Whitlock: “Sports media is dying by suicide and ESPN is Dr. Jack Kevorkian. You’re dying, too. ESPN just hasn’t told you yet.”
College Football, ESPN, Jason Whitlock, Media Gossip/Musings November 26th. 2008, 1:30pm
We were all set to run with a 1-liner on KC Star columnist Jason Whitlock calling Ball State’s Nate Davis the “best pro prospect — regardless of position — in the college game.” We chuckled for a moment, but let it slide since Whitlock’s a BSU alum and joyous about the school’s undefeated regular season.
And then Whitlock’s Fox Sports column came out on the same topic … except he took the opportunity to pummel ESPN for its shoddy coverage of Ball State and college football in general. It’s epic Whitlock. The best stuff is reserved for saintly Chris Fowler, who really should step up and tell everyone why he dropped BSU out of his Top 25 last week.
Chris Fowler dropped Ball State out of his AP top-25 ballot last week after the Cardinals beat a then-9-2 Central Michigan team on the road … What Fowler has done is ridiculous and reeks of the kind of simple-minded arrogance that permeates ESPN. Fowler has had his ass kissed for too many years. He travels around the country during football season and everywhere he goes, there’s an Army of BCS sports information directors waiting to kiss his ass and tell him how great “GameDay” is.
He has never been a professional journalist a day in his life. He’s a TV personality. He knows what someone else has told him. I’m not 100 percent sure, but I’d suspect he hasn’t worn a jock since junior high school. This is the combination that is killing the sports media. No journalism background, no real athletic experience and no backbone. No clue. Fowler wouldn’t make a competent blogger … Fowler knows little about football and nothing about Ball State. His celebrity status justifies his AP vote.
This has to be, without question, the harshest ESPN rip-job in quite some time. While we’d like to hear why Fowler dropped Ball State, but we could do without the jock strap imagery, and frankly, we’re not sure how much it matters whether or not Fowler played high school or college sports.
Craig Kilborn was an All-State basketball talent and got a scholarship to Montana State. Does that somehow make his vote (if he had one) more or less credible in the Top 25? Sometimes, we feel sports has too many former athletes behind the mic, and often we find many are partial to teams and friends and perhaps not as critical as the need to be. (Jerome Bettis, Dan Marino and Howie Long are too kind; Tiki Barber is not.) For instance, Jay Bilas is terrific on college hoops, and rarely holds back. CBS will miss Billy Packer’s unbiased analysis (though mid-major fans won’t). And other than the Ball State ranking gaffe, we have enjoyed much of Fowler’s commentary on Gameday.
It’s times like these that you just know ESPN corner offices are whispering, “Damn, how do we get this guy on our side?” Here’s more of Whitlock’s browbeating of ESPN:
ESPN is so financially tied to the organizations it covers and so devoid of basic journalistic ethics that it cannot properly analyze the sports world. ESPN just bought the BCS television package. It has a vested interest in promoting all things BCS.
If you’re going to televise multiple Big 12 games in primetime on ABC and ESPN, you have every reason to promote the myth that the majority of Heisman Trophy candidates play in the Big 12.
Hey, that’s something we asked about last week!
The story ESPN doesn’t want you to know (Fox Sports)
* That’s Whitlock on the right with the shades on his head. His buddy, JA Adande, is on the left. Photo taken by a reader in Vegas during a summer league hoops game.
86 Responses to “Whitlock: “Sports media is dying by suicide and ESPN is Dr. Jack Kevorkian. You’re dying, too. ESPN just hasn’t told you yet.””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

November 26th, 2008 at 1:37 PM
considering Whitlock’s roasting of Fowler, that’s a burn on bloggers too, if I’m not mistaken.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:38 PM
Man’s a hero, straight-up.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:40 PM
Didn’t ESPN show Ball State’s last two games? What the hell, man, how much FCS dick-sucking does one need?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:41 PM
if you’re fowler, do you somehow defend your logic for yanking ball state?
and the shit about the Ball State-CMU announcer … that’s laughable
November 26th, 2008 at 1:43 PM
That was a really long and really bad article, just ranting and raving against the establishment. Ball State sucks, has 0 fans, and 0 national interest, why the hell would espn want to talk about them.
I know we all love Whitlock, but that was crap.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:43 PM
how the hell can you hate chris fowler?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:44 PM
“All who believe a pursuit of the truth is the lifeblood of a genuinely free society must stand against the Wal-Mart-ization of sports journalism.”
