The NBA MVP Award Madness Must Stop!
NBA April 18th. 2008, 6:30pm
Thank you, Neal Pollack. Thank you very much. We only know you from what we read about you Gawker, but if you ever see us in any city in America (burbs included!), we owe you a drink. Lists suck. They are lazy. Lists are lame. Still, they happen. Frequently. On the internet. To everyone. Us included. (We made allusion to the incredibly-overhyped MVP race during a Carmelo Anthony rant earlier this week, but mostly, people disagreed with our take on ‘Melo at the WWL, and probably missed it. Sigh.)
NBA playoffs. Right. Cousins of Ron Mexico put it much better than we could (and he ran shit in a Fantasy Hoops League this season), but we’ll throw out our dimestore opinions anyway. For all the hype the Western Conference gets, there will be nary an upset in the first round, and if you really count the Spurs over the Hornets in round two an “upset,” then so be it; the Lakers will reach the Finals. We’ll be pulling for the Suns, and for the first time ever, we might finding ourselves rooting for the Spurs just because we can’t take six weeks of Kobemania. As much as we’d like to take the Jazz at 15:1 to win it all, that’s a waste of money. They don’t play well on the road and there’s no chance of them defeating the Lakers and Spurs/Suns. No shot. A better hole to throw your money into is the Wizards at 50:1. But beating LeBron and then the Celtics sounds mighty difficult. For the naysayers: Washington has much more firepower than the LeBrons, and played above-average in taking three of four from Boston. We do smell upsets by Washington and Toronto in the first round, and think the Celtics will bury the overrated Pistons (Rip ain’t Rip, the bench is untested, Saunders is a terrible postseason coach when it matters) in five to meet the Lakers in the Finals. And Boston raises the banner, against either the Lakers or Spurs, but not the Suns.
29 Responses to “The NBA MVP Award Madness Must Stop!”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

April 18th, 2008 at 6:40 PM
Look at TBL, working late on a Friday.
If I ever find myself rooting for the Spurs I would have to kick my own ass.
April 18th, 2008 at 6:42 PM
I love Slate. It’s my gateway drug into things other than sports.
Why? I don’t know, maybe the unfiltered style of writing that gives readers the impression a real live human wrote the story/column, and the gems it produces: “the ultimate circle-jerk of sports-guy self-regard.”
April 18th, 2008 at 6:52 PM
TBL knows he yearns to be wrapped in a cocoon of Kobemania. I don’t know why he keeps frontin:)
April 18th, 2008 at 6:56 PM
ABK
Anyone But Kobe
April 18th, 2008 at 6:57 PM
“In the 23 years I’ve been an MVP voter,” writes Mike Monroe of the San Antonio Express-News, “there never has been a more difficult choice than that faced by this year’s selection panel.” Fascinating, but I’d prefer to read about a basketball game.
Oh yes. Oh Dear God yes. Fuckin’ A Hell Yeah God Damned right yes.
Anyway this season is a prime example how how screwed up everything becomes when it strays fromt he preordained script that the media has written. If the writers could remove themselves from arguing this irrelevant “well, he didn’t win it yet” bullshit, Chris Paul would probably win. Or at least have a chance.
April 18th, 2008 at 7:04 PM
no more lifetime achievement awards, CP3 4 MVP!!!!!!!
April 18th, 2008 at 7:19 PM
I said something good? CRM 4 MVP!!!
/Who wants a drink?
alumnigonzo@gmail.com
April 18th, 2008 at 7:27 PM
CRM 4 MVP!!!
You may deserve it, but I already decided before this post that TBL was due.
April 18th, 2008 at 7:39 PM
Great article, I was actually going to send a link to alert you of it, but alas, you found it first.
I think that there is enough of a call for these pieces of “journalism” to exist, and I think the blogosphere is a perfect forum for them. The problem arises when these things are then incorporated into “legitimate journalism” like the WWL and spun as a news story. Obviously, debating position and rank is part of what is fun about sports, but for it to exist on a site that claims to be journalistic in nature, a line is crossed.
Obviously, TBL has no vested interest in the rankings of the lakers vs. the hornets vs. the spurs so for him to post a ranking and to then allow us a forum to comment on them is fine. Same thing with the MVP “race” since he (presumably) doesn’t have a vote. The issue here is when ESPN uses these formats to drive viewers to its website and cable channels and magazines; when they create the hype and then provide an outlet for that hype. It seems disingenuous when ESPN does it, but when it’s real fans without sponsership, I have no beef with lists and MVP debates (though you fucking, ohio bastards are driving me up a wall with LeGlobal).
