Who Do You Think Should Be the Next Backpage Columnist at SI?
Uncategorized October 23rd. 2007, 2:15pm
In case you missed it Monday, we had a couple of Rick Reilly posts about his high-profile move from Sports Illustrated to rival ESPN (he even spoke to us about it). Now that we’ve sufficiently covered the ESPN side of the deal, we turn our attention to what SI will do to fill the void. We can’t imagine a massive spike in circulation regardless of who gets the job – if anyone does. (It took SI about six months to fill Steve Rushin’s column space.) We’ve outlined 12 candidates for the job, and we’re looking for some feedback. After the names, we look at some blogger opinion on the big move. Why the photo of New York Times columnist Selena Roberts? Because if SI has any hope of landing her, they better hustle. We’re hearing ESPN is close to hiring her.
Bill Simmons, ESPN – Whether you like it or not, he still has an immense fan base. Would he want the job? We suspect not. The important question, one that cannot be answered, is whether or not the million or so people who read Simmons each week would immediately go to the newstand and see what he had to say. It’s one thing to read him at the office – it’s another to actively go and find his work. He’s had a few ESPN the Mag columns that have made us think, ‘wow, this guy actually can be good’ (mostly about the NBA). But is he well-rounded enough to pull it off?
Norman Chad, Freelancer – It’s probably just us, but he’s the most consistently funny sports columnist. Many of you disagree. Back when we were in high school and Chad was penning a weekly NFL picks column, we’d wake up on Fridays and tear open the Washington Post looking for it. We saved many of them, which may appear stalky. SI seems to have already tried the funny route, though (Bill Scheft).
TJ Simers, LA Times – Funny as hell, and fearless, too. A renegade, perhaps? Was willing to badmouth a TV show he was on (Around the Horn; he was permanenty banned), which proves the guy’s got some onions. Doesn’t have national name recognition, but he’s witty enough to earn one quickly.
Selena Roberts, NY Times – She’s the wordsmith who recently infuriated Red Sox nation with this column about performance-enhancing drugs. Not sure SI is ready to put a female on the backpage (just an opinion), but she stirs the pot (mostly on corrupt college sports) while being insightful. We actually hear she is the next target of big, bad ESPN, and it could happen as soon as next month. You know what this feels like? A game of Risk where ESPN has gobbled up North America, South America, Asia and Africa (name writers), and everyone else is Europe and Australia. Would you prefer a Monolopy analogy? One time, we went into the NY Times for an interview (probably as a courtesy). We presented our clips. And we were told, “this is how you write a game story.”
Jason Whitlock, KC Star/Fox Sports – Seems to generate buzz very frequently on a national level, and he’s done so in the KC Star, online, and on TV. Has strong opinions and stirs emotions. If a big splash is your goal, he or Simmons might make the biggest on this list.
John Feinstein, Washington Post – Actually reminds us of Reilly in the sense that he seems to stand for wholesome values and the underdog. He’s a huge college basketball guy, and has carved out quite a niche for himself in the Ivy/Patriot Leagues. Seems to stick with the facts and offer less opinion than anyone on this list.
Wright Thompson, ESPN – Would he leave the cushy life of being a features writer at ESPN the Mag and ESPN.com for the pressure-cooker of the SI backpage? Eventually, the job could be his, but he’s by far the youngest writer on this list, so perhaps they make a play for him to groom him as Reilly’s successor. Apparently, he once interned at Sports Illustrated … how they let him go, we’re not sure.
Mitch Albom, Detroit Free Press – His better days are probably behind him, if only because his focus has drifted to the lucrative world of books. His popularity among sports fans has waned, but only because he’s traded beer-swilling louts for the Starbucks set. He gave that blog thing a shot … but it never took. He’s got name recognition, if that’s what the mag is looking for.
Mike Lupica, NY Daily News – See Albom. His drawback is that his ego won’t fit in the book, and he’s more of a navel-gazer than someone who actually goes out into the field and dabbles with the hoi polloi. He’s have to give up Sports Reporters, something we can’t imagine happening.
Dan LeBatard, Miami Herald – Engaging, funny, and successful as a columnist and radio host. Always seems upbeat and happy to be alive, which, on the surface, is what you think when you see Reilly’s picture or Reilly in a beer commercial. Personally, we don’t think he misses a beat when TK is traveling on PTI. One person who would be thrilled: Ricky Williams.
