Michael Lombardi brought this up on the B.S. Report and wrote about it on the National Football Post this morning. By losing to the Ravens and not finishing among the final 8 teams, the Patriots gain a significant advantage heading into uncapped free agency next year. Could the Pats have thrown the game?
The uncapped year is not the unfettered free-for-all that at least I imagined. Teams that finish in the final eight have “severe restrictions,” namely they can’t add free agents. They can only sign players to replace ones they lose.
New England wasn’t winning the Super Bowl. Their defense was inexperienced and inadequate. They lost the MVP of their offense, Welker, just before the playoffs. Brady was hurt. Maybe the Pats get through one round. But, beating both the Colts and the Chargers on the road and winning the Super Bowl was implausible.
That restriction would be devastating to a team, such as the Patriots next season, that needs to reload in a number of areas. They don’t have much money committed for next year. Because they lost, they can now capitalize on the free agent chaos. As Lombardi writes.
If you can’t win the Super Bowl with your current roster, which clearly the Patriots could not do, then losing in the first round is the place to be.
We all know how much Bill Belichick appreciates fair competition, but it’s hard to believe he would send out a team to deliberately lose. That said, if you know that losing is not the worst thing in the world, it saps your urgency and focus. Playing “the game of football” in “The National Football League,” that will get you beat.
Michael Lombardi brought this up on the B.S. Report and wrote about it on the National Football Post this morning. By losing to the Ravens and not finishing among the final 8 teams, the Patriots gain a significant advantage heading into uncapped free agency next year. Could this explain the Pats being beat that badly at home?
Read the rest of this entry »