Sizing Up the US National Soccer Team
Soccer July 2nd. 2008, 12:00pm
Buoyed by all the fun we had with Euro 2008, the soccer posts keep on comin’. Yesterday, we asked Tyler Duffy of The Odds and Sods to pick the World’s Best 11, today, we begin an exercise that we hope to revisit periodically over the next two years: Picking the US National team. The talent pool has gotten considerably deeper in the wake of the disaster that was the 2006 World Cup. As club play heats up, we hope to revisit this every other month.
GK: Tim Howard (Everton, England) There is one position the U.S. have tremendous depth. Unfortunately, it’s at goalkeeper. Of the many viable candidates, Howard has to be the choice. He has consistently been one of the top goalkeepers, both statistically and through spoken word, in the Premier League. He would be first choice for nearly any country.
DL: Jonathan Bornstein (Chivas USA, MLS) Bornstein was the MLS Rookie of the Year in 2006 and is exceedingly skillful for a left back, having been a forward in college. Recovering from a knee injury right now, he will probably be first choice over Heath Pearce when healthy. He’s also a strong candidate to make the jump across the pond, possibly to Israeli club Maccabi Haifa. He needs to score a screamer from long range, so I can start referring to him as the Hebrew Hammer.
DC: Oguchi Onyewu (Standard Liege, Belgium) “The Gooch†has been one of the best players in Belgian League (although it is the Belgian League). He attracted the interest of top European clubs before an underwhelming loan performance at Newcastle two seasons ago, where he gave up free kicks as often as Jay Mariotti bleats. He has his weaknesses as a player, but he is big (6′4†200lbs).
DC: Carlos Bocanegra (Rennes, France) The Kickette favorite was a longtime fixture at the back for Fulham U.S.A. He’s not particularly brilliant but has competent experience playing at a top level in Europe. And, unlike most of the U.S. strikers, he’s frisky in front of goal (9 goals in 58 matches for the U.S.)
DR: Steve Cherundolo (Hannover 96, Germany) Cherundolo is solid, stable and experienced, having played 250 matches and serving as a vice-captain for his German club. He’s probably the best option.
ML: DaMarcus Beasley (Glasgow Rangers, Scotland) Beasley was playing well for Scottish side Rangers (including a spectacular performance against Lyon in the Champions League) before a knee injury in November kept him out for nearly the entire rest of the season. He should feature in the starting XI through 2010, provided he regains his pre-injury form.
M: Freddy Adu (Benfica, Portugal) Free from the overinflated expectations that branded him a failure before his 18th birthday, Adu has quietly thrived for the U.S. U-20 National Team and Portuguese side Benfica. Left languishing stupidly on the wing, he now plays a natural central role that maximizes his creativity and on the ball talents. He may not be the christened superstar, but can still be quite good.
DM: Michael Bradley (Herenveen, Netherlands) The coach’s son is coming off a terrible run of games for the national team where he plays a more defensive role. But, he was co-leading scorer for Herenveen last season with 15 goals (most of any American player in a top European league ever), so he has talent that should come through for the red, white and blue.
MR: Clint Dempsey (Fulham, England) When not busting rhymes or putting caps in peoples’ asses, “Deuce†has endeared himself to Fulham USA fans, notably for scoring the $60 million goal that saved them from relegation two seasons ago. He was Fulham’s top scorer last season, but that was with six goals.
AM: Landon Donovan (L.A. Galaxy, MLS) Landon “Landycakes†Donovan, king of the self-imposed fishbowl, is a bellwether for American fortunes. When they made the quarterfinals in 2002, he was the best young player of the tournament. When they withdrew meekly in 2006, he was arguably the worst player in the tournament. The most gifted American to date, he must mature past the delicate part of his genius, or, to be blunt, grow a pair.
F: Jozy Altidore (Villarreal, Spain) To make true progress internationally, the U.S. need a top-level goal scorer. With a $10 million investment, Spanish runner-up Villarreal think Jozy may be just that. He could thrive in Spain and be the next big thing, or he could flop miserably. The U.S. will have to hope it is the former, otherwise more Eddie Johnson!
This guy will emphasize how difficult the 2010 qualification will be, but it would be a Troy-scale disappointment of the U.S. failed to qualify. Their advancement once they arrive will depend on whether they discover a consistent goal scoring threat.
If anyone from Nike is reading this, someone should have to score goals regularly to pull off bright yellow or orange shoes.
35 Responses to “Sizing Up the US National Soccer Team”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

July 2nd, 2008 at 12:04 pm
USA! USA!
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:04 pm
Rumors persist that Jagr might return to Pittsbugh. This would be even worse than David Lee Roth reuniting with Van Halen.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:06 pm
But where’s the NHL free agency post?