/ From Whitlock’s fox sports column, but could double as TBL’s tagline, or somewhere in the “About The Big Lead” section.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:44 PM
Lance, how was that wedding? snag any poon?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:47 PM
I agree with Whitlock that ESPN and the Gameday crew essentially determine who is going to win the Hesiman trophy every year. I also think the current BCS setup is specifically designed to minimize impact of so called mid majors from interfering with tOSU, Tex, OU, Florida, LSU, and USC playing for the championship each year. Utah, Boise State, and Ball State have all had terrific years and deserve a shot to play for a BCS championship.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Also, Nate Davis is a stud QB and should be the 2nd QB taken (Bradford first) in next years draft.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:50 PM
coop,was that sarcasm?
i mean, in a roundabout way … isn’t what ESPN is doing to the Cleveland the Knicks exactly what whitlock is talking about that’s happening in college football?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:51 PM
wtf?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:51 PM
What is up with the constant Jay Bilas stroke-job? He is AWFUL…constantly and needlessly defending his cronies (he may not “hold back”, but he constantly promotes his buddies). His ridiculous defense of Tommy Amaker, and blatant begging for Michigan to make the 2006 tourney was one of the least professional things I’ve ever seen.
Fact is, I know very few people (both in person and in cyberspace) who think Bilas is worth a crap.
He sucks. Fowler is 80,000 times better.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:52 PM
@ benji: I ended up hitting on a bridesmaid who I later found out was married.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:53 PM
Fowler is one of the few sane people at ESPN. Stupid target.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:53 PM
Also, Bilas is a notorious mid-major devaluer. Why would anybody think he’s good?
November 26th, 2008 at 1:54 PM
I think I found out why TBL really linked this story.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:55 PM
For Whitlock to call out Fowler for a lack of athletic endeavors is hilarious. At this point in their lives, at least Fowler doesn’t need an assistant to aim his dick or tie his shoes.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:56 PM
@coop — You’re missing the point. The Ball State’s of the world have no chance of their story being told when their is a single source for national media coverage, and that source chooses to ignore them.
That the same entity has a vested interest in ignoring the Ball State’s of the world in order to promote it’s own financial interests makes it borderline criminal, and is why Whitlock is clearly going for the kill.
@Jay V — I love Bilas. Now you know one more person in cyberspace who thinks he’s worth a crap.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:56 PM
This is a guy who is shamelessly shilling for his alma mater the same way he carries around the jock strap of Jeff George. I guess he’s just upset that he doesn’t have the influence to have people kiss his ass in order to help out his school or girl. Rage Against The Machine.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:56 PM
I was thinking the same thing since last year an 9-3 SEC QB won it, especially considering CBS has the main SEC football contract.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:57 PM
No sarcasm, that article was crap. His argument was garbage. ESPN has been stroking Big 12 Qb’s because they have been playing amazing, not because of a conspiracy. Espn doesn’t talk about Ball State because they aren’t very good and have 0 national interest.
“Ball State is the most disciplined, well-coached team in college football. Check the stats. The Cardinals almost never get penalized. We’re the least flagged team in the nation. We’re in the top 20 in the country in turnover margin. Someone like Chris Fowler can’t grasp how that helps you win football games. No penalties, no turnovers and Nate Davis are how Ball State would beat the ACC or Big East champions, teams that will play in BCS bowl games.”
VOMIT
November 26th, 2008 at 1:59 PM
Do you think Whitlock started throwing things when he found out about Fowler’s ballot? Did he spit out his food? Punch something? I would like to know.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:59 PM
@sportsdork…noted. But could you explain why? As far as I am concerned, he is a posterboy for just what Whitlock is railing against.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:59 PM
yeah, we’ve been over the Bilas/Amaker thing here before. when calling games, though, i like his honesty.
i still think the premise for this column is accurate, but the message will get lost in the over-the-top hammering. it was like he was aiming for a small village with a bomb … and then just nuked the entire country, sparing nobody.
November 26th, 2008 at 1:59 PM
Funny, its on ESPN’s main page right now complete with a Pat Forde write up and video highlights. Average team beats crappy teams, goes to bowl game. Wow, what a story.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Coop — How much national interest any team or athlete has is directly proportional to how much ESPN shows you on TV. That’s the point you’re missing.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:01 PM
I’d have to say Whitlock got it dead right in this article.
How many times has ESPN had some celebrity, like will ferrell, come on sportscenter in a USC sweatshirt to do an interview? It hasn’t been about sports for a long time now and it’s always refreshing to see someone put that commentary out there.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:02 PM
i mean, in a roundabout way … isn’t what ESPN is doing to the Cleveland the Knicks exactly what whitlock is talking about that’s happening in college football?
