Gannett and the Associated Press Will Not Stand for These Draconian New SEC Media “Rules”
College Football, Media Gossip/Musings August 25th. 2009, 10:30am
Two weeks after the SEC announced its stringent new media rules, there’s finally some serious push-back from newspapers. More than a handful, including the catch-all Associated Press, refuse to sign the new credential policy. With the season just two weeks away, what are the chances your local paper will have zero SEC coverage this season?
Here’s what newspapers refuse to adhere to (and rightly so):
- No use by newspapers of video and audio game highlights on their Web sites.
- Time-limited restrictions on use of post-game and pre-game video and audio.
- Photographs may only be used online as part of regular news coverage, not for other purposes, archives or sale.
- The SEC and its universities must be granted licensing privileges to use newspaper images for its own news coverage and other uses. [Ed. This is probably a biggie.]
- No blogging on newspaper Web sites of game events during games. [Ed. This makes absolutely no sense. None.]
Gannett has directed its daily newspapers that cover the Southeastern Conference not to sign on to a controversial new credential policy, while the Associated Press has also declared it will not agree to the new rules that have sparked opposition for limits on Web video and audio use, photo displays, and blogging.
One would assume that the MLB Network and the NFL Network will be closely monitoring this situation (and potential court case, if it goes that far) very closely. The line of thinking from the SEC might go something like this: In a decade, what will we need local newspapers for? We own it all, we can release news and videos via our website, have TV shows about SEC football on year-round, and through social media, we can interact directly with fans with no need for the middle man. Sure, there will be a negative fallout initially – but in a few years, it’ll be a well-oiled machine.
This is a round newspapers desperately need to win.
Gannett, AP Refuse to Sign New Sports Credential Policy (E&P)
24 Responses to “Gannett and the Associated Press Will Not Stand for These Draconian New SEC Media “Rules””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

August 25th, 2009 at 10:36 AM
as long as the papers agree to continue their policy of 100% unapologetic homerism i think they’ll be ok
August 25th, 2009 at 10:37 AM
No twitter restrictions?
August 25th, 2009 at 10:38 AM
The biggest paper in SEC country isn’t a Gannett paper, so they’re only going to put themselves farther behind by taking this stance.
August 25th, 2009 at 10:41 AM
The great hypocrisy of not paying players also some nominal stipend via vouchers for services and various goods, not with cash, is at hand here.
The same arrogant bojacks, especially in the SEC, crying about the merits of the student-athlete are milking them for every last dollar via their “rights” in intellectual property as the institutions are in fact PUBLICLY funded.
Typical bullshit crapitali$m — our private are private, but our losses and expenses are public of course …
Take that again you Wall Street fuck Mike NYC too. Crapitali$m was not “economic progress” as chanted by most New Yorkers and such but merely a demographic anomaly via the Baby Boomers:
http://www.kitco.com/ind/Summers/jul152009.html
August 25th, 2009 at 10:42 AM
And that’s just in the “financial” era from 1982-2008 mind you … another take on the same by Moses Kim:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/149898-the-case-for-depression-part-3-demographics?source=email
August 25th, 2009 at 10:43 AM
We all thought the singularity would be full of cyborgs, but it seems perfectly self-evident now that it will be full of suits.
We’ll still have freedom of the press, we just won’t own it …
August 25th, 2009 at 10:44 AM
(not being flippant) i read there’s a florida judge that’s outraged by this because he likes to twitter/post facebook photos from gators games. my heart was warmed to read that.
i know there’s lawyers out there reading, may be they can chime in on this:
in a state like florida which has very open laws when it comes to state anything, how is it the sec can prevent someone from posting a photo they took from a football game inside a university (publically funded) facility/stadium?
i can understand if it was a private university’s facility (vanderbilt) but what about a publically funded facility of a state university stadium?
i mean, cr(h)ist, you can go to the florida state house and shoot photos all day but you can’t at an open-air football stadium???
August 25th, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Corrected:
Typical bullshit crapitali$m — our profits are private, but our losses and expenses are public of course.
