Was this a case of the young, vibrant Lakers rallying behind an energized crowd, or the elderly Spurs just tiring in the second half, 48 hours after closing out the Hornets on the road? Or, we could all just blame the early 6 p.m. tipoff, which was necessary to appease the large segment of East Coast viewers.

Trailing by 20 in the third quarter, Kobe took over, scoring 25 of his 27 points in the second half as the Lakers refused to relinquish home court advantage. The painfully obvious question: Why were the Spurs so adamant not to double-team Kobe Bryant?

He’s the second-best player in the league, he can take anyone off the dribble and he’s got a deadly jumper, yet the Spurs elected to defend him with just one player. There was no scheming – no instant double teams, no trapping, no collapsing of the defense when he cleaved into the lane. Mostly, it was Bruce Bowen who drew the assignment; occasionally, Manu Ginobili gave it a whirl. When Kobe had a mere two points after a passive first half, you know Bowen went into the locker room, his ego swelling like a self-inflating raft, and maintained that he could defend Kobe.

So when Kobe spearheaded a 14-0 run in the third quarter, why were the Spurs so stubborn? Derek Fisher was struggling, and so was Lamar Odom, so why not force those guys to make a shot? Want to know why the Celtics ultimately were successful in sending LeBron James home early for the summer? He was constantly suffocated by defenders, and forced to settle for long jumpers or heavily contested shots in the clogged lane. Bowen’s a top-notch defender, but the thought that he could contain Kobe for an entire game is patently absurd.

Despite the second half collapse, the Spurs had a chance to win late, but Ginobili’s three – a good look – misfired. Any Hornets fans who were watching surely were asking: How do the Spurs shoot 12-for-28 from three in game seven, and go to LA and only make 5-for-20 from downtown?