Upon seeing this tattoo on the back of prized high school recruit Brandon Jennings, should we really be surprised he’s chosen European basketball over college? Between the tat and not qualifying academically, this isn’t jaw-dropping news. Guess the question now is what European team wants to rent a flashy point guard who has zero intent of staying longer than a season?The NY Times is floating the thought that Jennings’ decision could be a watershed moment, and many quality points are made (especially the one about the weak US dollar). But how many 18-year-olds can handle going from high school to living on your own in Europe? Did any of them see how much soccer star Landon Donovan hated it? It’s one thing to play in college for a few years, then ride an NBA bench for a few years before going to Euro to make a career out of it in your late 20s. But a teenager?

We’re more curious about how the European teams handle this. Will they really be willing to give a player $300,000 for one year of service, knowing that said player is simply coming there to show NBA scouts what they’re made of? Have European teams expressed interest in American high school players?

Let’s say Jennings gets a one-year contract, plays well, banks a few hundred K, and then is a lottery pick. How much will the NCAA worry that other upper echelon prep talents will follow his lead? (We had this brain fart about the NCAA thinking about finally paying revenue-generating sports teams, but Title IX and greed got in the way.) Regardless of Jennings’ success, can you really see a flood of high schoolers eschewing college for a European payday?

Problem is, there were what, a dozen NBA draft picks last month who played just one year of college? Could the numbers spike to 30-40 kids attempting this, when you take into account non-qualifiers who go the junior college/prep school route?