Gary Smith, Sports Illustrated – A few years ago he was named ‘America’s best sportswriter.’ If he wrote one cover story a month, you’d know what we were talking about. Instead, he writes one every three months. He’s tremendous on 10-page features, but how would he handle a weekly column?
Chuck Klosterman, Esquire/ESPN – Hip, edgy and intelluctual. Thought-provoking. His column in Esquire is our first read in the magazine. Though we don’t know the guy (outside of a few emails), he may not be sports-centric enough for the job. Might be a bit dark and negative, too.
Rick Reilly leaving SI for ESPN (Lone Star Ball)
ESPN makes it official that Reilly is Bristol-bound (Watchdog)
‘They Want me for the Column’ (Fanhouse)
SI: Hire Deadspin’s Leitch to replace Reilly (Dan Shanoff)
Is Sports Illustrated losing relevance? (It’s a Fly World)
61 Responses to “Who Do You Think Should Be the Next Backpage Columnist at SI?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

October 23rd, 2007 at 2:19 PM
I fail to see my name mentioned.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:21 PM
I fail to see CRM’s name mentioned.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:23 PM
Honestly, what is the point of ESPN hiring all these writers? I know the internet has unlimited space, but dear god… overkill. I know barely anybody watches/remembers/cares about pro wrestling, but this reeks of when WCW would hire guys away from the WWF just for the sake of doing it. They’d end up rotting away for about a year, doing absolutely nothing while nobody noticed.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:26 PM
If SI is generally interested in saving itself and competing with an outlet that captures audiences young and old, they will need to transition to a young back page writer, that’s controversial enough to create buzz but not be divisive….
LeBatard
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:26 PM
People follow specific writers/columnists? Weird. I can’t even tell you who writes for my local paper up in MN.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:27 PM
Simmons almost goes out of way now to rip SI for its alleged irrelevance so I’d be shocked – SHOCKED! (to steal from Bob Ryan) – if he left ESPN for greener pastures…unless he actually gets upset when he can’t criticize ESPN personalities to the extent he would like to
Then again he always talks about wanting to leave that gig someday and start writing movie scripts or whatever so maybe getting cushy gig writing one small column a week would suit him well
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:29 PM
I thought ESPN just re-upped on Simmons less than a year ago.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:29 PM
I completely agree with you guys on LeBatard though…I loved those weeks on PTI when it was him and Whitlock, that was great television
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:30 PM
Chuck Klosterman would be GREAT!! I like LeBatard as well, but Klosterman has an interesting take on all things sports that’s usually different than most sports writers.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:40 PM
I gotta go with Mozatta on this one. Do people really like a writer so much that they would actually buy a magazine because of them? I mean if one of my favorite authors wrote a story featured in the New Yorker or something then I might check it out. But to follow a sportswriter’s coverage of a game I already saw, or their analysis of a specific player or team seems like a bit of a stretch to me.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:48 PM
Norman Chad, Freelancer
DING… DING… DING… DING… DING!!!
feinstein would be a good no. 2.
TBL: you don’t remember when chad actually DID write for SI? he devoted an entire chapter of his book to this episode of his life.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:51 PM
Please, not LeBatard – guy is a straight up kook.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:56 PM
pkiguy – especially when their analysis and commentary is exactly the same as mine. I watched the game, I know what happened. What make’s Bill Simmon’s opinion about something so special? The only articles I read are recaps of games that I happened to miss. Other than that, give me the box score and I’m fine. I read a whitlock column the other week and afterwards, I realized that his writing is the same as everyone else’s, it’s not anything special or spectacular. His sentences are put together nearly identical to anyone else who is able to read/write. So I don’t get the whole cult following of specific writers.
October 23rd, 2007 at 2:58 PM
I would vote for Whitlock or LeBatard. Album is a hack these days who only follows sports when his radio show and other non-sports stuff doesn’t get in the way. I wouldn’t read Lupica if you paid me…the arrogant little lepricon.
