The Spurs, Math, and Titles in Odd-Numbered Years
NBA, Numbers May 16th. 2008, 2:15pm
Max Wasserman, the numbers fanatic from Cornell who earlier this week broke down college football, today takes a stab at the NBA. The Spurs have won four NBA titles in the brief 32-year history of the franchise. Here’s what’s quirky – they’ve all come in odd-numbered years. What are the odds? No, really, how random is that? Incredibly. Max breaks out a calculator after the jump.
After crunching the numbers on college football my last post, this post I worked on something a little more in-season. As we all know, the San Antonio Spurs have won four NBA Championships in their 32-year history, all of which came in the last 10 years and all of which occurred in odd-numbered years. TBL was pondering what is the probability of this happening randomly. Well, with the semester over and the Nationals recent dominance of the Mets putting me in a positive mood, I set to working on the problem.
First, assuming 32 seasons, (the Spurs’ tenure in the NBA) and an equal chance for each team to win an NBA title in each year. With these parameters it turns out the expected probability of winning at least one NBA title with all titles coming in odd-numbered years to be 24.86% (variance 0.044). Of course, that includes the situation that a team wins one NBA title in an odd-numbered year. Keeping with the Spurs motif, the expected probability of winning at least four NBA titles, all in odd-numbered years, to be 0.14% (variance 6.61*10^-5).
But as we all know, NBA teams do not all have equal chances of winning an NBA title, no matter how much Pacers fans may hope. So I changed the parameters of the situation, this time looking at 11 seasons (Tim Duncan’s time in the NBA) and a more Spurs-appropriate probability for an NBA title each year (12.5%). With these parameters in place, the expected probability of winning at least four NBA titles, all in odd-numbered years, to be 0.049% (variance 7.05*10^-6). Not very likely at all (duh).
There you have it. The expected probability of a Spurs-with-Tim-Duncan-quality team winning at least four titles in 11 years with all titles coming in odd-numbered years and everything being random: 0.049%.
Do you have any other random/intriguing/pointlessly intriguing sports probability problems? Such as an expected value of how many appearances until Aaron Heilman doesn’t ruin a game for the Mets?
30 Responses to “The Spurs, Math, and Titles in Odd-Numbered Years”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

May 16th, 2008 at 2:20 PM
0.049%
So you’re saying there’s a chance!
/sorry bad joke not made better by acknowledging it but, eh.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:20 PM
Those are the type of pictures Buzz Bissinger doesn’t want posted. Who cares if TD is gay.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:21 PM
didudidudu pop! … you just blew my mind!
May 16th, 2008 at 2:22 PM
Numbers? Who has time for numbers!?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:24 PM
@Max Wasserman: At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:24 PM
LOL! I didn’t pay attention is stats 101 in college, and I didn’t do any better here, either. But that line caught my eye!
May 16th, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Damn Nick, how do you really feel?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Yeah this might be the stupidest waste of time I have ever seen.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:28 PM
Sorry August, but the phrase “how do you really feel” (said sarcastically) is an exhausted meme. We’re cutting edge here at the 3 letter. w00t!!!11!!11one!!111!!!eleven!!!!111!!
May 16th, 2008 at 2:28 PM
What are the chances that the PM roundup will be someone with
big titscurves rather than some skinny chick?May 16th, 2008 at 2:31 PM
I’m rooting for TBL to hop in the way-back machine and give us some vintage Tara Reid.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:33 PM
Does TBL accept requests for Roundups? I’d vote for some Nicole Kidman. Class this place up a bit.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:33 PM
@ clown, Curves?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:34 PM
@Nick: Don’t know if you watched Scrubs last night but it was one of the ones with Tara Reid in it. Damn.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
I did. Same episode twice in the last week actually.
Different stations, though.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
@ Hef
Any others I should avoid?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
I’d take requests for the Round girl. has to be a file and not a link though. And nothing that will get me fired.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
triston, now you’re talking!
/jayski commenter
May 16th, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Rihanna, Ronald.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Pic needs to be submitted. I’m always open to suggestions.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:37 PM
Rihanna, nice choice. I’ll have to fire up the Hot 100 list. As an aside, how the hell did Taylor Swift make that list? So overrated.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:39 PM
What’s the probability that a woman Travis Henry has sex with doesn’t get pregnant?
May 16th, 2008 at 2:39 PM
Nick, you mean this Tara Reid. (SFW, Bikini)
Step away from the plastic surgeon.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:39 PM
Someone will have to submit it for me. I don’t have email.
/Jayski commenter
//Clown joke stealer
May 16th, 2008 at 2:45 PM
Nick P. – I use that Billy Madison quote all the time at work when someone starts rambling.
I choose BUSINESS ETHICS.
May 16th, 2008 at 2:45 PM
/Made more “today.”
May 16th, 2008 at 2:57 PM
Good post, dude. I barely passed statistics. Least favorite class. But much more entertaining when someone does the work for me.
May 16th, 2008 at 3:15 PM
Just for the record, yes I know it’s pointless. Yes, I know it’s a waste of time. But…um…I got nothing.
May 16th, 2008 at 3:41 PM
That pic is “Too Close for Comfort” for my taste
:: As they Look Lovingly into each others eyes during a Mutually-Shared Embrace ::
May 16th, 2008 at 4:59 PM
So…….Many…….Numbers……I ca…….I can’t………take it……
/Overload