How’s Rick Reilly’s First Month Going?
Blogging, ESPN, Media Gossip/Musings June 23rd. 2008, 6:35pm
Rick Reilly’s nearing the completion of his first month at the WWL, and here’s a quick peek at what he’s written about: His Dad (good stuff), Tiger or Phil, and most recently, that catcher who purposely dropped his mitt and let a pitch drill the umpire in the face. Hmmm. One of those surprise you? A reader email from last week:
How bad was his article about the catcher who ducked and let the pitch hit the ump? He basically summarized the event and said it was bad days after it made the rounds through the blogs. I think this is a perfect example of why traditional journalists like Mr. Reilly are on their out. A few years ago this would have been the first we heard about the ducking incident, and it probably would have been a decent read. Now? It’s old and stale and hard to chew. Where is Reilly going to go from here? How can he do what he does if he is relying on recycled stories? $3 million for this? And if you figure he writes 800 words a column on average, once a week, he is getting paid $72.11 for every word he inks. Crazy talk!
Although ESPN is pulling in something like 20 million unique readers a month – which is probably more than every single sports blog, combined – and there’s a chance many of them had not previously read about this story … this could be something worth monitoring.
34 Responses to “How’s Rick Reilly’s First Month Going?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


June 23rd, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Did Dan Jenkins write about it first too? That would explain Riles picking it as a topic.
June 23rd, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Oops. Not sure why this didn’t get posted earlier. We made the move to apache from IIS (not that anyone cares) and the whole timestamp stuff is difficult to grasp. been out and pissed i missed this kobe thing!
June 23rd, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Reilly has, like, changed since he became so popular. And now he sucks.
/Leitch
June 23rd, 2008 at 7:52 pm
I haven’t read a Reilly column since my subscription to SI expired. I’ll leave it at that.
June 23rd, 2008 at 7:53 pm
“Shaq disses Kobe in freestyle rap”
OMG OMG OMG
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Good point, odessa, Of course there isn’t much that Dan Jenkins hasn’t written about, and written it damn well, indeed. TBL,you’d be doing all of us a favor if you could snag an interview with Mr. Jenkins.
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Wheres the post TBL?
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:18 pm
I think that a point that needs to be emphasized is how bad his packages are written on TV. Television writing is a different language. He can’t awkwardly stumble through the same alliteration, quirky words and half-assed pop-culture references that he uses in his columns. The complicated structure prohibits the punch his words would have had in print. It’s borderline unwatchable.
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:29 pm
@BBP,
I have to admit, whenever I can’t think anything to say about Reilly, I fall back on the classic “he just rips off Dan Jenkins” motif. Then again, Dan Jenkins has never come off as smug and smarmy, so Reilly must get that from somewhere else.
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Reilly was 0 for 3. In my book. The drunken dad one made me laugh out loud at how bad it was.
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:59 pm
Tyduffy, just curious, are you in the TV business?
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:12 pm
I thought his first column about his alcoholic father and golf was pretty damn good, but the last two have been very boring. I do remember being glad when he left SI so I wouldn’t have to read his smug ass on the last page any longer, completely ruining each and every issue.
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Your an alcoholic father Hef..your an alcoholic father!
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:19 pm
I thought alcoholics went to meetings? And stop shouting at me!
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:22 pm
No, I’m not in the TV business, but I recently completed a Journalism grad course in T.V. Newswriting. So I can’t help but notice the flaws now.
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:24 pm
Bastard in a basket!
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Ahhh very good Ty, I was once in your shoes – and look at me now! A hated TBL commenter with 10’s of thousands of dollars of debt! Where you at?
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:36 pm
I’m a hated TBL contributor, but thankfully no debt as of yet.
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:43 pm
who the hell are the two of you?
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
I get that a lot, unfortunately.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Then answer the question Palazzo.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm
This is at least the third time Reilly has written this article.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:18 pm
The tiger-phil article.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Sadly, the SI back page is still schmatz central, no matter who is writing it. A tear jerker of the week = no buys.
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Hef, how in the hell did you get my Myspace alter ego? That’s some heavy duty investigating on your part..
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:24 pm
I’ve never been a Reilly lover.
Sometimes he’s great. Sometimes he’s mediocre.
Sounds like everyone else in the world to me.
But I’ll come to his defense for two reasons.
1.) I hate the unification of opinion that exists in the blogosphere.