I might actually go out of my way to read Whitlock. When I was in College, Whitlock was a local columnist for the Ann Arbor News – before he big-timed us & went national. Very provocative, very controversial, but very good. I enjoyed him when he was on WWL.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:01 PM
How about Bob Ryan? I always liked his writing and he always seemed less annoying than Lupica on the Sports Reporters. For an older guy like him, the backpage of SI may hold more luster than it does to other younger writers.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:03 PM
And as for Shanoff’s post – Leitch to replace Reilly? Good god, bloggers are delusional sometimes.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:04 PM
Why do people think Selena Roberts is a good writer? I guess she’s a wonderful writer if you like bitter, extreme hyperbole, and dislike old fashioned things such as facts and sources. Her track record is atrocious — as many on this blog have pointed out repeatedly. Pick one: her assault on Duke, her coverage of Michael Vick, her rumor-laden piece on the Knicks, just name it. Now she has another brilliant column today, the premise is which is: maybe George Mitchell leaked HGH info on Paul Byrd to the SF Chronicle. What? Prove that he didn’t. Great article. Fox Mulder thinks Selena is too much into conspiracies. Either that or this is just the type of reasoning we can expect from an Auburn grad.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:10 PM
Bill Simmons, ESPN: f’ simmons. even if i loved him, he can’t write. if nothing else, SI writers can actually write. simmons babbles and rambles (i swear he just rambles into a digital recorder and uses voice recognition software).
TJ Simers, LA Times: from what i have read of him, he’s more condescending than funny or witty. not sure if SI is looking for that.
Selena Roberts, NY Times: she just might be PC enough, which SI loves. she comes across as preachy, which SI loves. It also helps she’s a woman (diversity). She would be a good fit. I wouldn’t neccesarily buy a magazine because of her, but she fits the SI model.
Jason Whitlock, KC Star/Fox Sports: he would be good if not great. but whitlock is too outspoken and can be anti-PC. SI doesn’t like that. next…
John Feinstein, Washington Post: feinstein would be just about perfect because he likes the same things reilly does. but feinstein may not be witty/entertaining enough as reilly is. feinstein is more of a nuts and bolts journalist. he’s more into substance than style, and that may work against him. personally, i like feinstein a lot. not sure if he fits the back page model though. i’d buy an issue of SI just to read feinstein.
Wright Thompson, ESPN: since i rarely go to espn.com and read the rag even less, i have no idea who this is.
Mitch Albom, Detroit Free Press: – albom would be a fantastic replacement. should be among the top three targets for SI.
Mike Lupica, NY Daily News: ain’t happenin’
Dan LeBatard, Miami Herald: the ultimate jocksniffing, PC fraud. if SI hires this clown, they have lost all credibility. a player can never, ever do anything wrong in his eyes. NEVER! he is so pro-player/anti-coach/front office he borders on unethical.
btw TBL, if you have his email addy, ask him for his side of the story when he tried to submit a $3,000 expense account to the herald for an interview with sammy sosa.
anyone have a youtube link of when lebaretard appeared on the old baseball and boardwalk game show on espn as a contestent (when he was a student at miami) with chris berman as the game show host?
Gary Smith, Sports Illustrated: why am i drawing a blank on this guy?
Chuck Klosterman, Esquire/ESPN: i don’t read esquire and i don’t read bspn the rag so i have no insight on to who he is or his qualifications (or lack thereof).
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:12 PM
A few years back Whitlock lost his damn mind. Please no. But for the best person on this list is Dan Le Batard. To fully appreciate Le Batard is to read his ESPN bi-weekly columns as his TV appearances do not do him justice. What makes Le Batard so great is how thoughtful he is, and his willingness to buck journalistic convention. When I read Le Batard, I LEARN SOMETHING NEW. As undeniably great a writer that Reilly was, when he wasn’t talking about feel-good stories of HS athletes or the occasional social causes (see Nothing But Nets), he basically could be counted on to have the same popular opinion as everybody else on the planet. His value was that he would just say it in a more clever way.
But what would be my choice is the quiet recent signing of DAVE ZIRIN to the SI website. He is as every bit as funny and clever as Reilly, but would bring an added social and political dimension rarely seen on a consistemt basis. Zirin would CHALLENGE readers. Perhaps Zirin could alternate with another writer, similar on how Newsweek alternates two writers. Here is more on: “Strange Bedfellows: Dave Zirin and The Edge of Sports Illustrated” http://www.cosellout.com/?p=139
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:14 PM
This was the best list I’ve seen thus far. It was also the only list of potential candidates, but a list nonetheless. Good work.
