Ballin’: Joint Effort, College and Pro!
Uncategorized February 13th. 2007, 5:04pm
No. 7 Pittsburgh 53, Louisville 66: We’ve been telling you all season not to believe the hype, and this should cement it. A home loss to a decent-at-best Cardinals team. Pittsburgh can’t shoot straight (3-for-21 on three’s), Aaron Gray is overrated, and this year’s first-round loss will sting more than the one to Bradley last year.
No. 17 Oklahoma St. 54, Texas 83: Looks like we’re one win away from seeing Kevin Durant in the NCAA tournament, which is outstanding news. We can see the Longhorns being a dangerous No. 7 seed, and taking down an overrated No. 2 seed in the second round like … Pittsburgh. Even a team like Wisconsin should fear the Longhorns. Durant had 21-12 and fellow frosh DJ Augustin had 19 points and eight assists. The Cowboys don’t have a quality out-of-state victory.
No. 22 Georgetown 71, West Virginia 53: When it wants to, Georgetown can play some stifling defense and run a precise offense (57 % shooting). Here’s the key to their March potential – are the guards good enough? We know Hibbert and Green will produce, but what about ball handling? Three-point shooting? We’re still not so sure.
Santa Clara 84, Gonzaga 73: Damn you, Zags. More specifically, damn you and your shrooms, Heytvelt. Gonzaga lost for the first time in 50 games at home, and got swept this season by lost to Steve Nash’s old school. Minus their best low-post threat, the Zags were forced to jack 30 three-pointers. At 18-9 and with no shot at winning the WCC, Gonzaga’s going to need at least 22/23 wins to get into the NCAA tourney. Anything less than the finals of the WCC tourney could be detrimental to NCAA hopes.
Denver Nuggets 123, Golden St. Warriors 111: Bad news for Don Nelson – not only couldn’t his offense stop the Iverson-less Nuggets, but Baron Davis had surgery on his knee and probably is done for the season. Kiss any playoff chances they had goodbye. The Warriors hit 53 percent of their shots, but were destroyed on the glass (Denver had 22 offensive rebounds). Carmelo Anthony and JR Smith had 28 apiece for the Nuggets.
Utah Jazz 102, Atlanta Hawks 76: The Jazz put six players in double figures and made 32-of-36 free throws in the rout. Rookie Paul Millsap had 13 points and nine rebounds for Utah, which hasn’t looked awful since losing Carlos Boozer. Atlanta was never in this one and was led by Marvin Williams, the forward from UNC who had 15 points.
12 Responses to “Ballin’: Joint Effort, College and Pro!”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

February 13th, 2007 at 5:13 PM
I’m confused…is Pitt losing in the first or second round?
February 13th, 2007 at 5:27 PM
Damn you. Your perceptive eyes had to catch that. If we say lose in the 1st round, they’ll win in the first round. If we say 2nd round, they’ll lose in the first. You can’t win, Rocky!
Second.
February 13th, 2007 at 5:30 PM
you really have it out for Pitt. Did they lose you a lot of money one year?
February 13th, 2007 at 5:39 PM
With all due respect (if there is any due), how can you call Louisville a “decent-at-best” team and then say Texas is a dangerous 7 seed. Take a look at the resumes. You’ll find pretty much identical teams, except one doesn’t have ESPN pimping them every day and the other does. It still doesn’t make Texas a better basketball team, or any more deserving of an NCAA bid, much less a 7 seed.
February 13th, 2007 at 5:41 PM
No. Choking in the NCAA tournament is the reason.
2002 – 3 seed, lost to a 10 seed
2005 – lost to Pacific (was 8 v 9, but still …)
2006 – 5 seed, lost to a 13 seed
Nice runs in 03 and 04 …
Dixon has this supposedly great team … what will he do with it in March?
Just 4-3 against the Top 50 … not sold. What are we missing here?
February 13th, 2007 at 6:02 PM
Before last night, Louisville did not have a quality win. UConn does not count. The Cards are now 1-6 v the Top 50. RPI was 73 … it’ll go way up.
Texas now 3-7 vs. Top 50. RPI was 54 … will go up way up with win.
Also, early-season losses to Mich St, Gonzaga, and Tenn probably wouldn’t happen now, since this team without any seniors had little or no experience then.
I like Louisville … assuming Character is on the team. But have they been much better than ‘decent’ all season?
February 13th, 2007 at 6:09 PM
This is Dixon’s first chance to go to the tournament with a deep veteran laden team. If they make a run this is the year to do it.
Listing their 2002 loss to a 10 seed is uncalled for. That 10 seed (Kent State) was un fucking real, plus the game went 2 ot’s. That was the night I really trashed my dorm room.
February 13th, 2007 at 6:32 PM
After last night, I don’t have much left. But I have to say that Gonzaga beat Santa Clara on the road, so those dirty Broncos didn’t pull off the sweep.
At this point, I’ll take what I can get.
Go Zags.
February 13th, 2007 at 7:32 PM
[The Big Lead] Gonzaga lost to Santa Clara? FRAUD! FRAUD! [/The Big Lead]
Sorry, that’s just my natural expectation for this blog when a top 10 team (or Gonzaga, a fave of the blog) loses by more than 5 points.
February 13th, 2007 at 7:37 PM
Louisville would have beaten anyone last night.
Other than Louisville they have lost to three very good teams. Two of those losses we on the road, 1 at Wisky where it is impossible to win, another at Stillwater which is about 25 miles away from OK States home court and OK State was a different team a month and a half ago.
You cant blame this team for past teams coming up short in the tournament.
February 13th, 2007 at 8:36 PM
Big East… [/yawn]
February 13th, 2007 at 10:26 PM
I hate being a Warriors fan.
That Linesmaker football ad to the right makes me love being a 49ers fan, though.