Reporters, but it always made me crazy too. I know you’re supposed to go with what you know, but when Dick Schaap gave his 4,264th “parting shot” on Vince Lombardi’s Green Bay Packers, I started to tune out.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:32 pm
And thanks for adding Mitch “I call out cheaters and liars, but I submitted a bogus Final Four column” Albom too.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
I work with a little douchebag who looks and acts like Lupica. Not a day goes by that I don’t want to stab him in the face with a sodering iron.
BTW, is this the same Lisa Olson who was involved in that incident in the Patriots locker room back in the late 80s when Zeke Mowatt flashed her?
January 30th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
@jgp: That’s the problem with ESPN in general. They can have reporters from all over the country, but only a few of them can offer a truly unbiased, objective view on sports, and they normally don’t have the platform the narrow-minded (see Simmons) reporters/entertainers have.
Even though I can’t stand Gregg Easterbrook, you’d think he’d get more print time because his veiws on some of football are the msot objective on that website.
January 30th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
I wonder if we can get a time machine, get the Lupica from 20 years ago and have him kill the current Lupica using a pitching wedge….hmmmm….TO THE BATCAVE!!!!
January 30th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
@Dornoch
Yes she’s the same one. Only this time she got screwed by a little dick.
January 30th, 2008 at 7:45 pm
I love America. If you EVER perform at a level slightly above competence at anything you can become a star, hence Mike Lupica and Bill Simmons. Neither of these guys has written anything even slightly entertaining or notable in years, yet they continue to get top billing. Really, we need to put name this kind of phenomena. I think there was talent there at one time, but come on…these guys suck. Lupica is terrible. I don’t care about bias or objectivity…for God’s sake, make it READABLE…make it ENTERTAINING…
January 31st, 2008 at 12:16 am
They can have reporters from all over the country,
Theoretically, but have you seen a journalist based in a “real” Southeast city ever on a program or write a column on their webpage? And Tim Cowlishaw and Dallas are not really the Southeast. They have jouralists who are originally from the South like Ivan Maisel and Chris Mortensen, but they have national beats and work for ESPN. I mean real journalists and writers from the Atlanta Journal Constitution, New Orleans Times Picayune, Memphis Commercial Appeal, any Florida papers (minus Miami, which isn’t really a “southeastern” city) and so on. I’ve never seen guys from those cities on shows like “Around the Horn,” but the show claims to cover the entire country.
January 31st, 2008 at 7:20 am
I don’t read Lupica. I could care less what he has to say. And while I am hardly a fan of Simmons it is completely assinine to say he hasn’t written anything entertaining in “years”. Gimme a break. Are you saying he used to be entertaining and then it just came to a sudden halt?
So you’ve been reading his un-entertaining articles for years? Lupica too? How else would you know? Do you eat food you hate, watch TV shows you don’t like and screw women who you find not attractive, with the rest of your day? If you don’t like Lupica or Simmons you should at least grow a pair big enough to stop reading them. It wouldn’t be that hard.
January 31st, 2008 at 8:40 am
try reading a Sunday column from Lupica.
It’ll make you call Simmons and apologize for bashing him.
January 31st, 2008 at 9:34 am
Rabidwolverine and others: I never understand all the hating on Simmons… The guy continually writes funny, interesting, provocative columns and all he gets in respone is haters like you who have nothing to add. Give me a break, you don’t like him? Don’t freacking read him, people like you are so annoying.
January 31st, 2008 at 10:15 am
Farvicodin: I think the hate for Simmons comes from the fact that so many people feel they could do exactly what he does. He’s not a reporter and he’s not a columnist in the traditional sense. He’s a sports fan who cracks a bunch of jokes, brags about his teams, and makes some good (and some bad) observations about the sports he likes. That sounds like what most sports bloggers & commenters do. Simmons, though, is making millions off of it while getting VIP trips to the Super Bowl, World Series, All-Star Game, etc. It’s a matter of jealousy.
I say good for him. While many of us feel, on some level, that we could do what he does and do it better, he had the balls to actually do it. He skip traditional newspapers and a 9 to 5 job and started the Boston Sports Guy Schtick in the 1990s, which led him directly to the charmed life he’s now living. I can’t hold that against him.
January 31st, 2008 at 10:21 am
How does Lupica still have this much pull? What is he doing that another columnist couldn’t? Does he still draw readers?
January 31st, 2008 at 10:24 am
“F*ck Lupica” – D. Jacobson
February 1st, 2008 at 1:09 pm
Let’s give Simmons a break. His whole schitck was the “suffering average guy who could make funny jokes about his constant suffering”. It’s not his fault that all the teams he cheers for are powerhouses now, even if it does make him a little intolerable sometimes. I think this Boston success has been bad for his career.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:23 pm
lol…I don’t read him. I used to read him. I’m not jealous of him…who cares? I just think it’s fascinating that someone so spectacularly untalented is given top-billing. When his column first appeared, it was fresh and amusing. But he’s still telling the same joke 4, 5, 6 years later. Time for some new material. Perhaps it’s just laziness. He knows most suckers like Farvicodin will still read even if the product is bad just based on blind loyalty and nostalgia.
February 4th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Late on this, but next time I see Lupica at a Yankees game, and I tend to see him, he’s getting a gigantic wedgie.