April 18th, 2008 at 7:57 PM
The issue here is when ESPN uses these formats to drive viewers to its website and cable channels and magazines;
Hef,
What makes TBL different from ESPN in this case? Because TBL isn’t on tv? I don’t know if ESPN.com allows comments for their MVP article, but isn’t TBL trying to bring in viewers? Perhaps someone becomes a fan of TBL because they saw the site and see a forum where they can discuss this MVP race. I see no difference.
April 18th, 2008 at 7:58 PM
What makes me frustrated is that they framed it all season as “Kobe is the frontrunner, and Chris Paul is this ’surprise candidate’ who came out of nowhere.” Why was he a so-called “surprise candidate?” Was he complete shit in December and then started averaging a triple-double in February? Or is it because you didn’t even consider him until February because he wasn’t, as I said before, on your script (Kobe, KG, LeBron)? Think about it.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:10 PM
I think that the pundits were just surprised on how CP3 went from pretty darn good to totally badass. People in OKC and NO were maybe in on that, but the rest of us were just catching on.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:17 PM
clown, my only point on that is that if Kobe and CP3 had a level playing field from the beginning of the season–if they had paid attention to the outcomes, highlights, and boxscores from day one instead of overly-relying on ESPN-type spin doctors, CP3 woulnd’t have been that surprise candidate.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:17 PM
Lists are, for all intents and purposes, the beauty of sports. Without lists, what would we even talk about?
If not for MVP races, BCS rankings, strength of schedule rankings, et al., what the fuck would we talk (argue) about?
April 18th, 2008 at 8:21 PM
If the Hornets would ever get on TNT as much as the Lakers it woulda been a no brainer
April 18th, 2008 at 8:24 PM
@gonzo: to be honest i think TBL could care less about the number of viewers. If it were just him and CRM making each other laugh, he’d probably be fine with it.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:26 PM
@hef: that’s the beauty of this site, we haven’t seen the sell out from TBL
April 18th, 2008 at 8:27 PM
How ’bout this as a compromise? ESPN can talk all they want about these lists and debates, but only after they show every NBA highlight. That includes Memphis/Minnesota. After all, it is a sports highlights show.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:27 PM
@nick: i agree. Lists are fun. But they’re not newsworthy, esp at a site like espn where the impartiality flows like PBR at .50 pitcher night at the college pub.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:35 PM
Of course he’d be fine with it. But I imagine he’d have to get a 9-5 job in order to maintain the site. Cuz has his own site, and he writes for this site. But he writes it while at his regular job.
I know ESPN is hated right now. But let’s not forget the reasons. I remember when they just reported the scores and highlights. Now it’s a friggin circus to get thru a show. Who’s Now and stupid roundtable discussions that should be reserved for other hours of the day are crammed into the 90 minute sportscenter everyone on the planet watches. Chad Johnson and T.O. get more face time because of their soap opera antics than their actual football skills, and this eats up time they could be showing me highlights of the NHL (Remember them ESPN?). Minutes of time spent on interviews with so called experts that are not news. Yeah I can log on to the dot com to get quick scores and even highlights. But I just wanna sit back and watch some sports news. Remember when Dan Patrick and Keith Olberman and Bob Ley and Tom Mees and Charlie Steiner and Craig Kilborn were our best friends? They didn’t even TRY to be, yet we loved them so much. ESPN is just corny anymore. Just gimme the damn score!
April 18th, 2008 at 8:42 PM
Here’s why I think lists are useless:
a) they’re arbitrary
2) they try to shut out all meaningful debate
D) anyone can do one
April 18th, 2008 at 8:43 PM
@gonzo: i think we’re agreeing. I too miss those times and hate the circus. But some people want the circus. I don’t think ESPN should paint itself as both serious and NOW. I think blogs can provide the parts that people want that don’t belong on a serious sports show.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:45 PM
Wow clown. +1.
April 18th, 2008 at 8:52 PM
I haven’t watched in Sportscenter in years. No lie. What does it have that ESPNEWS or Yahoo! Scores doesn’t? Nothing of use.
BTW, clown has been bringing the funny all week. I give him the TBL Commenter of the Week Award.
April 18th, 2008 at 9:13 PM
I would sell out so fast Bill Simmons would blush.
April 18th, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Usually selling out isn’t a conscious decision. It kinda happens gradually.
April 18th, 2008 at 11:43 PM
Sorry I took a powder there. Phils disappoint once again.
April 19th, 2008 at 1:02 AM
Oh…well…just give me some money
April 19th, 2008 at 10:01 AM
I would respect that article much more if he asked the players about their thoughts on such things. Maybe Olajuwon on losing the vote to Robinson.