Manute Bol, Heading to Iowa for the Caucus
NBA, Politics December 28th. 2007, 2:48pm
Figured we slide in a political post late on a Friday, when many folks have probably left for a four-day weekend. So here’s the deal – next Thursday, Iowa, the first caucus. Manute Bol will be in the house! We’d love for a reader to head down to the scene and quickly bang out a first-person account (with photos would be rad), but we understand that is a lot to ask. (But the offer stands!) At any rate, 2008 is an election year, and we know you’re not supposed to mix politics with sports, but F it. There’s a strong possibility that someone other than a white male could be President of the United States, and chronicling history is always fun. There are about four kajillion polls floating about (we saw one with Belichick leading all Republicans in Massachusetts; it also had Tom Brady leading Democrats in Vermont, even though he claims to be an Independent), so we’ll spare you links to any of those. But since everyone loves a history lesson … the last three Democrats to win Iowa have won the nomination (one ran opposed); the last four Republicans to take Iowa have earned the nomination (two ran opposed).
21 Responses to “Manute Bol, Heading to Iowa for the Caucus”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

December 28th, 2007 at 2:51 PM
First person to suggest the Google-ing of Ron Paul gets a milk shake on the way home…
December 28th, 2007 at 2:52 PM
hey anyone who says no IRS and a smaller government, they got my vote
December 28th, 2007 at 2:53 PM
Hillary is the woman. Who’s the black guy, Obama? I could have sworn his mother is white as a lily.
December 28th, 2007 at 2:58 PM
Only way a Dem wins is if he’s male and from the South. It’s historical man, well, mostly.
Ron Paul has got a bad beat from the mainstream media mostly due to his stance on Iraq and the fact that he has some insane followers. But he seems like the logical choice for the blogosphere given he is often opposed to the mainstream and given his ideas are logical and constitutional – both of which are becoming rarer in Washington. I think he has begun something that may not take hold this year but in the next decade his ideas will take hold…kind of like Barry Goldwater basically got elected when Ronald Regan got elected.
December 28th, 2007 at 3:01 PM
Ron Paul is the biggest kook running. It’s not very often you see both LGF and Kos united on an issue, but when both are slamming Paul for his racist, anti-semitic leanings/past, well, they may be on to something there.
December 28th, 2007 at 3:02 PM
4-day weekend? Who are those assholes who get the 4 days…fuck that shit..I want my first Post at 9:00 am Monday…I want it with plenty of links and some NSFW pics of the latest Hollywood whores. If I am here you are here TBL…Dec 31 is only important at 11:59 and 59 seconds….(yes I am bitter)
December 28th, 2007 at 3:08 PM
im with you roman, i work on monday also
money doesnt sleep
December 28th, 2007 at 3:16 PM
what do you do irish?
December 28th, 2007 at 3:20 PM
I’ll be working too, Roman… You’re not alone!
December 28th, 2007 at 3:24 PM
money doesnt sleep
That’s why there are paid vacations, I’ll be getting paid while I sleep. See you guys Wednesday!
December 28th, 2007 at 3:25 PM
nick, you ask what i do, what high school i went to a week back
what else man
cmon its all about anonymity
December 28th, 2007 at 3:26 PM
cbh49er i bet you cant tell me what movie that is from and from that nick you should know what i do
December 28th, 2007 at 3:27 PM
social security #?
December 28th, 2007 at 3:32 PM
Wall Street
December 28th, 2007 at 3:33 PM
classic, you never fail cbh
December 28th, 2007 at 3:41 PM
Haha, thanks Irish
December 28th, 2007 at 10:16 PM
Nick PappaSTALKSyou
December 29th, 2007 at 11:32 AM
Bottom line on IA on the Dem side is that Hillary can’t finish third to Obama and Edwards (yes, Edwards – don’t sleep on the guy, he’s within 4 points of the virtual tie that is Hillary & Barack) or else anything less than a 1st place finish in NH will doom her (she is currently tied with Obama in NH). Part of her appeal was her “inevitability” – and now that’s more or less gone.
For the GOP, Rudy is fucked. He’s polling just above Ron Paul in IA (read: next-to-DFL), and he’s a distant 3rd in NH to Mitt and McCain. Don’t buy the “resurgent McCain” story in IA – he’s 16 points behind Romney and 26 behind Huckabee. But if McCain catches Mitt in NH (only 11 points behind with about 10 days to go and trending upward), it’s a race. What’s amazing on the GOP side is that Rudy will likely have to drop out after NH (he won’t finish top 3 in IA and won’t be top 2 in the state), and Mitt might not win either state.
December 29th, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Interesting analysis, Tugnutt. Seems as if you’re putting a lot of stock in the polls. Maybe I haven’t read enough, but the phrase Rudy “likely have to drop out” is a new one on me.
December 29th, 2007 at 12:15 PM
I’m not saying the polling is right — especially in IA, but if you look at trend lines, it’s pretty tight in IA on the Dem side, with Edwards and Obama both trending up and Hillary pretty flat, if not downtrending. It’s still anyone’s race in IA between Clinton, Obama and Edwards. It’s entirely possible that Hillary could finish 3rd there.
Regarding Rudy, if you are his campaign, and you started 2007 as the prohibitive favorite, and you can’t even finish top 2 or 3 in IA or NH (and NH is next to your home state!), where do you go from there? SC, where you are currently fighting Fred Thompson for 3rd/4th? Nevada, where you are winning, but could change after IA/NH? This will be an interesting test of the new primary system, with NV and FL having moved up their dates. Rudy is winning both states, but the media attention that Huckabee (“he’s for real”) and/or McCain (“back from the dead”) will get if they win IA and NH, respectively, might offset any lead that Rudy has in those states. Plus, there will be the inevitable “What happened to Rudy?” stories. In politics, unlike sports, no one likes a loser. There is no equivalent to the Chicago Cubs.
December 29th, 2007 at 1:01 PM
Ron Paul v. Obama. Matchup I would like to see most. I know this aint politico, drudge or salon, but it would really spark the most debate on where we are. Dude, our days of spending are over, we need to save money. Giving Jerusalem boatloads of cash to protect them does nothing. Did you know that Israel is the largest beneficiary of U.S aid? And it has the highest (3rd) GDP/ per capita. They buy hellicopters from us. Why dont we give money to someone else? Or atleat ratify kyoto?