Mort Tackles a Tough Chat Question
ESPN, Media Gossip/Musings September 18th. 2008, 10:30am
The real NFL battles aren’t waged on the gridiron – but rather on the internet. Jay Glazer (Fox) vs. Peter King (SI, NBC) vs. Mike Silver (Yahoo) vs. the ESPN Armada (Mort, Clayton, Mosley, etc). Which is why we’re shocked this question made it through into Chris Mortensen’s chat yesterday:
Ken (Tarzana, CA): What are your thoughts on ESPN not giving credit to reporters who break stories? Instead giving credit to ESPN reporters who confirm stories. I’ll give you mucho credit if you actually answer this question.
SportsNation Chris Mortensen: Wow, I was looking for that credit. Look, our business has changed dramatically with the immediacy of everything. Sometimes, we’ll get something out over the airwaves first before we ever get it posted on the website. Plus, we don’t have automatic email lists that goes out to different blog sites but there are a lot of good reporters out there doing excellent work. The best thing any reporter can do though is to stick the the standards – it is better to get beat on a story than to compromise the standard. We have worked hard at giving credit when credit is due.
Anyone know if Fox’s Ken Rosenthal lives in Tarzana, California? We kid. But seriously, five years ago, can you imagine anyone even dreaming up this question? Five years ago, the sports blogs were few, Yahoo and Fox weren’t online powerhouses, and it’s not like the media care about such trivial matters.
First Buster Olney and now Mort. Who’s next, Chris Sheridan?
21 Responses to “Mort Tackles a Tough Chat Question”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

September 18th, 2008 at 10:36 AM
He looks sexually confused
/sports hernia
September 18th, 2008 at 10:41 AM
irish is spot on. That, or some other player is running around beating the shit out of some poor cameraman or something and it perplexes mort. He just looks…baffled.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:42 AM
Having a more accountable, or at least well established, organization like ESPN or Yahoo! confirm a story that is just a rumor somewhere else means something to me. However, if they’re confirming something Jay Glazer or another competitor is reporting then that’s weak.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:43 AM
@irish: Awesome.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:45 AM
ESPN doesn’t confirm Mort reports anymore because they always know they’ll have to reneg because he’s always fucking wrong.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Of these stories that are breaking news, 98% are meaningless and only used to promote whoever is breaking the story. It is like at 5:00 every night the local news leads off with “breaking news.” Most of the time it is something stupid like a wreck during rush hour or some school board issue. Technically, yeah, they are giving us breaking news, but it is pointless news.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:45 AM
@ August: The issue is that ESPN will say, “Chris Mortensen is reporting…,” rather than, “Fox Sports’ Jay Glazer reports…” I think there’s a huge difference and one makes ESPN look like they’re the only ones on top of things when they’re not. In other news, the general public doesn’t care about this stuff.
September 18th, 2008 at 10:50 AM
YEA IRISH!
September 18th, 2008 at 10:50 AM
Who gives a shit
September 18th, 2008 at 10:54 AM
I’m not sure if he actually answered the question…
September 18th, 2008 at 10:56 AM
matt jones will be the best WR in the NFL.
/mort
//never, EVER gets old
September 18th, 2008 at 11:01 AM
I understand that, but the questioner was asking about their habit of coming in 30 minutes after a story is broken by Jay Glazer, for example, with a headline that says “ESPN’s Chris Mortensen confirms reports that Bret Favre thinks Peter King uses too much teeth”.
I think that’s unethical, but if the story comes from ‘Pulaski Joe’s blog’ then confirmation from an entity like ESPN feels a little more legitimate.
September 18th, 2008 at 11:05 AM
i wish there was video of this
September 18th, 2008 at 11:12 AM
TBL, still waiting for you to answer my question.
September 18th, 2008 at 11:14 AM
@August – do you know Pulaski Joe? dude’s got major meth-mouth.
/middle Tennessee joke
September 18th, 2008 at 11:24 AM
Holy Fuck Irish…well done..I know you hate them but +JS
September 18th, 2008 at 11:30 AM
miz: true, but I’ll be damned if his tweaky nature doesn’t result in lighting fast injury reports sometimes, and a meth-addict from Pulaski is at least as reliable as Florio from PFT.
September 18th, 2008 at 12:10 PM
TBL, you guys should start to “confirm” stories and treat it like an exclusive just like ESPN… would be somewhat comical.
September 18th, 2008 at 12:13 PM
I dont know if he answered the question either…and can someone over at ESPN help Mort wade through these questions so there aren’t spelling/grammatical errors and typos and so they make sense. Is having a “chat” an excuse for poor grammar and incomprehensible drivel?
September 18th, 2008 at 1:07 PM
Awesome, love that you remember that.
September 18th, 2008 at 4:37 PM
Never understood the whole penis envy over who breaks stories. Nobody is breaking anything.. 90% of the time, it’s a GM who picks up the phone and calls a “safe” reporter to run with the story. Then 10 minutes later, a press release is written.
Big deal.