NCAA Lays Down a Weak Gauntlet for Live-Bloggers
Blogging, College Football, Media Gossip/Musings September 5th. 2008, 12:00pm
At Iowa coach Kirk Ferentz’s news conference, school officials gave reporters a copy of the NCAA Blogging Policy. This policy limits credentialed reporters at football and basketball games to five blog entries per half, one at half-time and two during an overtime period. Reporters may mention both the score and the time remaining, but compose nothing that could be construed as play-by-play.
This policy mitigates earlier draconian edicts, which stopped reporters from blogging at all during NCAA baseball or allowed reporters to blog, but not about game action.
This policy should be understood tactically. It’s an attempt to stop live-blogging, and that only. College sports, particularly football and men’s basketball, are a business. The NCAA and the universities get their grubby little palms greased for all sorts of broadcasting rights (television, radio, text message, etc.). They have no fingers in the live-blogging pot, and they view the practice, if it provides play-by-play, as a form of broadcasting that may keep you, internet fiend, from patronizing other NCAA approved venues.
The sticky wicket for the NCAA, from a legal perspective, is that blogging is, in actuality, reporting, not broadcasting. It may be far more timely and efficient, but it’s reporting. Because of the first amendment, the NCAA can’t copyright a newsworthy event. The NCAA can control the right to broadcast audio and visual representations of a touchdown. However, they can’t prevent someone from reporting the fact that the touchdown occurred.
Protecting broadcasting revenue may be an admirable goal, but it hardly justifies enacting an arbitrary censorship regime in violation of the First Amendment.
NCAA lawyers will huff and they will puff, until a news outlet with some stones decides to blow their house down. Like most NCAA activities, the policy is shortsighted, stupid and a complete waste of time, since anyone outside of the press box can write the same live-blog with impunity.
Maybe the NCAA should devote its energy to more worthy endeavors, such as sending someone besides Mr. Magoo to investigate the whole Reggie Bush thing?
NCAA, Newspapers Draw Blogging Battle Lines (The Wiz of Odds)
51 Responses to “NCAA Lays Down a Weak Gauntlet for Live-Bloggers”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


September 5th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
I am not sure why the NCAA is picking this battle. If I have a choice am I going to watch the game on TV or read a live blog. If I am at work, I may be forced to read the blog, but I see no way the live blogging hurts the NCAA or its broadcast rights.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
Leave to the NCAA to have their heads up their own asses.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
I gave up College Football a while ago. As you get older I noticed that you follow all the sports less and follow only the ones you truly are interested in.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
As Ty implied, the NCAA policy has already been eclipsed by technology. Per usual, good work, NCAA!!!
September 5th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
I Hope Reggie Bush has a good season.
Mark Sanchez > Tebow
as far as pro aspirations
September 5th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
I have noticed the same thing.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Ya Mike Like in College I was big on College football now I follow USC and everything else very loosely. Just NBA NFL and MLB …some Futbol but not like I used too.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Why is this an issue with the NCAA? With all the other media outlets so readily available, the LAST thing I want to do, to get my play by play, is read about it.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
this could
could
get ugly
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/09/here-we-go.html
September 5th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
I guess if you’re on your cellphone or something. Like if you want more than just the score. This makes no sense to me whatsoever
September 5th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
How is this a violation of the First Amendment?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
you also blog to yourself and then comment to yourself on that same blog that no one is reading.
/mikeychx
September 5th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Could it get ugly, or could could it get ugly?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
I don’t see the importance of the Alaskan First Dude’s business partner sealing his divorce papers. is he rumored to have had an affair with her? otherwise, why could that make anything get ugly?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Hakeem is he underrated?? Possibly because he is a devout Muslim?? just my thoughts.. IMO he is better
September 5th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
DAMMIT! I just got roped into talking about politics. disregard my previous comment.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Yep.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:40 pm
miz – the natinal enquirer reported it earlier this week, i believe.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
He hit it.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
who hit what?? the link was broken
September 5th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Sportscenter is Dead
September 5th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
Me in Vegas with an Oakley jersey
September 5th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
sorry to do this to a nice little sports post…but why would the guy seal his divorce papers if he’d porked Palin? I would think his ex-wife, who would obviously know of the infidelity, would be very willing to f’ up the career aspirations of her homewrecker.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Farouq, are you using a random comment generator?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I’m just hoping Palin cannot possibly be as dumb as Edwards to run for the office knowing full-well this would come out.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Farouq is part of the Nation of Domination
September 5th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
My best Beetlejuice impersonation
September 5th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Mike, I am more worried about McCain’s campaign team being too dumb to find this out first.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
farouq, are the strippers and blow in those videos?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Nah Benji …. I cant be posting that I have a girlfriend
September 5th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Hasn’t Palin been popping babies out non-stop? How could she find time to have an affair when…uh-oh.
/ Now that’s how wild speculation starts
September 5th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
“Protecting broadcasting revenue may be an admirable goal, but it hardly justifies enacting an arbitrary censorship regime in violation of the First Amendment.”
This isn’t a First Amendment thing, Walter.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Do her breasts feel like great big bags of sand?
September 5th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Ok I was at Prive in Planet Hollywood about two weekends ago and I had a table My Girlfriend and I and a couple friends. Paul Pierce has an adjacent table with like 10 white girls. Paul and his bodyguard only, the best part was that he had a championship belt(think WWE) on. I didnt take any pictures but my girl asked who he was and thought him wearing the belt was corny. I on the other hand found it hilarious
September 5th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
+1 broseph, 40 Year Old Virgin my favorite movie EVER.
September 5th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
judge denied the motion to seal
http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=4301
looks like this story will pop very soon …
September 5th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
from comment #1 on TBL’s link:
So is this the version of the rumor you guys know? that her advisor slept with guy’s wife?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Mizerle — the rumor is that Palin herself had an affair w/ her husband’s business partner.
The rumor you quoted above seems more plausible, but that may be wishful thinking on my part. Still … she is not John Edwards stupid, right?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
seriously, Mike. that’s what I’m trying to ask here. surely the rep’s aren’t stupid enough to pick a VP candidate that has an affair on her record after seeing the reaction to Edwards.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Shes whore stupid.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Very classy, Tampa Bo.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
classy has no place on this blog’s message board.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
I heard a rumor that she slept with the star of her daughter’s high school hockey team and got knocked up.
/all these rumors are probably bullshit.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I heard a rumor once that she porked this guy names Jason Raj somethingornother after watching him do curls in his driveway.
/starting shit
September 5th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
I hear that her husband’s biz partner knocked her up and kid #5 was his.
The way that woman pops out kids, I wouldn’t share a Coke with her for fear of her getting preggers.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Can we please get a link or two that is from some nutjob right or left wing site?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
@dirty – how do you drink a coke, man? that “thingee” down there isn’t a straw.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
PSA – Calling all PurdueMatts!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
I don’t know about that, but I know that Lumbergh fucked her.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
+1 clown.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Palin’s other investigation fast-tracked