We pick who we like and who we don’t like. After that, it isn’t questioned. A defense of Around the Horn, Jay Mariotti, ESPN or any number of entities that have fallen out of our favor are dismissed out of hand.
Around the Horn, Dan Le Batard and Scott Van Pelt are the lucky beneficiaries of this hive mind mentality, but I’m sure they’d also look real bad if we chose to put them under the same brutal microscope we subject other to.
So, now Reilly sucks and he’s no good anymore or maybe we never liked him anyway.
Like I said, I’m not a Reilly fan, but teeing off on him because it’s easy is pretty worthless.
2.) While making room for the blogger and YouTube in the media in general and sports specifically is a laudable objective shared by all those who frequent this place, we’re forgetting that the role of the writer must inevitably change.
No shit, sir.
Sportswriters aren’t going to break this incident. That’s going to be up to YouTube and bloggers.
Hooray, that a good, exciting thing.
So what’s Reilly et al. to do about it?
Ignore it? Play dumb? Stay out of touch?
I hope not.
YouTube gave us a few seconds to see the incident unfold. There was no context, no aftermath, no nothing. (Unless you can’t slow-motion replays as something, or those fucking worthless comments).
Reilly rehashed the situation, then he expounded on it and gave us some details.
Interesting video clips that raise as many questions as this one deserve and benefit greatly from a written companion like Reilly provided.
Now we know the names of the players involved. We know the umpire is considering a legal response, and we know that it cost one of the players a shot at walking on to Gordon College.
Maybe a few seconds of action and gratuitous replays are enough for some, but I want to find out what the hell that was all about.
And Reilly provided that.
June 24th, 2008 at 12:15 am
Where’s the surprise? That’s the same stuff he’s been writing for years at SI. Where is the news?
June 24th, 2008 at 12:23 am
Dude it’s your picture and you left a comment. I’ve got an eye for faces.
June 24th, 2008 at 12:27 am
RiSK,
I disagree with your characterization of the blogosphere. I don’t think that it is a herd mentality it all. The people who are targets are not randomly chosen. They all share the same characteristics. Mariotti, Shaughnessy, Woody Paige, Skip Bayliss, Lupica etc. People don’t like hackneyed mailed-in columns, and people don’t like arrogance.
If you look at figures that are respected by the blogosphere it is people like Peter Gammons, Bob Ryan etc. who are humble, enjoy what they do, and turn out great, honest work.
It’s too often that sports blogs are seen as the harbingers of doom. We take sports seriously. We think that sports journalism should be a held to a higher standard. And, we believe that if someone is getting paid over $3 million a year to write an 800 word column per week he should do better than swiping an idea from blogs or YouTube.
June 24th, 2008 at 12:35 am
Same old crap.
Reilly’s just another schnook-faced sportswriter fashioning himself as a TV star.
Let us puke………
June 24th, 2008 at 12:38 am
tyduffy, the funny thing is, I agree with most of the assessments made — certainly about Bayless, Mariotti and Lupica — but I think that about half their detractors have thought it out as well as you have. Everyone else just sees a fun, negativity-based bandwagon and hop on.
Think about it. People connect over common dislikes more often than shared likes. (That is to say, complete strangers can find something they both hate and go off on it more easily than they can find something they admire and sing its praises.)
I think that’s a big part of what we’re seeing here. It’s human, and I don’t dislike it for its own sake. But at times the mentality leads to lazy criticism, and that’s what bothers me.
But I’m glad you mentioned Gammons.
I know I should hate those awkward Baseball Tonight spots featuring him and his Fender, but I don’t. I find them oddly charming, and they work for me. (The “Battle of the Bands” itself is a different matter. We could probably gang up on that.)
June 24th, 2008 at 1:15 am
RiSK: you’re exactly right about the herd mentality. Amazingly, you might meet resistance from said herd. It’ll pass. The median salary of commenters to internet sports blogs is like $35K. You may not be able to beat them or join them. Just read the main stuff and forget about it.
June 24th, 2008 at 8:12 am
The drunken father column was good. The other two…not so much. Reilly was one of my favorites at one time, but has become a bit lazy.
And now that he’s lost about 10 MPH off that fastball he’s apparently raking it in hand over fist. So, good for him…I guess.
June 24th, 2008 at 11:21 am
i know i’m in the minority, but i didn’t know about it until reily’s article on the .com