What is Good for You? Utah 31, Alabama 17
College Football January 3rd. 2009, 11:00am
Reactions may be as polarizing for the Sugar Bowl as they were for the Pac-10’s 5-0 romp through Bowl season: Alabama’s a fraud. Florida is going to get worked by Oklahoma. Utah would have been Cinderella if there had been a playoff. We could go on and on.
Alabama fans don’t seem to know what hit them, but the result reinforced the No. 1 reason we need a playoff. Utah was playing for perfection. Alabama was playing a game that meant nothing. The inter-team scrimmage in the spring where players are fighting for starting jobs meant more than this game. Alabama’s season ended with the loss to Florida a month ago. The Tide trailed 21-0 in the first quarter before many fans had left Bourbon street to stumble into the Dome. “I don’t think we gave them their due respect coming into the game,” is how Alabama’s RB Glen Coffey put it.
The only value we take away from this game is that Utah fended off Alabama’s advances when the score was 21-17 in the third. In six days, the final votes for No. 1 will be cast. Depending on the Oklahoma-UF result, will USC receive any votes? What about perfect Utah, which defeated teams from the Big 10, Pac-10, and SEC this season?
“I know where I’m voting us. I’m voting us No. 1. End of story,” Utah coach Kyle Whittingham said afterward.
“I don’t know why they wouldn’t deserve that consideration,” he added later. “Somebody has to explain to me why they wouldn’t. There is only one undefeated team in the United States of America right now in Division I football, and it’s these guys right here.”
If we had a vote, we would, too. Our only hope for change is enough people who have votes do the unexpected: Vote for a team that didn’t play in the BCS Championship game.
38 Responses to “What is Good for You? Utah 31, Alabama 17”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

January 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 am
Our only hope for change is enough people who have votes do the unexpected: Vote for a team that didn’t play in the BCS Championship game.
Many people will vote for a team that didn’t play in the BCS Championship Game. Unfortunately it will probably be for Texas or USC. I mean, don’t you know how many 5-stars those teams have? They’d wipe the floor with that Utah team!
/sarcasm
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:10 am
And if I’m looking correctly, if Florida wins, the SEC will have more more bowl wins than the Pac 10 had bowl eligible teams. So they can take their ESPN trophy and shove it up their ass.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:13 am
TBL continues his cynical look at this years bowls. I loved every second of it, Bama was a fraud all season (very easy schedule despite playing in the mighty SEC), and seeing Nicktator blowing up cursing at everything on the sidelines is always enjoyable.
Time to fire Saban, he can’t win the big games.
/Bamer fans
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:13 am
tcu is better than utah.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:15 am
Utah deserves a #1 vote.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:20 am
intra.
shawn I think you’re right, but bottom line is Utah went undefeated and beat TCU. Unless either OU or Florida throttles the other, I’d put Utah at #1.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:21 am
yes he can.
/oklahoma
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am
See, the problem is that SEC fans are not offended when you say that Alabama is a fraud. You underestimate how much everyone hates Nick Saban. All LSU had to do is not throw four interceptions and they had them beat in the regular season. Kentucky and Ole Miss had their chances too. Most people in the SEC knew Alabama was a fraud too.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am
Fixed.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:25 am
Time to fire Saban, he can’t win the big games.
Well, he is 4-6 in bowl games
/wiki’d
//oh yeah, and Louisiana-Monroe beat him
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am
Fox News just had a segment about legalizing marijuana and taxing it and whether it would help save the economy.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am
Utah isn’t as good as USC, Oklahoma, or Florida. Give them top 5 and call it a day.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:30 am
Utah just buttfucked a team that played Florida pretty well and was #1 for what, half the season? I’d say they could compete with USC, OU and Floriday.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:34 am
I’d say they could compete with USC, OU and Floriday.
Oh, but USC and Florida have a combined 352 first-round draft picks on their teams. How dare you suggest that what happens on the field matters!
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:37 am
If the NFL worked like these voters apparently think, they would have given the Jets the Dolphins’ spot in the playoffs because they have Brett Favre. And we all know he’s better than Chad Pennington. Does Chad Pennington have 3 MVPs? Has Chad Pennington started in 3576 consecutive games? Case closed. The Jets are better.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:40 am
All LSU had to do is not throw four interceptions and they had them beat in the regular season.
That’s all huh?
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:44 am
How the hell do you not give Texas votes if they blow out OSU and OU beats Florida?
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:47 am
the season would have been a whole lot different if it weren’t for thur night road games. usc and tcu.