TBL, why not go a step further (since we’re all just speculating) and type up a list of COMPLETE dark horses? That would probably draw some interest from around the internets.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:16 PM
Chuck Klosterman, Esquire/ESPN – Hip, edgy and intelluctual. Douchebag for a lot of reasons. Will fall on his ass in a stiff wind. More annoying than Tony Kornheiser. Too many gigs on VH1 talking about Lisa Lisa and Cult Jam. Chuck? How about Charlie. Much too New York. Extremely boring.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:17 PM
you know who would be fantastic to replace reilly, but i seriously doubt it would happen? tony kornheiser.
you figure he’s not long for monday night football. and the man can still write. and he’s ungodly funny. i still say he has the best sports radio show on the airwaves… the few weeks a year he is actually doing his radio gig.
would TK do it? jump from the washington post? he’d probably get a helluva buyout from the post in these trying newspaper times.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:21 PM
Whitlock can only write on four different subjects so he is out of the equation.
Wright Thompson, who used to own Whitlock at the KC Star, would be awesome, but he does seem a bit young. My favorite up and coming columnist. I wish he’d write more.
Simmons obviously not. He just re-upped and is King at the dot com. Moving to SI he’d be the new guy amongst crusty old stuck in their writers.
“Chuck Klosterman, Esquire/ESPN – Hip, edgy and intelluctual”. More like smarmy, egotistical, and dense. He’s just a younger TMQ who’s done blow. That’s how his articles read.
Norman Chad would not work. I like him, but I don’t see how funny translates to SI. Scheft was not funny, btw. Plus, he works for ESPN and I doubt he’ll give up the cushy Poker announcing gigs.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:22 PM
Has Klosterman really talked about Lisa Lisa and Cult Jam? Seriously? Wow. No lie … i enjoy several of their songs. They are upbeat, and all over my ipod.
Opinions … Bob Ryan is good, but you can’t have a picture of an old guy with white hair in a magazine that needs to hook younger readers … Jimmy, those are some strong opinions…do you like anyone?
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:23 PM
Forgot one guy….This one is a pretty obvious one when you think of the cross promotion between SI and NBC (Peter King …SNF)
I am guessing this one if I had to lay some money down since most of the guys you have listed are ESPN guys
KEITH OLBERMANN
BTW….Albom would be a great choice…as long as they dont put his picture next to the article…it would give new meaning to “dog earing” a page to be read later
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:24 PM
So KC … then who?
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:26 PM
Jimmy, those are some strong opinions…do you like anyone?
of course! as i wrote previously, chad, feinstein, kornheiser, albom.
i think the last time i actually bought SI on a regular basis was when chad wrote for them. but i do go to SI.com daily.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:31 PM
Hmmmmm, call me delusional, but might SI be interested in some bogus “Terry Bradshaw is dead” columns?
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:34 PM
wouldn’t you love to see SI give the gig to jimmy kimmel? LOL
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:37 PM
LeBatard is the smartest and most thoughtful of the bunch, tho’ I like Whitlock, too. But he’s already spread too thin (nice ironic pun, eh?). I agree with TBL-LeBatard on PTI is just as good as the original crew (bam.)
Klosterman, I’ve never been able to get into him. Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs seemed like it would be a good read, but it honestly annoyed the piss out of me. I assigned it to a group of college freshmen, thinking they’d dig it, and they all thought he was pretty much an arrogant douche. He’s pretty much the slighlty smarter and much more pretentious version of Simmons, I think.
Olbermann would be an inspired choice. Still the best SportsCenter anchor of all time, before ESPN entered the fateful boo-ya era.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:37 PM
TBL, Ask any guy between 18-35 who Bob Ryan is and who Wright Thompson is and I am sure they would know Ryan. I don’t think it is the old guy picture that keeps that demo from buying the magazine..its buying the magazine itself. That Demo is not going to shell out $4 or whatever it costs a week to read someone when they go on the internet and can get 40 guys similar to the guys in the magazine for FREE. If Si is smart (and they haven’t been) they should dedicate their content focus on the website and then have those writers do stuff for the Mag…Hell Simmons writes a Magazine article for ESPN and the .com puts it up for free. They need to do that type of stuff. Its not about one person…its about getting 10 people who are writing day in and day out. If SI.com can make their website the place to go for good opinions and insider stuff, then the Magazine will grow just because of the percentages. I don’t see why ESPN made the Reilly move…to me it was ESPN showing everyone that they are ESPN and to get some of the 50 year olds to buy the Mag.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:38 PM
I live in LA and can’t stand Simers..