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Awesome breakdown TBL.
US Soccer had targeted 2010 as their time to break through and challenge. The likelihood of that is slim, but the team ought to be better than it was in 2006 when they found out they weren’t as good as they thought they were.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Why does the US only play with one forward? Shouldn’t we be more offensively aggressive and go with 4-4-2 instead of a 4-1-3-1-1?
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:08 pm
It’s encouraging that there are so many young players in this. I doubt we’ll make much noise in 2010, but at least half this starting lineup will easily still be in their prime for 2014.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:13 pm
after every WC, it’s “wait til the next WC! The US will roll!” I’m not buying it until they actually show up. WC ‘02 was great and a boost, but the terrible showing in ‘06 pretty much negated it. My prediction again: the US will roll through qualifying causing the hype to be more than deserved, then barely get through the first round (most likely advancing due to dependance on another team losing), only to be shut out in the second round.
It’s science.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
I like telling my soccer crazy friend that 02 was all luck for the US. Pisses him off every time.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
What teams would challenge the US’s chances of qualifying? just the teams in CONCACAF? because there don’t seem to be too many teams from N. America that threaten us. sucks to be England and have to qualify against other Euro teams
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm
I think they go with the CAM and one striker mainly because it’s Donovan’s best position and they don’t have enough consistent strikers to do anything else.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:20 pm
I’m with Mike.
Soccer again?? UGHHH! I demand a hockey free agency post!!!!!!!!!
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:25 pm
The US is currently ranked 30th by FIFA.
I don’t anticipate any excitement from the squad in 2010. I just don’t see the talent to make it happen.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
GYD – Sounds a lot like what folks were saying in 2001/2002.
Hockey’s coming, folks. Patience
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Hockey’s coming, folks. Patience
hopefully tomorrow
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:32 pm
@cbh: There was some luck in 2002, mostly that we drew Mexico in the knockout stages. There’s probably not another team in the World Cup that we’re more familiar with, and I think that helped.
That said, though, we were tremendously unlucky against Germany… Kahn was inhuman in that game, and if they had had any other keeper, we’d have won it.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:33 pm
The lock out is almost over!?
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm
Wings signed Hossa….
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Damnit.
July 2nd, 2008 at 12:54 pm
He signed a one year contract. Putz.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:23 pm
Holy shit, he seriously signed with the Wings? Where did you see this?! Wow! The Wings are going to win the Stanley Cup again next year! Fucking awesome!
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:28 pm
we should be speculating on the U23 team we’re taking to the Olympics and the three over 23’s we can bring.
Howard, Onyewu, Landycakes
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I want to see more Freddy Adu. He is one of, if not the only player who looks like he has the ability and balls to go at players. The one thing the U.S. has never had is a dynamic, playmaking middie. I also want to see more from Benny Feilhaber. He looks like he has the talent to really help this team but he comes and goes a little too much.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Mizerle,
The problem is who do you put up top? Everybody is expecting big things from Jozy (and I think he is more than capable), but he is still relatively new to the international scene (at least in regards to the senior squad).
If we do pencil him in there, in a 4-4-2, who do you match him with? Eddie Johnson desperately needs to regain his form this upcoming season with Fulham. Brian Ching is streaky at best and invisible at worst.
I could see putting Dempsey up top with Jozy, maybe moving Landon over to the right side of the midfield and letting Freddy pull the strings in the center of the pitch, but that then puts a lot of pressure on Michael Bradley as a defensive midfielder playing behind either Freddy or Landon.
As far as the US has come in regards to world soccer, there are still more questions than answers for our team thus far.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:36 pm
I think there are two reasons for that.
First, the U.S. doesn’t have enough striking talent to justify a straight 4-4-2. They have a large number of players who are tweeners between forward and midfield (Donovan, Adu, Dempsey). Playing a five man midfield maximizes their ability to attack from multiple angles and with different personnel.
Two, the straight 4-4-2 is outdated. Even the so-called attacking Spain, played a 4-1-3-1-1. The presence of the holding midfielder allows the others the freedom to go forward, adding extra angles for attacking.
Roma actually have dispensed with the striker all together and play an attacking 4-6-0 formation with different players going forward at different times. They are one of the most fun teams to watch in all of European soccer.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:46 pm
sportsgal-Hossa signs with Wings
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:50 pm
I agree, the reason we play one striker isn’t because we want to be defensive, it’s because we only have one decent one, and our midfielders are too good to be dropped for a bad 2nd striker. EJ continues to flop against high quality opponents (and dominate CONCACAF), so at this point I think Jozy is the one forward we can rely on for 2010. Hopefully EJ steps up and becomes what his talent will let him, but I wouldn’t bank on it at this point.
