Media Thoughts on Rick Reilly’s Move From SI to ESPN*
Uncategorized October 22nd. 2007, 11:41am
[UPDATE: ESPN has put out a press release about the hire, and we've included it after the jump.] In the aftermath of Friday’s stunning news that SI backpage fixture Rick Reilly was joining the ESPN monolith – it that actually stunned employees of the WWL when we emailed around Friday seeking comment – we decided to pepper some journalists with this question: is the move a bigger loss for Sports Illustrated or a bigger gain for ESPN? While SI lost a star, ESPN added one to its firmament. Of our six responses, four elected not to be quoted by name, but two were OK with it. After the jump, here’s a taste of what media-types think of the move.
Prominent Sports Editor: “Does it matter when someone loses a ‘name’? Did ESPN fold when Dan Patrick left? Did the Los Angeles Times fold when Jim Murray died? I think all of this stuff is way overrated. Media isn’t like tv shows.”
Writer who is friendly with Reilly: “If it was the Reilly that ESPN first went after when it lauched the magazine, it would have been a huge loss for SI. But Reilly isn’t the same writer anymore. He seems more intent on self-promotion than writing the kind of stuff that made him at one time the best writer in the country. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but SI will be better off without him. At the salary that Reilly was getting, they can go out and hire five great writers who will actually care about their job.”
John Feinstein, author and columnist: “Neither: SI makes the writer as much as the writer makes SI–it will be fine. Rick’s talents will not be best-used at ESPN; they’ll have him doing so many non-writing things that he/they will lose track of what he does best–write.”
National sports columnist: “Bigger loss for SI…..they are dying….they are your grandfather’s magazine…..ESPN is bigfoot in sports with or without any one person….the brand name survives all….anyone can leave….but SI is sinking, and their star just jumped overboard…..”
Gregg Doyel, Sportsline.com columnist: “It’s a much bigger loss for SI than a win for ESPN. SI is bleeding to death in terms of relevance, and the loss of Reilly is one more quart of blood. ESPN is the Yankees and Reilly is A-Rod — whether ESPN has him or not, ESPN will continue to bludgeon most of its opposition because of sheer dollars.”
National sports columnist (different one): “No matter the criticism of Reilly, he was the face of SI and wrote an exceptional column for that back page slot, which is much more difficult to do than you’d think. For the avearge SI subscriber — and the guy who reads the mag in the dentist office — he was perfect. This is a major, major loss for the magazine. It also continues what’s been a disatrous run for Terry McDonnell, who’s lost talent, focus and credibility in the print product while mismanaging the web site to the point it is non-compeititve and often an embarrassment to the brand (Jenn Sterger?). SI has sunk so low, Reilly wound up too good for the place.It’s a much bigger blow for SI than gain for ESPN, which didn’t need him. SI needed him. He was their star. I’m sure he’s only going with contractural guarantees that protect his brand — he’s not sitting across from hacks like Skip and Rob parker or on Around the Horn.”
Here’s the ESPN press release that was just sent wide to media members.
Rick Reilly Joins ESPN
Veteran Sports Illustrated Columnist to Write for ESPN The Magazine, ESPN.com and contribute to TV
Rick Reilly, award-winning columnist and author who is best known for his popular Sports Illustrated column, Life of Reilly, will join ESPN as the back-page columnist for ESPN The Magazine and as a regular columnist for ESPN.com, it was announced by John Skipper, ESPN executive vice president, content.
Under the multi-year agreement, Reilly will also be an essayist for SportsCenter, as well as a contributor for the network’s coverage of major golf events, including the Masters, British Open, Ryder Cup and US Open. Voted National Sportswriter of the Year 11 times, Reilly has been a senior writer for Sports Illustrated since 1985. Following a sabbatical, he will join ESPN on June 1, 2008.
Beginning in June his column will be featured on the back page of ESPN The Magazine, and on off weeks of the biweekly magazine, his column will be featured prominently on ESPN.com. Reilly will also occasionally host interview shows on ESPN.
“Rick has been a premier voice of sports commentary for more than 20 years and we are thrilled and honored to add his considerable talents to ESPN’s outlets,” said Skipper. “The outstanding insights, reporting, and humor of his weekly column will continue, and fans will now be able to enjoy Rick’s work through television.”