Agreed. That would have made it a much better argument. Now, it’s Whitlock shilling for Ball State.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:02 PM
“Ball State would beat the ACC or Big East champions, teams that will play in BCS bowl games.€
Maybe. But the fact is, ESPN is not jocking either of those conferences right now, either.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:04 PM
ESPN made Will Ferrell put on a USC sweatshirt?
November 26th, 2008 at 2:04 PM
@TBL…I will concede that Bilas is OK when he is actually announcing a game. It’s his in-studio commentary that annoys the shit out of me.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:06 PM
“Coop — How much national interest any team or athlete has is directly proportional to how much ESPN shows you on TV. That’s the point you’re missing.”
That statement lacks much merit…Ball State has been on an ESPN network 5 times this year.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:07 PM
No, its directly proportional to the number of graduates (small), the city/state the school is located in (small), and the name recognition quotient (small). Ball State is a nobody.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:09 PM
Who doesn’t know the difference between Jason Whitlock and JA Adande?
November 26th, 2008 at 2:12 PM
Imagine that; a national network basing it’s programming on national interest. Local networks base their programming on………local interest.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:14 PM
I’ll say it…
Nate Davis > Terrell Pryor
November 26th, 2008 at 2:14 PM
did they stop selling ultra slim fast in kansas city?
November 26th, 2008 at 2:17 PM
I am a huge Whitlock fan but I think he overdid it on this one. On a personal note, Fowler is one of the only ESPN cronies that I enjoy listening to/watching.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:18 PM
id agree with that…
but TERRELLE Pryor > Nate Davis
November 26th, 2008 at 2:19 PM
I find it ironic that Whitlock uses the “you never played the game so you don’t understand” line on Fowler considering how upset media members get when athletes use it on them.
Whitlock is turning into a caricature of himself.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:21 PM
baloney. there are another national outlets not to mention countless websites/blogs out there with zero affiliation to bspn.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:21 PM
When people talk about ESPN why do they also forget that its a business? ESPN’s primary goal is to make money. Period. Nobody gives a shit about Ball State, which is why we don’t hear too much about them. There, that’s your answer — stop complaining now.
And Whitlock is ripping into Fowler (probably one of the five best ESPN TV guys there is, up there w/ Wingo, Van Pelt, Ravech, and Reece) because he didn’t play college football? Has Jason Whitlock ever familiarized himself with the term “TV anchor.” Their job is to host the show. That’s it. Fowler does it great.
Oh, and do you think the fact that ESPN canned Whitlock plays any factor in his animosity toward them?
November 26th, 2008 at 2:26 PM
but TERRELLE Pryor > Nate Davis
Ok. I can’t spell. Still, no chance that TerrellE is better than Nate Davis right now, or ever if we’re only focusing on throwing the ball. Davis has an excellent arm.
Spencer, I said it more than anything just to piss you off.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:29 PM
illformula. you should set your goals higher.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:30 PM
Hostng Scholastic Sports America doesn’t count as journalism?
November 26th, 2008 at 2:30 PM
@Mike NYC — A business’s job is to make money? Really? How enlightening.
Who the hell is arguing that ESPN isn’t a business. The problem, as Whitlock sees it, is that this business has no competition. To compound things, this business has a massive conflict of interest. It is essentially the sole national voice in covering sports. But it also has a financial interest in promoting certain pieces of the sports world.
I find that undeniable. That ESPN has managed to get to this point is a testament to the people who run the company — if they set out to take over the sports world they have succeeded.
That doesn’t mean it’s good for us fans.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:31 PM
I’d also venture to say that teams like Ball State gain more exposure than they normally would because national outlets are always looking for that one mid major on a good run to hype up in order to make the annual argument against the BCS.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:31 PM
I love Whitlock.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:32 PM
ill…sorry, i get worked up easily.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:33 PM
i like whitlock and fowler.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:33 PM
@clown,
Now, ESPN2 has broadcast Ball State’s last four games. The first game I believe Lou Holtz and Mark May provided the color commentary. It was their first real look at Davis, and they were appropriately complimentary and a bit guarded. The second game was against Miami of Ohio and a non-descript B team called the game.
The last two games were against Central Michigan and Western Michigan, two top-40-caliber squads who provided the Cardinals legitimate tests. Ray Bentley, an all-time great at CMU, a former NFL linebacker and a passionate follower of MAC football, was the color commentator.
