Yardwork: Anatomy of a Collapse
Uncategorized September 19th. 2007, 9:04am
New York 8, Washington 9: Another four-run lead wasted. They’ve zoomed past the panic stage in Flushing. You should hear these distressed dorks calling NY radio stations. Words cannot describe this collapse. Philly is 1.5 out.
Philadelphia 7, St. Louis 4: Surprising to see a team triumph in a marathon 14-inning affair with a mere two extra-base hits. The Cardinals only had one. Cole Hamels got hit hard and losery Brett Myers blew a save. And they still won.
Chicago 2, Cincinnati 5: There would be no magic two nights in a row. The streaking Brewers (four in a row!) won, so they’re tied for first.
Baltimore 0, New York 12: Mike Mussina pitched seven shutout innings, perhaps reclaiming his postseason starting spot in the process. No reason to get worked up just yet, but Boston lost to Toronto when Eric Gange pooped himself in the eighth inning and the Yanks are just 2.5 back.
Cleveland 7, Detroit 4: Four homers propel the Tribe to the win, and the Indians are tied for the best record in the AL with Anaheim.
5 Responses to “Yardwork: Anatomy of a Collapse”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

September 19th, 2007 at 9:33 AM
If Boston coughs up the AL East, there’s plenty of reason to get worked up. They would win the Wild Card, but it’s more symbolic than anything else. The Bosox really need to pull it together and bag the division.
September 19th, 2007 at 10:45 AM
Just in – the Washington Nationals are two games better than the Orioles.
Where art thou, Buster Olney?
September 19th, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Did Buster Olney say the Orioles would be better than the Nationals?
September 19th, 2007 at 12:17 PM
It is Surging Brewers TBL
September 19th, 2007 at 12:54 PM
The Philadelphia Phillies are the personification of Blue Balls…they start rubbing you the right way and you almost get there and then they leave you hanging…eventually I’m going to start chaffing and I’m going to have to slap that bitch…If i’m white does Isiah Thomas hate me for saying that?