Reilly added: “This is an itch I’ve wanted to scratch for a long time. For a guy who loves sports, ESPN is the ultimate. I feel like a mouse locked in a cheese store. I don’t know where to start first. I’m thrilled with the opportunity to speak to a whole new audience in a whole new way.”
Gary Hoenig, editor in chief of ESPN the Magazine added: “It’s a privilege to welcome Rick Reilly to the pages of ESPN The Magazine. With Rick joining Bill Simmons, our readers will now enjoy the two best sports columnists anywhere.”
Reilly began his career in 1979 at his hometown Boulder (Colo.) Daily Camera while a sophomore at the University of Colorado, from which he was graduated in 1981. He wrote for two years at the Camera, two at the Denver Post and two at the Los Angeles Times, before moving to Sports Illustrated.
Reilly’s most recent book, released in May, Hate Mail from Cheerleaders, was a New York Times bestseller as was The Life of Reilly: The Best of Sports Illustrated’s Rick Reilly. His prior book, Shanks for Nothing is a madcap golf novel that cracked the New York Times bestseller list as well. It’s the sequel to Reilly’s cult classic Missing Links. Reilly’s previous book “Who’s Your Caddy?” rose to No. 3 on the New York Times best seller list.
Reilly is co-author of the screenplay Leatherheads, a comic romance centered on the 1927 Duluth Eskimos of the fledgling NFL due out in April, 2008. George Clooney will direct and star along with Renee Zellweger and John Krasinski.
Reilly has won numerous awards in his 27-year writing career, including the prestigious New York Newspaper Guild’s Page One Award for Best Magazine Story. He is the co-author of The Boz, the best-selling autobiography of Oklahoma linebacker Brian Bosworth; Gretzky, with Wayne Gretzky; I’d Love to but I Have a Game with NBC announcer Marv Albert, and the The Wit and Wisdom of Charles Barkley. Reilly’s credits also include his critically acclaimed novel Slo Mo!
Reilly’s column of the same title was the inspiration for the organization, Nothing But Nets. A partnership with the United Nations Foundation, the initiative has raised millions to provide mosquito nets for children in Africa, where 3,000 children die every day of the disease. Every dollar goes to the purchase of nets.
30 Responses to “Media Thoughts on Rick Reilly’s Move From SI to ESPN*”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

October 22nd, 2007 at 11:49 AM
Two stories Reilly wrote really stick out in my mind: The one where he got to do something cool like fly in an F-14 or caddy for a pro and then tell us common-folk about it, and the one where something sad happened to a person and he wrote about it. Those are the two I remember best.
October 22nd, 2007 at 11:49 AM
I agree with “national sports columinst (different one).”
That being said, SI has been trying to expand into the multimedia world, and it has been ugly, especially with Reilly. I think his video “riffs” were horrible compared to his writing.
I assume that this will be a magazine and “Page 2″ move, right? He could do well with Page 2, even though his columns aren’t about New York (Pearlman), Boston (Simmons), and Racism (everyone else).
October 22nd, 2007 at 11:49 AM
“Writer who is friendly with Reilly” sounds like either Simmons or Caple.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Why do we really care?
The media is treating this like Tom Brady has been traded to the Jets. He’s a solid writer who’s time has passed; maybe due to feeling his own work too much, maybe due to the shrinking importance of SI in the sports journalism landscape.
Either way, this means nothing. The Internet has crafted itself to become the rebel forces against the evil empires of the major sports outlets. Reilly will be viewed as overrated and ridiculed in 6 months, a year tops.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:10 PM
Is Reilly going to get to produce all of those Chris Connelly pieces that ESPN had been stealing from him (I remember both the “Picking Up Butch” and “CS Cross Country Runner” stories that SportsCenter covered a couple months after the SI column)
I must be in the minority here but I still prefer SI to ESPN the Magazine (even though SI gets smaller every week) and like their website columnists better (King, Banks and Dr. Z are better than their ESPN counterparts and I think Stewart Mandel is the best college guy in the business)
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:14 PM
About 10 years ago, when I was helping start Travel & Leisure Golf magazine, I called Reilly to contribute, and he expressed he couldn’t for contract reasons. He was very friendly and accommodating and straight forward. At the time, ESPN had been putting the full-court press on Reilly to switch, and Reilly wanted to get into TV (and I think he still does). He wanted “Missing Links” or something golf turned into a sitcom, but, alas, the deal didn’t work — maybe because Gerald Levin, then the head of Time Warner, opened the dam so a waterfall of $100 bills flowed to Reilly. At the same time, remember, Reilly had openly vented at how SI had lost the position as sports’ leading voice – namely because of those late-night goofy subscription promotions featuring screaming Jets fans talking about their new sweatshirt. His point hit the mark. SI, about 20 years ago, made a pitch to buy ESPN. The price was high, so it got turned down. Do you think they regret that now?