January 3rd, 2009 at 11:50 am
hakeem, one was returned for TD, another set Alabama up with first and goal (they scored a TD), a third was the one in OT. I don’t remember the 4th. Jarrett Lee gave them that game. If Les Miles would have been smart enough to get Jordan Jefferson ready in the middle of the season, it could have been much different.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:15 pm
USC would have won the national title if OSU hadn’t caught a lucky TD, picked off a pass and returned it to the one, and had a running back play a great game.
/Commenter Jay
If UT and OU win there will probably be four teams getting first place votes in the final AP poll and that is how it should be.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:17 pm
I was pulling for Utah, but let’s not discount what affect losing 2 starting O-lineman would have against one of the best defenses in the country. And once Utah went up by two TD’s, I knew it was over because no way was JPW going to lead them back. Utah would probably have a difficult time against one of the Big 12 teams because their pass defense isn’t quite as good their run d, but it would be a good game.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:19 pm
The MWC needs to seriously consider adding Boise St., Fresno St., and either Hawaii, Nevada, or UTEP, and then demanding an automatic berth. That would be a helluva conference.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:19 pm
Too bad for him, he isn’t allowed to vote his team #1.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Jay seems like a Saben jilted lover to me.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:39 pm
Donald Brown is a man among boys in this … International Bowl.
January 3rd, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Karma’s a bitch, ain’t it ‘Bama fans?
/Ute’d
January 3rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm
why is there an international bowl AFTER the sugar?
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Maybe THAT is why Utah won the game and not:
January 3rd, 2009 at 2:22 pm
That game was painful. Some awful, awful picks and generally poorly thrown balls.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:23 pm
My friend, we have the GMAC Bowl yet to go.
The real question here may be … if GMAC is so desperate for capital (gotta get in on the the good time TARP thievery), why are they still sponsoring a bowl game? I would have bought the sponsorship from them for like, $100. Then we could have “thedude110 Bowl.”
I like it.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:24 pm
Alabama was without their best player you know
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:39 pm
*yawn* Just another .714 winning percentage for the Big East in bowl season.
January 3rd, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Jay seems like a Saben jilted lover to me.
Well, I (and by “I,” I mean my alma mater) got dumped by Nick Saban on Christmas Day. And he didn’t have the balls to do it before he got on the plane to Orlando for the Capital One Bowl
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:07 pm
Beating Buffalo, Memphis, NC State and North Carolina isn’t grounds for bragging.
Also, your math sucks. 4/6 = .667 where I’m from.
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Somehow I think he was kidding.
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Alabama was without their best player you know
Their best player wasn’t on defense
January 3rd, 2009 at 4:30 pm
I would really love for some talking head to come up with a legitimate argument as to why the system is ok as is.
Invalid arguments include (but are not limited to) –
- The college football regular season is the greatest regular season (you know why, because the post-season sucks worse than a $2 whore)
- Tradition! (That’s a fucking weak argument in the first place. Sadly, this is what most opponents of the playoff system hang their hats on)
- It’s all about the money (Well that’s true, it is. Why can’t we get a big conference president to just come out and say that?)
I don’t follow CFB all that much during the season, and precisely for this reason. What is the point of getting wrapped up week-to-week in the goings-on, when at the end of the day, there is no legitimate way to determine who is the best team?
This year has potential to be a gigantic shit-storm at the end of the year with possibly 4 teams getting first-place votes. Think about that. The people that follow this the closest and have the most knowledge about the sport could think that any one of four different teams is the best in the country. If that’s not absurd, I’m not sure what is.
January 3rd, 2009 at 10:27 pm
Jay is only partly right when he says SEC fans hate Saban. They hate him because he’s the coach of Alabama … the UNLV basketball of the SEC. Bama has cheated for decades but gotten treated with kid gloves because of The Bear. Now the Tide have brought in a coach who is only one letter removed from Satan (and it’s debatable to Auburn fans who is the greater evil), so it’s all the easier to despise Alabama. Seeing them get worked by Utah was mildly disappointing as an SEC fan … but wildly enjoyable as a Bama hater.
On to other matters: why does Texas get a free pass? Why is it unfair for Oklahoma to be playing in the title game just because Texas beat the Sooners? Am I the only one who remembers Texas losing to Texas Tech or did that game not happen? Utah gets more sympathy than the Longhorns. And why is the Big XII considered a great conference? Because it scores a ton of points? It’s 3-2 in bowl games. Two of the wins came against Minnesota and Clemson, two teams that finished 7-6. The third was against Northwestern and it came in OT. Texas Tech lost to the fourth-best team (at best) in the SEC and Okie State lost to Oregon. Both were favored by nearly a touchdown only to lose by double digits. I realize the two best Big XII teams have yet to play … but color me not sold thus far.