I kinda disagree about Bornstien vs. Pierce for left back. Pierce looked good vs. the big 3, and while Bornstein also looked good vs. Argentina in the Copa America a while back, I feel like his ceiling isn’t as high as Pierce’s. Honestly, Pierce reminds me of a young ‘Dolo. I think that’ll be a interesting fight for who starts, regardless of who wins.
Also, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Jonathan Spector make a push to be included in the backline.
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Good lineup TBL. I think I would rather have Pearce for Bornstein right now though. As for the 4-4-2 people, which attacking midfielder would you take off for one of the “couldn’t score in a brothel” strikers? You have to play to your strengths and minimize your weaknesses. For the US, the biggest weakness is up front.
I also don’t think Altidore will be as disappointing as Johnson…you can see the difference in their on-field attitudes. Altidore is fiery and intense, whereas Johnson barely looks bothered to be out there at all.
July 2nd, 2008 at 2:03 pm
To be fair – I was trying to project forward to 2010 based on how things were going now. Fair point on Pearce, I went back and forth on that.
verbal – I like Altidore as well. I am just worried about how well he will do in Spain. It might have been more beneficial for him to go somewhere like Netherlands or Germany where they would possibly structure his development a bit better.
July 2nd, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Agreed, I was all for his move to the Yellow Submarine when I thought he was going to be loaned out to a smaller club for a while. Now that I’ve read there’s a chance they might keep him around, I’m a bit more worried about how this will play out for him long term.
And honestly, wtf is going on with Adu at Benfica? In his early time there, he gets sub minutes, scores a few, and as evidenced by his performances for the USMNT and U23’s, develops his game nicely. The team takes a nosedive, and the new coaches don’t play the new kids because the team is in a fight for a champs league spot. That I understand. But everything I read on Benfica boards was of the opinion that Adu would be given significant sub minutes next season. Yet, Benfica picked up another central playmaking midfielder. This can’t be a good sign for Adu.
July 2nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Spain was an odd choice. Unless, I’m mistaken, he’ll be the first outfield player ever to play in La Liga. That, of course, assumes he’ll play. Only time will tell…
July 2nd, 2008 at 4:21 pm
Wayyyy late on this one, but for a 2010 projection I think its spot on. The only change I see possible is if Guisseppi Rossi changes his mind and plays for the US instead of Italy. I don’t believe he has played for the Senior Italian squad, so he should still be eligible for the USMNT since he was born in the States. And if his new teammate Jozy coaxes him into, we could have two top flight strikers who play together for club and country. This would just be too good for the team, and thus there’s no chance it’ll happen though.
July 2nd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Rossi is now ineligible to play for the United States. A player with dual nationality can change his designated country once, provided that he has not appeared in an A-level international and he is not yet 21.
Rossi would be eligible otherwise, but he turned 21 last February.
July 2nd, 2008 at 9:13 pm
I’m hurt you didn’t ask me to do this. This is the focus of my entire blog. Your picks are fine (read: safe). But I have problems with the left and right backs (BTW, what’s an LD? It’s called a left back in my sport). Bornstein is too inconsistent but people think there are no other options there. There is. His name is Marc Burch and he plays for DC United. As for Cherundolo, he’s a bit of a pussy. We need someone quick but strong. There is a lot more to choose from here, but I like Jimmy Conrad of Kansas City. Love the Jozy pick, but I’m worried about his longevity given that he’s struggled to regain his form from last summer. And putting him up there alone is too reminiscent of Steve Sampson and Bruce Arena’s 4-5-1 disasters. If the U.S. runs a 3-5-2, you can drop LD behind Jozy and a target striker like Brian Ching or Kenny Cooper (or my darkhorse candidate Adam Cristman from New England). It leaves a bit vulnerable in the back and forces DaMarcus and Dempsey to play D but it would get Freddy onto the pitch without having to bench Donovan (although I’m not entirely against that idea, either). Well that’s my $1.50. Cheers.
July 3rd, 2008 at 12:49 am
Even the so-called attacking Spain, played a 4-1-3-1-1. The presence of the holding midfielder allows the others the freedom to go forward, adding extra angles for attacking.
Yeah, but only Puyol, Marchena (whoever the center backs are) and Senns are static. Capedvila, Ramos, Xavi, et al. are always attacking. You’re right about the formation; I just think you’re off base by calling Spain a “so called” attacking team. There’s no so-called. They do attack.
July 3rd, 2008 at 12:51 am
One other thing. If the US do play a 4-1-3-1-1, couldn’t Donovan play the role of David Villa. Sure, he wouldn’t play it as well (only Zlatan can compare, and possibly Totti) but isn’t that a possibility?