There’s no doubt that since then the magazine couldn’t match the instantaneousness of ESPN. Magazines appearing five days after the big event made them stale. Still, the magazine’s strongest attributes were its unique voices – Deford, Reilly and now Gary Smith. That doesn’t seem to matter as much anymore, unfortunately. In the mean time, the current SI.com site is full of people who seem to have no in-depth experience in things like college and pro football, etc. (The best SI.com site is in golf, penned by Gary Van Sickle).
That said, this whole thing is greater than Reilly moving to SI. For Reilly, I think his future is movie scripts, script-doctoring and the occassional feature. Hey, who owns ESPN? Oh, ABC does. Hmmm. And 10 years ago, when he was getting doused by all those Gerry Levin $100 bills, if you had told Reilly that it was going to turn out the way it has, he would have put up an umbrella and left for the WWL so fast it he would not have had to take that ride in the F-16.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:16 PM
“I still prefer SI to ESPN the Magazine”
What? You still enjoy journalism over big, pretty pictures?
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:20 PM
Actually, if you’re looking for a sports analogy, this is probably like Joe Namath going to the LA Rams. Which makes Dan Patrick to SI along the level of the Royals signing Juan Gonzalez.
In other words, both of these guys have long outlived their usefulness and have only been indulging themselves like crazy for years.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:26 PM
I’d also contend that these days SI.com’s Extra Mustard has better content than Page 2…aside from Simmons and TMQ there’s not a lot on there anymore that’s any good
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:28 PM
Hell, maybe it’s like Page 2 hiring Hunter S. Thompson. I’m a huge Hunter fan, but he did nothing for Page 2 except provide name recognition. I never made it a habit to go to Page 2 to read his articles, which were a shell of his writings from the 70s. His worst writing was still better than most people’s best writing, but it just wasn’t as essential as it once was.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:28 PM
I’ll agree with s1rweeze. Reilly was past his usefulness at SI. He might even have been one of the very reasons people portrayed SI as “grandfather’s magazine.” Then again, when your kids (Peter King) or your desire for fine wine (Zimmerman) become a part of every column, that’s also a big example that you’ve become the old codger in the room.
As for ESPN, they don’t need anyone as long as they got a monopoly on the sports TV landscape. ESPN is Calvin, sports is the rib sandwich at WacArnold’s and we gots to go through them to get it.
So it’s us that lose.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:37 PM
Did someone just reference Greg Easterbrook in a positive manner? Back of the line!
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:47 PM
I agree with ButtersBC on this one. I prefer SI to ESPN on both the printed and web fronts. (I’m still bitter that ESPN the Magazine won’t fit on a normal bookshelf because of it’s ridiculous width, but that’s more my problem than anyone else’s.) And ESPN.com is larger and where I’m most likely to go to find something, but I would argue that SI.com is deeper with readable content. They’re even putting worthwhile content on the “On Campus” section these days. Plus they don’t have that Satanic video player that starts up and scares people when I’m in a meeting.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:49 PM
Dude, it is tastefully spelled Gregg.
“Hell, maybe it’s like Page 2 hiring Hunter S. Thompson. I’m a huge Hunter fan, but he did nothing for Page 2 except provide name recognition.” Agreed.
Isn’t one of the expectations of a lead columnist to attract and retain readers? SI has been going down for years. Losing Reilly isn’t that big a deal now that I think about it. As far as ESPN, he’ll just be lost in the plethora of other writers/scribblers and we will soon be cursing about him being all over the TV channel.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:52 PM
My bad, I swear I pronounce the second ‘g’ whenever I say it out loud.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:54 PM
When I get my SI every week, the first article I read when I stake a shit is Riellys..when I USED to get ESPN Mag…the First I would read was Patrick’s Outtakes.
Trade of these two probably more balanced that you think…
If that’s not enough…I agree with Extra Mustard on SI being better than ESPN Extra Patriots/ Red Sox Journalism (er I mean Page 2)
But I hate the three pages of click throughs to read an SI article.