/Jim Cramer boo-yahed especially for Mike NYC and other right-wing greedy-ass Wall Street fuckjobs with job fucks instead of real work
August 25th, 2009 at 10:51 AM
+1.5 Jimmy
Damnit TBL Godfather make him a made man! Consigliere JPQ vouched for him you know!
And folks wonder how the likes of fascism rears its ugly head.
Watch some covert-fascist jerk calling himself a Republican, commonly known as a Neocon, and covertly still thinking highly of Darth Cheney, John McCain, and Mitt Romney come on here and say something along the lines of that Mike NYC:
August 25th, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Still waiting patiently for Duffy’s freedom of speech stance on this one too …weigh in please, or does it not matter because you can’t bash Liverpool this time too?
August 25th, 2009 at 10:52 AM
jimmy – I’m going to Gainesville for the Tennessee-Florida game this Fall with our site’s Gator fan, GatorTrey. I’m taking a lot of pics and we will have them posted at Sparty & Friends as part of our recap and me paying up on a bet I lost to GatorTrey. the only way they can prevent me from taking pics is if they don’t let me in the stadium with my camera, and that’s never happened at any sporting I’ve ever been to.
August 25th, 2009 at 10:53 AM
(Was NOT supposed to be in quotes above)
Note as well that even private academic institutions who accept federal funding are by default subject to public scrutiny as well. This includes ESPECIALLY my alma mater Notre Dame, as is a noted hypocrisy I witnessed regularly on campus whilst there.
August 25th, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Pretty sure they are referring to credentialed photographers, not fans in the stands.
August 25th, 2009 at 10:59 AM
Paolo is a douche.
August 25th, 2009 at 11:00 AM
Luckily you only need 1 or 2 reporters to cover SEC football.
August 25th, 2009 at 11:08 AM
knife fight!
August 25th, 2009 at 11:10 AM
Fixed.
August 25th, 2009 at 11:23 AM
Paolo is a douche.
+ infinity
August 25th, 2009 at 11:24 AM
Wow, as if YOU in Cincinatti, a BENGALS FAN (HA HA!) saying that means soooo much with obviously your lame piece of shit full of shit mouth contributing absolutely NOTHING to this site ever?
As if YOU in Cincinatti really have anything meaningful to add in your lame racist jerkwater city? Want to write about your OchoCinco, stuck in perpetual loser oblivion perhaps? ESPN has that covered already you douche.
LongLiveRiverFront, if you have an opinion about sports instead of about me personally, why not back it up? Or unlike other folks with an opinion and an asshole is your asshole Longliveriverfront stopped up after several high hard ones all night too?
I thought so. I’ll let the audience judge the case.
In the meantime go fuck yourself high and hard many more times until you pass out. Boo-yah!
August 25th, 2009 at 12:08 PM
wow
August 25th, 2009 at 12:47 PM
paolo makes me laugh out loud
August 25th, 2009 at 2:02 PM
Coming from a Marine, this is my highest honour ever on this site. Seriously! Thanks Texans.
August 25th, 2009 at 5:31 PM
This probably won’t be read, but I’ll say it anyway.
After all that anger you still can’t figure out that the new policy is about credentialed media. You know, the guys that work for companies, or selling their stuff to companies, trying to make a profit off the pictures and video taken during SEC events. More SEC coverage equals more subscriptions and more ad revenue on websites and TV shows. It’s not about the media being a beacon of information for the lowly peasants, it’s about business.
So the hypocrisy you claim exists on the media more than the SEC. After all, the media gets some revenue for covering amateur athletics and gives the student athletes what in return? At least the SEC schools give kids a free education and for many a path to professional sports money as a reach-around. Not only that, but the revenue generated from SEC football funds just about every other sport except basketball. Either you’re a hypocrite, or you’re extremely dense. You choose. I’ll say both.
Either way you’re still a douche.
August 26th, 2009 at 2:07 AM
And just WHO started with the anger you douchebag?
YES! But obviously that is not an issue for you with private media milking off PUBLIC assets?
Student athletes (cough, cough) …the percentages who actually graduated from recruiting classes all over the country in Division I for the top teams are actually quite low on a consistent basis compared to the rest of the student bodies …puhlease!
More to go on for sure, but that would be a waste of time with this douchebag out of Cincinatti who started it anyway.