Cutler? Brad Childress Seems Content with T Jack and Sage
1-liner, NFL April 1st. 2009, 6:15pmJay Cutler Saga: The QB-poor Minnesota Vikings don’t seem interested in Denver’s Jay Cutler according to coach Brad Childress. “‘I don’t see it as in shambles,’ Childress said [of the QB situation]. ‘Now, do you want improvement there? Yeah. We always know that the laser is going to get pointed at the quarterback. But I don’t feel that way. I feel like we’ve upgraded with a guy like Sage, and I think that those two guys will compete. … Would we love to have a guy that could be a 10-year starter? Yeah, we would … I think we’ve got a younger, Gus Frerotte-type guy [in Rosenfels] with knowledge in the system that Gus didn’t have. I don’t think there is anything wrong with a 31-year-old quarterback that’s more athletic than Gus.’” Too bad Adrian Peterson has to have such a nincompoop for a head coach. (Star Tribune)
18 Responses to “Cutler? Brad Childress Seems Content with T Jack and Sage”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:19 PM
God, I’m glad I’m not a Vikings fan.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Did you really say nincompoop? I had to double check and make sure my grandmother didn’t write this post.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:19 PM
Did he have on a straight face while delivering that joke? It was pretty good.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:20 PM
The only situation more dire in the Vikings organization than quarterback is head coach.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:22 PM
reason # 340 why the vikes will never win a superbowl
April 1st, 2009 at 6:23 PM
I hate him more than I hate Roy Williams. Trade your whole frickin draft for Cutler if you need to. Oh well, hopefully this gets Childress out after next year.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:26 PM
does Cutler’s contract suck or something? I can’t believe Childress wouldn’t be interested.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:27 PM
i dont think you can have a bad contract if you’re a franchise qb..its the vikings head coach who sucks
April 1st, 2009 at 6:29 PM
A lot of anger towards Childress.
Let me hear one reasonable offer MIN could make that would cause DEN to even listen.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:29 PM
The fact that you’re using the word “upgrade” and “sage rosenfel” in the same breath and you don’t recognize a problem shows that you’ve lost touch with reality.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:31 PM
Cutler’s contract is great for the next three years, but Bus Cook is almost certainly going to exist on a contract extension with whomever he’s traded to. That’s likely the real reason behind all this mess, Cook wanting a fat commission and pulling Cutler’s strings. McDaniels’ pursuit of Cassel just gave him the ammunition. It’s about money, it’s always about money.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:32 PM
2 first round draft picks and a defensive lineman and a linebacker..reasonable enough?
April 1st, 2009 at 6:32 PM
Actually sponge his contract is fantastic, I think he on the books for like only 1 mill this year. However, I think its a forgone conclusion that whoever signs him is going to have to give him a huge new deal, prob somewhere around 8yr 120mil. Even the Teflon NFL is worried about cash right now and a smaller market kind of team like Min probably has no interest in taking on a contract like that.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:33 PM
*insist
/retard’d
April 1st, 2009 at 6:34 PM
a couple picks and sage rosenfels. Broncos have the 12th pick and could probably get sanchez/stafford there.
April 1st, 2009 at 6:40 PM
Maybe I’ll be proven wrong, but I can’t see the Broncos getting much more than a usable linebacker and a second or third for him. Between the likely ocntract demands and the very public need to sell, I just don’t see a real bidding war here.
April 1st, 2009 at 8:25 PM
That’s exactly the problem….nincompoop
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:06 AM
One of the willaims DT’s, Tavarris or Sage plus a #1 and #2. If Denver actually thinks they are getting 2 #1’s good luck to them. If they get some idiot owner to agree than I’ll eat crow but I highly doubt they will get 2 #1 picks for a guy that is going to demand a new (and large) contact.