SI.com, ESPN.com, and FOX Sports. com are like fast food now….ESPN has the best burger (Burger King), SI Has the best fries (McDonalds), and FOX has the best shakes (Jack in the Box (west coast homies))
You are gonna have to settle in one of the three areas of your daily sports meal intake no matter which one you go to.
October 22nd, 2007 at 12:58 PM
How in the hell can this guy pull 2 mil a year for what he does?
He’s terrible.
October 22nd, 2007 at 1:07 PM
“But I hate the three pages of click throughs to read an SI article.”
Me too. Why is it that these websites make it more difficult than it needs to be to casually surf/read their pages? ESPN with the dam video (this may have been fixed. It ran me off from their page and I rarely stop by) an pop ups that take 5 seconds to load. CnnSi with have multiple pages for a single article.
October 22nd, 2007 at 1:08 PM
I enjoy TMQ and will not apologize for it
October 22nd, 2007 at 1:10 PM
Interesting food analogy. Never been to a jack in the box … so that must be like visiting …
CRM beat me to the Easterbrook comment. I’m almost ready to give one of his columns a shot. Almost.
October 22nd, 2007 at 1:25 PM
is it just me or does Rick Reilly look like Bob Saget?
October 22nd, 2007 at 1:39 PM
Think of the clickthroughs as what you need to put up with to keep these fine websites up and running, sort of like how MNF and baseball are now merely vehicles for promoting ESPN properties.
They think less of the reader than they do the guy who drives the biodiesel fueled shuttle that combats global warming.
October 22nd, 2007 at 2:00 PM
“CRM beat me to the Easterbrook comment. I’m almost ready to give one of his columns a shot. Almost.”
Block out a couple hours and turn off your Smug Detector. It will explode if left running while reading TMQ.
October 22nd, 2007 at 2:13 PM
TMQ is the Garrison Keillor of sportswriters.
If you don’t know who he is, be very very thankful.
October 22nd, 2007 at 2:27 PM
I guess we know who is going to be ESPN’s version of Andy Rooney on E:60 now.
October 22nd, 2007 at 4:47 PM
When has ESPN Mag run a game story that gave you an understanding that never came from TV or the local sports page? Like, never. That’s what SI did. It was THE authority on sports – until ESPN and the new wave of communications came into being in the 1980-90s. SI never adapted.
Reilly is great on TV. He’s hilarious. He’s great on radio. Jim Rome never went on vacation very long becuase he realized that his bosses might come to the very easy understanding that Reilly was 14 times the host than that UC Santa Barbara fraud.
Reilly is something that nearly all of those in the blog community is not: A journalist. He calls people up. He hunts down stories. He gets people to open up about difficult subjects. He rips people in public and asks tough questions in public. He doesn’t hide behind a computer or an anonymous blog to do it.
And he puts words together in such a a way that no line of monkeys (or human, for that matter) will ever be able to duplicate in a million years. Anyone who challenges Reilly’s talent exhibits gross ignorance.
October 22nd, 2007 at 5:09 PM
Its nice to see Feinstein stay objective about Reilly.
Reilly has taken some shots at Feinstein over the years — once comparing his book “The Masters” to a pamphlet — that used to make Feinstein mad. Either Feinstein and Reilly have patched things up, or Feinstein’s gotten over it.
October 22nd, 2007 at 9:56 PM
Ballgame. Reilly’s writing talents and skills are not in question. Personally I have a love hate relationship with him. I love his socially-relevant columns, but “Reilly the Bully” can be nauseating. I try to tackle this issue fairly in: Rick Reilly is a Dork and Why it Matters http://www.cosellout.com/?p=66
Now TBL and others might be right that this is a short-term monetary loss, but it can also represent an opportunity to go in a different strategic direction.
October 23rd, 2007 at 10:00 AM
This would have been news a decade ago.
October 25th, 2007 at 1:11 AM
Gary Smith is the best. Still much too underrated because he is a true journalist and has been able to avoid the idiot box, which is the kiss of death for any good reporter. Wilbon is the only really good opinion guy who has been able to keep up quality-wise. Look at Albom (who I grew up loving), Lupica (never really loved him too much), and the rest of the guys. Maybe Reilly could be the Andy Rooney of E:60, which really needs to lose the “story pitch meetings.” Just show us the story, and drop the opinion. The biggest problem with ESPN is that it allows its “reporters” to do too much. Why allow them to do reporting, opinion and analysis. Don’t forget to watch “the Factor” boys and girls.