Unfortunately, ESPN did not require Bentley to leave his Central Michigan pom poms at home. Nor did the network force Bentley to disclose all pertinent information, such as the fact that his son is a walk-on member of the CMU football team and that the Ball State coaching staff declined to offer Bentley’s kid a scholarship despite Bentley’s request.
If the viewers knew all the relevant information coloring Ray’s commentary, then they probably would’ve understood why Bentley spent the entire Ball State-CMU broadcast pretending that CMU’s outstanding MAC quarterback, Dan Lefevour, was on the same level as Ball State’s once-in-a-lifetime passer.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:34 PM
easy on the bold…that text is now branded into my retinas.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
@Coop — FYI. Ball State is by no means a small school. Almost 20,000 undergrads.
Muncie, Indiana is as big or bigger than East Lansing, bigger than Champaign and Urbana combined.
So those facts are irrelevant. Obviously I’m not advocating that Ball State should get as much consistent coverage as Michigan St or Illinois.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:36 PM
It’s a good column.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:36 PM
anyone that confuses bspn with journalism is a fool.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:39 PM
Nice job missing his point and not getting his sense of humor. It’s common knowledge, albeit not your own, that his affinity for Jeff George has transformed into a self parody in recent years. Although for years George was the most talented unemployed QB walking the streets.
This article didn’t come off as whiny at all, he hit several nails on the head and is clearly one of the few writers saying what he’s saying about ESPN. It’s become the MTV of sports, and look at how MTV killed the music business. Like music, ESPN has made sports about hype, glitz, appointing pseduo-legends and sensationalizing everything it gets its hands on. It’s even tried to make stars out of the people who read the highlights every night. ESPN is Hoke and the sports world is Miss Daisy, being driven around like a fish on a hook that can’t get away, and Rage Against The Machine is exactly what people like myself are happy to see Whitlock do, even if it is inspired by a little alma mater love.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:40 PM
Hating Chris Fowler is like hating baby ducks.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:40 PM
Jason Whitlock needs more Beaker in his life.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:41 PM
okay, they showed more games than I thought. My point remains – they are lucky to get the coverage that they did. No one gives a fuck about the MAC. Armanti Edwards for the Heisman. App State played a tougher sked, anyways.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Nobody. But you’re crying about the fact that they’re a successful one, aren’t you, to the “detriment” of poor college football fans?
Again, ESPN can and does choose to cover whoever the hell they want. It’s not “borderline criminal,” it’s smart business. So please, stop the whining about Ball State not being able to “have their story told.” Start up your own media company and tell it yourself if you so wish.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:45 PM
How much national interest any team or athlete has is directly proportional to how much ESPN shows you on TV
Yeah, because UConn was an elite NCAA sports program before ESPN moved down the street from them.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:55 PM
His affinity for Jeff George “transformed” into a self parody in recent year? From where did it transform? It transformed from him actually shilling for Jeff George for years. His article was nothing but whiny as much as all this talk about how ESPN is the evil empire. It’s a sports network, and sports anchors tend to be entertaining. From a guy who grew up watching Warner Wolf in New York with his over the top reading of sports, to Jerry Girard with his sarcasm, to George Michael and the late Glenn Brenner in DC, sportscasters have always been entertaining, why? Because it’s friggin sports, not war, not poverty, not murder, but SPORTS.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:58 PM
UConn success has nothing to do with being in the Big East and eventually Calhoun becoming the coach.
November 26th, 2008 at 2:58 PM
Darrell you ain’t gettin it, but that’s ok.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:01 PM
Their shtick stopped being funny years ago. Now we have to put up with it because we don’t have much of an alternative if we want to watch sports on television.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:03 PM
UConn success has nothing to do with being in the Big East and eventually Calhoun becoming the coach.
Calhoun would have moved on years ago if UConn was the program it was before ESPN existed. Same for Geno Auriemma.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:04 PM
I agree with everything you wrote. Still, do you really blame ESPN for doing this if it has proven successful for them?
November 26th, 2008 at 3:04 PM
I got it. I just ain’t buyin it.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:06 PM
Based on the numbers they’re drawing and the lack of competition, I would say this is a relatively isolated opinion.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:07 PM
How about maybe Fowler FORGOT about Ball State. It happens. Look at the ballots of coaches and the AP, sometimes they leve teams off because they do it too quick. Fowler is amazing at his job and Whitlock is a clown. Ball State has been on TV the last 3 games and will be on again in the MAC title game.
