Obviously the huge news, which was covered this weekend by Imig: Mike & the Mad Dog may be splitting up. We listened to the show at 1 pm today and Mad Dog, hosting solo, opened the show by saying: “It was the first I had heard of that. From Easter through May 9, Mike and I were having a lot of issues. Yankee Stadium, Ortiz, Ramirez, Don Nelson, Shaq with Phoenix, Escobar with the Braves, you name it, we were fighting like cats and dogs. The tolerance level was low. Does that mean last Wednesday was our final program together? That’s taking a big leap. We are under contract. WFAN needs us - everybody’s replaceable, we’ve learned that - and I need WFAN.”

A great piece on how celebrities help sell stuff, featuring Dan Marino, Tiger, and Michael Jordan. Also, thanks for the memory of Joe Namath and pantyhose. (NYT)

Bob Papa could be the NFL Network’s play-by-play guy, and Michael Strahan is close to joining the FOX pre-game show. (NY Daily News)

Deitsch is sick of the ESPN flacks trying to get him to quit writing about Newsday’s Neil Best! (SI)

The person who updated Tim Russert’s death on his wikipedia page - before the family was alerted, or the news was out - worked at NBC and was fired. (NY Times)

Taking SI’s Chris Mannix to task for his pretty awful piece on hating soccer. (Unprofessional Foul)

The Golf TV people deserve the Tiger Woods injury. (Mushnick)

From Sports Business Journal: The New York Times partners up with YES Network. This means, of course, they are now in bed with the Yankees and Red Sox. “The YES Network has struck an online content syndication deal with The New York Times, extending a run of digital media deals for the New York regional sports network. Under the terms of the pact, the newspaper’s nytimes.com will use segments from YES’s original, wholly owned video content within its own coverage of the New York Yankees, including interview segments from YES’s pregame and postgame shows; its long-form interview program, “CenterStage”; and the weekly “Joe Girardi Show.”

And of course, there’s this. (Deadspin) Weirdest day in quite some time: A flurry of emails saying Colin Cowherd gave us props? And then a flurry of emails saying, “this is like Puffy laying in the cut setting up Tupac at the studio and now it’s time to bust back!” Sorry folks, I never really played that game. This guy named Matt Ufford attempted it repeatedly, and I just elected not to engage in it. Leitch? I met the guy once, probably about three summers ago before Deadspin had got off the ground and I “interviewed” (read: Had a beer) for his wingman gig. It probably only took place because I had done a test sports blog for Gawker nine months prior under a different managing editor, but it was nice of him to extend me the courtesy. (I was writing for ESPN.com at the time, and hey, the freelance money was nice.) Leitch has been nice enough over email and seems like a swell guy. There will be no stone throwing from here, though maybe if the book deal and sweet magazine gig come my way, perhaps. (We kid.) But I’m curious - so which is it: Do you want bloggers to clean up their act a bit or what?

I actually don’t think there’s been a dramatic change at our site, and I guess you can’t please everyone.