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:40 PM
They should take Bob Kravitz so the fine people of Indianapolis don’t have to read his drivle.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:40 PM
Totally hear you TBL. Just thought he was a good guy to hold down the fort down for a few years while SI figures out where they are going longterm.
Also, it isn’t like Ryan is some unknown dude. He has been a fixture on PTI, Around the horn and the Sports Reporters, so it isn’t like people don’t who he is.
I would say more 19-35 year olds know Ryan more than they know everyone else on that list (sans Simmons, Whitlock and maybe Lupica.)
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Does Flubby think I’m Florio from PFT?
Don’t you have pictures of Peter King’s daughter to post or something?
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Um … why do think they hired Dan Patrick?
I can’t imagine Reilly wasn’t classy enough to tell SI, after 22 years of working for them, that he was going to ESPN when his contract expired.
SI took this info and hired Patrick.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:43 PM
7 of these 12 are on or regularly on ESPN (Sports Reporters, WSOP, ATH, PTI)
If all (most) of the great writers are coming to ESPN I wouldnt leave voluntarily….
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:46 PM
Wright Thompson, like a guy like Gary Smith, is at his best when writing long in depth articles. The back page would not do him justice.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:47 PM
I’ve never seen Klosterman on any of VH1’s I Love the _____’s shows. I don’t read his Esquire columns, but I’ve never gotten the “too New Yorker” vibe from his ESPN.com posts.
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Speaking of ESPN though…nice to see Harold Reynolds back on the tube at FOX
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:49 PM
if SI really wanted to stick it to bspn, they’d hire phil mushnick and just turn him loose. LOL
three columns a week for the .com and one for the magazine.
try to tell me mushnick doesn’t have enough firewood in his brain to pull that off. and combined with peter king’s mmqb (which i think gets more hits than anything else at that site), that place would explode with the hits. LOL
October 23rd, 2007 at 3:57 PM
“So KC … then who?
Left by TheBigLead on October 23rd, 2007″
Don’t know. I got to the end of my post and thought, “It doesn’t matter. SI is dead.”
Like any magazine that has been around for decades, they need to do massive change up to the whole magazine. And I’m not talking layout, a back page columnist, shorter articles, etc… They need a complete reimagining of what sports fans want. This should have happened five years ago. They are so far behind. Sports news is so automatic now, giving me a 2 page recap on Thursday of the Pats game last Sunday is pointless.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:03 PM
Voting in this order:
1. LeBatard
2. Roberts
3. Chad
Norman Chad’s hilarious. His columns are so funny they would be out of place in the back page, because he doesn’t always drive home a main point other than certain sports absurdities.
Roberts is relevant, hard-hitting and seems balanced enough to make sense in the role as a featured writer.
LeBatard is funny, relevant and controversial but not to the point where agreeing with him becomes highly uncomfortable. He writes great columns and with his ESPN publicity he surely has a quailty fan following that would read and recommend his work.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:07 PM
It’s obvious, isn’t it? The new SI back-page will be an Absolut Citron ad.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:09 PM
I’m guessing Reilly has the best tip-line in the business. If there’s an obscure story that needs to be written, he’s probably got two interns sifting through emails and seeing who is worth the backpage and who isn’t.
I’d say Reilly only sees the best of the best leads. No need to have your star chasing down BS stories. Assuming this is where half the columns come from, you have to wonder: is Bob Ryan the kind of guy to fly to Iowa and interview some one-armed wrestler? Is Norman Chad?
Reilly made you laugh, tugged at your heartstrings, and made you think. Only a small population of writers can do all, simultaneously.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:18 PM
I like Klosterman more than most in here, it seems. But I don’t think he’s a good fit for SI. I’m not sure he’s a great fit for ESPN.com, but he does well in those roles. He makes me think more than anybody who writes sports. I like LeBatard a good deal. He’s not Rick Reilly in any way, shape, or form. But he’s one of the best sports columnists in the country.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:23 PM
Bill Conlin is prolly available.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:30 PM
I read some of the Dave Zirin stuff.
The world doesn’t need another angry Ward Chruchill bitching about black people and sports and women and sports.