By the way about Bilas. He’s not anti mid major, he’s anti the notio that the mid major gets credit for beating a low BCS school (i.e. Rutgers, FSU) and the majors get no credit for that. The man has a point. And last year he championed more mid majors getting into the NCAA tournament. so if your beef is with something he did two years ago then you need to look at the whole picture.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:10 PM
MTV developed illegal file-sharing and perfected archaic business methods?
November 26th, 2008 at 3:12 PM
The real question is whether or not their will be heat on some of these teams to up their schedules in future years, or are they conceding that it’s a once in a lifetime season and they can’t compete with the big boys (Utah notwithstanding..they scheduled Michigan when UM was Michigan).
November 26th, 2008 at 3:13 PM
Based on the numbers they’re drawing and the lack of competition, I would say this is a relatively isolated opinion.
I bet you many people would change the channel if they had the chance. It’s a shame Fox Sports is dropping the ball with their national sports news alternative. I’d watch it if a) I knew when it was on, and b) it wasn’t preempted half the time down here for a Rockets or Stars game.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:17 PM
mike nyc – you would make a great corporate lackey. or white house press secretary.
if it’s good for the company, you see no reason to consider anything or anyone else.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:24 PM
Sportsdork, have you ever heard of a little thing called shareholders? Jesus. They are in business for themselves and the people who buy their stock. Why is this so confusing for you to grasp? You must still be in high school.
I mean, ESPN should adjust their programming to please a few crybabies on a sports blog. Much better approach.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:25 PM
I think the answer to ESPN’s tyranny is government intervention.
/sportsdork
November 26th, 2008 at 3:29 PM
So sportsdork = Whitlock?
I’m not trying to disparage Ball State or anything. It seems to me they have had more coverage than they deserve, because of Letterman and Whitlock. I’ve seen BSU discussed on PTI, ATH, SportsCenter, Gameday, and elsewhere, not sure what else you want.
My last question, if this was Eastern Michigan and not BSU, would he have written this article? Doubtful. I don’t recall him being upset when Roethlisberger’s Miami (oh) team was left out of the BCS.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:31 PM
umm, whitlock works for fox sports now, right? Where is all the Ball State coverage on that network/site?
November 26th, 2008 at 3:32 PM
government intervention
Tread lightly.
/700 billion dollars
November 26th, 2008 at 3:32 PM
The development and implementation of that technology killed their profits, absolutely, but I am referring to the demise of music as a true art form. It became a product because of MTV bastardizing the art form into processed cheese. The same is happening to sports thanks to ESPN. Genuine sports moments are wringed dry of their purity, overnight superstars are created on a weekly basis, and tabloid sensationalism drives the ticker at the bottom of the screen. ESPN has also changed the way athletes behave, and not for the better. It’s like an eye dropper constantly polluting the water supply. Some see it and some don’t.
November 26th, 2008 at 3:43 PM
Well I’ve managed to argue both for and against the media today, and I don’t believe I accomplished one thing at work, so well done fellas. Have a good holidays and be safe.
November 26th, 2008 at 4:43 PM
sorry I had to leave the discussion… travelling. on the treo now so I gotta be brief (not that anyone cares)
mike – i’m kinda surprised that a guy who’s avatar is an Apple logo can’t see the obvious similarities between what ESPN has become and microsoft.
business is business, but there’s more to it than ‘if it’s good for shareholders then no one gets to complain’
pulled a groin – that’s not what I meant. and more importantly, you’re not funny
November 26th, 2008 at 6:17 PM
I usually like what Whitlock writes. But he’s full of shit this time.
There is a story told by one of Cincinnati Reds’ radio people. He was interviewing a Reds winning pitcher (Jack Armstrong, I think) and said something to the nature of, ‘So we did pretty well out there today, huh?’ The pitcher paused and replied, ‘We? I didn’t see YOU out there playing.’
Whitlock’s article was full of ‘us’, ‘we’, ‘ours’, and the like. That isn’t objectivity, that is making it all personal…. and him thinking that he’s a part of that team. I’ll be willing to bet that those Cardinal players and coaches don’t see him that way.
His piece reads like a total hatchet job.
November 26th, 2008 at 11:16 PM
He played football at the school charliewade. I doubt the Reds radio announcer used to suit up for Cincy. 2 + 2 = Big difference. Who said the article wasn’t personal?
November 27th, 2008 at 7:36 AM
I feel old that no one remembers when Ball State alum Bernie Parmalee was the best RB in the NFL.