Baseball Preview: NL West
Baseball April 1st. 2008, 4:01pmHow could we! Wecompletely forgot to offer up our worthless NL West predictions. These are silly and trivial, but it’s always fun to check back in eight months and see just how horrendous everyone’s prognostications were. (Last year, we had the Rockies last, and they reached the World Series! Then again, did anyone have them in the postseason?) After the jump, we opine on arguably the most competitive division in baseball. To recap, here are the AL East, AL Central, AL West, NL East, and NL Central. Your homework assignment: World Series picks tomorrow.
1. Arizona Diamondbacks - Can’t go against the best (narrowly) 1-2 pitching punch in the NL, Webb and Haren. The lineup is young, but emerges this year as the most balanced in a challenging division.
2. Los Angeles Dodgers - Guessing that Joe Torre’s crew finishes two games out in a tight race. The pitching keeps them in the mix, but the bats will probably be their undoing.
3. San Diego Padres - Love the Padres, really do, but the schedule-makers were unkind – a brutal road stretch bridging April and May where the Padres go on the road for 21 of 29, and a nasty interleague schedule (Yankees, Indians, Tigers, Mariners) will keep this team from the postseason. Despite this, we still see them within five games of first at season’s end.
4. Colorado Rockies - Fall back to earth because the pitching cannot possibly be as good as the second half and postseason. The prodigious offense should keep them within 10 games of first all season long, though.
5. San Francisco Giants - Seventy wins would be an accomplishment. Who on this team hits 20 homers?
28 Responses to “Baseball Preview: NL West”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


April 1st, 2008 at 4:03 pm
umm…Barry Bon…oh, yeah
April 1st, 2008 at 4:05 pm
The Giants are going to be 62 Mets bad. Benji Molina is their clean-up hitter.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:06 pm
60 wins would be cause for celebration.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:11 pm
If you have the Twins above the Royals in the AL Central, you lose all credibility. You are Jose Canseco to me, only you have done something to lose your credibility.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:13 pm
I think Peavy/Young is slightly ahead of Webb/Haren, assuming that is your number two 1-2 combo in the NL. Taking a look at thier ‘projected’ (take with a grain of salt) stats for 2008, and the combination of Peavy/Young has a lower ERA, lower WHIP, and higher K/9.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:15 pm
I believe that the only thing that will keep the Giants from being historically bad are Cain and Lincecum.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Damn 412, you beat me to it, I heard that on Mike and Mike today and nearly drove off the road from laughter.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Magglio — the Twins are better than the Royals. You love Gil Meche and Alex Gordon that much? Plus, this is a post for the NL West.
Dbacks are tough. If things fall into place, Dodgers or Padres can also take the division.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:20 pm
@Big Nuts
It is just one man’s opinion, but I like the Royals over the Twins this season. I wouldn’t be so sure about the Twins.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:23 pm
@Magglio: What? I know they are young, but I don’t think they finish behind the Royals. They have a few pretty good bats in Morneau, Mauer, Young, and Cuddy. Who do the Royals have?
April 1st, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Unforgettable Pedro G story…
April 1st, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Wow, we have people arguing over the basement teams in the AL Central. God I love baseball season!
April 1st, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Here’s a better debate. Who’s worse, Giants or Orioles? Orioles have a better lineup (Roberts and Markakis) and the Giants have better pitching (Cain and Lincecum). I think the win goes to Baltimore once they finally gets rid of Roberts
April 1st, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Yeah, another preview, and this one after the season has started.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:28 pm
@pkiguy22:
@Magglio: What? I know they are young, but I don’t think they finish behind the Royals. They have a few pretty good bats in Morneau, Mauer, Young, and Cuddy. Who do the Royals have?
Queing Billy Butler’s name in 5…4..3
I agree. The Roayals have a bunch of “should be good” type of guys. No Morneau and no Mauer. Thats for sure.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:28 pm
412, I left the last post to get away from the almost gay connotones. I was so deep, I almost came outta the closet. Now you post this you fucker (still laughing out loud).
April 1st, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Bear, it’s amazing the O’s just flat out released Gibbons, yet they are holding onto Roberts as if he was the next Jackie Robinson. That team will never make sense to me.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:30 pm
So does that mean that I have the same chance picking the World Series then Peter King does the Super Bowl Champs? Sweet. I pick the Giants versus the Orioles.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:31 pm
The O’s have a ridiculous contract to eat. Not good times…
April 1st, 2008 at 4:33 pm
Jay Gibbons was terrible, which makes it even more terrible that we paid him all of that money and then cut him.
Roberts is a good player, but we need to finish that trade with the Cubs.
As an Orioles fan I think they will be the worst team in the majors this year.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:41 pm
oh, picking the standings, I forgot.
Padres
D-Backs
Rockies
Dodgers
Gigantes
April 1st, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Well Mauer is an injury risk guy and in all actuality shouldn’t he get out from behind the plate? I mean honestly, the dude is huge to be bent like a pretzel like that. He should just face the facts and be a 1B. I have been watching this division for… ever and I just have a hunch the Royals are making the turn out of last place, no further.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:44 pm
You would hope San Fran would do the right thing and fire their GM.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:50 pm
C’mon. I’d be surprised if the padres win 75.
Az
Colorado
LA
Padres
Ginas
April 1st, 2008 at 4:53 pm
@Magglio: I do agree with you that the Royals are going to be better, but I just don’t think they are better than the Twinkies. I do agree with you on Mauer though. He needed to be on 3B last week.
If the Royals are going to be better, they need a few of their prospects to finally start playing up to the hype.
April 1st, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Things are so bad for me as a Giants gan that I no longer root against the other teams in the division (used to hate AZ, Col, and LA, SD was always ok) I don’t care what any of them do anymore, that’s a terrible feeling.
April 1st, 2008 at 6:01 pm
I’m right there with you Onterrio (O’s fan)
April 1st, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Balt will be better than you think — nowhere near good, but not historically terrible. Adam Jones and Sherrill will be worth about what they lose in Bedard, and Nick Markakis is a potential beast.