<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: NFL Power Rankings</title> <atom:link href="http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/</link> <description>Not just another sports blog.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: BFFredo</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-2/#comment-68162</link> <dc:creator>BFFredo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:23:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68162</guid> <description>While the Boys&#039; pick will depend on where Cleveland lands, they&#039;re more than likely going to look at either a WR (Terry Glenn and Terrell Owens aren&#039;t getting any younger) or more than likely a S to offset the number of times Roy Williams&#039; gets torched.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the Boys&#8217; pick will depend on where Cleveland lands, they&#8217;re more than likely going to look at either a WR (Terry Glenn and Terrell Owens aren&#8217;t getting any younger) or more than likely a S to offset the number of times Roy Williams&#8217; gets torched.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay V</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-2/#comment-68151</link> <dc:creator>Jay V</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:00:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68151</guid> <description>TBL...quit smoking Andre Woodson&#039;s pole.  He&#039;s good, but no better than Alex Smith at this point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBL&#8230;quit smoking Andre Woodson&#8217;s pole.  He&#8217;s good, but no better than Alex Smith at this point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stinder</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-2/#comment-68097</link> <dc:creator>Stinder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68097</guid> <description>I dont think you need to take a WR that high, while Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin are far from polished, maybe the Cowboys can coach them up to where they can be decent contributors because it is my belief that Terry Gleen wont be back in Dallas in 2008 and same for TO.  The Cowboys need upgrades at OT, DT &amp; DB.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think you need to take a WR that high, while Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin are far from polished, maybe the Cowboys can coach them up to where they can be decent contributors because it is my belief that Terry Gleen wont be back in Dallas in 2008 and same for TO.  The Cowboys need upgrades at OT, DT &amp; DB.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wilcoxfunk</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-2/#comment-68096</link> <dc:creator>wilcoxfunk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:17:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68096</guid> <description>So it seems to be a consensus, the Colts have played a tougher schedule, but Dallas and New England, who have played equally crappy teams are ranked ahead of them. I still think Dallas is the better of the overrateds.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it seems to be a consensus, the Colts have played a tougher schedule, but Dallas and New England, who have played equally crappy teams are ranked ahead of them. I still think Dallas is the better of the overrateds.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: grungedave</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68095</link> <dc:creator>grungedave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:14:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68095</guid> <description>the Texans lose a game and move *up* in the rankings?  Awesome.  If you told me in pre-season the Texans would be ranked #8 in *any* power poll - I&#039;d have called you a liar.I can&#039;t believe the Texans look like an actual, professional football team.  The question is whether any of the players will survive this season.  The whole f&#039;n team is injured.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Texans lose a game and move *up* in the rankings?  Awesome.  If you told me in pre-season the Texans would be ranked #8 in *any* power poll &#8211; I&#8217;d have called you a liar.</p><p>I can&#8217;t believe the Texans look like an actual, professional football team.  The question is whether any of the players will survive this season.  The whole f&#8217;n team is injured.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cbh49er</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68088</link> <dc:creator>cbh49er</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68088</guid> <description>JGP, it was only ESPN that said the Texans passing on Reggie Bush was a bad idea?The ESPN bashing on this site by some of the people on this site get&#039;s dumber by the second.  ESPN gives you people plenty to bash them about, you don&#039;t have to say dumb things like that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JGP, it was only ESPN that said the Texans passing on Reggie Bush was a bad idea?</p><p>The ESPN bashing on this site by some of the people on this site get&#8217;s dumber by the second.  ESPN gives you people plenty to bash them about, you don&#8217;t have to say dumb things like that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mozatta</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68087</link> <dc:creator>Mozatta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68087</guid> <description>In regards to WR I think Bowman from Ok. State is the only real potential &quot;stud&quot; Crabtree from T.Tech is decent The Michigan boys are decent Bryant from Purdue is decent.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to WR<br /> I think Bowman from Ok. State is the only real potential &#8220;stud&#8221;<br /> Crabtree from T.Tech is decent<br /> The Michigan boys are decent<br /> Bryant from Purdue is decent.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spencer096</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68085</link> <dc:creator>spencer096</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:00:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68085</guid> <description>as much as id love to continue the mcfadden debate, lets slow down and realize that the season just began.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as much as id love to continue the mcfadden debate, lets slow down and realize that the season just began.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gangsta D</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68084</link> <dc:creator>Gangsta D</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:54:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68084</guid> <description>Don&#039;t forget that the &#039;Boys have two first round picks.  They can easily get a reciever with the second pick.  Off the top of my head, I can&#039;t think of any stud WRs coming out this year.  I could be wrong.  Glen Dorsey is definitely a possibility.  I hadn&#039;t thought of him.  It probably depends on how well/poorly Tank does this year.  I still say you go with McFadden if he&#039;s available, though.  You can never have too much talent in the backfield, and Julius looks to be on his way out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that the &#8216;Boys have two first round picks.  They can easily get a reciever with the second pick.  Off the top of my head, I can&#8217;t think of any stud WRs coming out this year.  I could be wrong.  Glen Dorsey is definitely a possibility.  I hadn&#8217;t thought of him.  It probably depends on how well/poorly Tank does this year.  I still say you go with McFadden if he&#8217;s available, though.  You can never have too much talent in the backfield, and Julius looks to be on his way out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: YYSA</title><link>http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2007/09/25/nfl-power-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-68083</link> <dc:creator>YYSA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:48:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=3235#comment-68083</guid> <description>Stinder- you are right but Barber is perfectly capable and it is really hard to run the ball when A) You will have no wide receivers to throw to and B) you are playing from behind because your defense gives up 300 yrds in the air</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stinder- you are right but Barber is perfectly capable and it is really hard to run the ball when A) You will have no wide receivers to throw to and B) you are playing from behind because your defense gives up 300 yrds in the air</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/19 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: dscserv @ 2010-03-15 08:29:53 -->