Last week, the reader consensus was clear: ESPN ambushed Miguel Tejada. Charles Barkley thought it was racist, Dan LeBatard didn’t think it was journalism, NYC radio puppy Chris Russo got all handsy last night talking about it on Letterman, and the Houston Chronicle goes after the WWL today. After watching the E:60 segment last night, we’ve got a few questions for the Astros and Tejada’s clueless agent:

- Your player/client is under FBI investigation and he was named in the Mitchell Report. Why’s he sitting down for an interview with anyone about anything?
- Is this a good time to remind folks that Houston traded for a guy who was always thought to be a steroid user … the day before the Mitchell Report came out?
- That last point leads us to believe that Houston clearly didn’t do its homework on Tejada. If ESPN could find the guy’s birth certificate, how come Houston had no interest in protecting its multi-million dollar investment and looking into it?

Finally, it was just pointed out to us on gmail chat: Does what Gary Sheffield said last year about the media “taking advantage” of minority players have any merit? Surely you haven’t forgotten Rick Reilly asking Sammy Sosa to pee in a cup, right?

Few give a hoot about Tejada’s age (Houston Chronicle)