It’s SPORTS for CHRIST’S SAKE! Go back to graduate school if you think you want to change the world. That’s where people who think like him spend their lives.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:47 PM
I imagine SI would probably put Patrick’s new column back there.
I haven’t seen anyone post his name here, but why not Joe Posnanski? Great writer, well respected, writes without pandering.
Another option would be Steve Kelly from the Seattle Times. I just want that guy out of Seattle. It would prove that SI is a sinking ship.
October 23rd, 2007 at 4:48 PM
Move Frank Deford to the back page. Maybe not young, but the man is a pretty cool cat. And he can write with humor, feeling, and relevance, and most of the time he lets the subject matter speak for itself without getting to cutesy or self referential, unlike some of the other candidates. I may be in the minority, but I like and respect the old man.
October 23rd, 2007 at 5:32 PM
Tony Kornheiser would be a good replacement for Rushin. Reilly’s column varied from a touching story one week to something completely stupid the next. If SI wants to stick with the same format, I’d cross off all the legit sportswriters. I’m not sure they would want a “fluff”-type column. Not that Reilly was a poor writer, but I wouldn’t consider it journalistic writing. If SI wants to step it up a bit, I would go for John Feinstein as someone else mentioned earlier. He is very well-regarded for the most part, but he is a serious journalist and can also write the occasional moving story. I think he would add some much-needed credibility to SI’s depleted staff.
October 23rd, 2007 at 5:44 PM
Feinstein lost this year as a reader. He’s been getting very sloppy in the past couple of year, then he went ballistic on the Duke case. I would cancel my SI subscription if they gave it to him. LeBatard would probably be my first choice followed by Whitlock.
October 23rd, 2007 at 5:46 PM
robert, I do not think Selena is too much into conspiracies. Such a thing isn’t even possible.
THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE
October 23rd, 2007 at 6:20 PM
What is a “magazine”?
October 23rd, 2007 at 7:43 PM
If SI really wants to make a splash and hire a great writer, they should go after Randy Galloway of the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram. The guy is brilliant.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:40 PM
Keith Olberman would be a great spot, but he might get too political and end up alienating readers. Willie Geist is a funny, cynical mo-fo as well.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:41 PM
Assuming this is where half the columns come from, you have to wonder: is Bob Ryan the kind of guy to fly to Iowa and interview some one-armed wrestler? Is Norman Chad?
ryan much more so than chad.
I read some of the Dave Zirin stuff.
The world doesn’t need another angry Ward Chruchill bitching about black people and sports and women and sports.
LOL ward churchill!!!
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:42 PM
Whoever said Joe Posnaski is going to get a gold star I have a feeling. Good call. If SI wants a Reilly clone, Joe is it. Good writer. Sort of sappy. Has a bit of a problem of leaning too heavily on heart string pulling topics, but he’s there. Good feature writer and a good columnist. He’s 20 years behind Reilly which means he hasn’t quite hit the “I’m successful, have an intern find me a subject and I’ll pump out 500 words” stage of his career. But he will. It is inevitable with him, so SI might as well get him while he is on.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:58 PM
Good call on Posnanski, KC. I still have my “I Pounded Poz” t-shirt from when he was a young columnist in Augusta, GA years and years and years ago. It’s amazing to see him so successful now…still putting out great stuff. If SI wanted a Reilly-clone, Poz is their guy…
October 23rd, 2007 at 10:54 PM
Cosign Robert’s post RE: Selena Roberts. The woman is, quite simply, a horrible reporter. She regularly makes up “facts” (read: interpretations and wild speculation) without any corroboration.
To Robert’s list of sins, I would add her batshit insane profile of the Jets from a month ago, in which she basically insinuated that the team was coming apart and that the players were one loss from lynching Eric Mangini. Three straight losses later and the latest word is that the Jets’ locker room is completely on board with Mangini’s “starting the season over” process.
But hey, why let facts get in the way of a good juicy rumor? Isn’t that what reporting is all about?
It’s sad when I trust barely verbal troglodytes like Rich Cimini of the Daily News more than a “respected” reporter for the Times.
October 24th, 2007 at 1:40 AM
to the guy from minnesota who doesn’t know your local sportswriters. sid hartman, hallf of fame journalist, pat reusse, and joe souhan. welcome to the big city